Crusile
Chicowski
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2021
- Posts
- 2,709
- Reputation
- 2,533
"IQ negatively correlates with adult income In individuals from high class backgrounds"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
lol i was reading it before you tagged me, let me finish it reading it@Ragnar IQ is everything
This is all true.The ideal range is in the Trump range where you are slightly above average but not intelligent enough to be a programmer, astrophysicist etc. (so 110-115). As long as you are born with a bit of privilege and networks, you can end up president of the planet. You are smart enough to manipulate dumber people into your followers, and not smart enough to become depressed.
People in the 130+ range (Mensa) often not only have aspergers or fall on the autism spectrum, they develop all sorts of mental disorders and depression from having to interact with people who are literal retards in comparison to their mental level (more than 2-3 standard deviations below their IQ) 24/7, everywhere they go.
Most extremely smart people like Nikola Tesla did not end up as billionaire businessmen. He married a literal pigeon, he played cards under a bridge with some homeless people and he died utterly penniless and schizophrenic.
View attachment 2155875
The vast majority of 130+ IQ children and teenagers will become depressed virgins when they grow up, because women just don't like extremely smart men for a variety of reasons (unless they also happen to be very good looking and socially capable, but most high IQ individuals are socially handicapped and not very good looking).
You want your child to be about 1 standard deviation above average in IQ, or about 115 maximum. He or she can excel in any job, hobby or profession in the world but they will also likely be socially capable enough to have a healthy dating life and be capable of starting a family.
Higher is better doesn't apply to IQ. You do not want a 140 IQ child. The world is a depressing prison for most of those people.
I got 143, same as Uncle AdolfThe ideal range is in the Trump range where you are slightly above average but not intelligent enough to be a programmer, astrophysicist etc. (so 110-115). As long as you are born with a bit of privilege and networks, you can end up president of the planet. You are smart enough to manipulate dumber people into your followers, and not smart enough to become depressed.
People in the 130+ range (Mensa) often not only have aspergers or fall on the autism spectrum, they develop all sorts of mental disorders and depression from having to interact with people who are literal retards in comparison to their mental level (more than 2-3 standard deviations below their IQ) 24/7, everywhere they go.
Most extremely smart people like Nikola Tesla did not end up as billionaire businessmen. He married a literal pigeon, he played cards under a bridge with some homeless people and he died utterly penniless and schizophrenic.
View attachment 2155875
The vast majority of 130+ IQ children and teenagers will become depressed virgins when they grow up, because women just don't like extremely smart men for a variety of reasons (unless they also happen to be very good looking and socially capable, but most high IQ individuals are socially handicapped and not very good looking).
You want your child to be about 1 standard deviation above average in IQ, or about 115 maximum. He or she can excel in any job, hobby or profession in the world but they will also likely be socially capable enough to have a healthy dating life and be capable of starting a family.
Higher is better doesn't apply to IQ. You do not want a 140 IQ child. The world is a depressing prison for most of those people.
This is all true.
Benefits of IQ peak at 115. Anything above that starts having brutal drawbacks.
I've been trying to lower my IQ for years with hard-drugs and rotting now, but it simply doesn't work. Ur brain-wiring is simply too fucked up/different.
Dont lower your IQ. You will still be autistic but just more stupidThis is all true.
Benefits of IQ peak at 115. Anything above that starts having brutal drawbacks.
I've been trying to lower my IQ for years with hard-drugs and rotting now, but it simply doesn't work. Ur brain-wiring is simply too fucked up/different.
over for my 131 iqThe ideal range is in the Trump range where you are slightly above average but not intelligent enough to be a programmer, astrophysicist etc. (so 110-115). As long as you are born with a bit of privilege and networks, you can end up president of the planet. You are smart enough to manipulate dumber people into your followers, and not smart enough to become depressed.
People in the 130+ range (Mensa) often not only have aspergers or fall on the autism spectrum, they develop all sorts of mental disorders and depression from having to interact with people who are literal retards in comparison to their mental level (more than 2-3 standard deviations below their IQ) 24/7, everywhere they go.
