D
Deleted member 5189
Banned
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2020
- Posts
- 41,343
- Reputation
- 62,941
I was recently banned and had my thread about homophobia removed. The reason for my ban was the promotion of homosexuality and transsexualism. My opinion on my ban is irrelevant as I am not a moderator of the forum and quite frankly I do not present myself here to discuss my previous thread; I stand here today to discuss the rampant anti-intellectualism on this forum in respect to celebratory posts regarding my ban. I believe with utmost sincerity that my ban had nothing to do with supposed breaking of the rules, but stemmed from intellectual suppression under the guise of collective visceral hatred. There is clearly an ""establishment"" present on incels.is, my posts posed a peril to this invisible hierarchy, and thus I had to be done away with. There is a significant portion of this site who has distasteful ill feelings towards me so it was not arduous for the mods to adduce this as their justification for suspension. This is noisomely similar to media and tech oligarchs (or their technocratic henchmen) censoring speech they consider offensive and using the general populance dislike of un-liberal ideas as their vindication for doing so when there is clearly a political conflict of interest behind the scenes. This happens in every social information system on the planet and incels.is is no exception.
It's important to note the history of anti-intellectualism to know where it stems from. This post is too short to go over a history of every incidence of anti-intellectualism so I'll briefly go over some past examples and state my conclusion. I'll use the Nazis as a perfect example (inb4 I'm called a leftist Jewish shill, the Nazis were NOT our friends and were very Chad-centric, I'll make a thread on this later if I'm not banned). When the Nazis took power in Nazi Germany, the left had general control over academia, for good or bad depending on where you stand politically. Magnus Hirschfeld was a Jewish intellectual, advocate for transexualism and performed gender-changing operations on his students who requested one. I'm not looking for another ban so I will state clearly and explicitly I THINK THAT IS DISGUSTING AND I DO NOT SUPPORT IT. However it's important to note the National Socialists, upon taking power, used Magnus Hirschfeld and his sexual deviancy as a scapegoat to attack all intellectuals. The Nazis set an order to print papers explicitly stating exactly what he's been doing, and asked for these papers to be put up in every major city before rounding up any left-leaning professors as political prisoners. What's interesting is the posters outlining what this man did NEVER GOT PRINTED DUE TO AN ERROR IN THE PRINTING PRESS where these posters were supposed to be printed. Professors, intellectuals, and any professor who opposed the philosophy of Nordic Supremacy, National Socialism, or were merely critical of the parties strategic viewpoints, were imprisoned and the public was left without any justification at all for why this happened.
1587108939971.png1587108981002.png1587109023538.png
Can you guess what the public reaction was? Keep in mind this was a fuck-up by the Nazis. They raided these universities, instituted immediate book turnings of prized academic literature and shut down entire colleges demeaned as promoting liberalism or degeneracy WITHOUT distributing the propaganda posters stating why they were doing it. People at the time knew the Nazis were critical of higher-education but it still was unthinkable they would take such drastic action. DESPITE THE LACK OF JUSTIFICATION FROM THE NAZIS, THE PUBLIC CELEBRATED THE "INTELLECTUAL CLENSING" OF INTELLECTUALS, EVEN LOW-CLASS UNEDUCATED GERMANS WHO DIDN'T KNOW A MICK OF WHAT WHEN ON BEHIND THE GATES OF THESE IVORY TOWERS.
Soon after this event, the Nazis (and world political class) realized intellectuals were the easiest group of people to scapegoat, even easier than the Jews or Bourgeois. After-all, the Jews could appeal to innocence as a widely oppressed poor minority, and the bourgeois can claim they are the wealth and job creators and without them life would be worse; intellectuals had a much harder time justifying their existence. Regardless of if you think psychology, sociology, or the humanities are a waste of time or not, it's much harder to convince the general public that these are important for civilization maintenance than it is for a factory owner to convince his direct employees that he is needed for them to have jobs. Keep in mind what was stated here wasn't exclusive to Germany, this is a widespread sociological phenomena in every society with a non-religiously based intellectual class (intellectuals in ancient Egypt or medieval Europe for example were not despised as they were gatekeepers to heaven). Joseph Stalin noticed this about Germany and turned the Soviet propaganda machines against the Universities for more broad and unconditional support. Post 1935 Soviet propaganda was directed against intellectuals than the bourgoise (even though """bourgoise"""" capitalists still existed in the USSR until well into the 40s. The United States further seized on this unprecedented knowledge. In the 1950s the U.S government issued BOOK BURNINGS from European intellectuals, both under the influence of Senator McCarthy and from leftist government bureaucrats who deemed the academic literature ("dangerously undemocratic). The public supported this, and even moderate leftists generally supported the McCarthy efforts until he turned his focus to Hollywood and the military.
