[OP] Rate the big three

ArvidGustavsson

ArvidGustavsson

Women DO Approach
Joined
Jan 5, 2020
Posts
7,016
Reputation
7,270
Manlets. Real chads of Hollywood include
Tom Selleck
John Schneider
David Hasselhoff
John Stamos
Dolph Lundgren
Joe Manganiello
Alexander Skarsgård
Liam Neeson
Jason Momoa
Josh Duhamel
Chris and Liam Hemsworth
Idris Elba
Jim Carrey
Dwayne Johnson
Ben Affleck
your based for tall less attractive people than those on op’s list
when someone thinks Depp, they think this dude
View attachment 322675

dicacaprio is massively overrated.
He is not 6 psl bro. A lot of users rated me 6 psl and Leo obviously mogs me rly hard
 
Y

Yungyphnx

Apprentice
Joined
Aug 19, 2019
Posts
291
Reputation
74
6.75 for depp
7 for dicaprio
8 for Pitt
All in their Prime of course
You rated Johhny 6.75 and Leo 7 but Pitt 8 ? Lol, Depp has the only one minor flaw - too long ramus, he was a little bit strange looking (prime condition ofc). Leo had no flaws in his prime okay maybe Leo head looked a little bit strange due to fwhr proportions and chin, but he just wasn't classically handsome, but it's not a problem at all till it works. I mean Leo's harmony was perfect for his certain case and Johnny's was almost perfect for his certain case where the only little flaw was length of the ramus. At the same time Pitt looks really strange, he has worst eyeshape of all them + bloated jaw which remains me about some muscle disease, in comparison of two big jaws Pitt's jaw looks like a shit next to Johnny + Pitt has no harmony, some of his features looks better standalone but they looks too generic when meets each other + cheekbones 404, I even don't think he was appealing to JBs, maybe due to coloring and masculine body, but he is nothing in comparison to J or L if we compare face features only. I even think that there must be River Phoenix as the 3rd guy in this discussion, not a Pitt
 
ArvidGustavsson

ArvidGustavsson

Women DO Approach
Joined
Jan 5, 2020
Posts
7,016
Reputation
7,270
You rated Johhny 6.75 and Leo 7 but Pitt 8 ? Lol, Depp has the only one minor flaw - too long ramus, he was a little bit strange looking (prime condition ofc). Leo had no flaws in his prime okay maybe Leo head looked a little bit strange due to fwhr proportions and chin, but he just wasn't classically handsome, but it's not a problem at all till it works. I mean Leo's harmony was perfect for his certain case and Johnny's was almost perfect for his certain case where the only little flaw was length of the ramus. At the same time Pitt looks really strange, he has worst eyeshape of all them + bloated jaw which remains me about some muscle disease, in comparison of two big jaws Pitt's jaw looks like a shit next to Johnny + Pitt has no harmony, some of his features looks better standalone but they looks too generic when meets each other + cheekbones 404, I even don't think he was appealing to JBs, maybe due to coloring and masculine body, but he is nothing in comparison to J or L if we compare face features only. I even think that there must be River Phoenix as the 3rd guy in this discussion, not a Pitt
River phoenix doesn't look that good tho, Below 6psl for sure maybe mid 5s. Not having major flaws doesn't make you 7+ psl, Then i would be 7+ psl. Leo and depp both have below ideal ipd. Depps cheekbones do look striking but have to much mass and go to low on his face makng the hollowness of his hollowcheeks very small. Pitt is the perfect specimen and aged better + Looked more masc than both Leo and Depp, He just wasn't as striking but instead more conventionally attractive.
I'd give leo 6.8 and depp 7. Depps eyes doesn't look that good without a lot of hooding but still good pfl and leo looked to young but when he didn't (became older) started looking like shit
images.jpeg-126.jpg
 
