Male Dating Isn't Getting Worse. It's Returning To It's Historic Past

LowInhibIncel

LowInhibIncel

KHHV | 27 | Lowly Accountant
Joined
May 18, 2020
Posts
22
Reputation
622
I was browsing YT today (no blunt today I quit) and I saw an enlightening comment

1592301283242


This was true in our hunter gather stage

1592301554808


Keep in mind that 8,000 years ago a lot of people had gone through their agricultural revolution. The numbers from the Paleolithic days are likely much worse
Ironically in the midst of our technological advancement we've reverted back to animal harems
(read Future of Marriage in The West)
1592301901105


A rose ? Killing the weaker male seals must be romantic in the primal brain

What does this mean for incels/average/slightly above average men in this 90/10 or maybe 95/5 world

Can you ascend with money ?
Can you gain enough status to attract a woman ?
Can you gymcel your way into the top 10% of men?

I will answer this in a future megathread called "The Comprehensive PSL Rating" it will include everything having to do with looks, money and status and put it on one scale. As well as talk about how they each produce different responses in woman
Also stay tuned I'm cooking up something spicy with the scholar @the next o'pry

Tagged Users (If you want to get tagged in new threads, or removed from tag list PM me or drop a comment)
@JFLbuddyboyo , @the next o'pry , @SpearOfOrion , @GigaTyroneOrDeath , @PjSon , @Vvvvxxxx , @IndianJock , @stuckneworleans , @tyronelite ,@DoMoverPRETTYboy, @laske.7


My Most Liked Threads

Why Black People Like Watermelon
Guide to EscortMaxxing
How Big Should Your Jaw, Neck and Shoulders Be


New Threads
Masculine Facial Thirds
Why Woman Give Shit Advice
Ideal Shoulder Width for Slaying
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Love it
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 8165, casadebanho, Deleted member 14024 and 46 others
Bruh you post some quality threads. Keep up the good work :feelsokman:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9344, Shubham4894, Deleted member 7776 and 4 others
i don’t even want a harem (unrealistic goal), i want the monogamous relationships but i had to be born in this clown era
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
  • WTF
Reactions: underaverage, Deleted member 8765, Deleted member 14262 and 14 others
Soooo.... its still getting worse?
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 5061, klamus, CupOfCoffee and 9 others
yo add me on the tag list
 
  • +1
Reactions: LowInhibIncel
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: far336, Deleted member 5698, Norwooder and 5 others
Read like half don’t care tbh about any of this also incels can’t get girlfriends
 
  • +1
Reactions: HighIQcel, Deleted member 7776, SLA and 1 other person
tbh thread is legit but I hope it's not true

what kind of sick world is this that generates men who have an insatiable desire to reproduce but also gives the women the opposite desire to only be selective. it's horrible.
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
  • JFL
Reactions: underaverage, Deleted member 8765, 5'8manlet and 9 others
Really bright of you not to click on "show-more" before taking the screenshot so we could see the rest of what he said.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LowInhibIncel
Bruh you post some quality threads. Keep up the good work :feelsokman:

Why, because it plays into "easing your emotions" through releasing the pressure you feel in needing to find a woman?
 
I think while it was normal in previous far back generations, we need to acknowledge that that was a response to the outside environment.

This is not.

The guys not in the top 10% bracket struggling with picky girls in today's age are struggling because of technology. Not because of any natural/societal world influence. It's swipe left or swipe right culture. Average to semi attractive looking girls are emotionally educated enough by the time they are 14 to know if they slut themselves up, the top 10% guys are gonna come for them.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 8765, Marsiere214, middayshowers and 5 others
so it's still over.
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: LowInhibIncel
The internet has changed the world forever and not just dynamics between men and women. When it came out in the 2000s it was still new so it did more good than harm, but once developers got their teeth into developing dopamine addictive concepts and learned they could put those into apps which lived in our phones, LOL boy.

The best looking guys are suddenly drowned in pussy and need EVEN LESS GAME than they did before. While semi attractive guys have to LooksMax, StyleMax, CharismaMax, you name it and even then they'll struggle to get a LooksMatch.

Average guys need to have status and money and below average? It's learning and coming to terms with Black Pill philosophy.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Deleted member 14139, Deleted member 8765, OldcelMillennial and 7 others
The internet has changed the world forever and not just dynamics between men and women. When it came out in the 2000s it was still new so it did more good than harm, but once developers got their teeth into developing dopamine addictive concepts and learned they could put those into apps which lived in our phones, LOL boy.

The best looking guys are suddenly drowned in pussy and need EVEN LESS GAME than they did before. While semi attractive guys have to LooksMax, StyleMax, CharismaMax, you name it and even then they'll struggle to get a LooksMatch.

Average guys need to have status and money and below average? It's learning and coming to terms with Black Pill philosophy.

And might I add, that we haven't even seen the full-force of the effects that Tik Tok and OnlyFans will/could have and I say that ALSO because women now can make money all by them easy selves. Prostituting themselves in-front of a camera lens. What an easy life. Then they can choose a Chad fuck-boy to star in one of their "movies" which their customers have to spend however much money on.

Plastic surgeons are gonna be a busy bunch once quarantine fully ends.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 8765, Marsiere214 and Deleted member 7465
Are you really gonna trust George Ex with a palm tree pfp
 
I´ve come to the same conclusion a while ago. The notion that people are monogamous and every man will have a wife and kids was an artificially created, short lived phenomenon, held together by religion, the right economic situation and societal norms/pressure. But we were made to believe that this is the norm and something we all could have.

Now, as all these things are falling apart and disappearing rapidly (sped up by OLD) we are indeed returning to a more primal state of mating (one successfull man gets many women, many men get none). Nature has no sense of moral. This model of mating worked in the past. It IS not ideal for a stable society though, since it encourages more fierce competition between males and creates a class of men with no real perspective.

My prediction: Its gonna get ugly. Men are becoming more and more desparate. Teens injecting steroids, getting plastic surgery just to gain an edge in dating is one of the many symptoms of this development. We will see more incels snapping and going ER. Like almost everything I see going wrong in western societies - I think it will get MUCH worse until something is gonna change.

In the end, there is no easy solution to all of this since we are NOT created equal.
Some have it better than others and always will. A society can introduce measures to even out the differences and unfairness but not without making tradeoffs elsewhere.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 14262, Deleted member 8765, 5'8manlet and 15 others
I´ve come to the same conclusion a while ago. The notion that people are monogamous and every man will have a wife and kids was an artificially created, short lived phenomenon, held together by religion, the right economic situation and societal norms/pressure. But we were made to believe that this is the norm and something we all could have.

Now, as all these things are falling apart and disappearing rapidly (sped up by OLD) we are indeed returning to a more primal state of mating (one successfull man gets many women, many men get none). Nature has no sense of moral. This model of mating worked in the past. It IS not ideal for a stable society though, since it encourages more fierce competition between males and creates a class of men with no real perspective.

My prediction: Its gonna get ugly. Men are becoming more and more desparate. Teens injecting steroids, getting plastic surgery just to gain an edge in dating is one of the many symptoms of this development. We will see more incels snapping and going ER. Like almost everything I see going wrong in western societies - I think it will get MUCH worse until something is gonna change.

In the end, there is no easy solution to all of this since we are NOT created equal.
Some have it better than others and always will. A society can introduce measures to even out the differences and unfairness but not without making tradeoffs elsewhere.

Good post but...

"(Sped up by OLD)" ???

I wish people now a days would not be so lazy as not to say the word. What is that abbreviation for?
 
  • +1
Reactions: 6ft8InTheNetherlands
I´ve come to the same conclusion a while ago. The notion that people are monogamous and every man will have a wife and kids was an artificially created, short lived phenomenon, held together by religion, the right economic situation and societal norms/pressure. But we were made to believe that this is the norm and something we all could have.

Now, as all these things are falling apart and disappearing rapidly (sped up by OLD) we are indeed returning to a more primal state of mating (one successfull man gets many women, many men get none). Nature has no sense of moral. This model of mating worked in the past. It IS not ideal for a stable society though, since it encourages more fierce competition between males and creates a class of men with no real perspective.

My prediction: Its gonna get ugly. Men are becoming more and more desparate. Teens injecting steroids, getting plastic surgery just to gain an edge in dating is one of the many symptoms of this development. We will see more incels snapping and going ER. Like almost everything I see going wrong in western societies - I think it will get MUCH worse until something is gonna change.