Down Below IS AN AMERICAN BOOK BURNING SESSION
1587110299277.png1587110405462.png1587110465587.png1587110483865.png
*This is why the first thing Pol Pot did when he came to power is wipe out all the intellectuals. Not only were they a threat to his regime but they were a perfect scapegoat. He knew the public would support anti-intellectual oppression without any rationale needed. It got to the point where his regime would kill anyone with glasses because it meant they knew how to read. IMHO I believe the classic sterotype of intellectuals being UGLY is one reason why the public is so quick to turn on them. Had intellectuals been stereotypical good looking, public would not shift against them so easily
Personally I've always seen myself as a Galileo, but after spending some time on incels.is and seeing my ban I'm seeing myself more and more like Giordano Bruno. Giordano Bruno was an Italian philosopher and intellectual who defied the teachings of the church and argued for cosmic pluralism, heliocentricism, existential nihilism. He was expelled from every country he visited, hated by the unworthy masses, and eventually charged, convicted, and executed for heresy by the Roman Inquisition. He was tortured publicly, and then burned at the steak for arguing for things which we see as common sense today. This is how I feel after my incels.is ban. I feel like I'm merely suppressed by the powers that be for analyzing the blackpill with an academic mindset, while being ravaged by a willful majority who hate me merely for being an intellectual.
1587110902738.png1587110916976.png1587110952061.png
Why Are People Universally So Anti-Intellectual?
Asides from basic lookism and the fact that intellectuals are typically seen as unattractive and physically unfit, the answer is really quite simple. Intellectuals remind them of their own inferiority. When one stumbles upon one of my threads, realizes they are too impatient or too low-IQ to read, understand, and critically analyze and respond to my thread, they become angry. They become angry at themselves for being the intellectual dwarf they are, but they put the blame on me for bringing up the fact with my work. In all honesty I don't blame many of the low-IQ members of this forum for their beliefs. Incels spend all day feeling inferior, seeing Chads kissing Stacies, seeing normies live normie lives, being subtly shunned in every social interaction; they come to incels.is because they can be equals here and relate to other people with similar problems. When they see my threads discussing history, politics, philosophy, law, game theory, psychology, etc, they realize how much I as a fellow incel, someone of whom I am suppose to be their equal, IQ-mog them into oblivion. This site is meant to be a safespace for incels where no one can out-class them in any way. This is why we ban bragging. I must admit it hurts me the same way when I see another incel talk about how rich they are. I come from a lower middle class background, when I see incels, people I assume lived similar lives to me, have luxurious wealth privilege, it irritates me. It makes me feel even more inferior because I realize I am even lower than this individual who believes they are as low as one can be.
However, I still think intellectualism is important if we incels are to have any discussion at all. It is unfortunate that our very nature as humans makes us spiteful and resentful to those who are better, but we can not hold down this forum for the low-IQ users. If we want to search for truth, if we want to discover the very essence of the blackpill in its purest and undisturbed version, we need to be having these conversations. Posts like "[BLACKPILL] YOUR ONEITIS IS FUCKING CHAD DURING THIS LOCKDOWN" is absolute garbage that will contribute NOTHING to this forum. If we continue this pathway towards anti-intellectual tyranny, BlackPilPres will be the only one making threads longer than a sentence and they'll be nothing but subtle bluepills wrapped in cosmic nihilism and fallacious evolutionary arguments.
It's important to note the history of anti-intellectualism to know where it stems from. This post is too short to go over a history of every incidence of anti-intellectualism so I'll briefly go over some past examples and state my conclusion. I'll use the Nazis as a perfect example (inb4 I'm called a leftist Jewish shill, the Nazis were NOT our friends and were very Chad-centric, I'll make a thread on this later if I'm not banned). When the Nazis took power in Nazi Germany, the left had general control over academia, for good or bad depending on where you stand politically. Magnus Hirschfeld was a Jewish intellectual, advocate for transexualism and performed gender-changing operations on his students who requested one. I'm not looking for another ban so I will state clearly and explicitly I THINK THAT IS DISGUSTING AND I DO NOT SUPPORT IT. However it's important to note the National Socialists, upon taking power, used Magnus Hirschfeld and his sexual deviancy as a scapegoat to attack all intellectuals. The Nazis set an order to print papers explicitly stating exactly what he's been doing, and asked for these papers to be put up in every major city before rounding up any left-leaning professors as political prisoners. What's interesting is the posters outlining what this man did NEVER GOT PRINTED DUE TO AN ERROR IN THE PRINTING PRESS where these posters were supposed to be printed. Professors, intellectuals, and any professor who opposed the philosophy of Nordic Supremacy, National Socialism, or were merely critical of the parties strategic viewpoints, were imprisoned and the public was left without any justification at all for why this happened.
1587108939971.png1587108981002.png1587109023538.png
Can you guess what the public reaction was? Keep in mind this was a fuck-up by the Nazis. They raided these universities, instituted immediate book turnings of prized academic literature and shut down entire colleges demeaned as promoting liberalism or degeneracy WITHOUT distributing the propaganda posters stating why they were doing it. People at the time knew the Nazis were critical of higher-education but it still was unthinkable they would take such drastic action. DESPITE THE LACK OF JUSTIFICATION FROM THE NAZIS, THE PUBLIC CELEBRATED THE "INTELLECTUAL CLENSING" OF INTELLECTUALS, EVEN LOW-CLASS UNEDUCATED GERMANS WHO DIDN'T KNOW A MICK OF WHAT WHEN ON BEHIND THE GATES OF THESE IVORY TOWERS.