Last edited:
Y

Yungyphnx

Apprentice
Joined
Aug 19, 2019
Posts
291
Reputation
74
River phoenix doesn't look that good tho, Below 6psl for sure maybe mid 5s. Not having major flaws doesn't make you 7+ psl, Then i would be 7+ psl. Leo and depp both have below ideal ipd. Depps cheekbones do look striking but have to much mass and go to low on his face makng the hollowness of his hollowcheeks very small. Pitt is the perfect specimen and aged better + Looked more masc than both Leo and Depp, He just wasn't as striking but instead more conventionally attractive.
I'd give leo 6.8 and depp 7. Depps eyes doesn't look that good without a lot of hooding but still good pfl and leo looked to young but when he didn't (became older) started looking like shit
View attachment 336185
Firstly, Yeah, honestly all of them looks like shit now, as we all would be in some years (alcoholics like me even faster) Depp is a confirmed alcoholic and drugs user, also he was smoking 3 packs of cigarettes per day when he was young. Leo eating unhealthy food and smoking and drinking alcohol too, never heard something like this about Brad, so it's impossible to properly judge who got worse aging genetics and we don't even need to do it as we were speaking about them in prime.
Secondly, about "...don't having major flaws don't makes you 7+psl...". Well, but Leo and Depp almost have no flaws + great harmony, they just beautiful the way they are (especially Leo, must admit that Johnny's ramus makes his face looks strange, especially comparing to Pirates of the Carribbean where they were partly hidden with Sparrow's head stuff and he looked absolutely harmonic) and Pitt looks inharmonious (idk why just as it is). Even if Pitt looks better in psl terms you know that he is shittier IRL and every girl (especially JB) can prove it, Cole Sprouse looks more appealing for them then Brad... And it begs the question about correctness of psl rating system. But anyway I can't get it, even in psl system... How could you rate Pitt higher when his nose is worse then Leo's and Johnny's and he have no cheekbones ?
 
ArvidGustavsson

ArvidGustavsson

Women DO Approach
Joined
Jan 5, 2020
Posts
7,016
Reputation
7,270
Firstly, Yeah, honestly all of them looks like shit now, as we all would be in some years (alcoholics like me even faster) Depp is a confirmed alcoholic and drugs user, also he was smoking 3 packs of cigarettes per day when he was young. Leo eating unhealthy food and smoking and drinking alcohol too, never heard something like this about Brad, so it's impossible to properly judge who got worse aging genetics and we don't even need to do it as we were speaking about them in prime.
Secondly, about "...don't having major flaws don't makes you 7+psl...". Well, but Leo and Depp almost have no flaws + great harmony, they just beautiful the way they are (especially Leo, must admit that Johnny's ramus makes his face looks strange, especially comparing to Pirates of the Carribbean where they were partly hidden with Sparrow's head stuff and he looked absolutely harmonic) and Pitt looks inharmonious (idk why just as it is). Even if Pitt looks better in psl terms you know that he is shittier IRL and every girl (especially JB) can prove it, Cole Sprouse looks more appealing for them then Brad... And it begs the question about correctness of psl rating system. But anyway I can't get it, even in psl system... How could you rate Pitt higher when his nose is worse then Leo's and Johnny's and he have no cheekbones ?
His face shape is the best, His hairline is the best, His pheno is the best, He can pull of any hairstyle, He aged way better (56 years old still better looking than 99% of the population and one of the best looking men at 40 (troy)), His Mouth is the best, He has the best body etc etc. His harmony is also better than the other 2 in the Trinity what are you talking about
 
Y

Yungyphnx

Apprentice
Joined
Aug 19, 2019
Posts
291
Reputation
74
His face shape is the best, His hairline is the best, His pheno is the best, He can pull of any hairstyle, He aged way better (56 years old still better looking than 99% of the population and one of the best looking men at 40 (troy)), His Mouth is the best, He has the best body etc etc. His harmony is also better than the other 2 in the Trinity what are you talking about
Okay, you either just trolling or just a fanboy (avi proves) or both. I told you all about aging in previous reply + body not counts in psl, only in irl rating when you rated them in psl, so it's not an argument too + he definitely has the worst of all headshapes and it's just weird + he has almost the same hairline as Johnny and it's not an argument too as "...pull any hairstyle..." As we were talking about their prime, so Leo luckily chose the most suitable hairstyle for him and luckily BJs love this hairstyle, so it's not an argument, again. And Pitt had the worst phenotype of them 3 in their prime years. We were watching Fight Club with my JB gf and her 2 foids, all of them told that Brad isn't good looking at all, just weird, especially his disease-looking jaw and recessed chin which isn't suits to jaw at all. Honestly all of them think that Leo is the best looking of these 3, they don't even fans of Johnny, they saying he is a little bit strange but still go, just not in their type, but Pitt is just awful. Maybe it's a point of view due to location (Ukraine) but even I, who know some in PSL can't agree that Brad is the best looking through them all.
 
