According to the Mews, what or who is an example of a perfectly formed face?

KrissKross

KrissKross

A disciple of Lord Nibba and Lord Mojopin
Joined
Dec 14, 2018
Messages
2,540
I honestly think the Mews are right about nearly everything, but they don’t understand male and female facial attractiveness. At least not as well as we do. John Mew just states the same old “long face bad” when in reality we know damn well that’s not a hard and fast infallible rule.
According to John Mew in one of his speeches, the image I’ve attatched is what he believes to be what a perfectly formed female face should look like. Good jaw, cheekbones, forward face, etc. A paragon of perfection. Yet if we saw that in real life, we’d look at it like it’s an alien species.
I also don’t think the Mews account for genetic or phenotypes influence. There’s a reason why some sons look like their fathers and grandfathers for example, and it’s due to a genetic predisposition for a certain appearance. Simple as that.
So if any of you have photos of an ideal formed face, preferably white post then here.
 

Attachments

androidcel

androidcel

Banned
Joined
Nov 18, 2018
Messages
7,444
@Arceus300 has perfectly formed face even without mewing correctly,
 
KrissKross

KrissKross

A disciple of Lord Nibba and Lord Mojopin
Joined
Dec 14, 2018
Messages
2,540
Additionally, this is a reconstructed face of a teenage skull from the Mesolithic period which is the period Mike Mew bases his standards off. I’d hardly say it’s overly attractive by our standards of today:
@Arceus300 has perfectly formed face even without mewing correctly,
This is a high IQ thread old sport, you’re out of your depth here. We don’t need low IQ contributions like that
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Coping

Coping

Zephir
Joined
Dec 15, 2018
Messages
3,931
B378A420-EECF-4181-AFE9-94C63B08DDB0.png
This is a perfectly developed face imo look at his jaw angle and how forward his face is and also how it’s vertically perfect in length which indicates good growth
 
Lifeisgood72

Lifeisgood72

Zephir
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Messages
3,470
16ED366B-4EC0-48A2-B442-79B8CE3E4141.jpeg

The more right the more attractive. But all the faces here are good.
 
JellyBelly

JellyBelly

Clab my belly and it turns jelly
Joined
Feb 9, 2019
Messages
1,035
Additionally, this is a reconstructed face of a teenage skull from the Mesolithic period which is the period Mike Mew bases his standards off. I’d hardly say it’s overly attractive by our standards of today:
Quick reminder: Both Mew’s and this artistic impression how a mesolithic women may have looked like are inaccurate, especially when someone takes them as example on how all mesolithic women looked like. It completely ignores that the mesolithic started at different dates all across the world respectively, which spans over 10000 years.
Here an example to remove the appeal to authority out of your head:

EEB32CA8-35B4-44DC-87B3-251FA3F5AE3F.jpeg


If we take artistic impressions at face value, Mr. Julius would’ve looked like this.
Mind you, they couldn’t have used his skull, it was never found. How do they explain this waterhead of a dictator?

3CF0C1AD-591F-43BF-B7F7-C1B46CFB31AB.jpeg


Great.
Okay, they had a skull in your artistic reconstruction, yet how should they know about the placement of all the soft tissue or cartilage?
 
Phad

Phad

JATT
Joined
Nov 2, 2018
Messages
2,019
Quick reminder: Both Mew’s and this artistic impression how a mesolithic women may have looked like are inaccurate, especially when someone takes them as example on how all mesolithic women looked like. It completely ignores that the mesolithic started at different dates all across the world respectively, which spans over 10000 years.
Here an example to remove the appeal to authority out of your head:

View attachment 20108

If we take artistic impressions at face value, Mr. Julius would’ve looked like this.
Mind you, they couldn’t have used his skull, it was never found. How do they explain this waterhead of a dictator?

View attachment 20109

Great.
Okay, they had a skull in your artistic reconstruction, yet how should they know about the placement of all the soft tissue or cartilage?
Fucckkk what a dom skull. @Arceus300 on suicide watch
 
JellyBelly

JellyBelly

Clab my belly and it turns jelly
Joined
Feb 9, 2019
Messages
1,035
HailToTheKing

HailToTheKing

LARP
Joined
Jan 13, 2019
Messages
2,011
I honestly think the Mews are right about nearly everything, but they don’t understand male and female facial attractiveness. At least not as well as we do. John Mew just states the same old “long face bad” when in reality we know damn well that’s not a hard and fast infallible rule.
According to John Mew in one of his speeches, the image I’ve attatched is what he believes to be what a perfectly formed female face should look like. Good jaw, cheekbones, forward face, etc. A paragon of perfection. Yet if we saw that in real life, we’d look at it like it’s an alien species.
I also don’t think the Mews account for genetic or phenotypes influence. There’s a reason why some sons look like their fathers and grandfathers for example, and it’s due to a genetic predisposition for a certain appearance. Simple as that.
So if any of you have photos of an ideal formed face, preferably white post then here.
dang
 
KrissKross

KrissKross

A disciple of Lord Nibba and Lord Mojopin
Joined
Dec 14, 2018
Messages
2,540
SayNoToRotting

SayNoToRotting

Zephir
Joined
Feb 8, 2019
Messages
2,627
Yet if we saw that in real life, we’d look at it like it’s an alien species.
That would just be our way to cope with the mog, I find her stunning

I also don’t think the Mews account for genetic or phenotypes influence. There’s a reason why some sons look like their fathers and grandfathers for example, and it’s due to a genetic predisposition for a certain appearance. Simple as that.
yes, genetic phenotypes exist, but all human skulls obey the same biophysical rules and will all share the same traits if developed ideally, such as 90° gonial angle, great cheekbones, short midface and wideset, positively tilted eyes.

The people below all have different racial phenotypes, yet they all would be categorized as "dom", "handsome", because they all have the same skull development:

1550155547093.png

1550155701175.png

1550155835591.png

1550157460307.png


And human skulls never really had to evolve that dramatically, because all humans on earth pretty much had the same basic diet, and we were already advanced enough to keep ourselves alive even if we weren't 100% conform with unconventional diets a few hundred thousand years ago.
(The most dramatic genetic differences are skin colour and hair. I don't know why exactly we all evolved different hair tho, was probably because chicks digged something else in prehistoric europe than in africa.)


That's why I think @AstroSky is wording it pretty poorly when he says that genetics are a crucial factor and that some elements of a healthy developed face might be out of reach for some people due to "lacking genetic potential". I mean he is right when he says that one will never look like another person, but he makes the false impression that "genetic potential" is gonna hinder some from getting 90° gonial angle and shit like that, because "you were never genetically supposed to be something else".

"genetic destiny" is a pretty meaningless saying when it's literally about mms of bone and when we all still obey the same biophysiacl rules. If one is genetically a little bit less good at developing a more outward pointing chin or getting a bigger skull, then simply put more effort into it or hop on some enhancing drugs/vitamins, that's it. There is no unpenetrable wall one hits because of "genetics".

And it's not even needed to put more effort into things than others, because our genetic potential regarding bones is very similar.

Yes, a face will always have one's personal genetic fingerprit, but the skull will be almost the same as on all other good developed humans from correct oral posture, so it's guaranteed that one will look good.
 
SayNoToRotting

SayNoToRotting

Zephir
Joined
Feb 8, 2019
Messages
2,627
Bump because I arrogantly believe that my last comment is of great importance, fuck you all
 

Viewing This Thread (Looksmaxers: 0, Bluepilled: 1)

Top