In the end, there is no easy solution to all of this since we are NOT created equal.
Some have it better than others and always will. A society can introduce measures to even out the differences and unfairness but not without making tradeoffs elsewhere.

I mean you have a point but there are some factors like ease of access, and incentivized hypergamy that make modern woman act like complete whores.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6908
I mean you have a point but there are some factors like ease of access, and incentivized hypergamy that make modern woman act like complete whores.

And these are factors which have been funnily enough been caused by man-made inventions :ROFLMAO:

The creators certainly weren't the 10% of Chads.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: bonesoverblood
Why is water wet?

Wetness is our description of what we feel when we put our hand in water. Saying water is wet is like saying that wood is hard or fire is hot.

Sensory receptors on our hand send information about the water to our brain. Our brain receives the information from our sensory receptors and processes it. A combination of temperature, pressure and the way water moves tells our brain that water is wet.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 7776, thecel and turkproducer
Good post but...

"(Sped up by OLD)" ???

I wish people now a days would not be so lazy as not to say the word. What is that abbreviation for?
OLD = Online Dating. Social Media, Tinder, Insta, TikTok..

I mean you have a point but there are some factors like ease of access, and incentivized hypergamy that make modern woman act like complete whores.

How exactly is hypergamy incentivized? Just curious what you meant by that.

Also, women in some sense have always acted like whores, if you want to use that word. Their mating strategy involves getting sperm from high quality males (what these high qualities are is slightly dependant on the circumstances). So its more like women behaving like women always have, without the restraints of religion and societal pressure.
But yes, never in history have females had this level of access to basically every chad world wide. But this is just accellerating the underlying dynamic. Because males theoretically have the same ease of access to females now. Its just become apparent that the power dynamic in dating is severely skewed in womens favour.
 
  • +1
Reactions: klamus, Deleted member 8765, Deleted member 7776 and 2 others
OLD = Online Dating. Social Media, Tinder, Insta, TikTok..



How exactly is hypergamy incentivized? Just curious what you meant by that.

Also, women in some sense have always acted like whores, if you want to use that word. Their mating strategy involves getting sperm from high quality males (what these high qualities are is slightly dependant on the circumstances). So its more like women behaving like women always have, without the restraints of religion and societal pressure.
But yes, never in history have females had this level of access to basically every chad world wide. But this is just accellerating the underlying dynamic. Because males theoretically have the same ease of access to females now. Its just become apparent that the power dynamic in dating is severely skewed in womens favour.

Incentivized by:

Hyper-Validation & Money

Social Media Normalization. Instagram biggest source of revenue is woman, and female advertising. I mean, woman advertising their bodies.

Every woman is essentially advertising herself to the highest bidder, on Instagram. So they are incentivized to act as much of a whore as possible, to attract customers.

There is a literal monetary value behind being a monkey brancher. The more she climbs, the higher the chance of meeting a celebrity or rich yuppie.

Instagram is worse than tinder, because it's built around the idea that opposite sex interactions are not only casual, but a business proposition.

This is how E-Girls exist. They feed off of this. Using only fans to suck the wallets out of beta men, while monkey branching to the best chad.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 8765, Deleted member 7776, audreyen and 6 others
The question is, what comes next? The cumulative depression of young men has to have an outlet.
 
  • +1
Reactions: klamus, CupOfCoffee, Deleted member 8765 and 7 others
the more we integrate with the internet and AI, the worse it's gonna get for men
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 8765, Marsiere214, Deleted member 7776 and 2 others
That's true, i just wait until it would be ok to take women by force and kill the rivals like prehstoric times and i can finally ascend.

just kidding FBI continue scrolling
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: CupOfCoffee, Deleted member 8765, Deleted member 7776 and 1 other person

This is mostly a meme. Women reproduced more because men died at wars, and women on the defeated side got raped. Hypergamy has never been the default mating mode for man. The modern rise in hypergamy is a novel phenomenon due to novel circumstances. It's a perversion more than natural expression of human pair bonding.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Pikabro, klamus, Deleted member 14262 and 11 others
This is mostly a meme. Women reproduced more because men died at wars, and women on the defeated side got raped. Hypergamy has never been the default mating mode for man. The modern rise in hypergamy is a novel phenomenon due to novel circumstances. It's a perversion more than natural expression of human pair bonding.
so much this ^
 
  • +1
Reactions: LowInhibIncel
Baloney. Literally any man that isn't deformed can get a woman. Hell, even deformed people can get a woman. I remember watching a video of a wheelchair-bound guy with a blond girlfriend. If a man is persistent and doesn't spend his time rotting on internet forums he will get what he wants. The problem is most guys don't give it their all. I'm sure if you were to approach multiple women daily eventually you'll score one. I'm not disproving OPs post but it isn't as bad as he makes it seems.

