disillusioned
Kraken
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2019
- Posts
- 9,694
- Reputation
- 28,234
One of the biggest bluepills ever that I frequently see so called "redpilled" people say, is that the female orgasm is pointless and just an evolutionary leftover. This is utter bullshit and a cope. Not only is the female orgasm stronger (and it can last 2-3x as long), but they don't even have to cool down afterward, and can just keep pleasuring themselves to get more of them. I've read reddit threads where women speak of having as many as 4-6 orgasms per masturbation season. Imagine being able to cum 4-6 times in a row during your jerk off season. Just fucking lol if you think sex is equally good for men and women.
And on the contrary to what most people think, there are strong evolutionary reasons for this. Consider the fact that if most males don't get laid, nothing of value is lost, because some other dude can just impregnate the woman anyway. However, if a female doesn't care for fucking it means no baby is produced, which is terrible for the survival of the species. It therefore makes perfect sense, that nature would create incentives for the women to breed, by making sex feel 10x better for them compared to the males. Meaning, women actually have a higher sex drive than males. The only reason for the myth of women having lower sex drive exists, is because normie males needed some bullshit bluepill explanation for why most women don't want to sleep with them (the real reason being they are only turned on by chad).
Furthermore, if you look at other primate species then you would see its common for multiple males to fuck the same female. Their sperm then battles for dominance once inside. This however can't happen if the female just loses interest in mating after having cum once. So it makes sense that they can cum multible times, because it means they will still be horny once the other males fuck them. Women literally evolved to be gangbanged.
Jfl at this world there is no upside to being a man.
EDIT: Also, the fact that men have higher testosterone to increase libido could just be nature trying to compensate for the fact that they might not be willing to pursue sex otherwise for the sake of the pleasure only.
And on the contrary to what most people think, there are strong evolutionary reasons for this. Consider the fact that if most males don't get laid, nothing of value is lost, because some other dude can just impregnate the woman anyway. However, if a female doesn't care for fucking it means no baby is produced, which is terrible for the survival of the species. It therefore makes perfect sense, that nature would create incentives for the women to breed, by making sex feel 10x better for them compared to the males. Meaning, women actually have a higher sex drive than males. The only reason for the myth of women having lower sex drive exists, is because normie males needed some bullshit bluepill explanation for why most women don't want to sleep with them (the real reason being they are only turned on by chad).
Furthermore, if you look at other primate species then you would see its common for multiple males to fuck the same female. Their sperm then battles for dominance once inside. This however can't happen if the female just loses interest in mating after having cum once. So it makes sense that they can cum multible times, because it means they will still be horny once the other males fuck them. Women literally evolved to be gangbanged.
Jfl at this world there is no upside to being a man.
EDIT: Also, the fact that men have higher testosterone to increase libido could just be nature trying to compensate for the fact that they might not be willing to pursue sex otherwise for the sake of the pleasure only.
Last edited:
