Why Men Tend to Overestimate Women's Romantic Interest

rickfoley

rickfoley

Iron
Joined
Jan 9, 2019
Posts
119
Reputation
129
Men believe women are more sexually interested in them than women actually are.


Research consistently shows that men believe women are more sexually interested in them than women actually are (Levesque et al., 2006; Perrilloux et al., 2012; Treat et al., 2015). Interestingly, women also believe men are less sexually interested in them than men actually are (Levesque et al. 2006; Perrilloux et al., 2012). Men’s inaccurate perception of women’s sexual interest may be a factor in sexual harassment (Perilloux et al., 2012), or even sexual aggression or coercion (Treat et al., 2015). Men’s tendency to overestimate women’s sexual interest may stem from three sources — women’s subtle signals of sexual interest; men’s emphasis on unreliable indicators of sexual interest; and the possibility that men have more to lose by underestimating rather than overestimating women’s sexual interest.

Subtle Signals

Many of the strategies that women use to signal their sexual interest in men are subtle and nonverbal, such as eye contact, eyebrow flashing, open body posture, and smiling (Moore, 2010). Although men are more likely to use overt strategies, such as initiating conversation, men often wait to receive women’s signals before "making their move" (Moore, 2010). Researchers posit that women use more subtle sexual signals because they may want to avoid a reputation for promiscuity, or because they may want more time to evaluate a man's quality as a potential mate or interest in them (Perrilloux et al., 2012). Similarly, women may underestimate their own interest in men due to concerns over sexual double standards (Levesque et al., 2006). Because women tend to use subtle cues to signal sexual interest, men who are more sensitive to these covert cues may have more successful dating outcomes (Moore, 2010).

Unreliable Indicators

While it is true that women may dress in sexier clothing (such as revealing more skin or wearing the color red) to signal sexual interest (Durante et al., 2008; Elliot et al., 2013), that signal may only be meant for attractive men (Elliot et al., 2013), or it may only be directed toward one man in particular. Therefore, clothing is not a reliable indicator of women's sexual interest in men in general. Furthermore, men also seem to use women’s physical attractiveness as an indicator of sexual interest, assuming that women who are more attractive are also more interested in sex (Levesque et al., 2006; Perrilloux et al., 2012; Treat et al., 2015). Women's physical attractiveness is unlikely to be related to their interest in men in general, and women who are very attractive may even be lessinterested in sex with most men. Men who have been trained to ignore signals, such as clothing and physical attractiveness, and focus on women’s emotional expression tend to more accurately perceive women’s sexual interest in laboratory experiments (Treat et al., 2015). This training was particularly effective for men with a higher risk of sexual aggression.

Costly Errors

Evolutionarily, for men, it may be more costly to miss a potential matingopportunity than it is to risk rejection due to the misperception of sexual interest. Men who misperceive women’s sexual interest may have had more successful mating opportunities and, thus, may have evolved the bias to overestimate women’s sexual interest (Perrilloux et al., 2012). In fact, researchers even predict that women’s physical attractiveness should be related to men’s misperception, because missing a mating opportunity with an attractive woman (and thus likely a fertile woman) would be more costly than missing an opportunity with a less attractive woman.

Because women also tend to underestimate men's sexual interest (Levesque et al., 2006; Perilloux et al., 2012), more research will be necessary to increase accuracy in the perception of sexual interest among heterosexual pairs. Future research may also reveal whether same-sex individuals more accurately perceive one another's sexual interest. Until then, it may be wise for men and women to be aware of their biases in the perception of sexual interest.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/...en-tend-overestimate-womens-romantic-interest
 
  • +1
Reactions: Limerencel, TucoTheUgly, Afrikancel and 2 others
Tldr anyone?
 
  • +1
Reactions: dogtown
i missed allot of opportunities aswell this way... freek it.
 
  • +1
Reactions: dogtown
what dat mean?
 
To long didn’t read
men overestimate women's signaling of sexual interest towards them
women do the opposite

so bassically the title lol
 
  • +1
Reactions: kobecel, Deleted member 656 and dogtown
TLDR
If the cashier smiled and said hi to me, it does not imply she wants to fuck my brains out.

Who would have guessed
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 245
tldr

Men delude themselves to think that they are GL enough.
 
