'Sans' got featured on r/IncelTears for posting a perfectly rational observation of reality.

StoicNihilist

StoicNihilist

Ascended Truecel.
Joined
Aug 1, 2019
Posts
1,431
Reputation
2,081


He got featured on r/IncelTears for posting a perfectly rational observation about reality.

Are they even trying to hide their flagrant ignorance anymore?


In the comment section they harp on about no scientific proof being presented. Well, let me give that you you that proof. You people on IT will ignore it, as you've ignored literally everything else we've had to say, but hey it's worth demonstrating how wrong you are.

20190908 133334

20190908 133430



<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

1. Men's Looks Matter More Than Woman Admit, Study Shows:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.li...s-looks-may-matter-more-than-personality.html

Screenshot 20190908 125423 Samsung Internet


"Researchers asked young women (ages 15 to 29) to choose potential dates from a series of photographs and descriptions, while the women's mothers (ages 37 to 61) were asked to select possible boyfriends for their daughters using the same information. Results showed that a man's looks influenced both groups of women more strongly than his personality profile. This held true even if a man's profile was filled with highly desirable personal qualities, such as being respectful, honest and trustworthy.

In addition, the findings demonstrated that "a moderate level of attractiveness is a necessity to young women and to their moms, and they are not willing to give that up in favor of personality," Fugère said.

Physical attractiveness appears to act as a gatekeeper for potential mates. If a man meets a required level of physical attractiveness, then women are willing to consider his personality characteristics, the study revealed. "

- Dr. Fugère, professor of social psychology.


<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

2. Being Unattractive Reduces Men's Chances of Finding Partners, But Not Women's:

https://www.ingentaconnect.com/cont...rt00007;jsessionid=2mlp2gch5igqe.x-ic-live-01

"Researchers analyzed the results of 11,056 interviews in Spain to assess which factors most predicted a person's ability to find a partner for marriage.

Their study found in numerous parameters and analyses that male attractiveness had a massive effect on a man's ability to find a partner, to find a partner with a university degree, or to find a partner with a higher educational level.

However, in all areas of study, no major effects were seen for women based on their attractiveness. Female physical attractiveness generally played little or no role, however being unattractive presented a slight penalty to the likelihood of forming a couple among women of working-class origin, with the researchers noting this effect was much weaker among women of this social class then the one found among corresponding males of this class.

When speaking of the challenges that being an unattractive man poses in dating, many women are unsympathetic and cannot understand how being unattractive as a man could be so detrimental to success. Research suggests this may be because women do not suffer the same disadvantages from being unattractive, and thus have no personal reference for understanding the struggles of unattractive men. This is a cognitive bias known as the hot-cold empathy gap."


Quotes:

  • For men, the results show that being unattractive decreases the likelihood of finding a partner, of finding a partner with a university degree, and of finding a partner with a higher educational level.

  • Being unattractive reduced the probability of mating for males by between 15 and 17 points, depending on the models used, when compared to the more attractive group, and 10 points compared to those with an average attractiveness level.

  • Being unattractive decreased the probability of social advancement through mating in males. The difference between them and those that were very attractive was 29 percentage points. The difference for those with average attractiveness levels was 20 percentage points.

  • For women, physical attractiveness does not affect the likelihood of any of those events occurring.

  • Among women, physical attractiveness did not matter when it came to mating. The results for women indicate that attractiveness did not matter.

  • The opposite happens with males: their physical attractiveness matters.

  • Being unattractive penalised the likelihood of forming a couple among women of working-class origin, which was not the case for daughter of high-ranking professionals. Even in this case, the less attractive women had a greater likelihood of forming a couple.
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

To Conclude:

There are literally hundreds of peer-reviewed scientific studies conducted into this topic, and they all come to the same conclusions. That looks matter more than personality, and woman have a MUCH easier time finding a partner than men. You IT folks are free to explore this on your own if you wish, but it just pisses me off how you all continue to deny the truth. No matter how much scientific evidence gets tossed in your faces you people just keep on denying reality.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: GetShrekt, Deleted member 4563, Deleted member 2745 and 9 others


He got featured on r/IncelTears for posting a perfectly rational observation about reality.

Are they even trying to hide their flagrant ignorance anymore?


In the comment section they harp on about no scientific proof being presented. Well, let me give that you you that proof. You people on IT will ignore it, as you've ignored literally everything else we've had to say, but hey it's worth demonstrating how wrong you are.

View attachment 108649
View attachment 108650


<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

1. Men's Looks Matter More Than Woman Admit, Study Shows:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.li...s-looks-may-matter-more-than-personality.html

View attachment 108634

"Researchers asked young women (ages 15 to 29) to choose potential dates from a series of photographs and descriptions, while the women's mothers (ages 37 to 61) were asked to select possible boyfriends for their daughters using the same information. Results showed that a man's looks influenced both groups of women more strongly than his personality profile. This held true even if a man's profile was filled with highly desirable personal qualities, such as being respectful, honest and trustworthy.

