I don't agree with some anti-gatekeeping arguments

Tenshi

Tenshi

只管
Joined
Jul 5, 2020
Posts
1,564
Reputation
2,103
People say it's exagerrated, but I don't really agree with this. Yes, looksmaxxing won't ever become mainstream like fashion, shoes, tv shows. No, the overwhelming majority of people won't ever get surgery. But that's not necessary.

If looksmaxxing is merely superficially mainstream, that is enough to create a huge impact in our society, even if we don't necessarily can't see it irl. Not everybody needs to know about it to cause a cascade of events, just enough people.

Just think about the impact that dating apps have on dating. Most people (and specially women) still DON'T use tinder. But most people are were aware of it's existance, in such a manner that even if a woman never used tinder, the mere fact that she knows, even if obscurely, that this is a possibility, naturely creates a sense of entitlement among women.

Women nowadays are choosing zero over hypergamous ideals they have simply because they have this underlying sense that they have infinite options. It might not be true, but it doesn't matter.

Again, social media (IG, tiktok, etc). Most women can't get Chad, not even in a lifetime. Yet, because of social media they still hold absurd standards regardless of their own SMV. In fact, the looks overton window has shifted drastically regarding what is even considered an attractive male. The Chads of yesterday wouldn't make the cut nowadays.

Now, if you think looksmaxxing will have no impact on a societal level, and specificaly on dating, you're deluded. No, not everybody will become Chad, but that doesn't matter, it's the mere sense that this could be a possibility that might shape social dynamics in the future. And, as always, this will come to bite men in their asses.

Do I think information should be easily acessible? Not really. I don't believe in that. I believe the ones who care enough will find their way into knowledge. We have the internet, if your zoomer ass can't look up things like ''why I'm ugly?'' or ''how to get girls?'' and you need some 30 second tiktok video with some trendy song oversimplifying it for you, you don't deserve knowledge.
 
  • +1
Reactions: highschoolmaxxer, Chadeep, Pierrot and 4 others
gatekeeping will only slowdown the inevitable lmao, regardless of spreading looksmaxxing or not the general sentiment of it will still naturally spread over the next years.

this doesn't matter anyways genetics will always win regardless of how much knowledge is spread to every single person in the world about looksmaxing

men are at the same disadvantage as always wether it gets spread more or not it will always be the case and remain this way that:
-chad > woman > men . in terms of hierarchy of power, value , life etc
 
  • +1
Reactions: hopecel
Blackpill is being gatekept by genetics. Even if u know that height matters u cannot go from 5'6 to 6'4 and even if chad doesnt know shit abt it, he will remain 6'4. This isnt something u can learn. The only thing that will happen is cringy normies doing that 🤫🧏🏻‍♂️ mewing bs and sucking their cheeks like autists in pictures in 2024, and then no one will give a fuck. The 2nd possibility is that the west will turn into south korea 2.0 where plastic surgeries are everywhere. I dont see anything else happening in the recent future. 99% of looksmaxxing is just leaning down getting clear skin grooming ur face haircut and learning to take better pictures. Anything else has negligible effects on ones smv.
 
  • +1
Reactions: autistic_tendencies and gribsufer1
People say it's exagerrated, but I don't really agree with this. Yes, looksmaxxing won't ever become mainstream like fashion, shoes, tv shows. No, the overwhelming majority of people won't ever get surgery. But that's not necessary.

If looksmaxxing is merely superficially mainstream, that is enough to create a huge impact in our society, even if we don't necessarily can't see it irl. Not everybody needs to know about it to cause a cascade of events, just enough people.

Just think about the impact that dating apps have on dating. Most people (and specially women) still DON'T use tinder. But most people are were aware of it's existance, in such a manner that even if a woman never used tinder, the mere fact that she knows, even if obscurely, that this is a possibility, naturely creates a sense of entitlement among women.

Women nowadays are choosing zero over hypergamous ideals they have simply because they have this underlying sense that they have infinite options. It might not be true, but it doesn't matter.

Again, social media (IG, tiktok, etc). Most women can't get Chad, not even in a lifetime. Yet, because of social media they still hold absurd standards regardless of their own SMV. In fact, the looks overton window has shifted drastically regarding what is even considered an attractive male. The Chads of yesterday wouldn't make the cut nowadays.

Now, if you think looksmaxxing will have no impact on a societal level, and specificaly on dating, you're deluded. No, not everybody will become Chad, but that doesn't matter, it's the mere sense that this could be a possibility that might shape social dynamics in the future. And, as always, this will come to bite men in their asses.

Do I think information should be easily acessible? Not really. I don't believe in that. I believe the ones who care enough will find their way into knowledge. We have the internet, if your zoomer ass can't look up things like ''why I'm ugly?'' or ''how to get girls?'' and you need some 30 second tiktok video with some trendy song oversimplifying it for you, you don't deserve knowledge.
There was a redpill movement, I dont see why there wont be a blackpill one
 
There was a redpill movement, I dont see why there wont be a blackpill one
There was no "redpill" movement. Just a bunch of retards who dickrode their favourite podcasters and influencers and calling themselves "redpilled".

Looksmaxxing is seen as cringe by the normal people :feelshah:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Chadeep and zyzzbrah1234
Looksmaxxing is seen as cringe by the normal people :feelshah:
So it will die down just like any other normie trend. Normies themselves made it cringe.
 
  • +1
Reactions: n9wiff
Most women can't get Chad
But a good majority of them do. And others get High value men (LMS) just not always chad level.

Theres a reason why single mothers have so much entitlement, its not because they can get sex whenever. They as women KNOW thats what most men wont. Its just that alot of them actually DO get picked up by some cuck.
 
But a good majority of them do. And others get High value men (LMS) just not always chad level.

Theres a reason why single mothers have so much entitlement, its not because they can get sex whenever. They as women KNOW thats what most men wont. Its just that alot of them actually DO get picked up by some cuck.
it's simple math, there aren't enough Chads and high value men for all of them. I agree, a lot of women, even with lower SMV can BANG Chads, at least once. But getting Chad to commit, which is the female imperative, as a lower SMV female is really unlikely.

And women are ok with that. Some of that prefer having zero if they can't have that guy.
 
  • +1
Reactions: distance decay

Similar threads

Manana
Replies
20
Views
568
john788
john788
D
Whitepill FUCK PSL
Replies
31
Views
687
SLAY/NTs
SLAY/NTs
silencio
Replies
89
Views
929
silencio
silencio
NitoRump
Replies
29
Views
735
Lurkerslep
Lurkerslep

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top