thenumbersmason
Banned
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2024
- Posts
- 297
- Reputation
- 233
1. extremities used in argument
- whenever any argument is made , a lot of people will use an extreme example
like lets say , we're talking about whether behavior A is acceptable for a decent looking person
people will post someone model tier who did that and got away and say that your looks are the issue , meanwhile this same was never tried for other control groups like good looking tier , high tier normies , or even normies
what if the so called repulsive behavior would had added a halo to normie too
similarly , in other situations they may use someone very ugly
similarly money would halo a normie a lot but people here will give a ugly dude as an example and talk about how its useless when of course it wont help an ugly dude cause hes fucked to begin with
most of us are around the high tier normie range and that argument sucks dick
2. cherrypicking
- any scientific studies shown here will be picked to support narratives instead of introspection
now blackpill does have studies showing profound evidence , but so does bluepill .
and a lot of times those studies are from sketchy sources or having weird sample spaces or lobbying (bluepill studies may have the same)
3.prettyboy vs masc chad argument
- again , dumb shit , both of them do well and would attract women of all age groups , jfl if you think a woman around 16 would reject a very attractive dude just because he's too masculine or a woman around 30s would reject a dude just cause he's too pretty
theres a lot of factors , including and not limited to looks and i doubt something this small could matter
4. correlation vs causation and how they dont always go hand in hand
5. too much focus on online activities
- they'll talk about the stuff women say on the internet , example when they called a school shooter cute or comment on ramirez posts
or even talk about dating with respects only to online dating
meanwhile , its just that when you're online its way easier to find divergent people from the mean and they stick out more , and thats not a legitimate sample space
6. 'cope' argument
- example , any other things which may help you look better would be directly called cope
like we talk about dressing
but again tell me , dont you ever feel attracted to women who arent that attractive but have clothes that fit them really good and accentuate their face / body?
arent there enough mfers out there chasing goth girls being even more attracted to them than normal women
similarly , similar personalities and interests tend to create a bias and make people more attracted to each other , the more niche they are the more it is
all the 'cope' word does is promotes bias / creates a cult like situation where any contrasting beliefs are disregarded
- whenever any argument is made , a lot of people will use an extreme example
like lets say , we're talking about whether behavior A is acceptable for a decent looking person
people will post someone model tier who did that and got away and say that your looks are the issue , meanwhile this same was never tried for other control groups like good looking tier , high tier normies , or even normies
what if the so called repulsive behavior would had added a halo to normie too
similarly , in other situations they may use someone very ugly
similarly money would halo a normie a lot but people here will give a ugly dude as an example and talk about how its useless when of course it wont help an ugly dude cause hes fucked to begin with
most of us are around the high tier normie range and that argument sucks dick
2. cherrypicking
- any scientific studies shown here will be picked to support narratives instead of introspection
now blackpill does have studies showing profound evidence , but so does bluepill .
and a lot of times those studies are from sketchy sources or having weird sample spaces or lobbying (bluepill studies may have the same)
3.prettyboy vs masc chad argument
- again , dumb shit , both of them do well and would attract women of all age groups , jfl if you think a woman around 16 would reject a very attractive dude just because he's too masculine or a woman around 30s would reject a dude just cause he's too pretty
theres a lot of factors , including and not limited to looks and i doubt something this small could matter
4. correlation vs causation and how they dont always go hand in hand
5. too much focus on online activities
- they'll talk about the stuff women say on the internet , example when they called a school shooter cute or comment on ramirez posts
or even talk about dating with respects only to online dating
meanwhile , its just that when you're online its way easier to find divergent people from the mean and they stick out more , and thats not a legitimate sample space
6. 'cope' argument
- example , any other things which may help you look better would be directly called cope
like we talk about dressing
but again tell me , dont you ever feel attracted to women who arent that attractive but have clothes that fit them really good and accentuate their face / body?
arent there enough mfers out there chasing goth girls being even more attracted to them than normal women
similarly , similar personalities and interests tend to create a bias and make people more attracted to each other , the more niche they are the more it is
all the 'cope' word does is promotes bias / creates a cult like situation where any contrasting beliefs are disregarded
