How closely do our sexual preferences align (are we competing for the same women)?

How closely do our sexual preferences align (are we competing for the same women)?


  • Total voters
    63
Reckless Turtle

Reckless Turtle

Kraken
Joined
Jul 29, 2021
Posts
16,599
Reputation
23,037
Assume the following conditions:
  1. For the sake of this discussion, only consider physical attractiveness
  2. You acquire exactly 450k USD every week
  3. You must have unprotected sex exactly three times per week with the same woman during the week (but you can change women after each week)
  4. You must give the woman exactly 50k USD for each sexual session (150k per week)
  5. You have to compete with other men for sexual access to women in a realistic 2023 manner
  6. The collection of women you choose cannot extremely vary in physical attributes (tiny and large, natural and extremely bimbofied, etc.)
  7. Consider who you would approach for sex under the aforementioned conditions even if you believe rejection is possible (but not to the extent that point 3 cannot be satisfied)

The listed women do not necessarily reflect the absolutely most attractive women to you, rather, they reflect a range that would be considered under the aforementioned conditions.

If we have poor alignment, post your counterexamples using candids only (which will likely only be possible with celebrities, models, athletes, etc.).

  1. Gettyimages 81805032 2048x2048
  2. Zingara01
  3. Post 62633 0 1598667079 28304
  4. Post 3782 1171634039
  5. Gettyimages 1303487391 2048x2048
  6. CristianoBuraniSpring2013I6w7xerUKBZx
  7. 43044 1259 62146 3015 fullsize
  8. 1590448 800w
  9. Ruj8taAY o
  10. MICHAEL KORS glamour 14may13 rex b
  11. Tumblr d0ed1be2b7a18f2e91ec0246ac5f2e07 f8347fac 1280
  12. Camila morrone looks gorgeous in a satin dress while out for walk with her mom and a few frien
  13. 321176782 chloe ss 1995105b260483746614bfef749fc4087c2271

  14. Post 89779 0 24007100 1434908014
  15. 00010 CUSHNIE FALL 2019 READY TO WEARd954d82a57333c739caec3a2e3712061
  16. 1567428174 EmanuelUngaro1999WomenRTW530f70313a6ebb6c573b65b3a2798fe0dd
  17. 09 tbt doutzen

  18. Gettyimages 106418205 2048x2048
  19. E9NGBJDL o
  20. Roberto cavalli ss 2002 1eccda40730e580c9057bb4e67b0aef9f
  21. Post 9023 0 75218100 1432119857
  22. 49537983a5bcf630c10b5f5d497cd1a9
  23. Ac7c311c85a2b838cd76438c766399dc opt resp2400v
  24. Tumblr ad93ad7c3be939de1c81dcbc4226846a d4f1190a 1280
  25. L669 21P 02D 284 z RUNWAY8697ba149bb0204bcaf8b0781448547f
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: lemonnz, Deleted member 32485, emeraldglass and 2 others
Additional:
Gettyimages 1222859863 2048x2048

Gettyimages 83059333 2048x2048

Gettyimages 1438965896 2048x2048

LoKXJPt

Gettyimages 51947848 2048x2048

5eec55147667029

Gettyimages 110070494 2048x2048

550627357 PierreBalmain1998HauteCouture533c97138ae31f11b5f0ef414050f063cd

Gettyimages 50986033 2048x2048

Tumblr 3aaf948a724b8fe8a973a67513df3718 4ce22ae2 1280

1750717379 fabianasemprebomca019 de6abd0ce1cde74a7c9faed652c82b33

C78d59147251090

CustoBarcelonaSpring200534fWbnkP30dx

Tumblr pnjlj4ZrVJ1x1o8oqo1 1280

1466132028 zobos99tomaszStarzewski635aa89ada72d5b3ade476096f171977

Gettyimages 1422416482 2048x2048

Wsh6exr6dmr71

Gettyimages 967733016 2048x2048

Post 19430 1307093015

51835 Kat Bespyatikh 05 123 907lo

Post 42054 0 1446106911 21515

Tumblr 0c801cc836f325923ac89c2f364daddf 5b042acb 1280

LuisaBeccariaSpring2007PHWKCD10rCSx

Post 19430 1302690142

Gettyimages 1436111937 2048x2048
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Abhorrence
wtf r u trying to do ? can u simplify ur idea
It's inspired by this thread, but with specific details. @Xangsane
 
Last edited:
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: Abhorrence and Xangsane
  • Earth Dollar
  • ArcherxArcher
  • Saggitarian
  • Roamer
  • qotav
    • cloUder
    • JBcollector
    • saulgoodman
    • Trilogy
    • aesthetic beauty
    • emeraldglass
    • ceo
  • Danish_Retard
  • Reckless Turtle
  • Willmogulater
  • Graham
  • Guba
  • chrollo
  • bishōnenmaxxer
  • Maesthetics=King
  • try2beme
  • NegativeNorwood
  • AspiringMogger
  • orangomango2003
  • BrahminBoss
  • 5'7 zoomer
  • OCDisneyChad
  • TRUE_CEL
  • Slayer
  • JL~
  • IHateMyself
  • Hoso
  • Bitchwhipper2
  • Ekil73_YT
  • Sprinkles
  • gribsufer1
  • Milosz
  • mrriceguy
  • Fearless_RED
  • jrobts.
  • mbolo
  • 4Inch4
  • seleucus
  • Blond3cel
  • rdqs
 
autism is an epidemic
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Latinolooksmaxxer, Mog3D, iblamechico and 12 others
I saw something similar to this on a link to an archived Tumblr thread on Google image search called "the zero type" meaning appeals to all
 
I saw something similar to this on a link to an archived Tumblr thread on Google image search called "the zero type" meaning appeals to all
Couldn't find anything
 
I'm trying to find it again but it was Stacy after stacy
The point of the OP is to include curveballs that may have less alignment. You still haven't voted.
 
I found it I will vote now
It just seems like a typical wank bank like /r/models. Hardly any of these are candids either. The point of the OP is to test the limits of competition and filling niches.
 
  • +1
Reactions: lemonnz
It just seems like a typical wank bank like /r/models. Hardly any of these are candids either. The point of the OP is to test the limits of competition and filling niches.
Why does it matter if it's candids or not I don't believe there is diversity of appeal except for fetish people and it's ironic you calling the page a wank bank and ignoring your op
 
Because candids help control for frauding.
People fraud to get the same features.
I mostly agree. The fact that you voted 8/10 contradicts your logic though.
8/10 is high enough in my opinion to account for fetish people 9/10 would be underestimating how many fetish loving people there are imo
A number of examples in the blog you linked were intentionally posed as softcore pornography.
Underwear pics is close to softcore shows preferred body type
 
Even if you’re a chadlite these ladies wont sneeze in your direction
 
  • +1
Reactions: Xangsane
People fraud to get the same features.
That doesn't invalidate my point.

8/10 is high enough in my opinion to account for fetish people 9/10 would be underestimating how many fetish loving people there are imo
The assessment is meant to be based on your personal opinion rather than a prediction of the average. You've already indicated that we wouldn't be competing for exactly the same women, and that most likely isn't due to fetishes.

Underwear pics is close to softcore shows preferred body type
Underwear and bikini examples are preferable for assessing body types, but hypersexualized poses incorporate another element of frauding (as opposed to walking a runway).
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: try2beme
Idk but none of them are hot really big booty girls are better
 
  • +1
Reactions: lemonnz, hypernormie, thenewhebbe and 1 other person
Ohhh i get it now
@Reckless Turtle
 
All are too intimidating for me
 
  • +1
Reactions: Xangsane
  • +1
Reactions: try2beme
Roasties
 
  • JFL
Reactions: traveler
they are what would be considered pretty but reality is different

people focus on the paper stats while the average person in real life will be drawn to the first available decent option so yeah men are competing for similar females

but other condition can arise that restrict them from competing
 
Your thread was flawed because you tried to cut and paste fashion model faces (Imaan Hammam) onto chubby bodies. Our only overlaps are favela mulattas (Lais Ribeiro, for example), but their bodies are allegedly way too lean for you.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Xangsane
Your thread was flawed because you tried to cut and paste fashion model faces (Imaan Hammam) onto chubby bodies. Our only overlaps are favela mulattas (Lais Ribeiro, for example), but their bodies are allegedly way too lean for you.
"chubby" low T homo.
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: 98Zdeed98 and bishōnenmaxxer
jfl poll is filled with transexuals
 
Those women are rich billionaire only
Also most people find their faces hot not their auschwitz tier bodies
You still haven't answered my question.
 
Assume the following conditions:
  1. For the sake of this discussion, only consider physical attractiveness
  2. You acquire exactly 450k USD every week
  3. You must have unprotected sex exactly three times per week with the same woman during the week (but you can change women after each week)
  4. You must give the woman exactly 50k USD for each sexual session (150k per week)
  5. You have to compete with other men for sexual access to women in a realistic 2023 manner
  6. The collection of women you choose cannot extremely vary in physical attributes (tiny and large, natural and extremely bimbofied, etc.)
  7. Consider who you would approach for sex under the aforementioned conditions even if you believe rejection is possible (but not to the extent that point 3 cannot be satisfied)

The listed women do not necessarily reflect the absolutely most attractive women to you, rather, they reflect a range that would be considered under the aforementioned conditions.

If we have poor alignment, post your counterexamples using candids only (which will likely only be possible with celebrities, models, athletes, etc.).

  1. View attachment 2254529
  2. View attachment 2254533
  3. View attachment 2254534
  4. View attachment 2254536
  5. View attachment 2254539
  6. View attachment 2254540
  7. View attachment 2254542
  8. View attachment 2254544
  9. View attachment 2254546
  10. View attachment 2254551
  11. View attachment 2254552
  12. View attachment 2254555
  13. View attachment 2254559
  14. View attachment 2254560
  15. View attachment 2254561
  16. View attachment 2254569
  17. View attachment 2254572
  18. View attachment 2254578
  19. View attachment 2254589
  20. View attachment 2254595
  21. View attachment 2254574
  22. View attachment 2254579
  23. View attachment 2254584
  24. View attachment 2254580
  25. View attachment 2254576
2 and 7 are imo the best looking ones, the rest are just bland
 
@Xangsane your comments suggest a 1/10 competition level, not a 3/10. I dunno how this is a hard concept for you to understand.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Xangsane

Similar threads

6"4 Tyrone(I'm not)
Replies
12
Views
374
Sexually Disabled
Sexually Disabled
the_nextDavidLaid
Replies
17
Views
815
Detective
Detective
heightmaxxing
Replies
9
Views
526
OwenGwyther
OwenGwyther
AlphaLooksmaxxer666
Replies
18
Views
1K
future_darktriad000
future_darktriad000

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top