Even among primates the lower class males will sneak a female and mate with them, it's not over.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 8765, Deleted member 7776, thecel and 1 other person
Good shit, working on a thread right now for black men.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7776, thecel and LowInhibIncel
Number of quarks in the Universe IQ
 
  • +1
Reactions: LowInhibIncel
Even among primates the lower class males will sneak a female and mate with them, it's not over.

That's because rape is normal in the animal kingdom
 
  • +1
Reactions: LowInhibIncel and Subhuman trash
Saved. Can't wait for that Comprehensiv PSL Rating Guide thread OP :)
 
  • +1
Reactions: LowInhibIncel
What should we expect from the disenfranchised men?
 
  • WTF
Reactions: LowInhibIncel
Cope
 
  • +1
Reactions: LowInhibIncel
What should we expect from the disenfranchised men?


Either lack of changing due to the bluepilled apparatus or a conflict, eventually going militaristic.


I'd say the people that are benefitting from this state would want the former to happen.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LowInhibIncel and Deleted member 8765
You guys are a bunch of cucks sucking the clit of self-aware feminist propaganda.

Natural DOES NOT EQUAL GOOD OR BETTER.

You know what else isn't natural? The fact that intelligence results in resources. The smarter you are, the more likely you are to become a lawyer, doctor, engineer, businessman; and if you are "average" iq, you will likely be working jobs at marketing, logistics, or basic bitch coding; if you are low iq, you will be serving McChickens / Starbucks Coffee or a shitty trade like plumber or construction worker.

That isn't natural in the slightest. Women aren't attracted to intelligence at all, even though such genes are clearly more beneficial in our society. They are still attracted to "ooga booga" tall masculine jock dudes.

Should we just say "fuck it" and determine who can get resources based on what's natural? Let's make doctors, engineers, and lawyers based on your physical, brute strength; or fuck it - let's have a fight match between men, the strongest get to perform brain surgery!


And this reversion to polyamory, while more in line with our biological impulses, isn't "natural" in the slightest. It's a result of our artificial, technologically dystopic "dopamine" culture. There's nothing "progressive" or "beneficial" or "natural" about it


Modern civilization, going back to Ancient Rome onwards, was largely built on monogamy; if you are a guy who puts in the effort and slaves away working, you get to reproduce with wife and kids, and women in return gets protection, resources, and security. They aren't left alone to raise some dick's kids. That was the trade-off in monogamy.

Society is not going to function returning back to ooga booga caveman days. Men have nothing to work for now and are getting bitter, cynical, violent, and angry; women are getting bitter, cynical, and angry being used up, unwanted goods.

And I say let it burn, let's sit back and watch the show. It may not collapse in the immediate future, give it 20 years and it will.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Pikabro, klamus, Deleted member 8765 and 4 others
You guys are a bunch of cucks sucking the clit of self-aware feminist propaganda.

Natural DOES NOT EQUAL GOOD OR BETTER.

You know what else isn't natural? The fact that intelligence results in resources. The smarter you are, the more likely you are to become a lawyer, doctor, engineer, businessman; and if you are "average" iq, you will likely be working jobs at marketing, logistics, or basic bitch coding; if you are low iq, you will be serving McChickens / Starbucks Coffee or a shitty trade like plumber or construction worker.

That isn't natural in the slightest. Women aren't attracted to intelligence at all, even though such genes are clearly more beneficial in our society. They are still attracted to "ooga booga" tall masculine jock dudes.

Should we just say "fuck it" and determine who can get resources based on what's natural? Let's make doctors, engineers, and lawyers based on your physical, brute strength; or fuck it - let's have a fight match between men, the strongest get to perform brain surgery!


