In the grand scale of human existence, is it unusual for a man to have not killed another man by the time he's 30?

[6ft4]

Was there enough tribal conflict throughout our history that would mean most men would kill another man in their lifetime?

I listened to a Chris Wson podcast where he siad that the psycopath gene has been weeded out of humanity over time thanks to language to help humans strategize better.
If there was a psycopath within a tribe who's behavior was a net negative to the tribe, other tribe members who were tired of his behavior would communicate with each other and decide if he was a burden then come up with a plan to kill him.

Perhaps in the modern environment, because we dont live in tribes anymore where we are forced to be around others all day, the psycopath gene may have few drawbacks in terms of getting killed.
Since people can now encounter thousands of people in their lifetimes rather than dunbars number of 200 (+other tribes you encounter in prehistoric times) there is effectivly a never ending choice of victims for psycopaths to target then keep it moving before their reputation can catch up to them
You may end up in jail for your behaviour but there is a good chance you'll reproduce and do net damage to the human species before the law is able to stop you, whereas in the past you'd get killed for a willingness to fuck people over a couple of times.

Is being a psycopath a trait with more benefits than drawbacks in the modern world?

Also do you believe that regular non cucked males feel there is something very wrong with them if they have neither began raising a family nor fought a man to the death by the time he is 30.
I can't help but feel the longer a man goes without any evidence of reproduction, the less he cares about it but the greater his urge becomes to fight another man to the death.

It's like the first goal is to have sex with foids, impregnation and having a foid beg for your protection is an afterthought.
If no foid begs for your protection you stop caring about foids and subconsciously believe your seed has been spread from fucking so your next innate desire is to fight to the death because that's what your body now yearns for because it was common practice among males for hundreds of thousands of years most likely

 

[thatrandomteen]

Was there enough tribal conflict throughout our history that would mean most men would kill another man in their lifetime?

View attachment 2759905

I listened to a Chris Wson podcast where he siad that the psycopath gene has been weeded out of humanity over time thanks to language to help humans strategize better.
If there was a psycopath within a tribe who's behavior was a net negative to the tribe, other tribe members who were tired of his behavior would communicate with each other and decide if he was a burden then come up with a plan to kill him.

View attachment 2759896

Perhaps in the modern environment, because we dont live in tribes anymore where we are forced to be around others all day, the psycopath gene may have few drawbacks in terms of getting killed.
Since people can now encounter thousands of people in their lifetimes rather than dunbars number of 200 (+other tribes you encounter in prehistoric times) there is effectivly a never ending choice of victims for psycopaths to target then keep it moving before their reputation can catch up to them
You may end up in jail for your behaviour but there is a good chance you'll reproduce and do net damage to the human species before the law is able to stop you, whereas in the past you'd get killed for a willingness to fuck people over a couple of times.

Is being a psycopath a trait with more benefits than drawbacks in the modern world?

Also do you believe that regular non cucked males feel there is something very wrong with them if they have neither began raising a family or fought a man to the death by the time he is 30.
I can't help but feel the longer a man goes without a evidence of reproduction, the less he cares about it but the greater his urge becomes to fight another man to the death.
It's like the first goal is to have sex with foids, impregnation and having a foid beg for your protection is an afterthought
If no foid begs for your protection you stop caring about foids and subconsciously believe your seed has been spread from fucking so your next innate desire is to fight to the death because that's what your body now yearns for because it was common practice among males for hundreds of thousands of years most likely

I aint reading all that you nigger

 

[BigBiceps]

No. Even in wars, not all or even most soldiers usually killed anyone unless it was some massacre. There were some highly efficient soldiers who killed often, and then there were those that just basicly tried to stay alive in the midst of the battle.

 

[radicalrationalist]

throughout history, most men have had to kill in self defense or in defense of their country, livelihood, or in the performance of their civic duty. it was completely normal. this has been made impossible by laws favoring criminal rights over those of the law abiding civilian, thus with the law having invalidated itself this way in the minds of millions, we're now coming to the brink of a long overdue bloodletting.

open mass violence is all but assured, it's just not sustainable for a society to host this many flagrantly parasitic subhumans. gun purchases are at an all time high. government has begun banning civilian militia training in the fear that it may be used against them. the economy is terrible with a global recession looming just ahead, all institutions have been taken been taken over by npc morons. when you have literally nothing worth preserving including your rapidly depreciating bank account, you have nothing to lose.

 

[santlima]

throughout history, most men have had to kill in self defense or in defense of their country, livelihood, or in the performance of their civic duty. it was completely normal. this has been made impossible by laws favoring criminal rights over those of the law abiding civilian, thus with the law having invalidated itself this way in the minds of millions, we're now coming to the brink of a long overdue bloodletting.

open mass violence is all but assured, it's just not sustainable for a society to host this many flagrantly parasitic subhumans. gun purchases are at an all time high. government has begun banning civilian militia training in the fear that it may be used against them. the economy is terrible with a global recession looming just ahead, all institutions have been taken been taken over by npc morons. when you have literally nothing worth preserving including your rapidly depreciating bank account, you have nothing to lose.

In this situation, only bitcoin can save your assets and a rifle

 

[researcher888]

both reproduction and warfare are essential imo

unfortunately modern war is gay