MansNotHot
Kratos cucks everyone, including you
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2020
- Posts
- 4,431
- Reputation
- 5,334
I'm from Italy i don't know about these things
RecessedPrettyboy
👁️
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2019
- Posts
- 3,341
- Reputation
- 5,252
not gonna say anything.. just leaving this here..
African-descended people (Blacks) average cranial capacities of 1267 cm^3, European-descended people (Whites) 1347 cm^3, and East Asian-descended people (East Asians) 1364 cm^3.
African-descended people (Blacks) average cranial capacities of 1267 cm^3, European-descended people (Whites) 1347 cm^3, and East Asian-descended people (East Asians) 1364 cm^3.
MansNotHot
Kratos cucks everyone, including you
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2020
- Posts
- 4,431
- Reputation
- 5,334
Deleted member 6164
Lay flat when the war comes
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2020
- Posts
- 5,524
- Reputation
- 7,125
I think so. Maybe in certain areas they are not, when Africans like Nigerians come to America and other places like the US (Britain) I think, it’s pretty common for them to call black Americans ”Akata”.
Polka
High tier subhuman
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2020
- Posts
- 714
- Reputation
- 877
I would say it's environmental.
Listening to rap and doing drugs makes you lose braincells.
Listening to rap and doing drugs makes you lose braincells.
lutte
💤
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2020
- Posts
- 29,311
- Reputation
- 58,339
Youre on looksmax dot me so i was just saying. Subhumans always cope with muh iq muh mensa
Extrapolating my test results i should be 120-125 but I’d trade 30 points for 1 psl point or 6 inches of height in a heartbeat. If i could be 2 meters tall with 75 IQ I’d be overjoyed
goat2x
You are done son
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2020
- Posts
- 32,170
- Reputation
- 81,334
- OP
- #57
SupremeDream
Master
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2020
- Posts
- 1,610
- Reputation
- 3,151
Yes
S
Subhuman trash
Banned
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2019
- Posts
- 4,528
- Reputation
- 4,296
@Colvin76
S
Subhuman trash
Banned
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2019
- Posts
- 4,528
- Reputation
- 4,296
poloralf
Master
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2020
- Posts
- 1,513
- Reputation
- 2,104
Genetics, i mean iq was useless for most of humanity's existence, who the fuck expected that math pencil neck nerds would dictate progress and that humans would enter this exponential growth where iq is related to success, in ancient times bookworms were scrawny low T cucks that were frowned upon and bitchslapped for fun + creepy to women. no need to iqmax in africa where food is abundant
AutisticBeaner
Nosebreather
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2019
- Posts
- 8,924
- Reputation
- 12,279
tbh at this point i'm convinced that blacks simply didn't (have to) evolve as much as all the other races. they're features are a bit closer to our ancestors', like the flatter noses, the weaker chins and the rounder browridges (this one is arguable). though at the same time i have no idea why this would be the case. did their evolution stop earlier than that of other races? or did it progress more slowly?
goat2x
You are done son
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2020
- Posts
- 32,170
- Reputation
- 81,334
- OP
- #63
Might be the case
goat2x
You are done son
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2020
- Posts
- 32,170
- Reputation
- 81,334
- OP
- #64
Prime coping
You can only be a leader if you have above average smartness compared to the rest.
Deleted member 6095
It's only begun
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2020
- Posts
- 7,895
- Reputation
- 17,616
less environmental stressors tbh. makes you think what the fuck made gooks so drastic. Their epicanthic eye folds were thought to have come from the eskimo people as an adaptation from snow blindness
Polka
High tier subhuman
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2020
- Posts
- 714
- Reputation
- 877
Imagine growing up with no dad,skipping school spending day and nights on the streets, selling and doing drugs, listening exclusively to cancer like this.
Even with the genetic potentiol of Einstein your brain wouldn't develop in that environment.
Even with the genetic potentiol of Einstein your brain wouldn't develop in that environment.
goat2x
You are done son
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2020
- Posts
- 32,170
- Reputation
- 81,334
- OP
- #67
You fell for the jewish memes
lutte
💤
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2020
- Posts
- 29,311
- Reputation
- 58,339
You might wanna take an IQ test even if it’s bs. All i said was that IQ is cope and doesn’t really matter"Talk about your hobbies, share music, or post whatever comes to mind. "
HumidVent
Zephir
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2020
- Posts
- 1,976
- Reputation
- 3,450
Introduction
We are all aware of the massive problems with racism, fascism, and so-called "race realism" these days. In order to protect people from falling into this bigoted nonsense ("muh bell curve"), I figured it would be helpful to compile a list of high-quality sources for refuting racist myths and pseudo-science. As always, the sources are listed at the end.
