Blackpill Your height determines the size of your dating pool

Limerencel

Limerencel

No. 1 Looksmaxxer
Joined
Aug 11, 2018
Posts
731
Reputation
1,050
Time online
4d 20h 48m
Ecstasy

Ecstasy

Tripmaxxing is my cope
Joined
Aug 11, 2018
Posts
36
Reputation
41
Time online
8m
I thought I was 170 / 5'5 for a long time. Turns out I measured it wrong or something and I'm 178 / 5'8 in reality.

A fucking dream come true, but in the end nothing changed, I was incel before and after that.
 
  • +1
Reactions: lll
AmorFatis

AmorFatis

Amateur
Joined
Aug 11, 2018
Posts
352
Reputation
419
Time online
4d 3h 31m
That chart is bluepilled. It's assumes 6'6" men have the same size dating pool as 5'7" men.

In reality it increases linearly until 6'6" then stays at a high plateau. Anyone 6'6" will have 1000000x more potential dates than someone 5'7"
 
UBER

UBER

Livor Mortis
Joined
Aug 11, 2018
Posts
162
Reputation
190
Time online
0
I thought I was 170 / 5'5 for a long time. Turns out I measured it wrong or something and I'm 178 / 5'8 in reality.

A fucking dream come true, but in the end nothing changed, I was incel before and after that.
At least you won't be despised at 5'8 just ignored.tbhtbh
 
  • +1
Reactions: lll
AmorFatis

AmorFatis

Amateur
Joined
Aug 11, 2018
Posts
352
Reputation
419
Time online
4d 3h 31m
I thought I was 170 / 5'5 for a long time. Turns out I measured it wrong or something and I'm 178 / 5'8 in reality.

A fucking dream come true, but in the end nothing changed, I was incel before and after that.
How do you measure so wrong you lose 3"?
 
  • +1
Reactions: lll
UBER

UBER

Livor Mortis
Joined
Aug 11, 2018
Posts
162
Reputation
190
Time online
0
That chart is bluepilled. It's assumes 6'6" men have the same size dating pool as 5'7" men.

In reality it increases linearly until 6'6" then stays at a high plateau. Anyone 6'6" will have 1000000x more potential dates than someone 5'7"
Yup I noticed as well
 
  • +1
Reactions: lll
Ecstasy

Ecstasy

Tripmaxxing is my cope
Joined
Aug 11, 2018
Posts
36
Reputation
41
Time online
8m
How do you measure so wrong you lose 3"?
I have no idea. It was always the same measure tape and it said 169 - 172. I did that for years serveral times. Maybe I still grew a bit from 16-20.
At least you won't be despised at 5'8 just ignored.tbhtbh
I was once invited in the park and there was some Stacy lite alawys telling me she is a bit taller than me. such sui fiel. there was a chad smaller than me aswell and they didn't mog him. Never with normies again.
 
  • +1
Reactions: lll
Limerencel

Limerencel

No. 1 Looksmaxxer
Joined
Aug 11, 2018
Posts
731
Reputation
1,050
Time online
4d 20h 48m
That chart is bluepilled. It's assumes 6'6" men have the same size dating pool as 5'7" men.

In reality it increases linearly until 6'6" then stays at a high plateau. Anyone 6'6" will have 1000000x more potential dates than someone 5'7"
I agree. I haven't yet tried to find the original study/source.
But I suspect it might be very old, or their methodology was flawed.
Other than that it was a good chart.
 
  • +1
Reactions: lll
kantero

kantero

Amateur
Joined
Aug 11, 2018
Posts
348
Reputation
283
Time online
10h 31m
Taller = bigger choice, because girls are taller nowadays
 
  • +1
Reactions: lll
LifeIsNEET

LifeIsNEET

Trainee
Joined
Aug 11, 2018
Posts
62
Reputation
96
Time online
0
I wouldn't call the actual data or chart bluepilled unless the source directly stated that there was something that would imply bias. There are certain factors like there being less 6'7 men than 5'7 and women settling for someone under their preferred height that needs to be taken into consideration at the same time as the assumingly unbiased chart. Like we all know a slightly bigger man who looks exactly the same as a 6'0 10/10 chad would in most cases absolutely mog the statistically "Perfect" or "Ideal" chad.
 
  • +1
Reactions: lll
Michael B. Jordan

Michael B. Jordan

Trainee
Joined
Aug 11, 2018
Posts
45
Reputation
41
Time online
22h 58m
I thought I was 170 / 5'5 for a long time. Turns out I measured it wrong or something and I'm 178 / 5'8 in reality.

A fucking dream come true, but in the end nothing changed, I was incel before and after that.
178 is 5 foot 10
 
  • +1
Reactions: lll
Jockcel

Jockcel

Gymcel
Joined
Aug 11, 2018
Posts
47
Reputation
45
Time online
0
Holy shit there is a new heightpill everyday.
 
  • +1
Reactions: lll
Ecstasy

Ecstasy

Tripmaxxing is my cope
Joined
Aug 11, 2018
Posts
36
Reputation
41
Time online
8m
178 is 5 foot 10
I use google to convert cm in feet or inch and it always shows something that does not seem to match with what I read on hight-related sites. Let's just say I'm slightly below average for a germanic breed. Heightism is fucking real, but I also saw "men" a lot smaller than me with gfs. But they always were as small as them or even smaller and never above 6/10 looking.

fickhure.png
 
  • +1
Reactions: lll
Creep

Creep

Blackpill Scientist
Joined
Aug 11, 2018
Posts
117
Reputation
150
Time online
0
According to that chart being 5'9 is better than being 6'4. Total bullshit.
 
Nibba

Nibba

Using HGH at 6'4 Crew
Joined
Aug 11, 2018
Posts
16,496
Reputation
16,384
Time online
0
When looking at relationships height helps a lot: women want a big framed man to care for them and her/their offspring (if you're a beta provider this is even more so)
 
  • +1
Reactions: lll
Cancel

Cancel

Trainee
Joined
Aug 11, 2018
Posts
6
Reputation
6
Time online
0
Wow, if you're 5'6" then every little inch above that does wonders.

But I wonder where this was made? For example, if you're from the Netherlands, men there are apparently averaging 6' already.
 
  • +1
Reactions: lll
treedude

treedude

Grand Wizard
Joined
Aug 11, 2018
Posts
373
Reputation
413
Time online
0
I could have sworn 6'2 is the GOAT height.
 
  • +1
Reactions: lll
F

Facade

Banned
Joined
Aug 10, 2018
Posts
80
Reputation
143
Time online
0
I use google to convert cm in feet or inch and it always shows something that does not seem to match with what I read on hight-related sites. Let's just say I'm slightly below average for a germanic breed. Heightism is fucking real, but I also saw "men" a lot smaller than me with gfs. But they always were as small as them or even smaller and never above 6/10 looking.

View attachment 11
This unit is just ft and not ft + inches. People in America use ft + inches when they are referring to their height
 
Afrikancel

Afrikancel

Banned
Joined
Aug 11, 2018
Posts
2,415
Reputation
3,566
Time online
5d 22h 0m
Taller is always better
 
  • +1
Reactions: lll
Limerencel

Limerencel

No. 1 Looksmaxxer
Joined
Aug 11, 2018
Posts
731
Reputation
1,050
Time online
4d 20h 48m
I could have sworn 6'2 is the GOAT height.
You're likely right. I suspect this data was gathered a long time ago, possibly even in the 80s or 90s. Or maybe from a shorter country.
 
  • +1
Reactions: lll
Scarred

Scarred

Trainee
Joined
Aug 12, 2018
Posts
34
Reputation
36
Time online
1h 12m
6'2 master race checking in. You don't have to be a freak to be attractive, although Fisherian Runaway allows giants to find success at times
 
  • +1
Reactions: lll
GAY

GAY

Adept
Joined
Aug 11, 2018
Posts
146
Reputation
132
Time online
0
I was about to become happy as a manlet, but then I realized that it was female one and not male one
 
  • +1
Reactions: lll
T

TellemT

Trainee
Joined
Aug 16, 2018
Posts
5
Reputation
6
Time online
0
Taller is better has to be supplied with good frame
 
  • +1
Reactions: lll
Intel.Imperitive

Intel.Imperitive

[-={Imperitor of Intel《♡》Slayer Crew/Roidcel}=-]
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Posts
2,208
Reputation
2,215
Time online
6m
I'm 17, and 6' 1". Might grow to 6'2" with my steroids causr they made me grow a cm last time idk. Either way, im totally happy at 6'2".

