What was gigachad shoulder width in 60s is plain average today

G

Grinder

Skullcel
Joined
Oct 31, 2018
Posts
126
Reputation
96
75905
75906

These are two US army anthroprometric (body measurement) studies. One is conducted in 1966, the other in 2012. This basically shows that what was once a decent 50th percentile shoulder width is now considered a 3rd percentile subhuman framelet. Meanwhile a 99th percentile gigachad frame in 1966 is plain average in 2012. It's really over for sub 20 inch framecels. Soon 24 inch shoulders will be the norm. This really demonstrates the real importance of frame. This is literal proof of selective breeding done by femoids who choose the most masculine traits in men. If such amount selective breeding could take place in less 50 years then femoids must be really into frame (or perhaps frame only correlates with good masculine looks which they choose). And 2012 was fucking 7 years ago it has probably increased a lot. You can only imagine what It'll be in 15 years when the first generation born from the Tinder hypergamy grows up.
 
  • +1
Reactions: horizontallytall, Deleted member 5385, TheChosenChad and 2 others
Daily reminder to train your delts
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lumbersexual, The Dude Abides and middayshowers
Average is ~18.4 the infographic is wrong
 
This is US army only
 
  • +1
Reactions: The Dude Abides and Deleted member 656
This is US army only
Yeah obviously people in the army are going to have a significantly higher than average bideltoid and also bodybuilding as a hobby is far more prevalent than in the 60s
 
  • +1
Reactions: GenericChad1444, Deleted member 147 and Deleted member 470
Yeah obviously people in the army are going to have a significantly higher than average bideltoid and also bodybuilding as a hobby is far more prevalent than in the 60s
Yeh exactly

Also lol at that PFP
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 656
Yeah obviously people in the army are going to have a significantly higher than average bideltoid and also bodybuilding as a hobby is far more prevalent than in the 60s
This might have an effect on the averages but no way can these things change it THIS dramatically. Just look at the numbers Jesus Christ. It's insane how much it has changed.
 
  • +1
Reactions: randomguy1235 and Deleted member 656
This might have an effect on the averages but no way can these things change it THIS dramatically. Just look at the numbers Jesus Christ. It's insane how much it has changed.
It's one study, most still say ~18 as average. This is the one infographic getting spammed everywhere that disputes it.
 
19 inched shoulders checking in:feelsmega:
:feelswah::feelswhy:
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: TheChosenChad and Grinder
75928
75929

Alright I got another remarkable statistic which you just can't cope your way out of. This is how bizygomatic breadth (one of the most crucial chad traits) has changed in 50 years. Again what was once average is now the 10th percentile. You just can't deny this shit.
 
  • +1
Reactions: randomguy1235 and Deleted member 656
View attachment 75928View attachment 75929
Alright I got another remarkable statistic which you just can't cope your way out of. This is how bizygomatic breadth (one of the most crucial chad traits) has changed in 50 years. Again what was once average is now the 10th percentile. You just can't deny this shit.
Bizygomatic breadth is not important as long as not below average.
 
Bizygomatic breadth is not important as long as not below average.
Larger bizygomatic breadth simply correlates with masculine chad. Gl people seldom have a narrow face.
It's one study, most still say ~18 as average. This is the one infographic getting spammed everywhere that disputes it.
The studies that claim 18 include old manlets. The military one only includes young fit current generation men. That's why this is the most accurate one.
 
  • +1
Reactions: randomguy1235 and Deleted member 656
Larger bizygomatic breadth simply correlates with masculine chad. Gl people seldom have a narrow face.

This study likely includes old manlets. The military one only includes young fit current generation men. That's why this is the most accurate one.
Chico has a sub 14 cm bizygomatic
Nessman has a sub 14 cm bizygomatic
Ballou has a 14 cm bizygomatic

By your study David Gandy is average and he has both a wide IPD and large zygos.
 
Chico has a sub 14 cm bizygomatic
I honestly doubt that. He already looks high fwhr but I can only estimate what his actual measurements are
Gandy is certanl far above average in every measurement. There really is no chad without these traits.
 

Attachments

  • francisco-lachowski-1-640x456.jpg
    francisco-lachowski-1-640x456.jpg
    30.9 KB · Views: 34
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 656
I honestly doubt that. He already looks high fwhr but I can only estimate what his actual measurements are
Gandy is certanl far above average in every measurement. There really is no chad without these traits.
He's pretty much average in every regard. Average bizygomatic at pretty much 14 cm. Averagish IPD at 65 mm. Averageish nose at around 51 mm and a slightly shorter than average philtrum at 14 mm. Good midface ratio at ~1.0 though.
 
probably the fat on the shoulders since there is no way children have become higher T on average nowadays
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadelite and Deleted member 656
probably the fat on the shoulders since there is no way children have become higher T on average nowadays
True tbh higher obesity levels now + over 40% of men gymcel now to some degree vs 2% of men in the 60s.
 
  • +1
Reactions: randomguy1235 and FatJattMofo
Yeah obviously people in the army are going to have a significantly higher than average bideltoid and also bodybuilding as a hobby is far more prevalent than in the 60s

High IQ
This might have an effect on the averages but no way can these things change it THIS dramatically. Just look at the numbers Jesus Christ. It's insane how much it has changed.

Way more soldiers in the army use steroids now a days...
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 685 and Deleted member 656
View attachment 75905View attachment 75906
These are two US army anthroprometric (body measurement) studies. One is conducted in 1966, the other in 2012. This basically shows that what was once a decent 50th percentile shoulder width is now considered a 3rd percentile subhuman framelet. Meanwhile a 99th percentile gigachad frame in 1966 is plain average in 2012. It's really over for sub 20 inch framecels. Soon 24 inch shoulders will be the norm. This really demonstrates the real importance of frame. This is literal proof of selective breeding done by femoids who choose the most masculine traits in men. If such amount selective breeding could take place in less 50 years then femoids must be really into frame (or perhaps frame only correlates with good masculine looks which they choose). And 2012 was fucking 7 years ago it has probably increased a lot. You can only imagine what It'll be in 15 years when the first generation born from the Tinder hypergamy grows up.
Tinder must be abolished. So many people using it HOLY FUCK I HAVE NO FUCKING HOPE LEFT I JUST WANNA LDAR ALL Day
 
Fucking brutal, its all hgh in animal products no fuckin doubt
 

Similar threads

enchanted_elixir
Replies
93
Views
14K
One Rep Max
One Rep Max
AverageTevvezFan
Replies
240
Views
82K
Cinnamonzito
Cinnamonzito
Deleted member 13779
Replies
22
Views
6K
𝐀𝐬𝐬𝐲𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐖𝐚𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐨𝐫
𝐀𝐬𝐬𝐲𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐖𝐚𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐨𝐫
NeanderthalMax
Replies
25
Views
6K
Brazitard
B

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top