Kasanova
Mog or be forgotten
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2023
- Posts
- 253
- Reputation
- 249
1.The main problem is that you're rating yourself while comparing yourself to other people.
So when you are asked "How would you rate yourself from 1-10?" , you should ask more information. Because your rating in Netherlands and Thailand would be completely different. Also if you include or exclude elder or babies too in competitors, your rating would be completely different. Should you judge ony your face, or body and height included?
So, ideally, you should say your rating in your local area including height and face, comparing yourself with your local age-group.
So posting your face in rating subforum, praying to @Blackgymmax to rate is absolutely useless
2. You overrate your looks
Even that I didn't say how you rate yourself, NOBODY asked about this.
Btw, let's look at statitics. https://looksmax.org/threads/how-would-you-rate-yourself-from-1-10.803449/#post-12439472
This is a looksmaxing forum, so users here have to be less attractive that users on average (because, if you are 7/10, wtf are you doing here).
So, 20/34 (btw now I know, that there are only 34 active users here) = 58,8 % rate themselves higher than 5, so 6-10.
And only only 13/34 = 38,2% users rate themselves as average or below , while only 6/34 = 17,6% rate themselves less attractive than average.
So, what a conclusion.
1) Most respondents overrate their looks (btw, I ask to write why they think they're 6/10 and not 5/10, and only 9/34 wrote)
2) Users here are beautiful and autistic and instead of looksmaxing, should go to psychiatrist and slay.
3. Different people have different view of rating scale.
Especially normies.
For example, they can think that 1 is 0-10th percentile and etc.
But others think that 10/10 is PSL god (David, Chico, Barett), 9/10 is a top model, 8/10 is attractive sportsmen or model, 7/10 is gymmaxed tall HTN, 6/10 HTN average height or tall normie
And while on 1st scale if you're gymmaxed HTN you would be rated as 10/10 (because you're in 90th-100th percentile of attractiveness), on 2nd scale you would be rated as 7/10.
Let's go to normie ratings (I go to reddit and quora and find some statistics)
So, as you can see, normies rate themselves as true Blackpillers.
67,8 % of normies rate themselves as 5 or higher (btw 82,3% of blackpillers rate themselves as 5 or higher, chads.org)
And of course, that's impossible IRL
BTW, how they rate themselves
So, as you can see some of them think that calling someone as 6/10 is an insult.
Read again last photo,
Some smart normies also can use this to describe looks scale
However, they forgot only 1 thing.
There are more ugly people than attractive. Why? It's easier to be ugly than attractive. To be attractive you have to have a scincare, train, eat clean, sleep 8+ and etc.
While to be ugly you just have to exist.
So when you are asked "How would you rate yourself from 1-10?" , you should ask more information. Because your rating in Netherlands and Thailand would be completely different. Also if you include or exclude elder or babies too in competitors, your rating would be completely different. Should you judge ony your face, or body and height included?
So, ideally, you should say your rating in your local area including height and face, comparing yourself with your local age-group.
So posting your face in rating subforum, praying to @Blackgymmax to rate is absolutely useless
2. You overrate your looks
Unattractive people think they are more attractive than they are, while attractive people underrate their attractiveness
New research published in the Scandinavian Journal of Psychology suggests that unattractive people are largely unaware of how unattractive they are.
www.psypost.org
Even that I didn't say how you rate yourself, NOBODY asked about this.
Btw, let's look at statitics. https://looksmax.org/threads/how-would-you-rate-yourself-from-1-10.803449/#post-12439472
This is a looksmaxing forum, so users here have to be less attractive that users on average (because, if you are 7/10, wtf are you doing here).
So, 20/34 (btw now I know, that there are only 34 active users here) = 58,8 % rate themselves higher than 5, so 6-10.
And only only 13/34 = 38,2% users rate themselves as average or below , while only 6/34 = 17,6% rate themselves less attractive than average.
So, what a conclusion.
1) Most respondents overrate their looks (btw, I ask to write why they think they're 6/10 and not 5/10, and only 9/34 wrote)
OR
2) Users here are beautiful and autistic and instead of looksmaxing, should go to psychiatrist and slay.
3. Different people have different view of rating scale.
Especially normies.
For example, they can think that 1 is 0-10th percentile and etc.
But others think that 10/10 is PSL god (David, Chico, Barett), 9/10 is a top model, 8/10 is attractive sportsmen or model, 7/10 is gymmaxed tall HTN, 6/10 HTN average height or tall normie
And while on 1st scale if you're gymmaxed HTN you would be rated as 10/10 (because you're in 90th-100th percentile of attractiveness), on 2nd scale you would be rated as 7/10.
Let's go to normie ratings (I go to reddit and quora and find some statistics)
So, as you can see, normies rate themselves as true Blackpillers.
67,8 % of normies rate themselves as 5 or higher (btw 82,3% of blackpillers rate themselves as 5 or higher, chads.org)
And of course, that's impossible IRL
BTW, how they rate themselves
So, as you can see some of them think that calling someone as 6/10 is an insult.
Read again last photo,
Normie scale starts from 7.
Maths is useless for normies
Some smart normies also can use this to describe looks scale
However, they forgot only 1 thing.
There are more ugly people than attractive. Why? It's easier to be ugly than attractive. To be attractive you have to have a scincare, train, eat clean, sleep 8+ and etc.
While to be ugly you just have to exist.
