How reliable is photofeeler?

reborn

reborn

Banned
Joined
Aug 12, 2018
Posts
3,587
Reputation
5,759
Does anyone know this site? One of my pictures was rated "above average" attractive. The same pic did well on Tinder. I also had a picture that didn't do as well on Tinder and it got only voted "average" so it seems like the Tinder experience and the photofeeler experience correspond which might mean the ratings are actually accurate.
 
imo it's good for rating your pictures when you don't know which ones to put on tinder
but not really reliable when it comes to rating your face - I mean a 7/10 on this site doesn't mean you are a 7/10 irl
 
  • +1
Reactions: reborn and androidcel
Photofeeler rates picture, not your face.
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel, oldcell, reborn and 1 other person
imo it's good for rating your pictures when you don't know which ones to put on tinder
but not really reliable when it comes to rating your face - I mean a 7/10 on this site doesn't mean you are a 7/10 irl

Yeah if it wouldn't be this way I would have had to get the same rating on both pics. But one got 5.3 and the other got 7.5 which is a huge difference. It was the exact same on Tinder. They hardly responded when I used the 5.3 picture but they contacted me first with the 7.5 pic.

Just wondering if anyone else has made experiences with this site... It seems like a very interesting tool to me.
 
Post pics here, i can tell if your tinder pics are good better than roasties from photofeeler.
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
Just wondering if anyone else has made experiences with this site... It seems like a very interesting tool to me.
(posted that in some other thread already)
I put my best photo on photofeeler and got this
1548009928036

the photo was HQ, made by a 3rd person, not a selfie
 
Does anyone know this site? One of my pictures was rated "above average" attractive. The same pic did well on Tinder. I also had a picture that didn't do as well on Tinder and it got only voted "average" so it seems like the Tinder experience and the photofeeler experience correspond which might mean the ratings are actually accurate.
One of my pics got rated 6.9 on there and ended up only getting like 3 matches in a day, and another got rated 7.3 and it ended up getting 20+ matches in a day, 0.4 difference doesn't bring 7x higher results, so photofeeler is a meme.
 
  • +1
Reactions: dogtown
Why would you use anything other than this site? Too weak and :bluepill:?
 
If u are smiling with nice background u get auto high rating
But it is pretty good indicator how normies perceive pictures
 
  • +1
Reactions: reborn and androidcel
It doesn't mean shit unless that's exactly what you look like IRL which is a no go
 
Whatever you get on there subtract 2-2.5 points from it and that’s your PSL, even than its still bs
 
Photofeeler is extremely reliable
1548014599820

1548014606916

1548014812712

They base the attractiveness on the quality of the pic, more than the lighting
If you can make yourself seem SIGNIFICANTLY more attractive (im talking from 60% to 85%) by just smiling in a photo, you know it's unreliable. Lachowski in the top pic is objectively more attractive than the guy in the bottom (inb4 "only 10 votes") the percentages would change by around 10% tops, so the ugly normie would still mog lachowski by pf standards.

The only decent indication of how attractive you are, are the ratings you get on here/tinder matches.

How to get a good score on pf:
Use good lighting
Smile
Have your picture taken by someone else with a decent camera
95%+ guaranteed.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Xangsane, RedPilledStemcel, oldcell and 2 others
Look at the comments you get, not the results per se.
Photofeeler is extremely reliable
View attachment 14634
View attachment 14635
View attachment 14638
They base the attractiveness on the quality of the pic, more than the lighting
If you can make yourself seem SIGNIFICANTLY more attractive (im talking from 60% to 85%) by just smiling in a photo, you know it's unreliable. Lachowski in the top pic is objectively more attractive than the guy in the bottom (inb4 "only 10 votes") the percentages would change by around 10% tops, so the ugly normie would still mog lachowski by pf standards.

The only decent indication of how attractive you are, are the ratings you get on here/tinder matches.

Also that's biased, because pretty much everyone knows who Chico is, hence the low ratings for catfishing.
 