Most extremely smart people like Nikola Tesla did not end up as billionaire businessmen. He married a literal pigeon, he played cards under a bridge with some homeless people and he died utterly penniless and schizophrenic.
View attachment 2155875
The vast majority of 130+ IQ children and teenagers will become depressed virgins when they grow up, because women just don't like extremely smart men for a variety of reasons (unless they also happen to be very good looking and socially capable, but most high IQ individuals are socially handicapped and not very good looking).
You want your child to be about 1 standard deviation above average in IQ, or about 115 maximum. He or she can excel in any job, hobby or profession in the world but they will also likely be socially capable enough to have a healthy dating life and be capable of starting a family.
Higher is better doesn't apply to IQ. You do not want a 140 IQ child. The world is a depressing prison for most of those people.
TL-DRThe ideal range is in the Trump range where you are slightly above average but not intelligent enough to be a programmer, astrophysicist etc. (so 110-115). As long as you are born with a bit of privilege and networks, you can end up president of the planet. You are smart enough to manipulate dumber people into your followers, and not smart enough to become depressed.
People in the 130+ range (Mensa) often not only have aspergers or fall on the autism spectrum, they develop all sorts of mental disorders and depression from having to interact with people who are literal retards in comparison to their mental level (more than 2-3 standard deviations below their IQ) 24/7, everywhere they go.
Most extremely smart people like Nikola Tesla did not end up as billionaire businessmen. He married a literal pigeon, he played cards under a bridge with some homeless people and he died utterly penniless and schizophrenic.
View attachment 2155875
The vast majority of 130+ IQ children and teenagers will become depressed virgins when they grow up, because women just don't like extremely smart men for a variety of reasons (unless they also happen to be very good looking and socially capable, but most high IQ individuals are socially handicapped and not very good looking).
You want your child to be about 1 standard deviation above average in IQ, or about 115 maximum. He or she can excel in any job, hobby or profession in the world but they will also likely be socially capable enough to have a healthy dating life and be capable of starting a family.
Higher is better doesn't apply to IQ. You do not want a 140 IQ child. The world is a depressing prison for most of those people.
Yes because everyone on looksmax has autismeveryone on looksmax is a genius
The vast majority of 130+ IQ children and teenagers will become depressed virgins when they grow up, because women just don't like extremely smart men for a variety of reasons (unless they also happen to be very good looking and socially capable, but most high IQ individuals are socially handicapped and not very good looking).
Higher is better doesn't apply to IQ. You do not want a 140 IQ child. The world is a depressing prison for most of those people.
you can be low iq and be good at math. if you obsess over math you will be good at math. iq and math have nothing to do with each otherThe ideal range is in the Trump range where you are slightly above average but not intelligent enough to be a programmer, astrophysicist etc. (so 110-115). As long as you are born with a bit of privilege and networks, you can end up president of the planet. You are smart enough to manipulate dumber people into your followers, and not smart enough to become depressed.
People in the 130+ range (Mensa) often not only have aspergers or fall on the autism spectrum, they develop all sorts of mental disorders and depression from having to interact with people who are literal retards in comparison to their mental level (more than 2-3 standard deviations below their IQ) 24/7, everywhere they go.
Most extremely smart people like Nikola Tesla did not end up as billionaire businessmen. He married a literal pigeon, he played cards under a bridge with some homeless people and he died utterly penniless and schizophrenic.
View attachment 2155875
The vast majority of 130+ IQ children and teenagers will become depressed virgins when they grow up, because women just don't like extremely smart men for a variety of reasons (unless they also happen to be very good looking and socially capable, but most high IQ individuals are socially handicapped and not very good looking).
You want your child to be about 1 standard deviation above average in IQ, or about 115 maximum. He or she can excel in any job, hobby or profession in the world but they will also likely be socially capable enough to have a healthy dating life and be capable of starting a family.
Higher is better doesn't apply to IQ. You do not want a 140 IQ child. The world is a depressing prison for most of those people.
