Why are hairy legs on girls disgusting?

[TsarTsar444]

Evolutionary speaking it doesn't make sense at all, its 100% natural and before farming societies every women had hair, it wasn't until the 19th century that it became common to be hairless everywhere. Is it social conditioning?

 

[tylerhunter97]

Because its a dimorphic trait,
1.males have more hair females have less
2.females that have less hair are likely to have higher E and less T = more fertile/feminine
our brains associate less hair with more fertility therefore lesser the hair the better
No amount of social conditioning will like us hairy legs, armpits on girls. Feminists have tried that for a good time and advocated it as beautiful:
didn't work, won't work

 

[Deleted member 6497]

Society construct .
Shit , i sounded like a blue haired feminist

 

[Deleted member 6341]

Hairy legs on girls are disgusting only if they don't have pretty faces.

 

[Deleted member 4209]

lack of dimorphism/shows she is lazy.

 

[System Restore]

lolipill

 

[Deleted member 6902]

Cuz they r

 

[Deleted member 5683]

lack of dimorphism/shows she is lazy.

I don't think laziness has anything to do with it

 

[Finalchad]

Its 100% conditioning. Society follows porn trends, so there is a male preferation though

 

[Ritalincel]

 

[Deleted member 3328]

I find any body hair on a girl (other than head hair) absolutely disgusting. I don't know why.

 

[Deleted member 4209]

I find any body hair on a girl (other than head hair) absolutely disgusting. I don't know why.

what about vagene hair

 

[Deleted member 3328]

what about vagene hair

not as bad as armpit hair but still bad

 

[Ritalincel]

what about vagene hair

 

[Deleted member 4209]

Spoiler

 

[rawdogprince]

ass peach fuzz is the worst

 

[Ritalincel]

Spoiler

 

[john2]

I just see it as a dimorphic and manly trait. Liking hair on a woman's legs is actually gay.

But you make a good point on how it's natural too. I'm very confused myself.