Race > Height > Face > Money (SCIENTIFIC PROOF)

[Deleted member 4612]

Man look at him. He’s a just a boneless pretty boy and if you go to any upper class area you’d see many like him.

He’s not special, but girls love that upper class white pretty boy pheno

"muh boneless"

stop coping. the ONLY THING THAT MATTERS IS WHAT GIRLS WANT.

this may come as a surprise, but I have a secret wish:

I wish all the rotters on this site rated me as 1/10 truecel and every girl thought I was hot.

Instead, it seems to be the reverse because of a bunch of delusional people or them trying to be "nice"

 

[Deleted member 5522]

Just get star fish sex and cucked by betabuxxing theory

 

[Deleted member 7076]

good looking will pay less
good looking = good looking

 

[johncruz12345]

A white girl wouldn't date a 7/10 ethnic, only a 9 or 10
7/10 ethnic mogs 7/10 white guy in the eyes of an ethnic girl
7/10 white guy mogs 7/10 ethnic in the eyes of a white girl

Cope bro.

 

[kej3094]

THIS A REPOST OF A HIGH IQ .CO THREAD, SERIOUSLY OVER FOR ETHNICS

https://incels.is/threads/scientifi...f-importance-is-race-height-face-money.59098/

Race > Height > Face > Money

Highlights:
- Being Asian costs you $247,000 extra per year compared to a white guy.
- Being 5'7" costs you $150,000 extra compared to a 5'11" guy, or $180,000 compared to a 6'2" guy.
- Being bottom 10% facially costs you $40,000 extra compared to an average guy or $186,000 compared to a top 10% guy.

1) Race

As noted, it costs an extra $247,000 for an Asian man to date a white girl. It costs an extra $154,000 for a black man to date a white girl.

On the other hand, white men can make up to $24,000 less to be considered equally attractive to Asian women. ie. Asian women will accept poor white men over average income Asians.

2) Height

At extremely low male height (eg. 5'0"), height becomes more important than even race, but for more moderate cases of shortness (eg. 5'6"), race is still more important. A 5'6" man must make an extra $175,000 to match a 5'11" guy.


3) Face

The maximum cost of facial ugliness is $186,000, and that's for a bottom 10% guy to match a top 10% guy. ie. To bring the ugliest 10% of men up to the performance of the top 10% most handsome men.

4) Money
If we tally up the cost, then we find being an ugly 5'7" Asian will then cost you an extra $437,000 income per year. ie. You need to make $499,500 annual income to match the attractiveness of an average white guy.

In America, this income represents the top 0.5%.

So the only way money can compensate for being physically unattractive is if you are in the top 0.5%, and this is just enough to bring you back to equal to an average white guy.

It still isn't enough to make you actually attractive, and you need to find a way to make sure girls know about the money for it to even matter in the first place.

So again, we can see the hierarchy is Race > Height > Face > Money.

Reference
http://home.uchicago.edu/~hortacsu/onlinedating.pdf

bait.

 

[Deleted member 7313]

ugly 5'7" Asian

LOL, READ MY TITLE JFL JFL JFL, I MIGHT JUST ROPE

 

[eduardkoopman]

THIS A REPOST OF A HIGH IQ .CO THREAD, SERIOUSLY OVER FOR ETHNICS

https://incels.is/threads/scientifi...f-importance-is-race-height-face-money.59098/

Race > Height > Face > Money

Highlights:
- Being Asian costs you $247,000 extra per year compared to a white guy.
- Being 5'7" costs you $150,000 extra compared to a 5'11" guy, or $180,000 compared to a 6'2" guy.
- Being bottom 10% facially costs you $40,000 extra compared to an average guy or $186,000 compared to a top 10% guy.

1) Race

As noted, it costs an extra $247,000 for an Asian man to date a white girl. It costs an extra $154,000 for a black man to date a white girl.

On the other hand, white men can make up to $24,000 less to be considered equally attractive to Asian women. ie. Asian women will accept poor white men over average income Asians.

2) Height

At extremely low male height (eg. 5'0"), height becomes more important than even race, but for more moderate cases of shortness (eg. 5'6"), race is still more important. A 5'6" man must make an extra $175,000 to match a 5'11" guy.


3) Face

The maximum cost of facial ugliness is $186,000, and that's for a bottom 10% guy to match a top 10% guy. ie. To bring the ugliest 10% of men up to the performance of the top 10% most handsome men.

4) Money
If we tally up the cost, then we find being an ugly 5'7" Asian will then cost you an extra $437,000 income per year. ie. You need to make $499,500 annual income to match the attractiveness of an average white guy.

In America, this income represents the top 0.5%.

So the only way money can compensate for being physically unattractive is if you are in the top 0.5%, and this is just enough to bring you back to equal to an average white guy.

It still isn't enough to make you actually attractive, and you need to find a way to make sure girls know about the money for it to even matter in the first place.

So again, we can see the hierarchy is Race > Height > Face > Money.

Reference
http://home.uchicago.edu/~hortacsu/onlinedating.pdf

I think it's.

Manlet > micropenis > race > face > body > height > penis size.
When it comes to physical aspects.
I dunno where to put status and Money. Status and money matters significant. But highly dependant on location in world. And it's with status and money also I think. Being very low status or poor, is a big minus. But everything after that it doesn't matter much, and only again will it halo you when you have alot if status or money

 

[improover]

I think it's.

Manlet > micropenis > race > face > body > height > penis size.
When it comes to physical aspects.
I dunno where to put status and Money. Status and money matters significant. But highly dependant on location in world. And it's with status and money also I think. Being very low status or poor, is a big minus. But everything after that it doesn't matter much, and only again will it halo you when you have alot if status or money

there's no way a fit body is more important than height. Women prefer tall skinny guys rather than short and muscular

 

[eduardkoopman]

there's no way a fit body is more important than height. Women prefer tall skinny guys rather than short and muscular

Manlet. is more important then a fit body.

But when a dude not a manlet. They say height matters less, and body matter more.

I got this above from research statements, opinions.
They kinda say that after average height. extra height only matters like 10% (on physical apperance. Whereas body (fitness, muscles, etc..) matters like 22%. And face matters 68%.

Proof/science: Face, Body and strenght (masculinity)

I have done you and me a service. And I digged into the scientific results on (see links at bottom, study 1 and 2): What matters most/more in attractiveness for men? Face, or Body. And how much does it matter? Face Study 1. Face Is most important. To quote: "face attractiveness was a...

looksmax.org

 

[improover]

Manlet. is more important then a fit body.

But when a dude not a manlet. They say height matters less, and body matter more.

I got this above from research statements, opinions.
They kinda say that after average height. extra height only matters like 10% (on physical apperance. Whereas body (fitness, muscles, etc..) matters like 22%. And face matters 68%.

Proof/science: Face, Body and strenght (masculinity)

I have done you and me a service. And I digged into the scientific results on (see links at bottom, study 1 and 2): What matters most/more in attractiveness for men? Face, or Body. And how much does it matter? Face Study 1. Face Is most important. To quote: "face attractiveness was a...

looksmax.org

That only counts for hook ups. In long term relationships women women have other standards

 

[eduardkoopman]

That only counts for hook ups. In long term relationships women women have other standards

There are probably some differences there. No idea, what and how much though.
I guess betabuxxing matters more.

 

[Diremeyer]

Just call a research retarded without any counter arguments theory

The OP is full of broken logic, and here's why