My first facial analysis

whitegymmax

whitegymmax

Banned
Joined
Jun 3, 2023
Posts
7,560
Reputation
7,554
Travis Fimmel
Screenshot 20231127 1318592
eye spacing/ipd

not big falio, the ideal range is 0.44 to 0.47, he's only on the lower end masculine, 0.46 like Cavill or Pitt is more ideal
Screenshot 20231127 1319092
Midface ratio

a little longer than ideal, range of 0.93 to 1.01 is the male ideal, but it is not a big flaw, men have longer faces than women, probably the ipd influenced this measurement
Screenshot 20231127 1319152
Canthal tilt

Ideal, 5.2 to 7.6 is good in man, 8° is a good ratio
Screenshot 20231127 1319222
eye size ratio

3x1 wider than tall, extremely masculine, the ideal range would be between 2.8 to 3.5, overall he has very good eyes, not perfect, but he is in the model tier
Screenshot 20231127 1319272
Bizygo x Jaw ratio

your zygos correspond to 86% of the width of your jaw, perfectly ideal, neither too wide nor narrow, 84-89 is a good range
Screenshot 20231127 1319392
Jaw Frontal Angle

he scores the maximum score here, 92° is a perfect measurement, in the middle of the ideal range between 86 to 97, not too steep like Sean O'Aspie and not too cubic like Matt Lemond
Screenshot 20231127 1319302
face size ratio

it's a little outside the 1.30 to 1.36 range, but that's practically invisible to the naked eye, people won't notice if it's 0.1 off from ideal, I won't list it as a flaw, he just has a more compact face shape, but nothing crazy like Barrett who has 1.21
Screenshot 20231127 1319512
Proportions

one of his big flaws, his facial distribution is fucked up, his upper third swallows the other three, he doesn't fail to score well for that, but it's a flaw
Screenshot 20231127 1319362
FWHR

perfect measurement, above 1.88 is already an excellent measurement
Screenshot 20231127 1319422
Chin to Philtrum Ratio

Very good,is on the upper end, but still within the ideal range

Screenshot 20231127 1319452
Lips ratio

visibly he has great, full lips, I just measured for the sake of measuring, but I had in mind that it was ideal, 1.3x bigger than his upper lip, it's one of his strong points


Side Profile
Images   2023 11 27T135552462
It has a steep side profile, I started measuring it, but after seeing that it was recessed in the Frankfurt plane I was discouraged from continuing.

1757242 d91dd8c2b1c4302f190c41544aec7fb0
overall he has a very dysmorphic face, good collagen, good lips, good hairline and good coloring, he could have thicker eyebrows closer to the eyes, overall excellent dysmorphism


Harmony(Front=8.5 )
(Side=6.0)
Dysmorphism: 8
Coloring: 8
Features: 9
Overall=8.5
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: jagmogs1000, reptiles, Blackgymmax and 3 others
Is this you?
 
Travis Fimmel
View attachment 2575123
eye spacing/ipd

not big falio, the ideal range is 0.44 to 0.47, he's only on the lower end masculine, 0.46 like Cavill or Pitt is more ideal
View attachment 2575121
Midface ratio

a little longer than ideal, range of 0.93 to 1.01 is the male ideal, but it is not a big flaw, men have longer faces than women, probably the ipd influenced this measurement
View attachment 2575112
Canthal tilt

Ideal, 5.2 to 7.6 is good in man, 8° is a good ratio
View attachment 2575115
eye size ratio

3x1 wider than tall, extremely masculine, the ideal range would be between 2.8 to 3.5, overall he has very good eyes, not perfect, but he is in the model tier
View attachment 2575114
Bizygo x Jaw ratio

your zygos correspond to 86% of the width of your jaw, perfectly ideal, neither too wide nor narrow, 84-89 is a good range
View attachment 2575118
Jaw Frontal Angle

he scores the maximum score here, 92° is a perfect measurement, in the middle of the ideal range between 86 to 97, not too steep like Sean O'Aspie and not too cubic like Matt Lemond
View attachment 2575122
face size ratio

it's a little outside the 1.30 to 1.36 range, but that's practically invisible to the naked eye, people won't notice if it's 0.1 off from ideal, I won't list it as a flaw, he just has a more compact face shape, but nothing crazy like Barrett who has 1.21
View attachment 2575120
Proportions

one of his big flaws, his facial distribution is fucked up, his upper third swallows the other three, he doesn't fail to score well for that, but it's a flaw
View attachment 2575116
FWHR

perfect measurement, above 1.88 is already an excellent measurement
View attachment 2575117
Chin to Philtrum Ratio