Brain structure is genetic. Most people in the super high IQ range are autistic/aspergers.If they were smarter, they could just figure out solutions to those problems, like the Buddha or Camus.
yeah, i'm not saying the solution is to be a normie. i'm just saying there is some solution, like sitting under a bodhi tree until you no longer have desiresView attachment 2155874
Brain structure is genetic. Most people in the super high IQ range are autistic/aspergers.
They can't mask and pretend to be extroverted 'normies' socially no matter how hard they try.
It's like trying to force an extreme introvert into a beer pong party animal "frat bro". It's just not going to happen.
Not any more than that "frat bro" could ever become the next Nikola Tesla or Grigori Perelman.
They can excel in very intelligence intensive activities like chess or extremely advanced physics, but they are usually lonely and depressed due to no human contact.
Moggedover for my 131 iq
Citation needed.Most people in the super high IQ range are autistic/aspergers.
Yeah, I basically got zero guidance ever from any adult in my life. My parents are insane hippies with romantic impractical beliefs that only worked for my dad because he is giga NT Chad with extremely high verbal and social intelligence. Never had guidance from teachers. Never had guidance from councilors. Not even in college. And it was even worse because this was before social media, so I wasn't even being exposed to ideas about what you could do in life.Brutal thing about IQ is that nobody cares whatsoever to nourish that trait.
Public Schooling is essentially anti-IQ. It's made for people of average intelligence.
If you are low IQ, you get extra help to try and get you through the minimum level.
When you are high IQ you get 0 attention because the notion is that 'high IQ people can do everything by themselves'.
This is a brutal NPC societal construction that is completely flawed. Imagine applying this logic to sports.
'Look at that kid Messi, he is a football master-talent. I guess we don't have to give him any attention anymore since he's already doing well enough'.
Nah lmao. You have the best trainers, best clubs, best coaching, EVERYTHING is being arranged to get the absolute best out of talented kids like that.
It's the complete opposite compared to public schooling. Talented high IQ kids get 0 attention.
If you are high IQ, u need expensive private schooling else ur gonna get obliterated by the public schooling system and become a malfunctional NEET like me.
more like 90 for believing that's an actual IQ testMogged
Citation needed.
More like you having 50 for believing me or the guy I replied to were serious about this. Do you think he payed for professionals to do an actual IQ test?more like 90 for believing that's an actual IQ test
More like 30 IQ for thinking I wasn't just looking for any excuse to shit on someone.More like you having 50 for believing me or the guy I replied to were serious about this. Do you think he payed for professionals to do an actual IQ test?
That said, Mensa's Norway online test is pretty much on level with actual IQ tests in terms of results according to r/Mensa.
Now go fix your crappy post to rep ratio.
Now go fix your crappy post to rep ratio.
More like 0 IQ for making this up.More like 30 IQ for thinking I wasn't just looking for any excuse to shit on someone.
Noooooo not my heckin ratiorino
you've just received a laugh react, my dudeMore like 0 IQ for making this up.
We're just truth seeking. no one here is coping, not even youPEOPLE LOVE TO COPE ABOUT IQ EVEN ON .ORG ITS GENUINELY ONE OF THE MOST BLUEPILLED THINGS TO EXIST.
IQ IS 65-80% HERITABLE MAKING IT ONE OF THE MOST HERITABLE TRAITS LET ALONE PSYCHOLOGICAL TRAITS IN HUMANS. IQ HAS AN EXTREMELY HIGH CORRELATION CO-EFFICIENT WITH SUCCESSFUL LIFE OUTCOMES AND A PREDICTIVE VALIDITY LEAGUES ABOVE ANY OTHER MEASUREMENT IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES.
TIME TO STOP COPING YOU'RE NEUROLOGICALLY A SUBHUMAN PILE OF WASTE THANKS TO YOUR PARENTS JUST AS MUCH AS PHYSICAL TRAITS.
We're just truth seeking. no one here is coping, not even you
IQ has a heritably of 0% and hereditarianism is not valid science
"IQ negatively correlates with adult income In individuals from high class backgrounds"
Heritability estimates have gone down and genetics have zero predictive power in 2023. They are hopeful to eventually reveal it, we will seeHeritability of IQ has increased with its research esp with advances of GWAS research
What comes first is knowledge seeking behaviour, with IQ being the result. Any randomized knowledge test is equally predictive as IQ, is it fair to call that test "epic predictor with correlations unheard of in social science." No, its a fake predictor with stolen correlationsNo.
