It's about time we change how we measure MIDFACE RATIO

thecel

thecel

narrow-orbits brachy-skull ogre
Joined
May 16, 2020
Posts
23,191
Reputation
47,983
Try to guess this model's midface ratio.

1610906258703


What do you think his midface ratio is? 1.0? 1.05? 1.1?

What if I told you it's actually 1.33. JFL



The current method we use to measure midface ratio (IPD divided by the distance from the pupils to the top of the lip) is flawed because it's affected by lip height.

@Shodredux made a thread 1 year and 1 day ago about a better way to measure FWHR (byzigomatic width divided by the distance from the top of the eyes to the middle of the lips):


The conventional way to measure fwhr is pretty dumb tbh. It has too many varying factors that affect the values such as size of the lips , height of the brows etc.

I agree with him. And I think midface ratio should be changed too.

Instead of measuring down to the top of the tip, the vertical component of midface ratio should be measured down to the middle of the lips.

When measured this way, the model's midface ratio is 0.99, which makes sense.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Love it
  • Hmm...
Reactions: uglyfuck, Blackgymmax, Deleted member 12344 and 13 others
what No pussy does to a nigga
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • WTF
Reactions: nayb, Manfrommars, Deleted member 27660 and 34 others
  • JFL
  • +1
  • WTF
Reactions: Manfrommars, AscendingHero, Yerico7 and 9 others
absolutely pathetic tbh
 
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
  • WTF
Reactions: thecel, oatmeal and Deleted member 685
  • +1
  • So Sad
  • Love it
Reactions: Toth's thot, thecel, 5'8manlet and 4 others
  • +1
Reactions: barettrealrx, Deleted member 14392, AscendingHero and 8 others
I like the measurement more in which you divide the distance of the pupils by the top to the nose tip
which should be the golden ratio. (this would cancel out the philtrum)

try it out with the model
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: thecel and Lux
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: thecel, Deleted member 9670 and St. Wristcel

youve reacted to the thread already btw
 
  • +1
Reactions: Toth's thot and thecel
Why don't you just use the eye to mouth angle instead?
https://forum.****************/threads/eye-to-mouth-angle-another-brutal-blackpill.1674/
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
It's about time that we repent of our sins and put faith in God
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel and Deleted member 2733
Why don't you just use the eye to mouth angle instead?
https://forum.****************/threads/eye-to-mouth-angle-another-brutal-blackpill.1674/
That’s just 2*arctan(midface_ratio/2)
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Lookologist003
Nice thick lips is aesthetic af
 
  • Love it
Reactions: thecel
Try to guess this model's midface ratio.

View attachment 933684

What do you think his midface ratio is? 1.0? 1.05? 1.1?

What if I told you it's actually 1.33. JFL



The current method we use to measure midface ratio (IPD divided by the distance from the pupils to the top of the lip) is flawed because it's affected by lip height.

@Shodredux made a thread 1 year and 1 day ago about a better way to measure FWHR (byzigomatic width divided by the distance from the top of the eyes to the middle of the lips):




I agree with him. And I think midface ratio should be changed too.

Instead of measuring down to the top of the tip, the vertical component of midface ratio should be measured down to the middle of the lips.

When measured this way, the model's midface ratio is 0.99, which makes sense.
bro tbh look at this.
The midface ratio is the distance from the midpoint of the pupils to the middle of the lips (sometimes to the top of the lips) divided by the interpupillary distance.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Toth's thot and thecel
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 14392, Deleted member 12344, Inscol and 2 others
bro tbh look at this.
That sentence from the wiki reminded me of @Shodredux's FWHR thread and inspired me to make this thread
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6723
Tbh the best way to measure midface is just measuring nose length
 
  • Woah
Reactions: thecel
thats not 1.33
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: thecel
Try to guess this model's midface ratio.

View attachment 933684

What do you think his midface ratio is? 1.0? 1.05? 1.1?

What if I told you it's actually 1.33. JFL



The current method we use to measure midface ratio (IPD divided by the distance from the pupils to the top of the lip) is flawed because it's affected by lip height.

@Shodredux made a thread 1 year and 1 day ago about a better way to measure FWHR (byzigomatic width divided by the distance from the top of the eyes to the middle of the lips):




I agree with him. And I think midface ratio should be changed too.

Instead of measuring down to the top of the tip, the vertical component of midface ratio should be measured down to the middle of the lips.

When measured this way, the model's midface ratio is 0.99, which makes sense.
Legit post tbh with this method we are actually measuring midface ratio, agree with fwhr too. Btw what is average midface in mms for this method ?
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
Try to guess this model's midface ratio.

View attachment 933684

What do you think his midface ratio is? 1.0? 1.05? 1.1?

What if I told you it's actually 1.33. JFL



The current method we use to measure midface ratio (IPD divided by the distance from the pupils to the top of the lip) is flawed because it's affected by lip height.

@Shodredux made a thread 1 year and 1 day ago about a better way to measure FWHR (byzigomatic width divided by the distance from the top of the eyes to the middle of the lips):




I agree with him. And I think midface ratio should be changed too.

Instead of measuring down to the top of the tip, the vertical component of midface ratio should be measured down to the middle of the lips.

When measured this way, the model's midface ratio is 0.99, which makes sense.
lower edge of the incisor could be accurate as well no ?
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel

Similar threads

chief detectiveman
Replies
8
Views
2K
bourgeoizyzz
bourgeoizyzz
the_nextDavidLaid
Replies
48
Views
3K
onlyhereforthehair
onlyhereforthehair
EnglandBadman
Replies
8
Views
805
sportsmogger
sportsmogger

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top