saffacel
spinning my wheels
- Joined
- May 10, 2020
- Posts
- 381
- Reputation
- 370
Repost of earlier offtopic thread. If you can respond to the good looking loser thread you can respond to this come on now.
This is women's response to the q can you be in love with someone you aren't sexually attracted to.
Here is the link to how women answered
Summary of what was said:
I didn't count but maybe like 60% said no, but the others who did say yes differentiate between love and being in love.
i.e They may love the person who is not attractive but they can't and will never be in love with them.
So is this lifefuel/suicidefuel?
I see it as suicidefuel as all my non-sexual fantasies have been of the women being in love with me. For those asking how can this be lifefuel in any way -
Well, it means you don't need to be Chad to be "loved" - but why saddle yourself with expenses of a ltr and marriage for that?
I understand MGTOW more after reading those answers.
Overall it's just confirmation if we needed any that if you can't reach a level that's attractive to them it's over.
This is women's response to the q can you be in love with someone you aren't sexually attracted to.
Here is the link to how women answered
Summary of what was said:
I didn't count but maybe like 60% said no, but the others who did say yes differentiate between love and being in love.
i.e They may love the person who is not attractive but they can't and will never be in love with them.
So is this lifefuel/suicidefuel?
I see it as suicidefuel as all my non-sexual fantasies have been of the women being in love with me. For those asking how can this be lifefuel in any way -
Well, it means you don't need to be Chad to be "loved" - but why saddle yourself with expenses of a ltr and marriage for that?
I understand MGTOW more after reading those answers.
Overall it's just confirmation if we needed any that if you can't reach a level that's attractive to them it's over.
Last edited: