Is Eugenics good?

B

blackpilled I lost

Banned
Joined
Jun 6, 2022
Posts
754
Reputation
1,733
The way I see it people with disabilities and such (excluding injury) should not be allowed government assistance unless they loose their ability to make babies.

It's like the government is helping people that should be incels reproduce and spread their bad genes. So much suffering exists because people with bad genes are forced to exist.

If anything the government should be giving people with high iqs money for each child they have.
 
  • +1
Reactions: jagmogs1000, Chinlet Ascension, Abhorrence and 2 others
I love how this forum is slowly descending into nazism
But yes, I agree OP
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Shade91, KING REIDYZ, CuriousGuy and 7 others
Depends on severity of disease like Down syndrome. there’s a lot of conditions that aren’t life altering and people live with them like adhd, low autism, ibs, pcos
 
  • +1
Reactions: incelmogger and WanderingBurro
Well if modern medicine did not exist, people vulnerable to mental/physical illnesses would die out. Same with cosmetic surgery: uglies would die out. Humanity would be a race of disease-resistant tall chads.
 
  • +1
Reactions: incelmogger
Well if modern medicine did not exist, people vulnerable to mental/physical illnesses would die out. Same with cosmetic surgery: uglies would die out. Humanity would be a race of disease-resistant tall chads.
then why we aren't? modern medicine didn't exist thousands of years ago
 
then why we aren't? modern medicine didn't exist thousands of years ago
If everyone is a 10 no one is.

A 2 today is probably a PSL god compared to cavemen. I mean cavewomen had fucking hair lol.
 
  • +1
Reactions: the_explorer
then why we aren't? modern medicine didn't exist thousands of years ago
infant mortality rated falled in the past 100 years extremely. The babies that were not genetically viable were put under tubes to have their slave genomes passed down to cause more pain. The babies that were supposed to die didn't.
 
  • +1
Reactions: TrestIsBest and incelmogger
then why we aren't? modern medicine didn't exist thousands of years ago
Its a long process, especially since some illnesses (like virus) can also evolve. For looks, one example is we are getting taller and taller on average over time. But now with plastic surgery and medicine we have basically stunted human evolution.
 
  • +1
Reactions: incelmogger
Well if modern medicine did not exist, people vulnerable to mental/physical illnesses would die out. Same with cosmetic surgery: uglies would die out. Humanity would be a race of disease-resistant tall chads.
What a retarded assessment, you should be the one out of the gene pool dumbass. People throughout history got together or reasons other than looks and most people with diseases are born to parents with perfect health
 
Obviously. With eugenic measures being pulled back and basically 0 child mortality look where we have ended up. Many of the the best racial scientists in the early 20th and late 19th century predicted that this would happen.

Also crazy to think how just 100 years ago these eugenic policies (ugly laws, anti-popper legislation, strict laws against interracial marriage, sterilisation of people with unfit genes, etc.) were in place in dozens of different US states.

Hitler actually took a lot of his inspiration from the US in this sense:

“A model living standard is created here which is primarily determined by a knowledge of conditions and of life in the American Union.”
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 21345
Y
The way I see it people with disabilities and such (excluding injury) should not be allowed government assistance unless they loose their ability to make babies.

It's like the government is helping people that should be incels reproduce and spread their bad genes. So much suffering exists because people with bad genes are forced to exist.

If anything the government should be giving people with high iqs money for each child they have.
You stupid faggot.

Go fuck yourself

Piece of shit human waste disposal

1700984182277
 
  • +1
Reactions: bradpittshairline
Depends on severity of disease like Down syndrome. there’s a lot of conditions that aren’t life altering and people live with them like adhd, low autism, ibs, pcos
Well yeah. In the US and NS Germany only the severely disabled or ‘unfit’ were sterilised. But in the US there were ‘ugly laws’ and anti-popper legislation. Also much stricter anti-race mixing legislation and immigration laws.
 