  • +1
Reactions: dogtown and Phad
tldr

Men delude themselves to think that they are GL enough.


true

but they also say this is not a bad thing

(given you actually approach and not just write on some psl forum about the "IOS" u got today)
 
  • +1
Reactions: TucoTheUgly and bobs_pls
Also study says women dress nicely for attractive guys aka chadlites and above only
 
  • +1
Reactions: Schönling, Autist, TucoTheUgly and 2 others
Also study says women dress nicely for attractive guys aka chadlites and above only


basically the whole metoo / sexism discussion in a nutshell

1. women want to be treated like sluts

2. but only by chad not by subhumans

3. male subhumans are genetical programmed to think they are chads or at least somehow good looking, misinterpret everything as an IOI

this leads to misunderstanding and the whole sexual harassement stuff


actually boogles my mind how this big elephant in the room never gets adressed in this kind of discussions
 
  • +1
Reactions: TucoTheUgly and FatmanO
basically the whole metoo / sexism discussion in a nutshell

1. women want to be treated like sluts

2. but only by chad not by subhumans

3. male subhumans are genetical programmed to think they are chads or at least somehow good looking, misinterpret everything as an IOI

this leads to misunderstanding and the whole sexual harassement stuff


actually boogles my mind how this big elephant in the room never gets adressed in this kind of discussions
Can relate with nr 3 tbh
 
  • +1
Reactions: TucoTheUgly
Can relate with nr 3 tbh


from a evolutionary point this klnd of behavior is good for men and subhumans in particular

evolution and nature doesnt care about rejections, your hurt ego or self respect

all that matters is p in the v


its better to get rejected 99 times and score once then to get rejected 0 times but also to score 0 times


and this is the message you should take from this:

- be low inhib
- put your ego and self respect away


yes, if your average or subaverage looking (hell even a lot of good looking guys get rejected regulary) she probably dont want your dick even though you guys exchanged eye contacted for 0.00134 sec after you stared at her like an aspie for 30mins...

but it doesnt matter...you have to keep approaching...even though this might means rejection and a crushed ego

it might sound unfair but this is your fate, your destiny as a man.

your evolutionary programm

and in this context delusion about your own looks and the constant overestimation/overinterpretation of female interests is only beneficial


bluepill is power. and evolutionary advantage.

its a gift given by nature
 
  • +1
Reactions: TucoTheUgly
Only bluepilled men do this.

Blackpilled men know how direct women are towards Chads and that "subtle" signs of interest are cope.
 
  • +1
Reactions: dogtown and Deleted member 656
High IQ post tbh. I was just thinking about this
Only bluepilled men do this.

Blackpilled men know how direct women are towards Chads and that "subtle" signs of interest are cope.

But this is true ^

As a tyronelite women have literally grab my dick and body, grabbed my hand and forced me to grab their body, pin me against a wall,and I have nearly been raped.

Just imagine what chad gets
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 656
from a evolutionary point this klnd of behavior is good for men and subhumans in particular

evolution and nature doesnt care about rejections, your hurt ego or self respect

all that matters is p in the v


its better to get rejected 99 times and score once then to get rejected 0 times but also to score 0 times


and this is the message you should take from this:

- be low inhib
- put your ego and self respect away


yes, if your average or subaverage looking (hell even a lot of good looking guys get rejected regulary) she probably dont want your dick even though you guys exchanged eye contacted for 0.00134 sec after you stared at her like an aspie for 30mins...

but it doesnt matter...you have to keep approaching...even though this might means rejection and a crushed ego

it might sound unfair but this is your fate, your destiny as a man.

your evolutionary programm

and in this context delusion about your own looks and the constant overestimation/overinterpretation of female interests is only beneficial


bluepill is power. and evolutionary advantage.

its a gift given by nature
My biggest issue is actually asking girls thru instagram not irl. Ruins all chances
 
nice post paulus
 
It’s the hope that kills you.
 
only normies and women do this

blackpillers know its over

fuck off with your faggy studies
 
  • +1
Reactions: androidcel

Similar threads

can’t relate
Replies
11
Views
507
barettrealrx
barettrealrx
Baban
Replies
29
Views
4K
Allornothing
Allornothing
BucketCrab
Replies
59
Views
5K
BucketCrab
BucketCrab
D
Replies
49
Views
2K
EdgeLord69
EdgeLord69

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top