Youㅤ
seriousmaxxing , only talk serious
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2023
- Posts
- 3,722
- Reputation
- 4,450
the so-called scientists just test the same thing over and over again , focus on the already established pathways like mTOR and IGF-1 , test muh caloric restriction and muh CR mimetics over and over and over and over and over just for marginal results .
what is the point ? we dont need a new CR study , a new rapamycin study . we need to look for new things , new compounds , or more complex combinations of existing interventions , or more intricate methods .
id like more studies on methylene blue , id like more studies on deuterated molecules
but noooo , muuuhhhhh caloric restriction . when at the same time they say its infeasible in humans , why test it ? at least test some new species , maybe u will get an unexpected realization if u do like a rabbit or a hamster or some completely different animal instead of a fucking mouse each time !
theyve been doing CR studies since early 1900's and a century later still are
methylene blue and deuterated PUFAs niggers !!!!
at least people like bill andrews trying to develop new compounds , based
what is the point ? we dont need a new CR study , a new rapamycin study . we need to look for new things , new compounds , or more complex combinations of existing interventions , or more intricate methods .
id like more studies on methylene blue , id like more studies on deuterated molecules
but noooo , muuuhhhhh caloric restriction . when at the same time they say its infeasible in humans , why test it ? at least test some new species , maybe u will get an unexpected realization if u do like a rabbit or a hamster or some completely different animal instead of a fucking mouse each time !
theyve been doing CR studies since early 1900's and a century later still are
methylene blue and deuterated PUFAs niggers !!!!
at least people like bill andrews trying to develop new compounds , based