And this reversion to polyamory, while more in line with our biological impulses, isn't "natural" in the slightest. It's a result of our artificial, technologically dystopic "dopamine" culture. There's nothing "progressive" or "beneficial" or "natural" about it


Modern civilization, going back to Ancient Rome onwards, was largely built on monogamy; if you are a guy who puts in the effort and slaves away working, you get to reproduce with wife and kids, and women in return gets protection, resources, and security. They aren't left alone to raise some dick's kids. That was the trade-off in monogamy.

Society is not going to function returning back to ooga booga caveman days. Men have nothing to work for now and are getting bitter, cynical, violent, and angry; women are getting bitter, cynical, and angry being used up, unwanted goods.

And I say let it burn, let's sit back and watch the show. It may not collapse in the immediate future, give it 20 years and it will.
retards here think that something used to be natural 30,000 years ago then now we need it
same with this whole "lion beast carnivore" trash, its lacking nutrition and electrolytes, its good for weight loss but trash for day to day stuff, the more retarded thing is eating raw meat, we started cocking meat before we were even homo sapiens
 
  • +1
Reactions: Teutonic
I was browsing YT today (no blunt today I quit) and I saw an enlightening comment

View attachment 462990

This was true in our hunter gather stage

View attachment 462993

Keep in mind that 8,000 years ago a lot of people had gone through their agricultural revolution. The numbers from the Paleolithic days are likely much worse
Ironically in the midst of our technological advancement we've reverted back to animal harems
(read Future of Marriage in The West)
View attachment 463000

A rose ? Killing the weaker male seals must be romantic in the primal brain

What does this mean for incels/average/slightly above average men in this 90/10 or maybe 95/5 world

Can you ascend with money ?
Can you gain enough status to attract a woman ?
Can you gymcel your way into the top 10% of men?

I will answer this in a future megathread called "The Comprehensive PSL Rating" it will include everything having to do with looks, money and status and put it on one scale. As well as talk about how they each produce different responses in woman
Also stay tuned I'm cooking up something spicy with the scholar @the next o'pry

Tagged Users (If you want to get tagged in new threads, or removed from tag list PM me or drop a comment)
@JFLbuddyboyo , @the next o'pry , @SpearOfOrion , @GigaTyroneOrDeath , @PjSon , @Vvvvxxxx , @IndianJock , @stuckneworleans , @tyronelite ,@DoMoverPRETTYboy, @laske.7


My Most Liked Threads

Why Black People Like Watermelon
Guide to EscortMaxxing
How Big Should Your Jaw, Neck and Shoulders Be


New Threads
Masculine Facial Thirds
Why Woman Give Shit Advice
Ideal Shoulder Width for Slaying
The top comment has no clue what he is talking about. In 3rd world countries monogamy is at it's highest. Due to social constraints regarding dating. Many people get arranged marriages. The majority of people work jobs in manufacturing and farming. (Or could easily do so if they wanted to.) The only cultures where polygyny was acceptable was in Islam and some African cultures that are dead or which nobody cares about. The idea that in the past, 20% of men were wealthy nobles and 80% were peasants would be a fantasy.

Your example of the seals isn't great either. Seal society functions a lot more different to humanity. It's like foids saying "Peacocks impress the female so men should impress us!" Or retarded redpillers claiming the Alpha male gets to reproduce, this is true, but only with other Alpha females, which they conveniently ignore.
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 5786, thecel and Deleted member 8765
I was browsing YT today (no blunt today I quit) and I saw an enlightening comment

View attachment 462990

This was true in our hunter gather stage

View attachment 462993

Keep in mind that 8,000 years ago a lot of people had gone through their agricultural revolution. The numbers from the Paleolithic days are likely much worse
Ironically in the midst of our technological advancement we've reverted back to animal harems
(read Future of Marriage in The West)
View attachment 463000

A rose ? Killing the weaker male seals must be romantic in the primal brain

What does this mean for incels/average/slightly above average men in this 90/10 or maybe 95/5 world

Can you ascend with money ?
Can you gain enough status to attract a woman ?
Can you gymcel your way into the top 10% of men?