"White People Are the Most Intelligent!"
Over the last few decades, numerous studies have been conducted debunking the idea that there is a genetic IQ gap between whites and non-whites. We will now go over some of them.
In 1959, German biologist Klaus Eyferth published a study in the journal Vita Humana (Human Development), which studied the IQ of white and mixed-race children in post-war West Germany. The mothers were all white German women, while the fathers were white and black members of the US occupying forces. The mothers were matched for socio-economic status, and the children were tested for their IQ. The results were as follows:
As is clearly observable, this study (which is commonly known as the "Eyferth Study") found no statistically significant difference between white and mixed-race children. The majority of researchers, including James Flynn (the researcher who discovered the Flynn Effect), Richard E. Nisbett, and Nathan Brody, feel that this study supports the conclusion that racial gaps in IQ are mostly or wholly environmental in origin. However, since many "race-realists" dismiss this study on the grounds that it only included men who had qualified for military service, we should look at a number of more recent studies on the matter, to make things clearer.
One useful study was published in the journal Child Development in 1972. This experiment studied black, white, and mixed-race children raised in British long-stay residential nurseries, subjecting them to three different tests of cognitive ability. Two out of three tests found "no significant difference" between the various groups, while one test found "significantly higher" scores for non-whites. One wonders whether the racists would accept this as evidence of black superiority (I think we know the answer).
Another important study was published in the journal Developmental Psychology in 1986. The author observed that black and interracial children raised by white parents had a significantly higher mean IQ score than age-matched children raised by black parents (117 vs 104), and argued that differences in early socialization explained this gap. Nisbett et. al's 2012 review found that these differences in socialization "were large enough to account for virtually the entire Black–White gap in IQ," lending more credence to the environmental argument.
Rushton and Jensen (two leading figures of scientific racism in the USA) attempted to dispute the 1986 study by arguing that the children were surveyed before adolescence, and therefore the results were unreliable; however, subsequent research (such as this work by Richard Nisbett, published in 2009) found that there is virtually no gap in heritability between ages 7 and 17, and therefore, this argument falls apart.
An aforementioned 2012 paper by Richard Nisbett (co-authored with James Flynn and other leaders in the field), published in the American Psychologist, reviewed numerous studies conducted over the past decades, finding that the evidence "fails to support a genetic hypothesis.” The authors instead argue for an environmental explanation of the racial IQ gap.
In addition, a 2017 study in the Journal of Intelligence examined trans-racial adoptions, finding that "there is no consistent IQ difference between Black adoptees raised by Whites and White adoptees raised by Whites." This supports the "nil hypothesis" (i.e. "that adoptees of different races have similar IQs when raised in the same environment"), indicating that there is no genetic IQ gap between races.
In the book IQ and Human Intelligence, Nicholas Mackintosh of Cambridge University surveyed various studies on the topic of race and IQ (including many of those previously mentioned), finding their results to be entirely compatible with a 100% environmental explanation of racial IQ gaps, with no significant evidence found for a genetic difference.
Mackintosh's book also explores other common racialist arguments, such as old "whites have larger brains" line. He explains that there is no evidence to support a difference in IQ based on brain sizes; for example, he points out that men and women have gaps in average brain size, without an observable difference in average IQ's. This is corroborated by other experts, such as Nisbett et. al's 2012 review of the research on the topic.
A study published in the journal World Archaeology in 2006 thoroughly debunks Rushton's claim that prehistoric whites were smarter than prehistoric blacks due to evolution. As it states:
In short, decades of research have debunked the notion that whites and non-whites have a genetic difference in intelligence.
Racial Bias and the Criminal Justice System
There is significant evidence that the criminal justice system in the United States (including, but not limited to, the police and courts) are biased against black people. To begin with, black Americans are more likely to be killed by the police while unarmed than are white people. A 2016 study from the American Journal of Preventative Medicine found the following:
Black people are more likely to be arrested than whites for crimes which both commit at similar rates. For example, a report from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) found that "Despite roughly equal usage rates, Blacks are 3.73 times more likely than whites to be arrested for marijuana."