Very good,is on the upper end, but still within the ideal range

View attachment 2575113
Lips ratio

visibly he has great, full lips, I just measured for the sake of measuring, but I had in mind that it was ideal, 1.3x bigger than his upper lip, it's one of his strong points


Side Profile
View attachment 2575172
It has a steep side profile, I started measuring it, but after seeing that it was recessed in the Frankfurt plane I was discouraged from continuing.

View attachment 2575175
overall he has a very dysmorphic face, good collagen, good lips, good hairline and good coloring, he could have thicker eyebrows closer to the eyes, overall excellent dysmorphism


Harmony(Front=8.5 )
(Side=6.0)
Dysmorphism: 8
Coloring: 8
Features: 9
Overall=8.5
I ratio mog him.
 
  • +1
Reactions: whitegymmax
How did u do it I wanna do it too
 
  • JFL
Reactions: LooksThinker
How did u do it I wanna do it too
you can do this on the computer, it's actually easy, it's just time consuming, it took me about 45 minutes to take all the measurements
 
  • +1
Reactions: wsada and LooksThinker
Try mogging this:
1.05:1 midface ratio
1.8+:1 FWHR
1.333:1 upper lip/lower lip
1.7:1 chin to philtrum 💀
0.9:1 jaw/zygos
0.9:1 forehead/zygos
1:3 eye size ratio
85degree front frontal jaw angle
eyebrow angle: 5degree
canthal tilt angle 5degree
eye spacing 0.48:1
face length 1.4:1
nose to lip length: 1.56:1
nose height/width: 1.41:1
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Lookologist003 and whitegymmax
Try mogging this:
1.05:1 midface ratio
1.8+:1 FWHR
1.333:1 upper lip/lower lip
1.7:1 chin to philtrum 💀
0.9:1 jaw/zygos
0.9:1 forehead/zygos
1:3 eye size ratio
85degree front frontal jaw angle
eyebrow angle: 5degree
canthal tilt angle 5degree
eye spacing 0.48:1
face length 1.4:1
nose to lip length: 1.56:1
nose height/width: 1.41:1
This ratios are model tier, if you have them I don't know what you are doing on this incel forum
 
  • Love it
  • JFL
Reactions: DelonLover1999 and LooksThinker
  • So Sad
Reactions: smoth and whitegymmax
i have bad chin to philtrum :feelsrope:
Brutalpill, O'Pry have 3.1 JFL, Sean has a higher harmony than the average man, but brutally mogged by Pitt in ratios, he saves himself because his redeeming features make him an 8+
 
  • +1
Reactions: LooksThinker
Brutalpill, O'Pry have 3.1 JFL, Sean has a higher harmony than the average man, but brutally mogged by Pitt in ratios, he saves himself because his redeeming features make him an 8+
I will have 2.0 chin to philtrum and 1.475:1 nose height/width after 1rhino
 
  • +1
Reactions: whitegymmax
your autism test has come back positive
 
  • JFL
Reactions: sub5outsider, It'snotover, smoth and 3 others
Try mogging this:
1.05:1 midface ratio
1.8+:1 FWHR
1.333:1 upper lip/lower lip
1.7:1 chin to philtrum 💀
0.9:1 jaw/zygos
0.9:1 forehead/zygos
1:3 eye size ratio
85degree front frontal jaw angle
eyebrow angle: 5degree
canthal tilt angle 5degree
eye spacing 0.48:1
face length 1.4:1
nose to lip length: 1.56:1
nose height/width: 1.41:1
bro used pink shit
 
Travis Fimmel
View attachment 2575123
eye spacing/ipd

not big falio, the ideal range is 0.44 to 0.47, he's only on the lower end masculine, 0.46 like Cavill or Pitt is more ideal
View attachment 2575121
Midface ratio

a little longer than ideal, range of 0.93 to 1.01 is the male ideal, but it is not a big flaw, men have longer faces than women, probably the ipd influenced this measurement
View attachment 2575112
Canthal tilt

