Brutal blackpill: Humans are NOT a K selection species

disillusioned

disillusioned

Kraken
Joined
Jan 2, 2019
Posts
9,719
Reputation
28,312
For those who don't understand what the difference between R and K selection is:


K selection: Have few offspring and treat them very well.
R selection: Have a ton of offspring and hope some of them survive somehow.

The conventional wisdom is that humans are a K selection species, Problem is that this is just a yet another normie delusion the purpose of which is to defend the idea that humans are monogamous. The reason birthrates are lower now is merely because of birth control and feminism. Left to their natural impulses humans will breed like rats and have literally dozens of offspring many of whom will die young. Look at the third world where you got dumb as rock males fathering literally hundreds of children. How the fuck does that count as K selection?

I suspect that the reason humans are considered a K selection species despite all the blatant evidence suggesting otherwise is merely because suggesting that they are actually R selected would imply that monogamy isn't natural which would destroy the normie bluepill delusion about female nature.
 
  • +1
Reactions: thereallegend, PanMagister, thisend and 4 others
spawns me
 
  • +1
Reactions: thereallegend, GenericChad1444 and retard
Poor countries have more children, so not wrong in terms of coinflip survival. Also, ERs dad has multiple kids, couldn't care for one with quality.
 
  • +1
Reactions: thereallegend
1568767573681
 
For those who don't understand what the difference between R and K selection is:


K selection: Have few offspring and treat them very well.
R selection: Have a ton of offspring and hope some of them survive somehow.

The conventional wisdom is that humans are a K selection species, Problem is that this is just a yet another normie delusion the purpose of which is to defend the idea that humans are monogamous. The reason birthrates are lower now is merely because of birth control and feminism. Left to their natural impulses humans will breed like rats and have literally dozens of offspring many of whom will die young. Look at the third world where you got dumb as rock males fathering literally hundreds of children. How the fuck does that count as K selection?

I suspect that the reason humans are considered a K selection species despite all the blatant evidence suggesting otherwise is merely because suggesting that they are actually R selected would imply that monogamy isn't natural which would destroy the normie bluepill delusion about female nature.
lol at tradcucks who think that the nuclear family is somehow "traditional" humans have lived in tribes like herd animals for millennias
 
  • +1
Reactions: thereallegend and Deleted member 12344
I don't believe this is to be true, humans take forever to be raised to a decent age where they can take care of themselves, where as baby giraffes can hit the ground out of their mother's womb and already walk

The reason humans have so many kids is because we seem to enjoy sex more than most animals who only do it during mating season, also due to humans breeding with very low quality males and females, it screws up the entire gene pool where as in nature the harshness of living would surely weed out the garbage young humans
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: n0rthface, thereallegend, Dr. Greenberg and 4 others
I don't believe this is to be true, humans take forever to be raised to a decent age where they can take care of themselves, where as baby giraffes can hit the ground out of their mother's womb and already walk

The reason humans have so many kids is because we seem to enjoy sex more than most animals who only do it during mating season, also due to humans breeding with very low quality males and females, it screws up the entire gene pool where as in nature the harshness of living would surely weed out the garbage young humans

Fail logic is fail. Rat children aren't very independent either and horde around the mother. Granted they grow faster than humans but rats also don't live anywhere near as long.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 12344
EnvironmentUnstable and unpredictableStable and predictable
Mortality rateDensity independent and HighDensity dependent and low
Population sizeHigh and below the carrying capacityLow and near the carrying capacity
Survivorship curveType IIIType I and II
Selection favoursRapid development, Small size,Slow development, Large size
Life spanShortLonger
Parental CareLowHigh

Left is r, Right Side is k

Humans are heavily correlated with the right side, except for population size due to us being WAY OVER the top of the food chain conquering air, land, sea, and even space
 
EnvironmentUnstable and unpredictableStable and predictable
Mortality rateDensity independent and HighDensity dependent and low
Population sizeHigh and below the carrying capacityLow and near the carrying capacity
Survivorship curveType IIIType I and II
Selection favoursRapid development, Small size,Slow development, Large size
Life spanShortLonger
Parental CareLowHigh

Left is r, Right Side is k

Humans are heavily correlated with the right side, except for population size due to us being WAY OVER the top of the food chain conquering air, land, sea, and even space

Epic gigacope the only reason we are now mostly on the right is because modern civilization enabled it even just a few hundred years ago most people would have been on the left let alone tens of thousands of years ago.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: thereallegend, Deleted member 12344, CopingCel and 2 others
we spend up to a quarter of our lives being raised by our parents, usually birthed on our own (twins are rare, let alone litters of siblings) and you fat retards think we're not a K selection species?

Mariana's Trench IQ takes here
 
  • +1
Reactions: Dr. Greenberg
we spend up to a quarter of our lives being raised by our parents, usually birthed on our own (twins are rare, let alone litters of siblings) and you fat retards think we're not a K selection species?

Mariana's Trench IQ takes here

Low IQ this wasn't the case until only very recently thanks to feminism. In the past women would have a dozen children and kids would be considered adults at 14. You had 12 year olds working in factory jobs.
 
  • +1
Reactions: thereallegend and Deleted member 12344
True. Humans are like animals that one leader (chad) have all the foids and other males have nothing. That's how humans work
 
  • +1
Reactions: thereallegend and Deleted member 12344
Low IQ this wasn't the case until only very recently thanks to feminism. In the past women would have a dozen children and kids would be considered adults at 14. You had 12 year olds working in factory jobs.
as opposed to actual r selection types who don't take 15-20 years to grow up, yeah, you're really big brained

made one counter argument and refuted yourself, name one other r type that looks after its young for !2 to 15 years" since that's apparently the natural length (it isn't)
 
For those who don't understand what the difference between R and K selection is:


K selection: Have few offspring and treat them very well.
R selection: Have a ton of offspring and hope some of them survive somehow.

The conventional wisdom is that humans are a K selection species, Problem is that this is just a yet another normie delusion the purpose of which is to defend the idea that humans are monogamous. The reason birthrates are lower now is merely because of birth control and feminism. Left to their natural impulses humans will breed like rats and have literally dozens of offspring many of whom will die young. Look at the third world where you got dumb as rock males fathering literally hundreds of children. How the fuck does that count as K selection?

I suspect that the reason humans are considered a K selection species despite all the blatant evidence suggesting otherwise is merely because suggesting that they are actually R selected would imply that monogamy isn't natural which would destroy the normie bluepill delusion about female nature.
@disillusioned do you think different races can have different selection types ?
 
Mongoloids are most k selected, later sexual maturation and low promiscuity, highest sense of in-group

Negroids are the most r selected, earliest sexual maturation and highest promiscuity
 
Some valid points.
 
Mongoloids are most k selected, later sexual maturation and low promiscuity, highest sense of in-group

Negroids are the most r selected, earliest sexual maturation and highest promiscuity
Not true early steppe and Asian peoples had dozens of kids even genghis khan has millions of relatives today the idea that Asians are lower t therefore don’t want to fuck many women is retarded every man wants to fuck it’s only if the females are willing to in modern times.
 
Not true early steppe and Asian peoples had dozens of kids even genghis khan has millions of relatives today the idea that Asians are lower t therefore don’t want to fuck many women is retarded every man wants to fuck it’s only if the females are willing to in modern times.
Men are more r selected than females.

Men = far and wide, take what you can get

Women = secure best genetics and best genetics only
 

Similar threads

D
2
Replies
56
Views
2K
King Solomon
King Solomon
Xangsane
Replies
211
Views
3K
Xangsane
Xangsane
dreamcake1mo
Replies
44
Views
7K
Funnyunenjoyer1
Funnyunenjoyer1
mogstars
Replies
79
Views
5K
anitalooksmax
anitalooksmax

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top