I will answer this in a future megathread called "The Comprehensive PSL Rating" it will include everything having to do with looks, money and status and put it on one scale. As well as talk about how they each produce different responses in woman
Also stay tuned I'm cooking up something spicy with the scholar @the next o'pry

Tagged Users (If you want to get tagged in new threads, or removed from tag list PM me or drop a comment)
@JFLbuddyboyo , @the next o'pry , @SpearOfOrion , @GigaTyroneOrDeath , @PjSon , @Vvvvxxxx , @IndianJock , @stuckneworleans , @tyronelite ,@DoMoverPRETTYboy, @laske.7


My Most Liked Threads

Why Black People Like Watermelon
Guide to EscortMaxxing
How Big Should Your Jaw, Neck and Shoulders Be


New Threads
Masculine Facial Thirds
Why Woman Give Shit Advice
Ideal Shoulder Width for Slaying
Tag me!
 
OP is tripping and never goes outside. I see couples left and right who are both way below average in looks and both looksmatched with a child. In fact I sometimes even see subhuman tier fathers walking around with their child.

Also whats funny is, most of the time the child gets the facial features of the mother and you can basically tell if the child will look good or not later. (there are exceptions but usually the facial features are inherited from the mother).

Im not surprised women are hypergamous, because they hope that the good looking Chad will make their children look different than them and most importantly BETTER than them, because most women subconsciously and consciously know how dog shit they look in reality, especially without makeup.

Heres an example:

With makeup, fake eyelashes, ideal lighting, ideal angle, most would consider her 7.5-8/10 stacylite:
2666651 1640801877932


Here without makeup, without fake eyelashes, without ideal angle and lighting:

2666615 C070C64B C9D6 4E13 BD49 298DE939260F


Looks like a rat. Imagine her waking up in the morning with messy hair etc- drops another point and is around 4/10 in reality.

Meanwhile a Chad's face is almost always the same and always attractive. No shit women are hypergamous and hope that their dog shit genes get overwritten by Chads amazing genes and the child ends up looking healthy and attractive.

The reality is though- most women cant score a Chad as a partner, let alone husband, not even a "sperm donor", who afterwards wont commit. These women realize how fast they descend after 25, at latest 28 and end up partnering some average looking dude or even below averagge. Their children inherit the woman's dog shit facial features. This is why most young dudes nowadays have high set eyebrows etc.

Dont even try to tell me that their fathers 20+ years ago all had such high set, feminine looking eyebrows (and because of that the whole eye area).
 
Last edited:
I was browsing YT today (no blunt today I quit) and I saw an enlightening comment

View attachment 462990

This was true in our hunter gather stage

View attachment 462993

Keep in mind that 8,000 years ago a lot of people had gone through their agricultural revolution. The numbers from the Paleolithic days are likely much worse
Ironically in the midst of our technological advancement we've reverted back to animal harems
(read Future of Marriage in The West)
View attachment 463000

A rose ? Killing the weaker male seals must be romantic in the primal brain

What does this mean for incels/average/slightly above average men in this 90/10 or maybe 95/5 world

Can you ascend with money ?
Can you gain enough status to attract a woman ?
Can you gymcel your way into the top 10% of men?

I will answer this in a future megathread called "The Comprehensive PSL Rating" it will include everything having to do with looks, money and status and put it on one scale. As well as talk about how they each produce different responses in woman
Also stay tuned I'm cooking up something spicy with the scholar @the next o'pry

Tagged Users (If you want to get tagged in new threads, or removed from tag list PM me or drop a comment)
@JFLbuddyboyo , @the next o'pry , @SpearOfOrion , @GigaTyroneOrDeath , @PjSon , @Vvvvxxxx , @IndianJock , @stuckneworleans , @tyronelite ,@DoMoverPRETTYboy, @laske.7


My Most Liked Threads

Why Black People Like Watermelon
Guide to EscortMaxxing
How Big Should Your Jaw, Neck and Shoulders Be


New Threads
Masculine Facial Thirds
Why Woman Give Shit Advice
Ideal Shoulder Width for Slaying
At lot of young men don't realize that hypergamy has always been a thing
 
The real blackpill is that a solid 30% of men will never find someone and will die alone
 
brutal but unfortunately true. brace for impact boys
 

Similar threads

dreamcake1mo
Replies
44
Views
7K
Funnyunenjoyer1
Funnyunenjoyer1
PointOfNoReturn
Replies
30
Views
4K
nigkook
nigkook
dreamcake1mo
Replies
84
Views
18K
Coman
Coman

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top