Ideal, 5.2 to 7.6 is good in man, 8° is a good ratio
View attachment 2575115
eye size ratio

3x1 wider than tall, extremely masculine, the ideal range would be between 2.8 to 3.5, overall he has very good eyes, not perfect, but he is in the model tier
View attachment 2575114
Bizygo x Jaw ratio

your zygos correspond to 86% of the width of your jaw, perfectly ideal, neither too wide nor narrow, 84-89 is a good range
View attachment 2575118
Jaw Frontal Angle

he scores the maximum score here, 92° is a perfect measurement, in the middle of the ideal range between 86 to 97, not too steep like Sean O'Aspie and not too cubic like Matt Lemond
View attachment 2575122
face size ratio

it's a little outside the 1.30 to 1.36 range, but that's practically invisible to the naked eye, people won't notice if it's 0.1 off from ideal, I won't list it as a flaw, he just has a more compact face shape, but nothing crazy like Barrett who has 1.21
View attachment 2575120
Proportions

one of his big flaws, his facial distribution is fucked up, his upper third swallows the other three, he doesn't fail to score well for that, but it's a flaw
View attachment 2575116
FWHR

perfect measurement, above 1.88 is already an excellent measurement
View attachment 2575117
Chin to Philtrum Ratio

Very good,is on the upper end, but still within the ideal range

View attachment 2575113
Lips ratio

visibly he has great, full lips, I just measured for the sake of measuring, but I had in mind that it was ideal, 1.3x bigger than his upper lip, it's one of his strong points


Side Profile
View attachment 2575172
It has a steep side profile, I started measuring it, but after seeing that it was recessed in the Frankfurt plane I was discouraged from continuing.

View attachment 2575175
overall he has a very dysmorphic face, good collagen, good lips, good hairline and good coloring, he could have thicker eyebrows closer to the eyes, overall excellent dysmorphism


Harmony(Front=8.5 )
(Side=6.0)
Dysmorphism: 8
Coloring: 8
Features: 9
Overall=8.5
Good analysis. There are a few flames. I generally agree with the rating. 8.7/10
 
  • +1
Reactions: whitegymmax
Try mogging this:
1.05:1 midface ratio
1.8+:1 FWHR
1.333:1 upper lip/lower lip
1.7:1 chin to philtrum 💀
0.9:1 jaw/zygos
0.9:1 forehead/zygos
1:3 eye size ratio
85degree front frontal jaw angle
eyebrow angle: 5degree
canthal tilt angle 5degree
eye spacing 0.48:1
face length 1.4:1
nose to lip length: 1.56:1
nose height/width: 1.41:1
0.97 midface ratio
1.85 FWHR
1.5 upper lip/lower lip
2.1:1 chin to philtrum
0.91 jaw/zygos
? forehead/zygos
2.6 - 3.25 eye size ratio 💀
94 degree front frontal jaw angle
eyebrow angle: ?
canthal tilt angle 7-8 degree
eye spacing 0.42 💀
face length 1.4
nose to lip length: 1.35
nose height/width: 1.32
 
0.97 midface ratio
1.85 FWHR
1.5 upper lip/lower lip
2.1:1 chin to philtrum
0.91 jaw/zygos
? forehead/zygos
2.6 - 3.25 eye size ratio 💀
94 degree front frontal jaw angle
eyebrow angle: ?
canthal tilt angle 7-8 degree
eye spacing 0.42 💀
face length 1.4
nose to lip length: 1.35
nose height/width: 1.326
1.38 vs 0.97 is around tie or for you
1.85 vs 1.85 FWHR is tie
1.333 vs 1.5 is for you
1.7 vs 2.1 chin to philtrum is for you
0.90 vs 0.91 jaw/zygos is tie or for me
85 degree vs 94 degree jaw angle is for me
6degree vs 7.5 degree is for me
0.475 vs 0.42 eye spacing is for me
1.41 vs 1.35 is for me
1.43 vs 1.326 is for me
 