For the most part if you have a higher IQ you will do better in school go farther in college and get a higher paying job this is all backed up by statistics. Like I personally find it stupid that our main indicator of someones intelligence is their ability to fucking notice patterms, but it just so happens that this ability to notice patterns correlates with a whole bunch of other shit like debating and problem solving and math, so thats why we accept it as a reasonable test of someones cognitive ability.
Yes the reason is because high class people are already high class. They are getting all the privatized education and real world connections without having to try. It doesnt matter whether or not you are high IQ if you have good parents properly carrying you and raising you with a lot of money. The whole reason that low and middle class people with high IQ have an advantage is because they can work past the lack of opportunities and expensive (real) schooling in the sink or swim environment of public school and middle class life. If you are already born into high class life there is nothing to work out of, nothing to have an advantage over because everyone from 80iq to genius are being handheld through each and every step of life and they are already born into high class. The negative correlation possibly has to do with higher IQ people making decisions based off of work-life balance and trying to optimize their lifestyle, since they are already born into high class with the ability to make these kinds of decisions. Unlike someone low class or middle class with high IQ. Either way I dont understand what youre insinuating with the study. IMO it isnt surprising, though I would have expected iq to have little to no correlation at all with income when you are born into high class. Still a negative correlation is understandable.Heritability estimates have gone down and genetics have zero predictive power in 2023. They are hopeful to eventually reveal it, we will see
What comes first is knowledge seeking behaviour, with IQ being the result. Any randomized knowledge test is equally predictive as IQ, is it fair to call that test "epic predictor with correlations unheard of in social science." No, its a fake predictor with stolen correlations
GPA and social background are much more predictive and according this OP study, IQ negatively correlates with adult earnings in people from high class backgrounds
Brutal thing about IQ is that nobody cares whatsoever to nourish that trait.
Public Schooling is essentially anti-IQ. It's made for people of average intelligence.
If you are low IQ, you get extra help to try and get you through the minimum level.
When you are high IQ you get 0 attention because the notion is that 'high IQ people can do everything by themselves'.
This is a brutal NPC societal construction that is completely flawed. Imagine applying this logic to sports.
'Look at that kid Messi, he is a football master-talent. I guess we don't have to give him any attention anymore since he's already doing well enough'.
Nah lmao. You have the best trainers, best clubs, best coaching, EVERYTHING is being arranged to get the absolute best out of talented kids like that.
It's the complete opposite compared to public schooling. Talented high IQ kids get 0 attention.
If you are high IQ, u need expensive private schooling else ur gonna get obliterated by the public schooling system and become a malfunctional NEET like me.
go easy on the IQ-ists, most are/werent aware of the final coffin of IQ debunks listed ITT. theres nothing left in IQ to grasp onto after proving the non-existent heritability of behaviour. I can see how "IQ and heritabily of intelligence is true, but racial differences isnt true", doesnt make senseBelieving in iq is like believing in the tooth fairy at this point
"IQ negatively correlates with adult income In individuals from high class backgrounds"
keep using basic linear models for the most complex phenomenon known to mankind lmfaoDamn what a retarded post. Terman’s study on the gifted is less likely to find an association between IQ and income because they’ve already preselected for geniuses. This is like if I said that height has very little to do with basketball ability by looking at NBA players lol. Also, its not even true. His analyses didn’t replicate and the relation between IQ and income even non range restricted is still monotonic even in the terman samples.
View attachment 2158556
life is a gay little puzzleiq science in a nutshell: being good at gay little puzzles predicts you are good at gay little puzzles
With an high IQ you either reject the current system, try to overthrow the leaders of the current system, or attempt to create a new system altogther.A lot of climbing the corporate ladder is being a good drone and sucking the right cock to go up even further.
People with hIgh IQ wanna exist outside the system and show humanity there's another way, which is very unprofitable.
@MoggerGaston @_MVP_