moggathon
God make my life great inc.
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2023
- Posts
- 26,108
- Reputation
- 27,708
Why do they keep inseminating foids with their subpar genetics
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
because of monogamy, now with hypergamy in place we will see less ugly people again in the future
This is a fallacy. Hypergamy has always existedbecause of monogamy, now with hypergamy in place we will see less ugly people again in the future
Cause we stopped raping those bitches about 10,000 years ago
We need to get rid of them asap300.000 years of evolution, and there are still ugly people in 2024
Cope. Getting rid of ugly people will simply create a new group of ugly people.We need to get rid of them asap
Lies Jewish cope. We would have a perfect society without this dysgenic scum.Cope. Getting rid of ugly people will simply create a new group of ugly people.
Almost like its not real300.000 years of evolution, and there are still ugly people in 2024
Almost like mentalcel is not real
Your a fucking retard, people are just objectively ugly nowadays, shit like braces, recession, boneless faces were not common in the past and people were actually attracted to each other.Cope. Getting rid of ugly people will simply create a new group of ugly people.
i’m an ugly subhuman product of modernityYour a fucking retard, people are just objectively ugly nowadays, shit like braces, recession, boneless faces were not common in the past and people were actually attracted to each other.
height is proportional, if everyone is manlet then thats average also we really dont know, mongolians were like 6"2 avg.well think about it, our ancestors were manlet monkeys, so tbh we did ascend. except very recently natural selection doesn’t really exist so everyone’s a cuck
if everone had shit like forward growth their wouldnt be much looks hypergamy. THis is copeIf you get rid of the all the subhumans there will still be subhumans since there will always be people at the bottom and they will be considered so
You completely misunderstood the point. If we rid the world of what you call “objectively ugly” people the female brain would readjust the hierarchy of looks as needed. It’s a women’s biological imperative to find a male that’s better than the rest, this will keep going until we’re left with a single race of men that look nearly identical.Your a fucking retard, people are just objectively ugly nowadays, shit like braces, recession, boneless faces were not common in the past and people were actually attracted to each other.
Yes and if everyone looked identical there would be no looks hypergamy, there is theories out their that humans in primitive times looked very similair, almost identical. This would be ideal because there would be no "chad" just monogomany.You completely misunderstood the point. If we rid the world of what you call “objectively ugly” people the female brain would readjust the hierarchy of looks as needed. It’s a women’s biological imperative to find a male that’s better than the rest, this will keep going until we’re left with a single race of men that look nearly identical.
the female brain is hardwired to establish hierarchies of men regardless of the circumstances so ridding the world of what we currently consider ugly would only introduce a new group of ugly people. This new group could be a certain race, arbitrary feature, some characteristic that women would collectively agree with (social media will propagate this belief)Lies Jewish cope. We would have a perfect society without this dysgenic scum.
if everone had shit like forward growth their wouldnt be much looks hypergamy. THis is cope
How come tribe videos show monogamous relationships?the female brain is hardwired to establish hierarchies of men regardless of the circumstances so ridding the world of what we currently consider ugly would only introduce a new group of ugly people. This new group could be a certain race, arbitrary feature, some characteristic that women would collectively agree with (social media will propagate this belief)
I agree that would be ideal but it’ll only work under specific conditions like we all become the same race, relatively similar height, similar proportions face etc etcYes and if everyone looked identical there would be no looks hypergamy, there is theories out their that humans in primitive times looked very similair, almost identical. This would be ideal because there would be no "chad" just monogomany.
DNR on the basis of you bought a coloured name on an incel forumthe female brain is hardwired to establish hierarchies of men regardless of the circumstances so ridding the world of what we currently consider ugly would only introduce a new group of ugly people. This new group could be a certain race, arbitrary feature, some characteristic that women would collectively agree with (social media will propagate this belief)
Welcome to my ignore list
Don't care faggotWelcome to my ignore list
He believes he’s a mentalcelDon't care faggot
Well in primitive tribes they’re egalitarian meaning everyone’s on equal social standing and they all look similar to one another. Human beings are adaptable and social cooperation is the reason why we bested the Neanderthals, when women aren’t restricted by traditional laws/survival necessity to cooperate through monogamy they default to gene hunting.How come tribe videos show monogamous relationships?
He believes he’s a mentalcel
You’re an incel, rope.DNR on the basis of you bought a coloured name on an incel forum
Because when chad for example has 10 kids. When those kids get chad's DNA, it's slightly changed (mutation).Why do they keep inseminating foids with their subpar genetics
I mog youYou’re an incel, rope.
Not readingBecause when chad for example has 10 kids. When those kids get chad's DNA, it's slightly changed (mutation).
2 of those kids may come out even better looking, 6 come out more or less equal to chad while 2 end up uglier.
Every generation, there will always be genetic fuckups.
tldr I explained your question. If you actually want to learn, just read it. No rushNot reading
Aighttldr I explained your question. If you actually want to learn, just read it. No rush
Let’s say you do mog me, you’re still a low IQ incel given your membership in other incel forums, you’re low IQ incel outbursts, and repetitive post that lack originality.I mog you
What membership in other forums? I have a higher iq than you get baited ugly dogLet’s say you do mog me, you’re still a low IQ incel given your membership in other incel forums, you’re low IQ incel outbursts, and repetitive post that lack originality.
looks>iqLet’s say you do mog me, you’re still a low IQ incel given your membership in other incel forums, you’re low IQ incel outbursts, and repetitive post that lack originality.
Your brain is fucked, broooootal.
Your sorry ass can’t even type original thought provoking threads, I doubt your small fried brain could learn a basic thing like a programming language or install linux on a VMWhat membership in other forums? I have a higher iq than you get baited ugly dog
I agree but he’s not only low IQ his neurochemistry is fucked up which explains his inceldom at 30looks>iq
Iq is cope for incels with nothing to show for
hypergamy back then was getting the best beta buxThis is a fallacy. Hypergamy has always existed
With hypergamy chads are gonna be the new incels in the future and women will be peta chad onlybecause of monogamy, now with hypergamy in place we will see less ugly people again in the future