Analysis my subhuman genetic?
6E26575E 89A5 4792 B64A 1EFEEBB2775F
 
  • JFL
Reactions: coispet
1.38 vs 0.97 is around tie or for you
1.85 vs 1.85 FWHR is tie
1.333 vs 1.5 is for you
1.7 vs 2.1 chin to philtrum is for you
0.90 vs 0.91 jaw/zygos is tie or for me
85 degree vs 94 degree jaw angle is for me
6degree vs 7.5 degree is for me
0.475 vs 0.42 eye spacing is for me
1.41 vs 1.35 is for me
1.43 vs 1.326 is for me
I need to do my measurements now lol I suck at this
 
  • +1
Reactions: LooksThinker
Try mogging this:
1.05:1 midface ratio
1.8+:1 FWHR
1.333:1 upper lip/lower lip
1.7:1 chin to philtrum 💀
0.9:1 jaw/zygos
0.9:1 forehead/zygos
1:3 eye size ratio
85degree front frontal jaw angle
eyebrow angle: 5degree
canthal tilt angle 5degree
eye spacing 0.48:1
face length 1.4:1
nose to lip length: 1.56:1
nose height/width: 1.41:1
How do you measure that
 
what app did you use for this?
 
This ratios are model tier, if you have them I don't know what you are doing on this incel forum
Bro he has a low fwhr, dolphin eye spacing, feminine chin to philtrum, a steep jaw angle and a longer face shape

Not modelesque at all
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: whitegymmax
Nice
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: whitegymmax and reptiles
Travis Fimmel
View attachment 2575123
eye spacing/ipd

not big falio, the ideal range is 0.44 to 0.47, he's only on the lower end masculine, 0.46 like Cavill or Pitt is more ideal
View attachment 2575121
Midface ratio

a little longer than ideal, range of 0.93 to 1.01 is the male ideal, but it is not a big flaw, men have longer faces than women, probably the ipd influenced this measurement
View attachment 2575112
Canthal tilt

Ideal, 5.2 to 7.6 is good in man, 8° is a good ratio
View attachment 2575115
eye size ratio

3x1 wider than tall, extremely masculine, the ideal range would be between 2.8 to 3.5, overall he has very good eyes, not perfect, but he is in the model tier
View attachment 2575114
Bizygo x Jaw ratio

your zygos correspond to 86% of the width of your jaw, perfectly ideal, neither too wide nor narrow, 84-89 is a good range
View attachment 2575118
Jaw Frontal Angle

he scores the maximum score here, 92° is a perfect measurement, in the middle of the ideal range between 86 to 97, not too steep like Sean O'Aspie and not too cubic like Matt Lemond
View attachment 2575122
face size ratio

it's a little outside the 1.30 to 1.36 range, but that's practically invisible to the naked eye, people won't notice if it's 0.1 off from ideal, I won't list it as a flaw, he just has a more compact face shape, but nothing crazy like Barrett who has 1.21
View attachment 2575120
Proportions

one of his big flaws, his facial distribution is fucked up, his upper third swallows the other three, he doesn't fail to score well for that, but it's a flaw
View attachment 2575116
FWHR

perfect measurement, above 1.88 is already an excellent measurement
View attachment 2575117
Chin to Philtrum Ratio

Very good,is on the upper end, but still within the ideal range

View attachment 2575113
Lips ratio

visibly he has great, full lips, I just measured for the sake of measuring, but I had in mind that it was ideal, 1.3x bigger than his upper lip, it's one of his strong points


Side Profile
View attachment 2575172
It has a steep side profile, I started measuring it, but after seeing that it was recessed in the Frankfurt plane I was discouraged from continuing.

View attachment 2575175
overall he has a very dysmorphic face, good collagen, good lips, good hairline and good coloring, he could have thicker eyebrows closer to the eyes, overall excellent dysmorphism


Harmony(Front=8.5 )
(Side=6.0)
Dysmorphism: 8
Coloring: 8
Features: 9
Overall=8.5
good post brother
his side profile is surprisingly underwhelming
 
  • +1
Reactions: whitegymmax

Similar threads

smallman
Replies
7
Views
677
EGGY 1671u32g
EGGY 1671u32g
N
Replies
10
Views
485
newzealand
N
A
Replies
9
Views
176
Anth0ny
A
6'5 HTN
Replies
10
Views
479
negativetiltedheart
N
malvolio511
Replies
1
Views
561
BrahminBoss
BrahminBoss

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top