ArvidGustavsson

ArvidGustavsson

Women DO Approach
Joined
Jan 5, 2020
Posts
7,016
Reputation
7,270
Okay, you either just trolling or just a fanboy (avi proves) or both. I told you all about aging in previous reply + body not counts in psl, only in irl rating when you rated them in psl, so it's not an argument too + he definitely has the worst of all headshapes and it's just weird + he has almost the same hairline as Johnny and it's not an argument too as "...pull any hairstyle..." As we were talking about their prime, so Leo luckily chose the most suitable hairstyle for him and luckily BJs love this hairstyle, so it's not an argument, again. And Pitt had the worst phenotype of them 3 in their prime years. We were watching Fight Club with my JB gf and her 2 foids, all of them told that Brad isn't good looking at all, just weird, especially his disease-looking jaw and recessed chin which isn't suits to jaw at all. Honestly all of them think that Leo is the best looking of these 3, they don't even fans of Johnny, they saying he is a little bit strange but still go, just not in their type, but Pitt is just awful. Maybe it's a point of view due to location (Ukraine) but even I, who know some in PSL can't agree that Brad is the best looking through them all.
I used to have Depp as avi so no bias. If you woke up tommorow as a 16 year old, Either as Pitt, Depp or Dicaprio who would you choose? Yes Pitt of course. Leos head is too roundish and Depps is too cheekbone dominant while Pitt has the ideal rektangular headshape. Depps hairline is much higher and wider than Pitts more ethnic looking (perfect) hairline
FE555143-58C4-4097-B477-3AAD1626816C.jpeg
 
Y

Yungyphnx

Apprentice
Joined
Aug 19, 2019
Posts
291
Reputation
74
I used to have Depp as avi so no bias. If you woke up tommorow as a 16 year old, Either as Pitt, Depp or Dicaprio who would you choose? Yes Pitt of course. Leos head is too roundish and Depps is too cheekbone dominant while Pitt has the ideal rektangular headshape. Depps hairline is much higher and wider than Pitts more ethnic looking (perfect) hairline
View attachment 336287
I would choose to look like Leo due to most JB appeal and when u r 16y.o. it's ideal. Leo had heart shaped face when he was young and it's much more better, his cheekbones were prominent and jaw was slightly narrower to them and ofc his chin is much more better then Pitt's one which is recessed and as I told his face shape is one of the most weird of all I ever saw. Also Leo got better eyeshape which is more important. Pitt just not appealing to young girls and never was even in his young years, maybe he is good for 25+y.o. girls but then it's better to have Pitt's money then face as only young 8-10/10 girls interested in pretty faced boys when 25+ 8-10/10 girls would be much more interested in finances (check foids of Twitch :3)
 
ArvidGustavsson

ArvidGustavsson

Women DO Approach
Joined
Jan 5, 2020
Posts
7,016
Reputation
7,270
I would choose to look like Leo due to most JB appeal and when u r 16y.o. it's ideal. Leo had heart shaped face when he was young and it's much more better, his cheekbones were prominent and jaw was slightly narrower to them and ofc his chin is much more better then Pitt's one which is recessed and as I told his face shape is one of the most weird of all I ever saw. Also Leo got better eyeshape which is more important. Pitt just not appealing to young girls and never was even in his young years, maybe he is good for 25+y.o. girls but then it's better to have Pitt's money then face as only young 8-10/10 girls interested in pretty faced boys when 25+ 8-10/10 girls would be much more interested in finances (check foids of Twitch :3)
0A8A0C0A-D1E2-4760-B61B-BDCE9FE600B8.png
2C701CDC-3A74-4EA2-9CBB-1583B6AC1E3C.jpeg
Pitts side mogs Leo’s
 
dogeatsgrass

dogeatsgrass

Instructor
Joined
Mar 15, 2020
Posts
515
Reputation
683
I think Ajay Devgan is the best looking actor IMO.. He's underrated.

 
ArvidGustavsson

ArvidGustavsson

Women DO Approach
Joined
Jan 5, 2020
Posts
7,016
Reputation
7,270
Okay, now I got it, you are trolling, ok. Btw you looks good, you don't looks like a Pitt but u r great looking
That was the worst insult you could give me
@Yungyphnx i’m not trolling Pitt is better looking than those 2 also great looking pals but Pitt mogs
 
Last edited:
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
DianabolDownie Ratings 8
edgeso Ratings 0
LordGodcat Ratings 26

Viewing This Thread (Looksmaxers: 0, Bluepilled: 1)

Top