I wouldnt want to be taller than 6'2" no matter how many of you say its ideal to be 6'6". I just dont think thats the case. Surely, as with everything in life, there is an inevitable point of diminishing returns. If my experience comes to light, that point is around 6'2" to 6'3" max. Most women dont want a 6'6"-7'0" tall man, they just dont.

Having said that, the extremities on the taller side of the spectrum seem to far better than the extremities on the shorter side on the spectrum, despite both extremities having the same magnitude of difference from the ideal height.

Set 6'1" to ideal height. (Even if debatable)
Taller Extremity = +5 inches (6' 6")
Shorter Extremity = -5 inches (5'8").

- Its safe to say women prefer the 6'6" man over the 5"8" man.
- Taller > Short, but its more complicated than a y=mx+c straight correlation.

Somebody better fucking say "Hi IQ post".
 
  • +1
Reactions: lll
treedude

treedude

Grand Wizard
Joined
Aug 11, 2018
Posts
373
Reputation
413
Time online
0
Just be confident brahs
 
  • +1
Reactions: lll
Z

Zielony4

Trainee
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Posts
9
Reputation
10
Time online
0
I'm 17, and 6' 1". Might grow to 6'2" with my steroids causr they made me grow a cm last time idk. Either way, im totally happy at 6'2".

I wouldnt want to be taller than 6'2" no matter how many of you say its ideal to be 6'6". I just dont think thats the case. Surely, as with everything in life, there is an inevitable point of diminishing returns. If my experience comes to light, that point is around 6'2" to 6'3" max. Most women dont want a 6'6"-7'0" tall man, they just dont.

Having said that, the extremities on the taller side of the spectrum seem to far better than the extremities on the shorter side on the spectrum, despite both extremities having the same magnitude of difference from the ideal height.

Set 6'1" to ideal height. (Even if debatable)
Taller Extremity = +5 inches (6' 6")
Shorter Extremity = -5 inches (5'8").

- Its safe to say women prefer the 6'6" man over the 5"8" man.
- Taller > Short, but its more complicated than a y=mx+c straight correlation.

Somebody better fucking say "Hi IQ post".
Damn, it's over for highIQcels.
 
  • +1
Reactions: lll
You local thot

You local thot

Trainee
Joined
Aug 16, 2018
Posts
20
Reputation
22
Time online
0
I thought I was 170 / 5'5 for a long time. Turns out I measured it wrong or something and I'm 178 / 5'8 in reality.

A fucking dream come true, but in the end nothing changed, I was incel before and after that.
Lmao I was the opposite, thought I was 5'10 forever, found out i 5'8 like last month.
 
  • +1
Reactions: lll
C

Calvin Cunanan

Trainee
Joined
Aug 16, 2018
Posts
37
Reputation
20
Time online
0
I thought I was 170 / 5'5 for a long time. Turns out I measured it wrong or something and I'm 178 / 5'8 in reality.

A fucking dream come true, but in the end nothing changed, I was incel before and after that.
178cm is not 5'8 bro, its 5'10, which is an inch over average.
That chart is bluepilled. It's assumes 6'6" men have the same size dating pool as 5'7" men.

In reality it increases linearly until 6'6" then stays at a high plateau. Anyone 6'6" will have 1000000x more potential dates than someone 5'7"
Never under estimate the crucial importance of face, its more important and powerful than height. A 5'7 guy with a 9/10 face will have miles more success than a 6'6 guy with a 5/10 face, remember that because its reality. Yes height does help massively, but no amount of height can save a 2/10 face incel, even if he is 6'8, unless he comes across a foid that specifically has a fetish for height above all else on her list of requirements. FACE= KING!
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: lll
Barry

Barry

Apprentice
Joined
Aug 13, 2018
Posts
226
Reputation
404
Time online
3d 11h 45m
Is this study self reported? Because guys fucking lie about their height. I am 5'9 and i get guys who are shorter than me telling me to my face they're 6ft.
 
