Is being "chad" historical or absolute?

SMVbender

SMVbender

INTP
Joined
Nov 28, 2019
Posts
1,724
Reputation
2,191
let's say everyone in a location is chad by today's standart. transhumanism eugenics or whatever. would it lead to a new way of "elite men" to be defined?

or is there a minimum qualification that can be met by men and wont change until women mind evolve?

it is about beaty standarts in general. thoughts?
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
20200627 231814
 
  • JFL
  • WTF
  • +1
Reactions: thecel, Deleted member 6572, EverythingMattersCel and 2 others
You (and women) are genetically hard wired to seek out the best mate you can get to produce strong offspring.
1. So it doesn't die off due to weakness
2. Because you are passing your DNA on which is the closest any living being can get to immortality

Nothing will change that
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6403
It's absolute. Women have always been attracted to Chad only and the requirements to be Chad have always been the same.
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
Being chad has to do with health + mental health for best optimal offspring that can survive. And that is = looking good and being confident

Looking good = health
Confident = good mental health
 
  • +1
Reactions: GigaMogger and SMVbender
if you put a women with room filled with full of chads, she will like all of them, she will not start to chose best of the best from them before his mating program does not change geneticaly which needs thousands of years. so answer is no stantards will not get higher, maybe thats the situation when personality starts to matter:d
 
  • +1
Reactions: Achilles

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top