How closely do our sexual preferences align (are we competing for the same women)?

How closely do our sexual preferences align (are we competing for the same women)?


  • Total voters
    63

These aren’t candids but here are more than enough examples
When you try to look for AI-generated women IRL
Joe Biden Reaction GIF by The Democrats
 
  • JFL
Reactions: AspiringMogger
bump
 
  • WTF
Reactions: Crusile
No Asians, only one anorexic girl (the 12th additional one), no tiny short girls with fat asses and flat chests… my tastes may be like this because I know I will never get the kind of women in OP though
 
my tastes may be like this because I know I will never get the kind of women in OP though
Reread the instructions before you vote based on this.
 
Assume the following conditions:
  1. For the sake of this discussion, only consider physical attractiveness
  2. You acquire exactly 450k USD every week
  3. You must have unprotected sex exactly three times per week with the same woman during the week (but you can change women after each week)
  4. You must give the woman exactly 50k USD for each sexual session (150k per week)
  5. You have to compete with other men for sexual access to women in a realistic 2023 manner
  6. The collection of women you choose cannot extremely vary in physical attributes (tiny and large, natural and extremely bimbofied, etc.)
  7. Consider who you would approach for sex under the aforementioned conditions even if you believe rejection is possible (but not to the extent that point 3 cannot be satisfied)

The listed women do not necessarily reflect the absolutely most attractive women to you, rather, they reflect a range that would be considered under the aforementioned conditions.

If we have poor alignment, post your counterexamples using candids only (which will likely only be possible with celebrities, models, athletes, etc.).

  1. View attachment 2254529
  2. View attachment 2254533
  3. View attachment 2254534
  4. View attachment 2254536
  5. View attachment 2254539
  6. View attachment 2254540
  7. View attachment 2254542
  8. View attachment 2254544
  9. View attachment 2254546
  10. View attachment 2254551
  11. View attachment 2254552
  12. View attachment 2254555
  13. View attachment 2254559
  14. View attachment 2254560
  15. View attachment 2254561
  16. View attachment 2254569
  17. View attachment 2254572
  18. View attachment 2254578
  19. View attachment 2254589
  20. View attachment 2254595
  21. View attachment 2254574
  22. View attachment 2254579
  23. View attachment 2254584
  24. View attachment 2254580
  25. View attachment 2254576
Almost identical bro
 
Brother in christ this post is autism overload even by my standards. Also if you pick girls this skinny its just proof you never felt touch of a woman.
 
dont understand the thread, the pics are all of women
 
Alright Ill read the instructions. Thanks op @vanillaicecream @Shapeshifter
 
They all have dogshit bodies and look like men
 
Our tastes are practically different. Out of the ones you posted, these are the only 3 i would pick.

My type is very much different but not limited to 1 phenotype or particular feature.

I will post some girls I find extremely appealing in the next post in this thread
3/50 examples would translate to a 2/10 score. A 1/10 score is finding every example highly flawed.
 
@cloUder you can't just spend hours of your time talking about your sexual preferences and then not vote after viewing this thread.
 
1686613535613
Kendall
1686613563309
1686613601565
1686613617748
Snapinstaapp 348453352 261011573091920 6571187784826100784 n 1080
Snapinstaapp 340008375 745338643764402 4856502945122950069 n 1080
Snapinstaapp 317403982 6009065619124421 6029613062652921748 n 1080
1686613918659
1686613927310
a42f4c720364dd238f0496a891a89656.jpeg
6FLza9O.jpg
142_v9_bd.jpg
MV5BNjg4MTc0MDYtZDQ0Ni00YzY2LTk3YjQtZTI2MTIyNmViMmY5XkEyXkFqcGdeQXRoaXJkLXBhcnR5LXZpZGVvLXVwZGF0ZXI@._V1_QL75_UX500_CR0,47,500,281_.jpg
main-qimg-33b3d6b11fe0239e92cf5a62f3718a38-lq
1686614527071
1686614548005
29581
1686614735181
1686614891796
1686614931043
1686614955067
1686614962421
1686615010000
1686615066329
1686615126924
1686615315133
1686615327887
1686615595538



I'll post more soon
 
  • Love it
Reactions: AscendingHero
Most of these aren't candid. Palvin, Jenner, Bronova and Shayk have some overlap with the examples I posted. Bergman may have been a runway model if she was born in a later decade. Rai and Weaving have pretty faces but are too short.

Overall, there's enough overlap here that you should be voting at least 2/10.
ok 2/10 happy?
 
all of them look like men.

ideal for tradwife/reproduction:
marg-mariel-in-lipstickimages.jpeg

suzanna-hamilton-56e86d62-b5d4-4b9e-afeb-1b6d6708f73-resize-750.jpg


ideal for sex:
bt2ncKW.jpg

sgN1ipp.jpg

cYDv06s.jpg
 
nigga pls explain what ur talking about, i can get rejected by them while simultaneously able to fuck them exactly 3 times a week??
 
nigga pls explain what ur talking about, i can get rejected by them while simultaneously able to fuck them exactly 3 times a week??
No, they have to accept your offer in order to have sex with them (you can't rape). But you can use your theoretical money (by explicitly mentioning it) to sweeten the offer. The point is that you're allowed to get rejected so long as you manage to have sex three times per week (obviously with different women than those who rejected you).
 
Last edited:
All too skinny for me
 

Similar threads

6"4 Tyrone(I'm not)
Replies
12
Views
384
Sexually Disabled
Sexually Disabled
the_nextDavidLaid
Replies
17
Views
852
Detective
Detective
heightmaxxing
Replies
9
Views
539
OwenGwyther
OwenGwyther
AlphaLooksmaxxer666
Replies
18
Views
1K
future_darktriad000
future_darktriad000

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top