Photofeeler is extremely reliable
View attachment 14634
View attachment 14635
View attachment 14638
They base the attractiveness on the quality of the pic, more than the lighting
If you can make yourself seem SIGNIFICANTLY more attractive (im talking from 60% to 85%) by just smiling in a photo, you know it's unreliable. Lachowski in the top pic is objectively more attractive than the guy in the bottom (inb4 "only 10 votes") the percentages would change by around 10% tops, so the ugly normie would still mog lachowski by pf standards.

The only decent indication of how attractive you are, are the ratings you get on here/tinder matches.

How to get a good score on pf:
Use good lighting
Smile
Have your picture taken by someone else with a decent camera
95%+ guaranteed.
Jfl at those ratings :lul: even here and tinder its not 100% because it’s not in motion, the only real rating is how everyone reacts to you irl including women
 
Photofeeler is extremely reliable
View attachment 14634
View attachment 14635
View attachment 14638
They base the attractiveness on the quality of the pic, more than the lighting
If you can make yourself seem SIGNIFICANTLY more attractive (im talking from 60% to 85%) by just smiling in a photo, you know it's unreliable. Lachowski in the top pic is objectively more attractive than the guy in the bottom (inb4 "only 10 votes") the percentages would change by around 10% tops, so the ugly normie would still mog lachowski by pf standards.

The only decent indication of how attractive you are, are the ratings you get on here/tinder matches.

How to get a good score on pf:
Use good lighting
Smile
Have your picture taken by someone else with a decent camera
95%+ guaranteed.
Just smile more bro :soy:
 
pretty much everyone knows who Chico is
Maybe on lookism, he only has 1.9m insta followers which isn't that much.
Jfl at those ratings :lul: even here and tinder its not 100% because it’s not in motion, the only real rating is how everyone reacts to you irl including women
Yeah, but tinder is the only thing that has an impact IRL
 
  • +1
Reactions: dogtown
I think the most reliable way to build a rating site is if the people need to click on one image that they find more attractive. But if smiles and picture quality improve the rating so much it really is bullshit.
 
Maybe on lookism, he only has 1.9m insta followers which isn't that much.

Yeah, but tinder is the only thing that has an impact IRL

2m insta followers is more than enough, especially since the majority of the girls following him on instagram are most likely present on sites such as photofeeler, tinder and so on.
 
I think the most reliable way to build a rating site is if the people need to click on one image that they find more attractive. But if smiles and picture quality improve the rating so much it really is bullshit.
You just cannot trust women when it comes to rating.
2m insta followers is more than enough, especially since the majority of the girls following him on instagram are most likely present on sites such as photofeeler, tinder and so on.
Yes, but what are the chances you come across those? Lachowski really isn't that well known, he isn't a hollywood actor or anything.
 
2m insta followers is more than enough, especially since the majority of the girls following him on instagram are most likely present on sites such as photofeeler, tinder and so on.
Pretty much no normies know who chico is
 
You just cannot trust women when it comes to rating.

Yes, but what are the chances you come across those? Lachowski really isn't that well known, he isn't a hollywood actor or anything.

idk man, but pretty much every tinder experiment that was done with Chico girls called out the catfishing straight up.
 
idk man, but pretty much every tinder experiment that was done with Chico girls called out the catfishing straight up.
Probs because they used his modelling photos.
Even @JustChris Got called out for Catfishing when he used his own modelling photos on tinder.

If your tinder photos on tinder are TOO good, you won't get as many matches.
 
Probs because they used his modelling photos.
Even @JustChris Got called out for Catfishing when he used his own modelling photos on tinder.

If your tinder photos on tinder are TOO good, you won't get as many matches.

Yeah, that's the problem with good photos.
Photofeeler is somewhat reliable, but the only thing you should take into account is if you score more than a 9.7/10 and you get around 50% of notes out of your total votes.
 
  • +1
Reactions: dogtown
F4E32510 50BE 4D11 BABC 2D3C940902AE



9/10 checking in
 

Similar threads

ChadL1te
Replies
89
Views
2K
ChadL1te
ChadL1te
ElTruecel
Replies
13
Views
248
Xangsane
Xangsane
Mastermind
Replies
4
Views
384
Mastermind
Mastermind

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top