do u need cal surplus for to hypertrophy massaters?

appealmaxed

appealmaxed

do something good for the community
Joined
Jan 11, 2024
Posts
2,438
Reputation
2,528
or will they grow without it cos they are small relative to other mauscles
 
or will they grow without it cos they are small relative to other mauscles
You need caloric and nutritional (protein) surplus as with any bodybuilding

This is why you see body builders with insanely huge masseters (maybe they just roidmaxx)
 
You need caloric and nutritional (protein) surplus as with any bodybuilding

This is why you see body builders with insanely huge masseters (maybe they just roidmaxx)
yeah but in saying considering how small the muscle it relative to the rest of the body is it not needed? for whole body it needs only like 100-200 surplus.
massater is tiny compared
 
yeah but in saying considering how small the muscle it relative to the rest of the body is it not needed? for whole body it needs only like 100-200 surplus.
massater is tiny compared
it’s true, also why you should prioritize chewing over diet if you’re trying to grow it

But if you’re already lifting and in a surplus you will see faster and more noticeable results
 
  • +1
Reactions: appealmaxed
it’s true, also why you should prioritize chewing over diet if you’re trying to grow it

But if you’re already lifting and in a surplus you will see faster and more noticeable results
leanmax + chewing
i’m on rad current so should grow any way even if i go an large deficit
 
leanmax + chewing
i’m on rad current so should grow any way even if i go an large deficit
yes another good route to go, will become more defined with low BF regardless
 
  • +1
Reactions: appealmaxed
yes another good route to go, will become more defined with low BF regardless
think it will grow on rad + pretty large defect
 

Similar threads

Bonesbonesbonesbone
Replies
4
Views
212
Bonesbonesbonesbone
Bonesbonesbonesbone
Chinacurry
Replies
2
Views
45
Chinacurry
Chinacurry
try2beme
Replies
2
Views
62
try2beme
try2beme

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top