Midface ratio makes no sense

D

Deleted

Lurker
How can pitt have 1.07 midface when standing far away but 0.97 in others also standing far away? According to @SigmaDONkek this is how you measure fwhr which would mean pitt has 1.66 fwhr proving @SigmaDONkek 's low iq
How can pictures with similar circumstances vary so much?
Download 21
Download 22


Here is another picture of pitt with 0.1 higher midface ratio and 0.09 higher fwhr which makes no sense since both are taken from far away without distortion
Download 23
Download 24

How i measured midface is same as @SigmaDONkek but he's low iq and probably incorrect but i know i measured midface right
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401, Deleted member 5385, Deleted member 5632 and 1 other person
didnt read
but you are coping you have a horse midface
 
  • +1
Reactions: Introvertednarc, Deleted member 6401, jordanbarrettisgod and 2 others
u are truly tortured my dog you can keep barking but unless you post the originals for my trusted analysis you unsubstantiated numbers with no calculations are worth less than a manlet indian janitors poop to a ovulating stacey
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401 and jordanbarrettisgod
You are measuring FWHR wrong
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 8064, Deleted member 6401 and jordanbarrettisgod
How can pitt have 1.07 midface when standing far away but 0.97 in others also standing far away? According to @SigmaDONkek this is how you measure fwhr which would mean pitt has 1.66 fwhr proving @SigmaDONkek 's low iq
How can pictures with similar circumstances vary so much?
View attachment 327590View attachment 327595

Here is another picture of pitt with 0.1 higher midface ratio and 0.09 higher fwhr which makes no sense since both are taken from far away without distortion
View attachment 327610View attachment 327611
How i measured midface is same as @SigmaDONkek but he's low iq and probably incorrect but i know i measured midface right
I think you are right but i hate measuring because of the variances
I think @retard can help?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401, Deleted member 1680 and Deleted
Narrow
Horsee
Ntt


Keep coping you narrow horse
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Introvertednarc, Deleted member 6401, jordanbarrettisgod and 3 others
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401 and Deleted
Math maxxing

don’t resize in horizontal or vertical
minor error should happen, as you are not measuring exactly the same
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401 and Deleted
Lol bro
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401 and jordanbarrettisgod
You guys are both fucking retards
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401, jordanbarrettisgod and Vidyacoper
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401
Maxresdefault
Pitt
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401 and Kingkellz
lol i have the longest face on this whole site, you both should kys
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401
You just can't handle the fact your fwhr fraud got exposed
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401 and Deleted member 4991
Your measuring with EXTREME bias. You use top of my eyebrows but bottom of pitts and you overshoot pits zygos
yes this makes up for 0.3 midface, meanwhile you measures at a much narrower part of his skull, he is easily into the 1.9's keep coping about a mm here or there
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401
fucking shit thread
1585522358162

this is the 2nd picture full version
DOES IT LOOK LIKE IT WAS TAKEN FROM A DISTANCE?
looks like you made this thread to cope and tell yourself that your midface ratio isnt that bad
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401 and Darkstrand
btw retard i can go up as far as the blue line which the redline is as thick as, I just moved it a nudge on accident
fucking shit thread
View attachment 327634
this is the 2nd picture full version
DOES IT LOOK LIKE IT WAS TAKEN FROM A DISTANCE?
looks like you made this thread to cope and tell yourself that your midface ratio isnt that bad
both pics his fwhr is easily 1.9
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401 and Vidyacoper
yes this makes up for 0.3 midface, meanwhile you measures at a much narrower part of his skull, he is easily into the 1.9's keep coping about a mm here or there
yo send link of what you useing to measure i wanna measure mine
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401
yes this makes up for 0.3 midface, meanwhile you measures at a much narrower part of his skull, he is easily into the 1.9's keep coping about a mm here or there
Ideally i would want pitt to have 1.96 fwhr and 1.07 midface making us have the exact same
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401
btw retard i can go up as far as the blue line which the redline is as thick as, I just moved it a nudge on accident

both pics his fwhr is easily 1.9
how to increase fhwr?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401
OP doesnt even know the basics of measuring fwhr
 
  • So Sad
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401 and Deleted
OP doesnt even know the basics of measuring fwhr
I just did what @SigmaDONkek said. He's an ipd cel coping with fwhr. How i measured midface is correct though
@SigmaDONkek Your an ipd cel you faggot and there is no fix for that
 

Attachments

  • download (28).png
    download (28).png
    189.5 KB · Views: 53
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401
I just did what @SigmaDONkek said. He's an ipd cel coping with fwhr. How i measured midface is correct though
@SigmaDONkek Your an ipd cel you faggot and there is no fix for that
i've measures my IPD
AND
EME

which you don't even know about and they are both 0.1 percentile
keep coping
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401
i've measures my IPD
AND
EME

which you don't even know about and they are both 0.1 percentile
keep coping
Your ipd doesn't matter your ES ratio does. 0.45-0.47 is ideal and your WAAAY below that.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401
2399F095 C329 4C35 A62D 72CFEEE12AB1
 
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401 and Elias
@Amnesia how tf do i proper measure my fhwr
and midface im using this site
i've measures my IPD
AND
EME

which you don't even know about and they are both 0.1 percentile
keep coping
send what site your using and how to meaure mine
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401 and Deleted
Studies show that converting to islam increases your FWHR to make it in 1.95 - 2.0 range
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401 and Deleted
Depending on the focal length, zoom and distance to the camera, the ratio will change. So it's not an absolute thing.

If you want to measure your midface ratio you must take a picture that mostly resembles how others perceive you, and for that you will have to take several pictures varying the distance to the camera and zoom, so another person can judge which one is closest to how you look to them.

For example, if you take a picture at arms length with a 28mm focal lenth, your face will look longer and narrower.
If you want to take it with a 35mm, you would need to get farther away from the camera so the image catches the same area as the one previously taken.
If you use a 50+mm focal length, your face will look too flattened and wide.

In my case, I've realized that with my camera using a 35-38mm focal length at close up distance I look the closest to how I look in mirrors.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401
Weird this guys midface ratio is as bad as mine and he does very well with attractive women. And looks good.
 

Attachments

  • 9B292BF4-82D9-4D65-A70A-107296BC6462.jpeg
    9B292BF4-82D9-4D65-A70A-107296BC6462.jpeg
    551.7 KB · Views: 58

Similar threads

chief detectiveman
Replies
8
Views
2K
bourgeoizyzz
bourgeoizyzz
DelonLover1999
Replies
94
Views
3K
It'snotover
It'snotover
Roge
Replies
7
Views
1K
tempelcat4
tempelcat4

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top