Research has also found that non-whites receive harsher penalties than whites do for the same crimes. For example, a report from the United States Sentencing Commission found that blacks receive sentences which are, on average, 20% longer than whites for the same exact crime.
A 2011 study from the Sentencing Project has also found that only approx. 60% of the gap in racial imprisonment disparity can be explained by differing crime rates, meaning that approx. 40% is due to other factors, including racial bias.
"Non-Whites Commit More Crime Than Whites!"
Decades of research has found that, while there is a measured difference in crime rates among racial groups, this can be explained by socioeconomic factors, as well as discrimination in the criminal justice system. No compelling evidence has been found for a racial difference in crime rates when socioeconomic class is taken into account. The Oxford Handbook of Ethnicity, Crime, and Immigration summarizes these points quite well.
A study published in the journal Social Forces in 1996 examined Columbus, Ohio, concluding that "differences in structural disadvantage account for black-white differences in crime across communities." In other words, the racial gap in crime rates can be explained by structural inequalities in material circumstances.
A study published in the journal Criminology in 2003 found that social and environmental differences accounted for the gap in crime rates among racial groups, not some inherent tendency among any race.
"Immigrants/Refugees Are Criminals!"
Research consistently finds that immigrants (both legal and undocumented) commit fewer crimes than native-born citizens. Even the right-wing Cato Institute has published multiple reports supporting this conclusion, as has the Sentencing Project.
The United States Census Bureau published a report confirming that native-born citizens are more likely to be convicted of a crime than immigrants (regardless of legal status). This was discussed in a 2015 report from the American Immigration Council.
The Cato Institute also published a report finding no evidence to support the claims that refugees are more likely to commit violent crime or terror attacks, noting that nobody (refugee or non-refugee) from the nations on the Trump travel ban list had ever been involved in a terror attack of any kind. Their research also concluded:
Conclusion
Racism and "race realism" are cancers, which have been given an undeserved chance to reemerge in recent years. As such, it is essential that we all be well-informed on these issues, so that we may fight back against racist nonsense. Study this information carefully, and be prepared to deploy it when necessary.
Sources
We are all aware of the massive problems with racism, fascism, and so-called "race realism" these days. In order to protect people from falling into this bigoted nonsense ("muh bell curve"), I figured it would be helpful to compile a list of high-quality sources for refuting racist myths and pseudo-science. As always, the sources are listed at the end.
"White People Are the Most Intelligent!"
Over the last few decades, numerous studies have been conducted debunking the idea that there is a genetic IQ gap between whites and non-whites. We will now go over some of them.
In 1959, German biologist Klaus Eyferth published a study in the journal Vita Humana (Human Development), which studied the IQ of white and mixed-race children in post-war West Germany. The mothers were all white German women, while the fathers were white and black members of the US occupying forces. The mothers were matched for socio-economic status, and the children were tested for their IQ. The results were as follows:
Group | Boys | Girls | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
White | 101 | 93 | 8 |
Mixed-Race | 97 | 96 | 1 |
Difference | 4 | -3 | |
As is clearly observable, this study (which is commonly known as the "Eyferth Study") found no statistically significant difference between white and mixed-race children. The majority of researchers, including James Flynn (the researcher who discovered the Flynn Effect), Richard E. Nisbett, and Nathan Brody, feel that this study supports the conclusion that racial gaps in IQ are mostly or wholly environmental in origin. However, since many "race-realists" dismiss this study on the grounds that it only included men who had qualified for military service, we should look at a number of more recent studies on the matter, to make things clearer.
One useful study was published in the journal Child Development in 1972. This experiment studied black, white, and mixed-race children raised in British long-stay residential nurseries, subjecting them to three different tests of cognitive ability. Two out of three tests found "no significant difference" between the various groups, while one test found "significantly higher" scores for non-whites. One wonders whether the racists would accept this as evidence of black superiority (I think we know the answer).
Another important study was published in the journal Developmental Psychology in 1986. The author observed that black and interracial children raised by white parents had a significantly higher mean IQ score than age-matched children raised by black parents (117 vs 104), and argued that differences in early socialization explained this gap. Nisbett et. al's 2012 review found that these differences in socialization "were large enough to account for virtually the entire Black–White gap in IQ," lending more credence to the environmental argument.