  • +1
Reactions: lll
T

tc01

Trainee
Joined
Aug 18, 2018
Posts
3
Reputation
5
Time online
0
Im 6"6 and no one has ever told me im too tall this is retarded. Women may say they dont want men over 6"3, for example on suveys but in reality they like height up until its extreme, e.g. 6"10+
That chart is bluepilled. It's assumes 6'6" men have the same size dating pool as 5'7" men.

In reality it increases linearly until 6'6" then stays at a high plateau. Anyone 6'6" will have 1000000x more potential dates than someone 5'7"
I am 6"6 and this is true, and its even true for anyone up to 6"3 or certain. For example, If I was standing next to my identical twin who was 3 inches shorter no girl would pick him.
I'm 17, and 6' 1". Might grow to 6'2" with my steroids causr they made me grow a cm last time idk. Either way, im totally happy at 6'2".

I wouldnt want to be taller than 6'2" no matter how many of you say its ideal to be 6'6". I just dont think thats the case. Surely, as with everything in life, there is an inevitable point of diminishing returns. If my experience comes to light, that point is around 6'2" to 6'3" max. Most women dont want a 6'6"-7'0" tall man, they just dont.

Having said that, the extremities on the taller side of the spectrum seem to far better than the extremities on the shorter side on the spectrum, despite both extremities having the same magnitude of difference from the ideal height.

Set 6'1" to ideal height. (Even if debatable)
Taller Extremity = +5 inches (6' 6")
Shorter Extremity = -5 inches (5'8").

- Its safe to say women prefer the 6'6" man over the 5"8" man.
- Taller > Short, but its more complicated than a y=mx+c straight correlation.

Somebody better fucking say "Hi IQ post".
I disagree unless we're talking for a husband
 
Intel.Imperitive

Intel.Imperitive

[-={Imperitor of Intel《♡》Slayer Crew/Roidcel}=-]
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Posts
2,208
Reputation
2,215
Time online
6m
Im 6"6 and no one has ever told me im too tall this is retarded. Women may say they dont want men over 6"3, for example on suveys but in reality they like height up until its extreme, e.g. 6"10+
Idk if thats completely true. Its just that perhaps they dont discriminate against being 6'6" or say anything at least. I mean, who tf insults someome who looms over them like a tower? But Nah, most women dont want a 6'10 guys. Most women would prefer if a guy wasnt over 6'4. Sure, being 6'6 is better than 5'6, but there is a point of diminishing returns. The ideal height is between 6'1, 6'2 & 6'3 are the ideal heights. Lets call it 6'2. (This is measurment without shoes obviously).
 
  • +1
Reactions: lll
T

tc01

Trainee
Joined
Aug 18, 2018
Posts
3
Reputation
5
Time online
0
Idk if thats completely true. Its just that perhaps they dont discriminate against being 6'6" or say anything at least. I mean, who tf insults someome who looms over them like a tower? But Nah, most women dont want a 6'10 guys. Most women would prefer if a guy wasnt over 6'4. Sure, being 6'6 is better than 5'6, but there is a point of diminishing returns. The ideal height is between 6'1, 6'2 & 6'3 are the ideal heights. Lets call it 6'2. (This is measurment without shoes obviously).
true at some point (id say 6"6-->) you are starting to get too tall
 
dontgoLAXb4UMAXx

dontgoLAXb4UMAXx

islandcel
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Posts
654
Reputation
629
Time online
3h 21m
So 6'0 has the best dating potential? Lol
 
  • +1
Reactions: lll
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
W Why Body And Height Matters More Than Face IRL Looksmaxing 5
W Best height boosting insoles? Looksmaxing 0
6 Discussion Maximum height for majority appeal Looksmaxing 26

Similar threads

Viewing This Thread (Looksmaxers: 0, Bluepilled: 1)

Top