Rate ryan gosling

T

tudare172

Iron
Joined
Apr 22, 2020
Posts
19
Reputation
42
out of 10
 

Attachments

  • a4d240792607238794e4ae80974b2462.jpg
    a4d240792607238794e4ae80974b2462.jpg
    52.8 KB · Views: 113
  • Ryan-Gosling.jpg
    Ryan-Gosling.jpg
    154.6 KB · Views: 114
7

+ amazing harmony, good height and masculinity

- very average features
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Patrick Baitman, Deleted member 3853, Deleted member 6128 and 8 others
ugly as shit
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6128, Warlow, Deleted member 7776 and 2 others
7

+ amazing harmony, good height and masculinity

- very average features
Are you retarded

He's a normie jfl

He looks even worse in person, without the flash to make his coloring better.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 8064, Deleted member 6128, Warlow and 2 others
Weird looking man

Mogs 90% of the population while being a trucel
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Warlow, Deleted member 7776 and Deleted
Shit PSL but chad irl
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 8064, Deleted member 7776, Copeful and 3 others
Bad gomial like me
 
1595703421051

This pic just looks so shit and good at the same time tbh, before i learned lookstheory this was the most handsome picture of a man i had seen
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6873 and Sikkunt23
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: Sikkunt23 and Nisse
Has better appeal than Jordan
 
  • +1
Reactions: Sikkunt23
Are you retarded

He's a normie jfl

He looks even worse in person, without the flash to make his coloring better.
keep coping

Women love him and it's not because he starred in whatever movie. He got bigger than most actors. Anybody who doesn't see it is an autistic cunt who over analyzes individual features but can never understand harmony due to their mental disability.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7776
psl 5 unironically. not special at all.
 
His side profile is disgusting
 
yeah by autistic incels, whereas IRL women view him as one of the most handsome actors in the past 20 years
im not disagreeing with you

but people on here view things from a different perspective so not much can be said

they would tell you on here that this guy
1595875186609


is more handsome than this guy
1595875206084
 
  • +1
Reactions: iblamelebron and Deleted member 6873
  • JFL
Reactions: Warlow and aestheticallypleasin
PSL should be rated objectively, cases like gosling, Bateman, Barrett, etc. If they calculate as a low number, so be it. It Just makes it clear the system is not a clear indicator of real life appeal. I suggest not raising the numbers of someone just because they have more appeal in real life, either change the system or admit the system is faulty. Changing ratings because of appeal invalidates the system and leads to subjective ratings. Perhaps 2 rating systems should be developed, one for aesthetics and one for sex/real life appeal
 
actually 4psl low-t cuck pheno
 
Stupid eye area, he's a statusmaxxed mini chadlite
 
D5EF7939 6757 4223 A43B D2471747C45A Do I need to say more
 
Maybe gosling is truly 3.5-4.5 psl range as some say (I don't know how to rate). The calculation should be objective. There is also in sports scouting what is called the "eye test" which would equate to "looks good in motion." Or simply there is a case where a player performs better than others despite high physical attributes which would equate to a slayer where no one can understand why. That does not change the players physical attributes but acknowledges that there are elements outside of pure calculation that can lead to performance. This keeps ratings consistent and simply acknowledges that even if someone scores low, it is not totally indicative of how appealing they are.
 
They may not realize it but they are saying he is more "technically aesthetic" and not necessarily more "handsome." Aesthetics can be calculated, appeal or a nebulous "handsome" less so. As an analogy imagine an opera singer trained 30 years versus Freddy mercury. The first may be more "technically sound" but many would rather listen to the latter.
im not disagreeing with you

but people on here view things from a different perspective so not much can be said

they would tell you on here that this guy
View attachment 547708

is more handsome than this guy
View attachment 547711
 
  • +1
Reactions: aestheticallypleasin

Similar threads

LooksThinker
Replies
24
Views
492
LooksThinker
LooksThinker
whitegymmax
Replies
5
Views
123
DelonLover1999
DelonLover1999
D
  • Poll
Replies
7
Views
177
Willmogulater
Willmogulater
Chinacurry
Replies
3
Views
55
AlexBrown84
AlexBrown84
Vermilioncore
Replies
11
Views
202
Vermilioncore
Vermilioncore

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top