Rushton and Jensen (two leading figures of scientific racism in the USA) attempted to dispute the 1986 study by arguing that the children were surveyed before adolescence, and therefore the results were unreliable; however, subsequent research (such as this work by Richard Nisbett, published in 2009) found that there is virtually no gap in heritability between ages 7 and 17, and therefore, this argument falls apart.
An aforementioned 2012 paper by Richard Nisbett (co-authored with James Flynn and other leaders in the field), published in the American Psychologist, reviewed numerous studies conducted over the past decades, finding that the evidence "fails to support a genetic hypothesis.” The authors instead argue for an environmental explanation of the racial IQ gap.
In addition, a 2017 study in the Journal of Intelligence examined trans-racial adoptions, finding that "there is no consistent IQ difference between Black adoptees raised by Whites and White adoptees raised by Whites." This supports the "nil hypothesis" (i.e. "that adoptees of different races have similar IQs when raised in the same environment"), indicating that there is no genetic IQ gap between races.
In the book IQ and Human Intelligence, Nicholas Mackintosh of Cambridge University surveyed various studies on the topic of race and IQ (including many of those previously mentioned), finding their results to be entirely compatible with a 100% environmental explanation of racial IQ gaps, with no significant evidence found for a genetic difference.
Mackintosh's book also explores other common racialist arguments, such as old "whites have larger brains" line. He explains that there is no evidence to support a difference in IQ based on brain sizes; for example, he points out that men and women have gaps in average brain size, without an observable difference in average IQ's. This is corroborated by other experts, such as Nisbett et. al's 2012 review of the research on the topic.
A study published in the journal World Archaeology in 2006 thoroughly debunks Rushton's claim that prehistoric whites were smarter than prehistoric blacks due to evolution. As it states:
In 2005, Nisbett published an article in the journal Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, directly responding to Rushton and Jenson. He rips apart their various claims, stating that they "ignore or misinterpret most of the evidence of greatest relevance to the question of heritability of the Black-White IQ gap." Nisbett analyzes the research on race and IQ, and concludes that "the evidence most relevant to the question indicates that the genetic contribution to the Black-White IQ gap is nil."
In short, decades of research have debunked the notion that whites and non-whites have a genetic difference in intelligence.
Racial Bias and the Criminal Justice System
There is significant evidence that the criminal justice system in the United States (including, but not limited to, the police and courts) are biased against black people. To begin with, black Americans are more likely to be killed by the police while unarmed than are white people. A 2016 study from the American Journal of Preventative Medicine found the following:
A 2018 study, published in the American Journal of Public Health, found the following:
A 2020 study in the journal Social Psychology and Personality Research, which employed a "crime rate–correcting benchmark" (thus accounting for differences in crime rates), found "strong and statistically reliable anti-Black racial disparity in police killings of unarmed civilians."
Black people are more likely to be arrested than whites for crimes which both commit at similar rates. For example, a report from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) found that "Despite roughly equal usage rates, Blacks are 3.73 times more likely than whites to be arrested for marijuana."
Research has also found that non-whites receive harsher penalties than whites do for the same crimes. For example, a report from the United States Sentencing Commission found that blacks receive sentences which are, on average, 20% longer than whites for the same exact crime.
A 2011 study from the Sentencing Project has also found that only approx. 60% of the gap in racial imprisonment disparity can be explained by differing crime rates, meaning that approx. 40% is due to other factors, including racial bias.
"Non-Whites Commit More Crime Than Whites!"
Decades of research has found that, while there is a measured difference in crime rates among racial groups, this can be explained by socioeconomic factors, as well as discrimination in the criminal justice system. No compelling evidence has been found for a racial difference in crime rates when socioeconomic class is taken into account. The Oxford Handbook of Ethnicity, Crime, and Immigration summarizes these points quite well.
A study published in the journal Social Forces in 1996 examined Columbus, Ohio, concluding that "differences in structural disadvantage account for black-white differences in crime across communities." In other words, the racial gap in crime rates can be explained by structural inequalities in material circumstances.
A study published in the journal Criminology in 2003 found that social and environmental differences accounted for the gap in crime rates among racial groups, not some inherent tendency among any race.
"Immigrants/Refugees Are Criminals!"
