Males with gender dysphoria rated as more physically attractive

Crusile

Crusile

Chicowski
Joined
Dec 5, 2021
Posts
2,709
Reputation
2,533
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8435037/


On all five adjectives (attractive, beautiful, cute, handsome, and pretty), boys with gender identity disorder were judged to be more attractive than were the clinical control boys. Attractiveness correlated with extent of behavioral femininity in the clinical control group, but not in the group of boys with gender identity disorder.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Woah
Reactions: BucketCrab, thecel, poopoohead and 12 others
Show Ur face U semi-tranny :p
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: callisto, Deleted member 25938, MadTwatter and 2 others
Non gender dysphpric males are subhuman @thecel thece
 
gender dysphoria and bisexuality are aryan aristocratic traits
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: PoopyFaceTomatoNose, Deleted member 25995, Sexually Disabled and 8 others
maesthetic men should have a mix of feminine traits to raise approachability and lower the intimidation factor.
 
  • +1
Reactions: incel194012940, Deleted member 25995, thecel and 6 others
Not surprising, estrogen is the ingredient for beauty. They probably have some hormonal imbalance that started in the womb, probably from the phytoestrogens the elites are putting in food and women pissing their birth control into the water supply.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Woah
Reactions: PoopyFaceTomatoNose, thecel, ascension and 3 others
.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Crusile
body dysmorphia is evolutionarily successful trait intersexually
 
  • +1
Reactions: PoopyFaceTomatoNose, Sanguinius and Crusile
Its legit rare and difficult to be fully straight and good looking. Good looking males get approached and seduced by men at a frequency dependent on attractiveness and biological homosexuality makes you slightly better looking
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 25938, Deleted member 5815 and thereallegend
maesthetic men should have a mix of feminine traits to raise approachability and lower the intimidation factor.
Dude ur too active here
 
Biologically triggered Homosexuality and HSTS is statistical noise and selective evolution is not real, but they do have high fertility rates in non-modern societies because of superior social skills and looks
 
  • +1
Reactions: incel194012940
Biologically triggered Homosexuality and HSTS is statistical noise and selective evolution is not real, but they do have high fertility rates in non-modern societies because of superior social skills and looks
More than 10% of the us is lgbtqia, its not statistical noise at all. how they would have high fertility rate LOL? And wtf looks and skills has to do with one sexual preference
 
  • +1
Reactions: Magnum Opus
More than 10% of the us is lgbtqia, its not statistical noise at all. how they would have high fertility rate LOL? And wtf looks and skills has to do with one sexual preference
im referring to "biologically triggered" (exclusive) homosexuality that can be detected and predicted at a young age, the "biological trigger" is nothing specific, just statistical noise regular to humans.

Sexuality isnt a specific identity. Being bisexual is default human sexuality https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/...-many-heterosexual-women-not-totally-straight

The more looks you have, the more likely you're to develop homosexual attraction through:
1. getting approached by men, frequency and attractiveness level of those men are dependent on your looks

2. getting seduced at a young age (10%-20% of the population)

3. self attraction (you need to be attractive to be attracted to oneself)

4. autoandrophilia(bodybuilding), this is not necessarily homosexual. autoandrophilia and auto gynephilia are their own sexualities

You can selection bias ugly people and I can reverse selection bias male models, overall looks make you homosexual theres no way around it. Non homosexuals are subhuman with low looks
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: incel194012940
If you were good looking enough, you would be attracted to yourself. Whats good looking to you? If its a woman, then if you were a woman you would be attracted to urself, thus homosexual.

Looks = homosexual: proven
 
im referring to "biologically triggered" (exclusive) homosexuality that can be detected and predicted at a young age, the "biological trigger" is nothing specific, just statistical noise regular to humans.

Sexuality isnt a specific identity. Being bisexual is default human sexuality https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/...-many-heterosexual-women-not-totally-straight

The more looks you have, the more likely you're to develop homosexual attraction through:
1. getting approached by men, frequency and attractiveness level of those men are dependent on your looks

2. getting seduced at a young age (10%-20% of the population)

3. self attraction (you need to be attractive to be attracted to oneself)

4. autoandrophilia(bodybuilding), this is not necessarily homosexual. autoandrophilia and auto gynephilia are their own sexualities

You can selection bias ugly people and I can reverse selection bias male models, overall looks make you homosexual theres no way around it. Non homosexuals are subhuman with low looks
u r gay, arent u
 
Its legit rare and difficult to be fully straight and good looking. Good looking males get approached and seduced by men at a frequency dependent on attractiveness and biological homosexuality makes you slightly better looking
Homosexuals are known pederast. They pass on their mental illness by inflicting trauma on underage boys. Homosexuals believe that some adult men are better looking than others. Homosexuals can also believe that some boys are more attractive than others.
Homosexuals can target attractive boys instead of unattractive ones to pass on their mental illness making homosexuals better looking than straights on average in the long run.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: BucketCrab
Does it matter they're rating them at eight years old?
 
  • Woah
Reactions: thecel
Not surprising, estrogen is the ingredient for beauty.

Very surprising you can be so retarded. High-T moggers are more attractive than low-T subhumans.
 
  • +1
Reactions: PoopyFaceTomatoNose, Deleted member 1901 and BucketCrab
gender dysphoria and bisexuality are aryan aristocratic traits
niggas will say anything for a positive rep ratio.
 
Not surprising, estrogen is the ingredient for beauty. They probably have some hormonal imbalance that started in the womb, probably from the phytoestrogens the elites are putting in food and women pissing their birth control into the water supply.
Can I just increase my E levels as a man in order to prevent DHT from nuking my hair?
 
Not surprising, estrogen is the ingredient for beauty.
Hormonal imbalances tend to look like shit. Both males and females need a certain balance of estrogen and testosterone. As a matter of fact, excess estrogen in women causes bloating and weight gain, and abnormally low testosterone in men causes round childish faces and overall unaesthetic features.

Its legit rare and difficult to be fully straight and good looking. Good looking males get approached and seduced by men at a frequency dependent on attractiveness and biological homosexuality makes you slightly better looking
I've been hit on, and even physically molested in clubs by gay men multiple times but that doesn't make me attracted to men in the slightest.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: PoopyFaceTomatoNose
Very surprising you can be so retarded. High-T moggers are more attractive than low-T subhumans.
This is what an extreme high-T specimen looks like.

62933073-11263321-image-m-11_1664467193762.jpg
 
I’ve read of a theory that boys become gay because they have a pretty face which causes society to treat them a certain way.

There may be reason to be skeptical of this theory, but it’s interesting nonetheless.
 

Similar threads

can’t relate
Replies
31
Views
1K
eduardkoopman
eduardkoopman
6"4 Tyrone(I'm not)
Replies
13
Views
758
Splinter901
Splinter901
9cel
Replies
7
Views
780
Xtra
Xtra
chief detectiveman
Replies
8
Views
3K
bourgeoizyzz
bourgeoizyzz
mogstars
Replies
79
Views
5K
halloweed
H

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top