D
Deleted member 21044
Kraken
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2022
- Posts
- 8,391
- Reputation
- 12,835
I've been thinking about the role of body hair in attraction. Especially pubic hair and armpit hair. There is no real consensus on this and most people aren't sure what's ideal. Some say natural, some trimmed, some shaved, but as you know, beauty is objective. Here's what i found out.
I used to prefer shaved pubic hair and armpit hair on girls. However, once i started increasing my testosterone, i grew more and more attracted to natural pubic and armpit hair.
This led me to a thought: Why would hairless genitalia be naturally more attractive, when it is associated with prepubescent children without reproductive capability and therefore evolutionarily useless?
Being attraced to hairless pussy would lead prehistoric men to fuck undeveloped girls, which would be detrimental to the species. Same applies for men. So naturally hairless genitalia and armpits cannot be more attractive.
Why do so many men prefer shaved pussy and armpits then? The answer is pretty obvious - low testosterone. Testosterone is needed for psychological maturation of the male. Testosterone deficiency will result in abnormal and child-like sexual behavior, such as being attracted to child-like genitalia. As you know, global male testosterone is declining and there is a striking correlation between this trend and the advent of female genital shaving.
What is naturally attractive then? Unshaved and untrimmed genitalia and armpits. It is a sign of biological maturity and readiness for procreation.
Just as boobs, or other sexual characteristics.
However, there is a fine line of what is ideal.
Once body hair is left to grow, and not regulated by shaving, the only way to affect its look are hormones. Natural still doesn't equal attractive, since if there are hormonal imbalances in the organism, such too much DHT or Follicle Stimulating Hormone, it will manifest through unattractive body hair.
As you can see, the body hair in the example is unattractive. This is due to the fact that the woman shown is unhealthy and has a hormonal imbalance. As you can see, she is fat and likely has a surplus of DHT. As a result, the pubic hair is weirdly spread out, has low density and she even developed abdominal hair which is not natural for women.
So what does helathy natural hair look like?
Here are some examples:
What does all the attractive pubic hair have in common? It is evenly spread, dense, and covers an apropriate surface area (only the genitals). That is what pubic hair of a young healthy woman with a balanced endocrine system looks like and it is the natural peak of attractiveness.
Ideal armpit hair is relatively long, straight, low density and appropriate surface area.
Lastly, if you, like many men today, found yourself not aroused or even repulsed by these images of something that we used to look at and fuck for thousands of years, it's the best time to reevaluate your lifestyle and get your testosterone in check.
//Dr. HAIRY
I used to prefer shaved pubic hair and armpit hair on girls. However, once i started increasing my testosterone, i grew more and more attracted to natural pubic and armpit hair.
This led me to a thought: Why would hairless genitalia be naturally more attractive, when it is associated with prepubescent children without reproductive capability and therefore evolutionarily useless?
Being attraced to hairless pussy would lead prehistoric men to fuck undeveloped girls, which would be detrimental to the species. Same applies for men. So naturally hairless genitalia and armpits cannot be more attractive.
Why do so many men prefer shaved pussy and armpits then? The answer is pretty obvious - low testosterone. Testosterone is needed for psychological maturation of the male. Testosterone deficiency will result in abnormal and child-like sexual behavior, such as being attracted to child-like genitalia. As you know, global male testosterone is declining and there is a striking correlation between this trend and the advent of female genital shaving.
What is naturally attractive then? Unshaved and untrimmed genitalia and armpits. It is a sign of biological maturity and readiness for procreation.
Just as boobs, or other sexual characteristics.
However, there is a fine line of what is ideal.
Once body hair is left to grow, and not regulated by shaving, the only way to affect its look are hormones. Natural still doesn't equal attractive, since if there are hormonal imbalances in the organism, such too much DHT or Follicle Stimulating Hormone, it will manifest through unattractive body hair.
As you can see, the body hair in the example is unattractive. This is due to the fact that the woman shown is unhealthy and has a hormonal imbalance. As you can see, she is fat and likely has a surplus of DHT. As a result, the pubic hair is weirdly spread out, has low density and she even developed abdominal hair which is not natural for women.
So what does helathy natural hair look like?
Here are some examples:
What does all the attractive pubic hair have in common? It is evenly spread, dense, and covers an apropriate surface area (only the genitals). That is what pubic hair of a young healthy woman with a balanced endocrine system looks like and it is the natural peak of attractiveness.
Ideal armpit hair is relatively long, straight, low density and appropriate surface area.
Lastly, if you, like many men today, found yourself not aroused or even repulsed by these images of something that we used to look at and fuck for thousands of years, it's the best time to reevaluate your lifestyle and get your testosterone in check.
//Dr. HAIRY
@Dr. Mog @krisal @justshower @5'7 zoomer @ike57 @ascension! @Shitfacegoodbod=mog @anticel @julianchicago @Mouthbreath @PURE ARYAN GENETICS @beatEMinGTA @Grel Hellscream @ohwellmaxxing @ripcordgod1 @copefuel @positivecoper @malicieusss
@Ragnar
@Ragnar
Last edited:
