Calling things like Eye Color, Good Hair, or Skin a "Halo" is Stupid AF

[WhatIsMyPlan?]

Shit like blue eyes, good hairline/hair, and skin are not halos, they are inherently attractive features.

It's literally like saying that Henry Cavill is attractive because of "Jaw Halo", it's stupid as fuck.

An actual halo would maybe be like dressing well. Dressing well is not inherently attractive but it can make certain body proportions or colorings look better.

 

[Entschuldigung]

greycel moment

 

[Vidyacoper]

yeah i agree, other than eye color. light eyes/unique eyes can actually halo your whole eye area so they can actually be rightfully called a halo sometimes

 

[Deleted member 5583]

care I not

 

[Alexanderr]

How are blue eyes an inherently attractive feature?

 

[Deleted member 5185]

Shit like blue eyes, good hairline/hair, and skin are not halos, they are inherently attractive features.

It's literally like saying that Henry Cavill is attractive because of "Jaw Halo", it's stupid as fuck.

An actual halo would maybe be like dressing well. Dressing well is not inherently attractive but it can make certain body proportions or colorings look better.

I agree completely with this post. Also just lol when someone calls grey sweatpants "halo". That doesn't matter. Dressing well only matters via either making you actually look better (showing off physique, good proportions and so on) or in making first impressions via conforming to norms or telling you something about your personality i.e leather jacket and jeans with holes will be attractive to one demographic but not another and so on. Obviously approaching model tier looks this becomes less and less important, same with approaching sub humanity.

 

[Deleted member 6675]

A person can be attractive with brown eyes a person cant look good with a shit jaw thats the differnce

 

[Dutcher]

Eye color is different. It has no masculine not evolutionary value. It simply creates an attractive distinction between facial colors like peacocks

 

[Deleted member 5185]

How are blue eyes an inherently attractive feature?

It matters.

 

[WhatIsMyPlan?]

Eye color is different. It has no masculine not evolutionary value. It simply creates an attractive distinction between facial colors like peacocks

"Evolutionary Value" is BS pseudoscience. Both in humans and animals alike there are traits that provide 0 evolutionary advantages and yet are still seen as attractive.

Height, for example, is actually not evolutionarily valuable at all. A larger offspring is far more likely do die should there be any sort of famine or change in the environment because they need more food to sustain themselves.

If you're to argue the typical PSL incel style "Muh its an evolutionary advantage because dom height crushes the opposition", then that still creates issues. Large mammals almost always require large noses to be able to inhale as much oxygen as possible. Exceedingly large noses are obviously an incel trait on both sexes, even though they'd provide the evolutionary advantage of oxygen intake.

Sexual selection does not influence evolution, it is mostly natural selection, with some influence of sexual selection (though the belief that sexual selection influences evolution at continues to be debated within the scientific community.

 

[Dutcher]

"Evolutionary Value" is BS pseudoscience. Both in humans and animals alike there are traits that provide 0 evolutionary advantages and yet are still seen as attractive.

Height, for example, is actually not evolutionarily valuable at all. A larger offspring is far more likely do die should there be any sort of famine or change in the environment because they need more food to sustain themselves.

If you're to argue the typical PSL incel style "Muh its an evolutionary advantage because dom height crushes the opposition", then that still creates issues. Large mammals almost always require large noses to be able to inhale as much oxygen as possible. Exceedingly large noses are obviously an incel trait on both sexes, even though they'd provide the evolutionary advantage of oxygen intake.

Sexual selection does not influence evolution, it is mostly natural selection, with some influence of sexual selection (though the belief that sexual selection influences evolution at continues to be debated within the scientific community.

Fuck you educated me bro thanks

 

[WhatIsMyPlan?]