Research consistently finds that immigrants (both legal and undocumented) commit fewer crimes than native-born citizens. Even the right-wing Cato Institute has published multiple reports supporting this conclusion, as has the Sentencing Project.
The United States Census Bureau published a report confirming that native-born citizens are more likely to be convicted of a crime than immigrants (regardless of legal status). This was discussed in a 2015 report from the American Immigration Council.
The Cato Institute also published a report finding no evidence to support the claims that refugees are more likely to commit violent crime or terror attacks, noting that nobody (refugee or non-refugee) from the nations on the Trump travel ban list had ever been involved in a terror attack of any kind. Their research also concluded:
In other words, the research shows that refugees and immigrants do not commit more crime than native-born citizens.
Conclusion
Racism and "race realism" are cancers, which have been given an undeserved chance to reemerge in recent years. As such, it is essential that we all be well-informed on these issues, so that we may fight back against racist nonsense. Study this information carefully, and be prepared to deploy it when necessary.
Sources
- Child Development | Environmental Effects of Language Development: A Study of Young Children in Long-Stay Residential Nurseries
- Developmental Psychology | Family Socialization and the IQ Test Performance of Traditionally and Transracially Adopted Black Children
- University of Michigan | Intelligence and How to Get It
- American Psychologist | Intelligence: New Findings and Theoretical Developments
- Journal of Intelligence | Racial IQ Differences Among Transracial Adoptees: Fact or Artifact?
- Oxford University Press | IQ and Human Intelligence
- World Archaeology | Africanist Archaeology and Ancient IQ: Racial Science and Cultural Evolution in the Twenty-First Century
- Psychology, Public Policy, and Law | Heredity, environment, and race differences in IQ: A commentary on Rushton and Jensen
- American Journal of Preventative Medicine | Deaths Due to Use of Lethal Force by Law Enforcement: Findings From the National Violent Death Reporting System, 17 U.S. States, 2009–2012
- American Journal of Public Health | Risk of Police-Involved Death by Race/Ethnicity and Place, United States, 2012-2018
- Social Psychology and Personality Science | Racial Disparities in Police Use of Deadly Force Against Unarmed Individuals Persist After Appropriately Benchmarking Shooting Data on Violent Crime Rates
- American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) | The War on Marijuana in Black and White
- United States Sentencing Commission | Demographic Differences in Sentencing
- Sentencing Project | Addressing Racial Disparities in Incarceration
- Oxford University | The Oxford Handbook of Ethnicity, Crime, and Immigration
- Social Forces | Extremely Disadvantaged Neighborhoods and Urban Crime
- Criminology | Explaining Racial and Ethnic Differences in Serious Adolescent Violent Behavior
- Cato Institute | Stiffening Immigration Enforcement Is Not the Answer to Reducing Crime
- American Immigration Council | The Criminalization of Immigration in the United States
- Cato Institute | Little National Security Benefit From Trump's Executive Order on Immigration
Lux
Kraken
- Joined
- May 27, 2019
- Posts
- 11,017
- Reputation
- 20,411
@Blackout.xl
goat2x
You are done son
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2020
- Posts
- 32,170
- Reputation
- 81,334
- OP
- #71
Wtf is that im not reading that
You can find 30+ iq studies on the internet
Deleted member 6273
Brb detoxing, can't respond to DMs for now.
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2020
- Posts
- 9,031
- Reputation
- 22,360
It's multifaceted and difficult to understand tbh. Africa's iq's are rising significantly faster than others which seem to have stabilised.
Also African kids outperform white british kids in their GCSE's.
Average African American is about 25%European but barely score higher iq points than Nigerians in Nigeria (about 5 points) despite the drastic difference in enviroments(which definitely influence iq scores)
I remember also seeing once that the igbo had the highest grades as an ethnic community in the UK as a group.
Also Charles Murray who is the author of the bell curve has a strange(kinda racist) history.
But who knows maybe it is
Also African kids outperform white british kids in their GCSE's.
Average African American is about 25%European but barely score higher iq points than Nigerians in Nigeria (about 5 points) despite the drastic difference in enviroments(which definitely influence iq scores)
I remember also seeing once that the igbo had the highest grades as an ethnic community in the UK as a group.
Also Charles Murray who is the author of the bell curve has a strange(kinda racist) history.
But who knows maybe it is
Carbon Copy
Bronze
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2020
- Posts
- 418
- Reputation
- 731
When you look at statistics regarding IQ and race, you always have to look out for selection bias in the study. When only the smartest people from any country go to another country they obviously will outperform the native population. You could also import the 5 smartest aboriginals to Iceland and then do an IQ study in regard to race and surprisingly enough you come to the conclusion that aboriginals are the smartest race on average (damn it can't be genetics, so it has to be that juice kangaroo meat). But why compare blacks to whites? Go to the extremes to prove the point. Let's compare aboriginals to Ashkenazi jews. 20% of all Nobel prizes have been awarded to a group of people who make up only 0.2% of the world's population (probably even less if you only count the Askenazi jews and not other jews). And those people didn't exactly have an easy history either. Now compare them to aboriginals. 29% percent of the Australian prison population is Aboriginal despite only making up for 3% percent of the population (a factor of almost 10, in the USA the factor for blacks is around 3 for comparison). The numbers would probably be even higher if they didn't treat them with kid gloves and if the law enforcement was better in those reservations). Aboriginal Kids (mostly mixed) have to write songs in which they try to tell them that sniffing on petrol isn't a good thing.
I have read somewhere that a problem in Australia is that Aboriginals sleep on the warm street during the night and therefore frequently get hit by cars (don't know if true). If someone tries to tell you that all of this is just environment he is beyond retarded.
I have read somewhere that a problem in Australia is that Aboriginals sleep on the warm street during the night and therefore frequently get hit by cars (don't know if true). If someone tries to tell you that all of this is just environment he is beyond retarded.
goat2x
You are done son
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2020
- Posts
- 32,170
- Reputation
- 81,334
- OP
- #74
I didnt compare them to whites
i compared them to the rest of the races
they are below all
Carbon Copy
Bronze
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2020
- Posts
- 418
- Reputation
- 731
True, but when people ask this question they always imply that there couldn't be any difference whatsoever between any race (not only black and whites) so to prove the point it's better to go to the extremes (and with jews and aboriginals there isn't such a loaded history so you don't get labeled as a nazi immediately)
I don't know if you can put all blacks in the same category. There seems to be a lot of genetic variance between Africans.
goat2x
You are done son
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2020
- Posts
- 32,170
- Reputation
- 81,334
- OP
- #76
look at the thread there is a study on africans
Blackout.xl
Retired.
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2019
- Posts
- 23,344
- Reputation
- 47,559
I’m high iq and African
goat2x
You are done son
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2020
- Posts
- 32,170
- Reputation
- 81,334
Blackout.xl
Retired.
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2019
- Posts
- 23,344
- Reputation
- 47,559
Every iq test I do even on Mensa dk is above 110
goat2x
You are done son
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2020
- Posts
- 32,170
- Reputation
- 81,334
- OP
- #80
Blackout.xl
Retired.
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2019
- Posts
- 23,344
- Reputation
- 47,559
Created and administered directly by Mensa. Mensa.dk and Mensa.no are seen as the most accurate, with Mensa.dk often giving people scores below what they scored on real life Mensa testsinternet iq tests
goat2x
You are done son
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2020
- Posts
- 32,170
- Reputation
- 81,334
- OP
- #82
post the photo
Blackout.xl
Retired.
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2019
- Posts
- 23,344
- Reputation
- 47,559
Of what?
TsarTsar444
Asexual peaceful balkan monk
- Joined
- May 5, 2019
- Posts
- 41,369
- Reputation
- 105,068
i scored 130iq on mensa no tbh
D
Deleted member 6380
Af jooga looma adeego
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2020
- Posts
- 12,035
- Reputation
- 13,916
LOW-iq thread, check my avi;
Blackout.xl
Retired.
