[Discussion] Eugenics doesn't apply to modern society

Chineseguyslefort

Chineseguyslefort

Wizard
Joined
Apr 12, 2020
Posts
1,240
Reputation
1,187
Time online
19d 21h 47m
These sluts aren't having Chad's babies, they're having protected sex and taking birth control pills. And most fathers in modern society are weak boned guys who look like they are cooperative partners who will help with the kids. Beta men pass their genes on because they are more likely to get married and have kids.
 
Uglybrazilian

Uglybrazilian

Professional
Joined
May 21, 2020
Posts
940
Reputation
1,116
Time online
13d 23h 0m
Having kids is nonsense
Why would you care for passing on your genes if you will be dead
 
Danish_Retard

Danish_Retard

yuyevon stan account
Joined
Apr 20, 2020
Posts
3,646
Reputation
6,178
Time online
28d 11h 1m
Having kids is nonsense
Why would you care for passing on your genes if you will be dead
Why wouldn't you want to have kids? Do you just wanna ride the hedonistic treadmill for the rest of your life? That will surely be a good life jfl
 
Uglybrazilian

Uglybrazilian

Professional
Joined
May 21, 2020
Posts
940
Reputation
1,116
Time online
13d 23h 0m
Why wouldn't you want to have kids? Do you just wanna ride the hedonistic treadmill for the rest of your life? That will surely be a good life jfl
Just because it doesnt seem like a good or useful thing to do

I dont see how having a kid would improve my life
 
fonzee98

fonzee98

If you do not fight, life will never be won
Joined
Dec 23, 2019
Posts
4,104
Reputation
5,565
Time online
38d 5h 42m
These sluts aren't having Chad's babies, they're having protected sex and taking birth control pills. And most fathers in modern society are weak boned guys who look like they are cooperative partners who will help with the kids. Beta men pass their genes on because they are more likely to get married and have kids.
eugenics doesnt apply too because today nature isnt the one which chooses who lives, the man does with the help of modern medicine
 
animus

animus

Trainee
Joined
May 4, 2020
Posts
96
Reputation
176
Time online
7d 8h 51m
These sluts aren't having Chad's babies, they're having protected sex and taking birth control pills. And most fathers in modern society are weak boned guys who look like they are cooperative partners who will help with the kids. Beta men pass their genes on because they are more likely to get married and have kids.
Actually its dysgenics at work rn. Many high IQ normies or chads dont have kids while the lower (IQ) classes have the most kids. And as you said, the betas are having more kids than the chads. So the future looks bright indeed, lads.
 
Chineseguyslefort

Chineseguyslefort

Wizard
Joined
Apr 12, 2020
Posts
1,240
Reputation
1,187
Time online
19d 21h 47m
bump...

I know GL guys who have had sex with over 10 women, but they don't have kids, even though they are able to. Meanwhile I know plenty of unattractive beta providers that have kids.
 
Kurwa

Kurwa

5eryhgtf54wersujh4
Joined
Dec 19, 2019
Posts
422
Reputation
373
Time online
12d 3h 24m
Women simply have too much perks in modern life. Just give men an ability to do a "financial abortion" and we're all set. That one thing would be a major game changer.
 
Golang

Golang

FBI Spy. I'll doxx everyone here.
Joined
Feb 1, 2020
Posts
1,297
Reputation
2,760
Time online
29d 23h 11m
It seems that greycels here are too low I understand.

Girls don’t want to settle down with Chad because they know that high T leads to bad parenting, BUT this doesn’t mean they don’t want Chad’s semen, they do, but know that they can’t afford raising the child alone.

This is where the beta comes in to the rescue, while the girl is settled down with the beta, she will cheat on him with Chad and have Chad’s child who the beta will raise as his own, the beta will of course have a child with her, 1 out of the 3 or 4 of her children will be of the beta.

It’s the philosophy of “Alpha fux, beta buxx”

Here is a thread I made when my Psychology professor explained it (slides included)

https://looksmax.me/threads/psychol...lls-yet-normies-are-still-blue-pilled.142260/
 
Chineseguyslefort

Chineseguyslefort

Wizard
Joined
Apr 12, 2020
Posts
1,240
Reputation
1,187
Time online
19d 21h 47m
It seems that greycels here are too low I understand.

Girls don’t want to settle down with Chad because they know that high T leads to bad parenting, BUT this doesn’t mean they don’t want Chad’s semen, they do, but know that they can’t afford raising the child alone.

This is where the beta comes in to the rescue, while the girl is settled down with the beta, she will cheat on him with Chad and have Chad’s child who the beta will raise as his own, the beta will of course have a child with her, 1 out of the 3 or 4 of her children will be of the beta.

It’s the philosophy of “Alpha fux, beta buxx”

Here is a thread I made when my Psychology professor explained it (slides included)

https://looksmax.me/threads/psychol...lls-yet-normies-are-still-blue-pilled.142260/
Here're the real statistics, right from Wikipedia:
The rate of non-paternity is commonly quoted to be around 10%.[2][3][4] However, a 2005 scientific review of international published studies of paternal discrepancy found a range in incidence from 0.8% to 30% (median 3.7%), suggesting that the widely quoted figure of 10% of non-paternal events is an overestimate. In situations where disputed parentage was the reason for the paternity testing, there were higher levels; an incidence of 17% to 33% (median of 26.9%). Most at risk of parental discrepancy were those born to younger parents, to unmarried couples and those of lower socio-economic status, or from certain cultural groups.[5]

The median rate of misattributed paternity is 3.7%. If you're getting a DNA test to check on paternity because you think it may not be your kid, the chance is about one out of four it isn't. However among the population of men who are NOT getting DNA tests to check whether their children are theirs or not, the chance a kid isn't yours is sub-2%.
 
Golang

Golang

FBI Spy. I'll doxx everyone here.
Joined
Feb 1, 2020
Posts
1,297
Reputation
2,760
Time online
29d 23h 11m
Here're the real statistics, right from Wikipedia:
The rate of non-paternity is commonly quoted to be around 10%.[2][3][4] However, a 2005 scientific review of international published studies of paternal discrepancy found a range in incidence from 0.8% to 30% (median 3.7%), suggesting that the widely quoted figure of 10% of non-paternal events is an overestimate. In situations where disputed parentage was the reason for the paternity testing, there were higher levels; an incidence of 17% to 33% (median of 26.9%). Most at risk of parental discrepancy were those born to younger parents, to unmarried couples and those of lower socio-economic status, or from certain cultural groups.[5]

The median rate of misattributed paternity is 3.7%. If you're getting a DNA test to check on paternity because you think it may not be your kid, the chance is about one out of four it isn't. However among the population of men who are NOT getting DNA tests to check whether their children are theirs or not, the chance a kid isn't yours is sub-2%.
Not a word was read
 

Viewing This Thread (Looksmaxers: 0, Bluepilled: 1)

Top