Deleted member 4612
mentally crippled by lonely teen years
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2020
- Posts
- 21,748
- Reputation
- 43,271
You're not incel because you're autistic.
You're not incel because you don't have confidence.
You're not incel because you're a misogynist.
And you're definitely not incel because you have bad luck.
You are incel because you are ugly.
Here's the truth:
If you were good-looking, the halo effect would cause your autistic mannerisms to be framed as quirky, eccentric, or cute. You would not be labeled a creep or a moron because of your autism. If you're neurotypical enough to use a computer and browse a web forum, your autism is not severe enough to be the main cause of your inceldom. Autistic people tend to be below-average looking, which explains perfectly why so few autistic men manage to find a partner.
If you were good-looking, you would not be stuck in an ego-sapping negative feedback loop. If you woke up the next morning looking like Jeremy Meeks, society would pluck you out of that loop immediately and give you the positive feedback needed to boost your confidence. You get constant negative feedback because you are viewed by society as unworthy of anything else. You are genetically inferior and sexually worthless.
If you were good-looking, whatever subtle cues you give off about your misogynistic attitudes would be either missed or framed as something not intrinsic to your character, i.e. fixable, due to the halo effect. Everyone has several social masks, and most people don't have the social intelligence to see entirely through them. Because you are ugly, your words and actions are always cast in a poor light, so people will look for reasons to hate you since your face tells them you should be hated. It's a form of cognitive bias that affects everyone. Even benign things you do or say that don't actually reflect poor character traits can and will be perceived as such. Attractive people have the opposite experience: their words and actions are always cast in a positive light, and the only time they're going to be viewed as awful people is when they're clearly and obviously awful people -- and even then, there's a market for good-looking awful people.
Although we're all subject to the vicissitudes of chance, it would take an extremely convoluted series of events to make an attractive person incel. Occam's Razor cuts through your superstitious cope like a saber through a block of jelly. What's more likely: that through your entire 16 or more years of life, you've so consistently rolled poorly in the game of fortune that you've had nothing but affirmation after affirmation of a nonexistent ugliness, or that your inability to enter the sexual marketplace is caused by a grossly subpar sexual market value, i.e. ugliness?
You're not incel because you don't have confidence.
You're not incel because you're a misogynist.
And you're definitely not incel because you have bad luck.
You are incel because you are ugly.
Here's the truth:
If you were good-looking, the halo effect would cause your autistic mannerisms to be framed as quirky, eccentric, or cute. You would not be labeled a creep or a moron because of your autism. If you're neurotypical enough to use a computer and browse a web forum, your autism is not severe enough to be the main cause of your inceldom. Autistic people tend to be below-average looking, which explains perfectly why so few autistic men manage to find a partner.
If you were good-looking, you would not be stuck in an ego-sapping negative feedback loop. If you woke up the next morning looking like Jeremy Meeks, society would pluck you out of that loop immediately and give you the positive feedback needed to boost your confidence. You get constant negative feedback because you are viewed by society as unworthy of anything else. You are genetically inferior and sexually worthless.
If you were good-looking, whatever subtle cues you give off about your misogynistic attitudes would be either missed or framed as something not intrinsic to your character, i.e. fixable, due to the halo effect. Everyone has several social masks, and most people don't have the social intelligence to see entirely through them. Because you are ugly, your words and actions are always cast in a poor light, so people will look for reasons to hate you since your face tells them you should be hated. It's a form of cognitive bias that affects everyone. Even benign things you do or say that don't actually reflect poor character traits can and will be perceived as such. Attractive people have the opposite experience: their words and actions are always cast in a positive light, and the only time they're going to be viewed as awful people is when they're clearly and obviously awful people -- and even then, there's a market for good-looking awful people.
Although we're all subject to the vicissitudes of chance, it would take an extremely convoluted series of events to make an attractive person incel. Occam's Razor cuts through your superstitious cope like a saber through a block of jelly. What's more likely: that through your entire 16 or more years of life, you've so consistently rolled poorly in the game of fortune that you've had nothing but affirmation after affirmation of a nonexistent ugliness, or that your inability to enter the sexual marketplace is caused by a grossly subpar sexual market value, i.e. ugliness?