I agree completely with this post. Also just lol when someone calls grey sweatpants "halo". That doesn't matter. Dressing well only matters via either making you actually look better (showing off physique, good proportions and so on) or in making first impressions via conforming to norms or telling you something about your personality i.e leather jacket and jeans with holes will be attractive to one demographic but not another and so on. Obviously approaching model tier looks this becomes less and less important, same with approaching sub humanity.

While I mostly agree with your sentiments about dressing, It is interesting how dressing poorly can completely ruin someone's looks. An average guy in a shitty Metallica t shirt and oversized cargo pants with white socks and sketches is gonna look like a mega-incel. Maybe poor dress is unattractive since it indicates poor socialization the same way bad hygiene indicates poor health.

 

[Alexanderr]

It matters.

Of course it matters, everything does. A person can be considered beautiful with brown eyes though and not be considered better looking with blue eyes. Like Chico, for example.

 

[Deleted member 4612]

greycel moment

 

[RAITEIII]

Lol. Something that makes u look attractive can be called a halo as in something that you're relying a lot your attractiveness on.

 

[Deleted member 1338]

A person can be attractive with brown eyes a person cant look good with a shit jaw thats the differnce

 

[WhatIsMyPlan?]

View attachment 400067

This jaw's on the smaller side, but his thirds are ultimately balanced and it's impossible to call a jaw with that level of definition "shit". You need to go outside more.

 

[Deleted member 5185]

While I mostly agree with your sentiments about dressing, It is interesting how dressing poorly can completely ruin someone's looks. An average guy in a shitty Metallica t shirt and oversized cargo pants with white socks and sketches is gonna look like a mega-incel. Maybe poor dress is unattractive since it indicates poor socialization the same way bad hygiene indicates poor health.

Its the age old "face matters" vs "everything matters". I think dressing in a certain way can seriously change someones life simply because it can alter your status, or rather womens perceptions of your status. Same with behavior. But while it can have meaningful impact, it can never change the way one looks. So its like, on the one side everything matters, down to the smallest minutae. Its like physics, a single human being is always subjugating the earth of its gravity, but its like zero point almost infinite zero Gs of force. So while some redpill stuff is actually true, its impact is so laughably small compared to looks, money and status its ridiculous.

 

[toth77]

High IQ

 

[Deleted member 5927]

Graycel is right on this one, essentially you are saying that a HALO effect is not the same as just a good trait. A halo is something that makes you inheritly noticeable and you gain respect from women by it, but a positive trait is just something that is good but not really respectable, such as good skin/hair.

 

[aestheticallypleasin]

Shit like blue eyes, good hairline/hair, and skin are not halos, they are inherently attractive features.

It's literally like saying that Henry Cavill is attractive because of "Jaw Halo", it's stupid as fuck.

An actual halo would maybe be like dressing well. Dressing well is not inherently attractive but it can make certain body proportions or colorings look better.

kinda agree kinda disagree. a halo is something (like 1 feature) without which you wouldnt be considered that attractive.

For example look at this guy with and without eye colour halo. from above average indian to international model jfl.

 

[BigNigga69]

Haloes are real, yes they are attractive features but they don't just look attractive themselves, they "halo" the rest of your face and ultimately you as a person.

 

[Deleted member 14262]

"Evolutionary Value" is BS pseudoscience. Both in humans and animals alike there are traits that provide 0 evolutionary advantages and yet are still seen as attractive.

Height, for example, is actually not evolutionarily valuable at all. A larger offspring is far more likely do die should there be any sort of famine or change in the environment because they need more food to sustain themselves.

If you're to argue the typical PSL incel style "Muh its an evolutionary advantage because dom height crushes the opposition", then that still creates issues. Large mammals almost always require large noses to be able to inhale as much oxygen as possible. Exceedingly large noses are obviously an incel trait on both sexes, even though they'd provide the evolutionary advantage of oxygen intake.

Sexual selection does not influence evolution, it is mostly natural selection, with some influence of sexual selection (though the belief that sexual selection influences evolution at continues to be debated within the scientific community.

tf you mean, large noses look good on men.