ImpressionableYouth
CWCVille Resident
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2020
- Posts
- 189
- Reputation
- 236
The last maxillofacial surgeon I had been closely working with to solve my Class III Malocclusion flat out refused the idea of distraction osteogenesis over bimax, due to the "possibility of imprecise results", so I've been contacting other surgeons from around my area and a few other states to see if I might get a different opinion from one of them.
To me, it just makes so much sense to move forward with DO over Bimax since the devices they install will slowly move the jaws forward, so you could get even more advancement unlike Bimax which really starts to become unstable after a certain point.
Let's not forget the horrific recovery process that happens after bimax, where you get your mouth wired shot, you're vomiting blood, liquid diet, and barely functioning for the next 6 weeks.
Meanwhile, Distraction Osteogenesis uses similar cuts to Bimax but has far less pain and swelling, shorter recovery time, people say it's about the same level of discomfort as tightening your braces, and it's an outpatient procedure, whereas with Bimax you HAVE to stay in the hospital after the surgery.
My question for you guys is: What could I do to help my case for Distraction Osteogenesis to improve my chances when I'm talking to maxillofacial surgeons? I really am trying to avoid bimax and just get DO for both upper jaw and mandible.
Bonus question: Are there any doctors in the US that are actually open to Distraction Osteogenesis from the very beginning and don't need much convincing? Hope that there is.
To me, it just makes so much sense to move forward with DO over Bimax since the devices they install will slowly move the jaws forward, so you could get even more advancement unlike Bimax which really starts to become unstable after a certain point.
Let's not forget the horrific recovery process that happens after bimax, where you get your mouth wired shot, you're vomiting blood, liquid diet, and barely functioning for the next 6 weeks.
Meanwhile, Distraction Osteogenesis uses similar cuts to Bimax but has far less pain and swelling, shorter recovery time, people say it's about the same level of discomfort as tightening your braces, and it's an outpatient procedure, whereas with Bimax you HAVE to stay in the hospital after the surgery.
My question for you guys is: What could I do to help my case for Distraction Osteogenesis to improve my chances when I'm talking to maxillofacial surgeons? I really am trying to avoid bimax and just get DO for both upper jaw and mandible.
Bonus question: Are there any doctors in the US that are actually open to Distraction Osteogenesis from the very beginning and don't need much convincing? Hope that there is.