belnar93
Equinox
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2019
- Posts
- 2,552
- Reputation
- 2,822
I match with almost every girl i swipe right on tinder and they message me first at a rate of 15-20% and reply rate over 90%.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
PSL 4 wouldnt get 60 tinder matches in under a hour in a nordic country.u are psl4
i am 16 and mog u hard
Tinder is cope. If u can't become a model then u are uglyPSL 4 wouldnt get 60 tinder matches in under a hour in a nordic country.
I would be model if was 6'1 im 5'11Tinder is cope. If u can't become a model then u are ugly
why are you so confident about who mogs who loljfl you are not even top 5
if aesthetic salludon and defiant soul mog you to death then it simply cannot be
JFLI would be model if was 6'1 im 5'11
30? I think negative t levelsyes you are. but ur like completely softmaxxed/gymcelled etc.
but half the forum is not even close to their potential while you already hit yours so its not a fair comparison considering ur nearly 30 too
He'd lose 2 psl lolPost a normal selfie looking at the camera without frauding
idk tbh but its mainly a basic idea of looks thoery that runs on all the true basicas like development and gentics and how the person looks in my opinion. which if i admit makes me kinda bias.why are you so confident about who mogs who lol
its not even about this case atm, just in general you always have extremely strong opinion on who mogs who and I think in a lot of cases it's very complex to decide without female brains
idk tbh but its mainly a basic idea of looks thoery that runs on all the true basicas like development and gentics and how the person looks in my opinion. which if i admit makes me kinda bias.
i feel woman are extremely unreliable in the answers they give about a mans looks. real results for trying to fuck them is the best way to judge ngl.
You look significantly better from these slightly off-centred 3/4esque pictures because it goes a long way towards hiding your long midface and big forehead. If your mother walked in the room and whacked a quick picture of you, you'd lose 2 PSL.
nah. not at all imo. certain niches or looks do better on tinder . as for tik tok or insta. its different for different groups of looks and the audianceTinder, Badoo, maybe photofeeler score sometime talks a lot
Those are defo determinats if u are attractive or not, not PSL rating form dudes
Laughing so hard right nowI would be model if was 6'1 im 5'11
its way more complex than if you just aspie science measure chin width, orbitals etc. if it was that easy to become good looking, surgerycelling would be legit in the first place and everyone would ascend. but in 95% of the cases it doesnt make people "truly" ascend. its a lot about pheno/harmony w/e u wanna call it i dont careidk tbh but its mainly a basic idea of looks thoery that runs on all the true basicas like development and gentics and how the person looks in my opinion. which if i admit makes me kinda bias.
i feel woman are extremely unreliable in the answers they give about a mans looks. real results for trying to fuck them is the best way to judge ngl.
imo you can break down 'impression' with aspie science, scale of bone, postion, soft tissue etcits way more complex than if you just aspie science measure chin width, orbitals etc. if it was that easy to become good looking, surgerycelling would be legit in the first place and everyone would ascend. but in 95% of the cases it doesnt make people "truly" ascend. its a lot about pheno/harmony w/e u wanna call it i dont care
just think of it as like combo moves in fighting games. back back front quick and you do a special move/kick. thats what harmony is. random features together that create certain "impression" in women which I can't explain and no one can. if it was possible to explain everyone could be chad and I'd bet in most cases you would need to change things that you would never think of normally, or even make certain things worse by PSL standards to actually become better looking. its incredibly fucking complex
its way more complex than if you just aspie science measure chin width, orbitals etc. if it was that easy to become good looking, surgerycelling would be legit in the first place and everyone would ascend. but in 95% of the cases it doesnt make people "truly" ascend. pheno (not "just" coloring, but the synergy of your features).
just think of it as like combo moves in fighting games. back back front quick and you do a special move/kick. thats what harmony is. random features together that create certain "impression" in women which I can't explain and no one can. if it was possible to explain everyone could be chad and I'd bet in most cases you would need to change things that you would never think of normally, or even make certain things worse by PSL standards to actually become better looking. its incredibly fucking complex
no thats just a straight up lie you can't break it into 100% correlation with how women respond. THERE IS a % correlation. but its not 100%, i don't even know what % it is, cuz thats impossible to tell as well, but theres definitely a strong correlation between PSL standards and women attraction. the question is what the fuck is the piece of the cake which PSL can't explain (just looks wise). and that's what we call "harmony". the things we cant explain, but know it exists.imo you can break it down with aspie science, scale of bone, postion, soft tissue etc
your pics are frauded as fuck holy shit. Now a pic from the FRONT and SIDE with NORMAL lighting
he looks extremely good for his ageyes you are. but ur like completely softmaxxed/gymcelled etc.
