What is considered a good post to reputation ratio?

Lokki

Lokki

Recognising patterns
Joined
Feb 24, 2024
Posts
550
Reputation
588
Usually 1k+ positive unless ur on double digit posts then it turns to 10k

I have the minimum positive rep for my post ammount
 
MFs be worried about their "status" on an obscure autistic forum

if you're so concerned about it you can just farm reps by writing DNR on any post with more than 50 words.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: reddotguy, PseduoAryan, deepfuckingvalue and 8 others
MFs be worried about their "status" on an obscure autistic forum

if you're so concerned about it you can just farm reps by writing DNR on any post with more than 50 words.
yeah its really not hard to have good ratio on this shithole. you have 1.83 ratio and i have never seen you do anything like that. even mine is over 1 and i post braindead schizo nonsense that no one likes
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Imretarded? and Brus Wane
yeah its really not hard to have good ratio on this shithole. you have 1.83 ratio and i have never seen you do anything like that. even mine is over 1 and i post braindead schizo nonsense that no one likes
Yeah it's nothing crazy

I limit shitposting and try to add something of value to the forum in more than half my posts

Might have to put in more effort to hit 4:1 or 5:1 tho
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Imretarded?, TechnoBoss and Xtra
1:3 minimum
 
  • +1
Reactions: TechnoBoss
Yeah it's nothing crazy

I limit shitposting and try to add something of value to the forum in more than half my posts

Might have to put in more effort to hit 4:1 or 5:1 tho
i really dont get how mine is above 1 seeing as i use this place as a diary and i have random schizo threads where i just put a random date (like the image shown below)

there are users with a ratio of as high as 6:1

1711353721468
 
  • JFL
Reactions: TechnoBoss and Brus Wane
i really dont get how mine is above 1 seeing as i use this place as a diary and i have random schizo threads where i just put a random date (like the image shown below)
JFL:lul:
there are users with a ratio of as high as 6:1
My guess is that they farmed the shit out of retards or they wrote maybe 6-7 bangers threads that will get them reacts forever
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: forevergymcelling and TechnoBoss
MFs be worried about their "status" on an obscure autistic forum

if you're so concerned about it you can just farm reps by writing DNR on any post with more than 50 words.
I agree but most dogshit users have horrible rep ratio
 
  • +1
Reactions: sub5c3l and TechnoBoss
Over for my 1:1 subhumanity
 
JFL:lul:

My guess is that they farmed the shit out of retards or they wrote maybe 6-7 bangers threads that will get them reacts forever
Just post good or funny threads, it really isn't that hard
 
Just post good or funny threads, it really isn't that hard
Funny threads yes, for sure.

Good threads aren't always appreciated.

Gore, porn, humour and maybe some hot take on politics occasionally. That's where the reps are.
 
MFs be worried about their "status" on an obscure autistic forum

if you're so concerned about it you can just farm reps by writing DNR on any post with more than 50 words.
Ye like me right
 
Just post good or funny threads, it really isn't that hard
Funny threads yes, for sure.

Good threads aren't always appreciated.

Gore, porn, humour and maybe some hot take on politics occasionally. That's where the reps are.
You guys are both wrong.
The best way to farm reps is through profile posts, since they don't increase you post number but still get you reacts.
 
You guys are both wrong.
The best way to farm reps is through profile posts, since they don't increase you post number but still get you reacts.
How am I wrong?

Your idea to farm profile posts doesn't make my list of farming ideas bad.

Yes the profile thing could work but does it really stack up 25-45 reacts per post?
(legit question BTW, I've never tried)
I don't think users go around looking at other people's page
 
  • +1
Reactions: Narcissus🥀
Those guys who have a very good post to rep ratio is not ethically earned. Many just make shitpost threads and do not converse with anyone. It's easy to get high reps to posts this way.

Some others are negative but they post their every single thought on the forum and double post replies when they could have single posted.

Also not to mention high IQ posts get little attention vs shitposts. I tend to do both and I'm 1.6 😊

I think 1.5 is minimum as long as it's ethically earned.
 
  • +1
Reactions: sub5c3l, Brus Wane and N1666
my biggest goal in life is to get to 1:2

im trying really hard recently
 
  • Hmm...
  • JFL
  • Woah
Reactions: SecularIslamist, Brus Wane and sub5c3l
Yeah it's nothing crazy

I limit shitposting and try to add something of value to the forum in more than half my posts

Might have to put in more effort to hit 4:1 or 5:1 tho
based Bruce
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Brus Wane
Usually 1k+ positive unless ur on double digit posts then it turns to 10k

I have the minimum positive rep for my post ammount
nota not a ratio:feelsuhh:
 
I’m not sure but I think 327 posts to 235 is a pretty good rep
 

Similar threads

ggg.tv
Replies
2
Views
53
smoth
smoth
97baHater
Replies
3
Views
46
LowTierVitoBss
LowTierVitoBss
asdvek
Replies
1
Views
82
Autismcel
Autismcel
ihatereddit
Replies
2
Views
48
Latinus
Latinus

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top