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2019
- Posts
- 23,344
- Reputation
- 47,559
Mensa no is seen as accurate but less accurate than Mensa.dk. Try Mensa.dk
Carbon Copy
Bronze
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2020
- Posts
- 418
- Reputation
- 731
I had to do a captcha every 5 min on the last mensa test I did because they thought an AI was at work. The next day a cute milf waited in my office. Apparently she was a professor at Harvard. She gave me a blowjob to convince me to teach at Harvard. I just laughed and kicked that dumb slut out of my office. No larp. 100% legit. Really happened!
goat2x
You are done son
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2020
- Posts
- 32,170
- Reputation
- 81,334
- OP
- #88
low iq
cant even see it
lifestyle21873
do not disturb
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2020
- Posts
- 10,177
- Reputation
- 15,892
unrelated but broderick hunter is high iq
And gigatyrone
And gigatyrone
goat2x
You are done son
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2020
- Posts
- 32,170
- Reputation
- 81,334
- OP
- #90
idk i will never do an iq test again
boring as shit
D
Deleted member 6380
Af jooga looma adeego
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2020
- Posts
- 12,035
- Reputation
- 13,916
goat2x
You are done son
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2020
- Posts
- 32,170
- Reputation
- 81,334
- OP
- #92
wont read it tbh
too much
rather jus tread studies than fairy tales
D
Deleted member 6380
Af jooga looma adeego
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2020
- Posts
- 12,035
- Reputation
- 13,916
ok
TsarTsar444
Asexual peaceful balkan monk
- Joined
- May 5, 2019
- Posts
- 41,369
- Reputation
- 105,068
i watched this video of a chess grandmaster doing the menaa.no iq test, and i guessed the answers faster then him by a whole minute. IQ is cope
Deleted member 6273
Brb detoxing, can't respond to DMs for now.
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2020
- Posts
- 9,031
- Reputation
- 22,360
Was that Nakamura jfl he barely got over 100
goat2x
You are done son
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2020
- Posts
- 32,170
- Reputation
- 81,334
- OP
- #96
cope test
Deleted member 6273
Brb detoxing, can't respond to DMs for now.
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2020
- Posts
- 9,031
- Reputation
- 22,360
TsarTsar444
Asexual peaceful balkan monk
- Joined
- May 5, 2019
- Posts
- 41,369
- Reputation
- 105,068
it's not shit, thats exactly an iq test jfl, the problem is it only tests it in one way, a psychiatrist will test you in more ways
Deleted member 8461
Equinox
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2020
- Posts
- 2,615
- Reputation
- 5,298
morons here don't know what their talking about. genetics may also contribute to lower iq in nigs, but environment 100% for sure does:
- BEING POOR
- GROWING UP IN A STRESSFULL DANGEROUS DEADLY ENVIRONMENT
- EATING FRIED CHICKEN AND SHIT FOOD
- NOT BEING CHALLENGED ENOUGH BY TEACHERS, SCHOOL, AND PARENTS FROM AN EARLY AGE
- EXPOSURE TO DRUGS AND ALCOHOL AT AN EARLY AGE
ALL THESE THINGS DAMAGE A CHILD'S BRAIN ITS NO WONDER 50% OF BLACKS ACT LIKE CHIMPS.
White people like to pretend its genetics so they can rationalize the absolute despicable treatment of the black population for OVER 200 FUCKING YEARS.
CUMSKINS AND JEWS MADE NIGS VIOLENT AND STUPID
CUMSKINS AND JEWS CREATED SHITTY VIOLENT BLACK CULTURE
CUMSKINS AND JEWS CREATED BLACK POVERTY
- BEING POOR
- GROWING UP IN A STRESSFULL DANGEROUS DEADLY ENVIRONMENT
- EATING FRIED CHICKEN AND SHIT FOOD
- NOT BEING CHALLENGED ENOUGH BY TEACHERS, SCHOOL, AND PARENTS FROM AN EARLY AGE
- EXPOSURE TO DRUGS AND ALCOHOL AT AN EARLY AGE
ALL THESE THINGS DAMAGE A CHILD'S BRAIN ITS NO WONDER 50% OF BLACKS ACT LIKE CHIMPS.
White people like to pretend its genetics so they can rationalize the absolute despicable treatment of the black population for OVER 200 FUCKING YEARS.
CUMSKINS AND JEWS MADE NIGS VIOLENT AND STUPID
CUMSKINS AND JEWS CREATED SHITTY VIOLENT BLACK CULTURE
CUMSKINS AND JEWS CREATED BLACK POVERTY
goat2x
You are done son
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2020
- Posts
- 32,170
- Reputation
- 81,334
- OP
- #100
You are an idiot. jfl all of your shitty points can be disproven by a baboon
Similar threads
Persians and iranic peoples are the most superior nonwhites in the entire world besides east Asians.
- CFW432
- Offtopic
BrahminBoss
dehydrated