but half the forum is not even close to their potential while you already hit yours so its not a fair comparison considering ur nearly 30 too
I dont agree on no one knowing what it is or being able to explain it. tbh. I know what it is most of the time. but I favour the option with the most development and dominance in looks.its way more complex than if you just aspie science measure chin width, orbitals etc. if it was that easy to become good looking, surgerycelling would be legit in the first place and everyone would ascend. but in 95% of the cases it doesnt make people "truly" ascend. pheno (not "just" coloring, but the synergy of your features).
just think of it as like combo moves in fighting games. back back front quick and you do a special move/kick. thats what harmony is. random features together that create certain "impression" in women which I can't explain and no one can. if it was possible to explain everyone could be chad and I'd bet in most cases you would need to change things that you would never think of normally, or even make certain things worse by PSL standards to actually become better looking. its incredibly fucking complex
I didn't mean to say 100% correlative, imo attraction is irrational and in constant flux, one can only create the highest template face based on science and pslno thats just a straight up lie you can't break it into 100% correlation with how women respond. THERE IS a % correlation. but its not 100%, i don't even know what % it is, cuz thats impossible to tell as well, but theres definitely a strong correlation between PSL standards and women attraction. the question is what the fuck is the piece of the cake which PSL can't explain (just looks wise). and that's what we call "harmony". the things we cant explain, but know it exists.
its very simple minded and low-consciousness thinking PSL can explain everything
Lol still frauding, RELAX YOUR FACE NIGGA
be honest with me. who the actual fuck relaxes their faceLol still frauding, RELAX YOUR FACE NIGGA
thanks for making us sufferI match with almost every girl i swipe right on tinder and they message me first at a rate of 15-20% and reply rate over 90%.
View attachment 180605
hes underrated here cuz hes too femininehe looks extremely good for his age
I dont agree on no one knowing what it is or being able to explain it. tbh. I know what it is most of the time. but I favour the option with the most development and dominance in looks.
yes i didnt say PSL isnt the place to go to when trying to understand how women rate men. i just said there's a lot it can't understand/explain yet some people here are so fucking confident about how women think when in reality you can't fucking knowI didn't mean to say 100% correlation, you can create the highest template for attraction based on scientific findings on pheno, harmony, race, dimorpish etc...attraction is irrational asf as well in constant flux
.... copeLol still frauding, RELAX YOUR FACE NIGGA
Holy copes.I would be model if was 6'1 im 5'11
I agree psl hasn't taken the facial averagness pill, there is difference between 'looks' and actual attraction from women, some members struggle to distinguish the twohes underrated here cuz hes too feminine
a lot of incels here are incels cuz they lack masculinity, thats part of reason why they hate a lot of more "feminine" type of appeal guys. its just like a defense mechanism.
"i won't rate guys highly with less masc. vibes, because then i would have to rate myself higher and then i wouldn't be able to blame my looks on my inceldom as much, so I would feel shit about myself bcuz I would be knowing I can impact my dating life more than I've learned to accept by PSL standards"
again, it matters, but its not the whole package. im not saying having bad development is a good thing or having very good bone development isn't a plus, but it doesn't automatically make you good looking or it doesnt automatically make you ugly if you don't have it. it's not that easy to describe. i personally believe when it comes to face women value the "key of averageness" and "lack of failos" more than having prominent features. you don't need these very striking super giga bone development to be good looking, a guy with good skin/hair/midface and no recession but average development can easily mog someone with "big bones" to death. its not just about masculinitxy and being dom. its about balance of dimoprhic and androgynous features. chico is good example
yes i didnt say PSL isnt the place to go to when trying to understand how women rate men. i just said there's a lot it can't understand/explain yet some people here are so fucking confident about how women think when in reality you can't fucking know
if we got women start rating users who posted their face you would see MAJOR surprises, i'm 100% sure of it