Soon after this event, the Nazis (and world political class) realized intellectuals were the easiest group of people to scapegoat, even easier than the Jews or Bourgeois. After-all, the Jews could appeal to innocence as a widely oppressed poor minority, and the bourgeois can claim they are the wealth and job creators and without them life would be worse; intellectuals had a much harder time justifying their existence. Regardless of if you think psychology, sociology, or the humanities are a waste of time or not, it's much harder to convince the general public that these are important for civilization maintenance than it is for a factory owner to convince his direct employees that he is needed for them to have jobs. Keep in mind what was stated here wasn't exclusive to Germany, this is a widespread sociological phenomena in every society with a non-religiously based intellectual class (intellectuals in ancient Egypt or medieval Europe for example were not despised as they were gatekeepers to heaven). Joseph Stalin noticed this about Germany and turned the Soviet propaganda machines against the Universities for more broad and unconditional support. Post 1935 Soviet propaganda was directed against intellectuals than the bourgoise (even though """bourgoise"""" capitalists still existed in the USSR until well into the 40s. The United States further seized on this unprecedented knowledge. In the 1950s the U.S government issued BOOK BURNINGS from European intellectuals, both under the influence of Senator McCarthy and from leftist government bureaucrats who deemed the academic literature ("dangerously undemocratic). The public supported this, and even moderate leftists generally supported the McCarthy efforts until he turned his focus to Hollywood and the military.
Down Below IS AN AMERICAN BOOK BURNING SESSION
1587110299277.png1587110405462.png1587110465587.png1587110483865.png
*This is why the first thing Pol Pot did when he came to power is wipe out all the intellectuals. Not only were they a threat to his regime but they were a perfect scapegoat. He knew the public would support anti-intellectual oppression without any rationale needed. It got to the point where his regime would kill anyone with glasses because it meant they knew how to read. IMHO I believe the classic sterotype of intellectuals being UGLY is one reason why the public is so quick to turn on them. Had intellectuals been stereotypical good looking, public would not shift against them so easily
Personally I've always seen myself as a Galileo, but after spending some time on incels.is and seeing my ban I'm seeing myself more and more like Giordano Bruno. Giordano Bruno was an Italian philosopher and intellectual who defied the teachings of the church and argued for cosmic pluralism, heliocentricism, existential nihilism. He was expelled from every country he visited, hated by the unworthy masses, and eventually charged, convicted, and executed for heresy by the Roman Inquisition. He was tortured publicly, and then burned at the steak for arguing for things which we see as common sense today. This is how I feel after my incels.is ban. I feel like I'm merely suppressed by the powers that be for analyzing the blackpill with an academic mindset, while being ravaged by a willful majority who hate me merely for being an intellectual.
1587110902738.png1587110916976.png1587110952061.png
Why Are People Universally So Anti-Intellectual?
Asides from basic lookism and the fact that intellectuals are typically seen as unattractive and physically unfit, the answer is really quite simple. Intellectuals remind them of their own inferiority. When one stumbles upon one of my threads, realizes they are too impatient or too low-IQ to read, understand, and critically analyze and respond to my thread, they become angry. They become angry at themselves for being the intellectual dwarf they are, but they put the blame on me for bringing up the fact with my work. In all honesty I don't blame many of the low-IQ members of this forum for their beliefs. Incels spend all day feeling inferior, seeing Chads kissing Stacies, seeing normies live normie lives, being subtly shunned in every social interaction; they come to incels.is because they can be equals here and relate to other people with similar problems. When they see my threads discussing history, politics, philosophy, law, game theory, psychology, etc, they realize how much I as a fellow incel, someone of whom I am suppose to be their equal, IQ-mog them into oblivion. This site is meant to be a safespace for incels where no one can out-class them in any way. This is why we ban bragging. I must admit it hurts me the same way when I see another incel talk about how rich they are. I come from a lower middle class background, when I see incels, people I assume lived similar lives to me, have luxurious wealth privilege, it irritates me. It makes me feel even more inferior because I realize I am even lower than this individual who believes they are as low as one can be.
However, I still think intellectualism is important if we incels are to have any discussion at all. It is unfortunate that our very nature as humans makes us spiteful and resentful to those who are better, but we can not hold down this forum for the low-IQ users. If we want to search for truth, if we want to discover the very essence of the blackpill in its purest and undisturbed version, we need to be having these conversations. Posts like "[BLACKPILL] YOUR ONEITIS IS FUCKING CHAD DURING THIS LOCKDOWN" is absolute garbage that will contribute NOTHING to this forum. If we continue this pathway towards anti-intellectual tyranny, BlackPilPres will be the only one making threads longer than a sentence and they'll be nothing but subtle bluepills wrapped in cosmic nihilism and fallacious evolutionary arguments.