In addition, the findings demonstrated that "a moderate level of attractiveness is a necessity to young women and to their moms, and they are not willing to give that up in favor of personality," Fugère said.

Physical attractiveness appears to act as a gatekeeper for potential mates. If a man meets a required level of physical attractiveness, then women are willing to consider his personality characteristics, the study revealed. "

- Dr. Fugère, professor of social psychology.


<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

2. Being Unattractive Reduces Men's Chances of Finding Partners, But Not Women's:

https://www.ingentaconnect.com/cont...rt00007;jsessionid=2mlp2gch5igqe.x-ic-live-01

"Researchers analyzed the results of 11,056 interviews in Spain to assess which factors most predicted a person's ability to find a partner for marriage.

Their study found in numerous parameters and analyses that male attractiveness had a massive effect on a man's ability to find a partner, to find a partner with a university degree, or to find a partner with a higher educational level.

However, in all areas of study, no major effects were seen for women based on their attractiveness. Female physical attractiveness generally played little or no role, however being unattractive presented a slight penalty to the likelihood of forming a couple among women of working-class origin, with the researchers noting this effect was much weaker among women of this social class then the one found among corresponding males of this class.

When speaking of the challenges that being an unattractive man poses in dating, many women are unsympathetic and cannot understand how being unattractive as a man could be so detrimental to success. Research suggests this may be because women do not suffer the same disadvantages from being unattractive, and thus have no personal reference for understanding the struggles of unattractive men. This is a cognitive bias known as the hot-cold empathy gap."


Quotes:

  • For men, the results show that being unattractive decreases the likelihood of finding a partner, of finding a partner with a university degree, and of finding a partner with a higher educational level.

  • Being unattractive reduced the probability of mating for males by between 15 and 17 points, depending on the models used, when compared to the more attractive group, and 10 points compared to those with an average attractiveness level.

  • Being unattractive decreased the probability of social advancement through mating in males. The difference between them and those that were very attractive was 29 percentage points. The difference for those with average attractiveness levels was 20 percentage points.

  • For women, physical attractiveness does not affect the likelihood of any of those events occurring.

  • Among women, physical attractiveness did not matter when it came to mating. The results for women indicate that attractiveness did not matter.

  • The opposite happens with males: their physical attractiveness matters.

  • Being unattractive penalised the likelihood of forming a couple among women of working-class origin, which was not the case for daughter of high-ranking professionals. Even in this case, the less attractive women had a greater likelihood of forming a couple.
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

To Conclude:

There are literally hundreds of peer-reviewed scientific studies conducted into this topic, and they all come to the same conclusions. That looks matter more than personality, and woman have a MUCH easier time finding a partner than men. You IT folks are free to explore this on your own if you wish, but it just pisses me off how you all continue to deny the truth. No matter how much scientific evidence gets tossed in your faces you people just keep on denying reality.

inceltears is a circlejerk of cucks and whiteknights.
 
  • +1
Reactions: SikKunt
I imagine most reditors are cucks for their girlfriends if they have them or orbiters.
 
1568653846442


giphy.gif
 
  • +1
Reactions: Vitruvian
1568653968345
 
  • Love it
Reactions: rtssssy
fuark my nigga Homie
 
  • JFL
Reactions: NiggersMe
Why do you waste your energy browsing cucktears? Don't try to find logic in their posts, they are Incels themselves and are even uglier than we are.
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: john_cope, Roping Subhuman and didntreadlol
Why do you waste your energy browsing cucktears? Don't try to find logic in their posts, they are Incels themselves and are even uglier than we are.

Exactly op. what's even the point of all this? we already know they're :bluepill::bluepill::bluepill::bluepill::bluepill::bluepill::soy::soy::soy::soy: morons.
 
  • +1
Reactions: didntreadlol and SikKunt
but where is the science though?
 
but where is the science though?
It doesn't matter, there's plenty of it out there (FaceandLMS, MondayFAMonday, Incel Wiki). He just made a simplified version of this clown world.
 
I did not see an r/inceltears thread for quite some time. I thought we stopped caring about that troll board that only exists because of Reddit's ridiculous double standards. I guess not.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 245 and Ritalincel
mANY MEN, MAN.
 
maxresdefault.jpg
 
  • +1
Reactions: didntreadlol
Thanks for posting these tbhhh
 
Lol remember when this place was blackpilled
 

Similar threads

9cel
Replies
7
Views
766
Xtra
Xtra
chief detectiveman
Replies
8
Views
2K
bourgeoizyzz
bourgeoizyzz
D
2
Replies
56
Views
2K
King Solomon
King Solomon
Baban
Replies
29
Views
4K
Allornothing
Allornothing

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top