Acne Victim
lobotomy + monobloc patient
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2023
- Posts
- 4,095
- Reputation
- 5,530
To answer this question, let's first take a look at Nero Angelo's newest video on the looks rating of people who bought his rating service. WW's data was quite similar, but it was smaller, hence I won't use it. So, here is Nero's data out of 2000 people:
- A little over 1/4 of guys are sub-5s (incels): 27.7%
- Around half are MTNs (might have a GF): 46.3%
- A little over 1/4 were rated HTN or higher, with the ratings being for HTNs, Chadlites, and Chads respectively (sexually active): 18.75%, 6.25%, and 1%
This graph aligns perfectly with Nero's data, where the sub-5s are virgins.
However, all of the data above is not fully conclusive in itself, as there are a couple of factors here that were not fully considered:
- First, the average blackpiller is, or at least was before looksmaxxing, uglier than average. If they were not, then they most likely wouldn't have found such spaces in the first place. This means that if everyone was looksmaxxing, they would in theory lose such an edge on their looks. In reality though, they are on the same level as most normies
- Also, the average blackpiller is, and especially a guy that buys face ratings, much more likely to fraud his pics. On this forum, we see a lot of this happening, which also helps to explain the more posts more looks effect you see going on.
- We also can't be 100% sure whether he rates people higher to make them feel better and is using different stats here, but I genuinely doubt that's the case.
- It is also agreed upon by most forum users that Nero overrates people:
looksmax.org
looksmax.org
looksmax.org
(Screenshots were taken from the threads above)
What all of this means is that we can safely reduce 1 point from Nero's ratings to have a closer look at the actual reality. But before doing so, here are some other important things to consider:
- The 27% self-reported virginity data is from before the pandemic (it was likely even higher already since men lie about being virgins)
- Covid has worsened the incel problem even further (isolation, mental illnesses, higher standards)
- "Male students are less sexually active than their female counterparts, with just a over a third (34 per cent) saying they’ve had sex during their time at university"
www.telegraph.co.uk
So, here is what we are left with:
- A little over 1/4 of guys are sub-5s (sexless incels): 74%
- Around half are MTNs (might have a GF or luck out occasionally): 18.75%
- A little over 1/4 were rated HTN or higher, with the ratings being for HTNs, Chadlites, and Chads respectively (sexually active): 6.25%, 1%, and 0%
I think this is a pretty fair representation of reality. Only the top 10% of men actually manage to have sex consistently, besides a few normies that have GFs. Most guys get pretty much nothing for a multitude of reasons. AKA, EITHER LOOKSMAX OR IT'S OVER.
What do you guys think? Feel free to prove me wrong but use actual evidence and rationality to do so.
- A little over 1/4 of guys are sub-5s (incels): 27.7%
- Around half are MTNs (might have a GF): 46.3%
- A little over 1/4 were rated HTN or higher, with the ratings being for HTNs, Chadlites, and Chads respectively (sexually active): 18.75%, 6.25%, and 1%
This graph aligns perfectly with Nero's data, where the sub-5s are virgins.
However, all of the data above is not fully conclusive in itself, as there are a couple of factors here that were not fully considered:
- First, the average blackpiller is, or at least was before looksmaxxing, uglier than average. If they were not, then they most likely wouldn't have found such spaces in the first place. This means that if everyone was looksmaxxing, they would in theory lose such an edge on their looks. In reality though, they are on the same level as most normies
- Also, the average blackpiller is, and especially a guy that buys face ratings, much more likely to fraud his pics. On this forum, we see a lot of this happening, which also helps to explain the more posts more looks effect you see going on.
- We also can't be 100% sure whether he rates people higher to make them feel better and is using different stats here, but I genuinely doubt that's the case.
- It is also agreed upon by most forum users that Nero overrates people:
nero angelo rating
https://ibb.co/kMHhqrF nero angelo rated me as a 6,I know in this forum he's not considered a good rater but, you have seen me already, do you think that's a good rate?
looksmax.org
Nero Angelo rated me a 7 aka chadlite, thoughts?
looksmax.org
According to Nero Angelo I am 7.5 which is top 4%
Damm I was hoping for a 6/10 and would be happy with a 7/10, but I never expected to be top 4% after getting rated a LTN here.
looksmax.org
(Screenshots were taken from the threads above)
What all of this means is that we can safely reduce 1 point from Nero's ratings to have a closer look at the actual reality. But before doing so, here are some other important things to consider:
- The 27% self-reported virginity data is from before the pandemic (it was likely even higher already since men lie about being virgins)
- Covid has worsened the incel problem even further (isolation, mental illnesses, higher standards)
- "Male students are less sexually active than their female counterparts, with just a over a third (34 per cent) saying they’ve had sex during their time at university"
University students aren't having sex – and parents don't know whether to be relieved or worried
The current cohort of university students is having far less sex than their parents' generation – and it's not because of the pandemic
www.telegraph.co.uk
So, here is what we are left with:
- A little over 1/4 of guys are sub-5s (sexless incels): 74%
- Around half are MTNs (might have a GF or luck out occasionally): 18.75%
- A little over 1/4 were rated HTN or higher, with the ratings being for HTNs, Chadlites, and Chads respectively (sexually active): 6.25%, 1%, and 0%
I think this is a pretty fair representation of reality. Only the top 10% of men actually manage to have sex consistently, besides a few normies that have GFs. Most guys get pretty much nothing for a multitude of reasons. AKA, EITHER LOOKSMAX OR IT'S OVER.
What do you guys think? Feel free to prove me wrong but use actual evidence and rationality to do so.
