DownSyndromeBBC
DESI BEBS
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2020
- Posts
- 110
- Reputation
- 118
T. I'm writing this pretty fucking stoned rn, I know it's going to sound like absolute generic bullshit when I'm sober.
Also, I'm not going to post science links to my post, which highly discredits this theory in a way (Even though I have put research into this) I've chosen not so since adding links after I've already come up with the would make me apply links in a biased way. So I'll leave it up to my forum to critique my thread to overcome such bias.
I theorise that human sexual behaviours are a remnant of a feedback loop that basically allowed us to become more intelligent via having to socialise more which we then could apply those skills and traits to overcome external environmental factors (Like predators and shit). Since humans are less exposed to the selection pressures that made HSBs (Human sexual behaviours) beneficial. our brains have gotten smaller due to things like our bigger bodies, consumerism, more individual/liberal mindsets, STRESS (which is a huge one; which can be caused by loads of factors: loneliness, toxins, poverty, health issues etc.).
If you look at our most common ancestor alive today, bonobos. They have smaller, slimmer, less dimorphic bodies than other great apes which makes it impossible for male bonobos to be territorial like chimps because the females naturally have the advantage over the males due to being the gatekeepers of sex and like a said before about the dimorphism. Due to this matriarchies generally exist within bonobos societies.
[For clarification] It's important to note that humans are more closely related to bonobos than chimps meaning that our ancestors were bonoboifed (betaized) too.
What am I getting at?
HSBs like AWALT, hypergamy, fertility factors, female coyness, the halo effect have forced our male ancestors to become smarter to overcome these challenges. Our ancestors were forced to become more social which has the secondary benefit of reducing stress and allowing for more blood flow to the neocortex (which is like the furthest away from the brain stem within the skull.) Since these males have to cooperate but are also in competition mate security is drastically decreased which causes these males to become more determined to copulate (as you know sex makes you feel good and human biology is more wired towards sexual pleasure than other apes) in a way where you can't kill your competition.
Meaning that: you can't kill your competition, you need them to survive and they'd all probably overwhelm you and kill you instead ---> You're forced to become more likeable through beta shit like courting, providing material things, simping etc. to fulfil some need a female has and to impress her whilst at the same time not pissing off your competition and creating strategies too maximise mating success.
Also, I believe that the statistic: "for every one female, 1 in 17 men reproduced" doesn't necessarily apply to chad but the most cunning man.
This thread is probably doesn't make rn ik. Hang in with me.
Another important distinction to make which I've prelude previously is that the bonobo system highly depends on empathy (feminine) behaviours like cooperation, food sharing, social playing. Whilst on the other hand chimps are systemising (masculine) focusing on things like tool use, aggression, spatial memory.
If you've been on this forum long enough you already know that women prefer men who would fall into the systemising/masculine/chad/ archetype. Why? I have a mixture of a few theories for this-
THIS DOESN'T MEAN BE A LITTLE BITCH, THIS DOESN'T MEAN BE A SOYCUCK AND SO ON.
I don't care if you label yourself as one of those dark triad fags but use your intelligence to figure out what women want (beta men) and give it to them in a way where you don't lose power and you get what you want from a woman.
Also, I'm not going to post science links to my post, which highly discredits this theory in a way (Even though I have put research into this) I've chosen not so since adding links after I've already come up with the would make me apply links in a biased way. So I'll leave it up to my forum to critique my thread to overcome such bias.
I theorise that human sexual behaviours are a remnant of a feedback loop that basically allowed us to become more intelligent via having to socialise more which we then could apply those skills and traits to overcome external environmental factors (Like predators and shit). Since humans are less exposed to the selection pressures that made HSBs (Human sexual behaviours) beneficial. our brains have gotten smaller due to things like our bigger bodies, consumerism, more individual/liberal mindsets, STRESS (which is a huge one; which can be caused by loads of factors: loneliness, toxins, poverty, health issues etc.).
If you look at our most common ancestor alive today, bonobos. They have smaller, slimmer, less dimorphic bodies than other great apes which makes it impossible for male bonobos to be territorial like chimps because the females naturally have the advantage over the males due to being the gatekeepers of sex and like a said before about the dimorphism. Due to this matriarchies generally exist within bonobos societies.
[For clarification] It's important to note that humans are more closely related to bonobos than chimps meaning that our ancestors were bonoboifed (betaized) too.
What am I getting at?
HSBs like AWALT, hypergamy, fertility factors, female coyness, the halo effect have forced our male ancestors to become smarter to overcome these challenges. Our ancestors were forced to become more social which has the secondary benefit of reducing stress and allowing for more blood flow to the neocortex (which is like the furthest away from the brain stem within the skull.) Since these males have to cooperate but are also in competition mate security is drastically decreased which causes these males to become more determined to copulate (as you know sex makes you feel good and human biology is more wired towards sexual pleasure than other apes) in a way where you can't kill your competition.
Meaning that: you can't kill your competition, you need them to survive and they'd all probably overwhelm you and kill you instead ---> You're forced to become more likeable through beta shit like courting, providing material things, simping etc. to fulfil some need a female has and to impress her whilst at the same time not pissing off your competition and creating strategies too maximise mating success.
Also, I believe that the statistic: "for every one female, 1 in 17 men reproduced" doesn't necessarily apply to chad but the most cunning man.
This thread is probably doesn't make rn ik. Hang in with me.
Another important distinction to make which I've prelude previously is that the bonobo system highly depends on empathy (feminine) behaviours like cooperation, food sharing, social playing. Whilst on the other hand chimps are systemising (masculine) focusing on things like tool use, aggression, spatial memory.
If you've been on this forum long enough you already know that women prefer men who would fall into the systemising/masculine/chad/ archetype. Why? I have a mixture of a few theories for this-
- To make the rest of the group, the 99%/sub 8 males, work harder to make something useful out of what they already have and kind of drive evolution forward
- Being a larger more dimorphic male obviously helps with protection and resource collection. So has a huge short term benefit.
- The female is trying to combine her feminine brain with the males masculine body to a hybrid of the two that's strong but will still look after the tribe.
- And a little bit of interspecies rape, probably made the females used to it.
THIS DOESN'T MEAN BE A LITTLE BITCH, THIS DOESN'T MEAN BE A SOYCUCK AND SO ON.
I don't care if you label yourself as one of those dark triad fags but use your intelligence to figure out what women want (beta men) and give it to them in a way where you don't lose power and you get what you want from a woman.
)