What a retarded assessment, you should be the one out of the gene pool dumbass. People throughout history got together or reasons other than looks and most people with diseases are born to parents with perfect health
Did I say anything that was wrong? Yes people focused on looks a lot less before because food water and shelter were less abundant. People are getting taller and taller over time, no reason that wouldn't happen with other attractive features: look at blue eyes, literally came from ONE GUY. More tall and blue eyed people over time = increase in over all attractiveness = closer to chad race. And for disease, a lineage ending due to cancer in someone more likely to have cancer is mathematically making mankind more resistant. Most people with diseases are born to parents with perfect health because most diseases right now are man made, and if we fix them with medicine then evolution against those will stop (Im not saying we should stop fixing them with medicine Im just laying out the facts)
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: bradpittshairline
Did I say anything that was wrong? Yes people focused on looks a lot less before because food water and shelter were less abundant. People are getting taller and taller over time, no reason that wouldn't happen with other attractive features: look at blue eyes, literally came from ONE GUY. More tall and blue eyed people over time = increase in over all attractiveness = closer to chad race. And for disease, a lineage ending due to cancer in someone more likely to have cancer is mathematically making mankind more resistant. Most people with diseases are born to parents with perfect health because most diseases right now are man made, and if we fix them with medicine then evolution against those will stop (Im not saying we should stop fixing them with medicine Im just laying out the facts)
Blue eyes are literally a recessed trait you silly little cunt

People are getting taller based on better nutrition and environment not genetics you dumb fuck. Your genes are a toss up, they don’t guarantee shit

Diseases create themselves. They also adapt so if you get rid of certain diseases more variants will just take their place except this time even more resilient.

Low IQ dickhead
 
  • Love it
Reactions: bradpittshairline
Blue eyes are literally a recessed trait you silly little cunt

People are getting taller based on better nutrition and environment not genetics you dumb fuck. Your genes are a toss up, they don’t guarantee shit

Diseases create themselves. They also adapt so if you get rid of certain diseases more variants will just take their place except this time even more resilient.

Low IQ dickhead
Russians grew taller at a faster rate than americans after ww1 despite having less nutrients its not about nutrients retard. not all diseases adapt: cancer, alzheimers, dementia do not adapt. If people prone to it were gone we would mathematically be more resistant to disease.
 
The way I see it people with disabilities and such (excluding injury) should not be allowed government assistance unless they loose their ability to make babies.

It's like the government is helping people that should be incels reproduce and spread their bad genes. So much suffering exists because people with bad genes are forced to exist.

If anything the government should be giving people with high iqs money for each child they have.
There shouldn't be a welfare state at all, then we would have social darwinism and subhumans would be gone
 
The way I see it people with disabilities and such (excluding injury) should not be allowed government assistance unless they loose their ability to make babies.

It's like the government is helping people that should be incels reproduce and spread their bad genes. So much suffering exists because people with bad genes are forced to exist.

If anything the government should be giving people with high iqs money for each child they have.
I think that eugenics have never truely been a issue and that having children is a privlage not a right. People have to go through intense screening but the average down syndrom woman living off of food stamps can shit out some kid that wont live past 20
 
  • +1
Reactions: blackpilled I lost
The way I see it people with disabilities and such (excluding injury) should not be allowed government assistance unless they loose their ability to make babies.

It's like the government is helping people that should be incels reproduce and spread their bad genes. So much suffering exists because people with bad genes are forced to exist.

If anything the government should be giving people with high iqs money for each child they have.
In nazi germany they cut 25% of house mortgage for every child you made. So basically make 4 children and your house is free other than down payment.
 
In nazi germany they cut 25% of house mortgage for every child you made. So basically make 4 children and your house is free other than down payment.
They should bring this back instead of importing subhumans from india. I guarantee we’d see a baby boom with this genius policy.
 
They should bring this back instead of importing subhumans from india. I guarantee we’d see a baby boom with this genius policy.
In Poland we get 500 zlotys for every child you have per month. That's about 20% extra from normal salary and it hasn't increased birth rates at all.

The only way to increase birth rates is abolishing obligatory pensions (w/o pensions the children would take care of their old parents thus having kids would be incentivised), getting rid of wealth transfer from men to women so they rely on having a husband more and getting rid of shitty obligatory public education.
 
In Poland we get 500 zlotys for every child you have per month. That's about 20% extra from normal salary and it hasn't increased birth rates at all.

The only way to increase birth rates is abolishing obligatory pensions (w/o pensions the children would take care of their old parents thus having kids would be incentivised), getting rid of wealth transfer from men to women so they rely on having a husband more and getting rid of shitty obligatory public education.
You’re comparing $100 a month versus slashing your mortgage payment 25%? Are you sane? The reason people aren’t having kids is cause they don’t want to downgrade their lifestyle, also women are in the work force and have no time to be mothers.
 
You’re comparing $100 a month versus slashing your mortgage payment 25%? Are you sane? The reason people aren’t having kids is cause they don’t want to downgrade their lifestyle, also women are in the work force and have no time to be mothers.
The loan was 1000 reichmarks, while a house costed 5000 on average, so even if you had 4 kids it was "only" 20% of the cost. Also it's nonsensical to say it's only 100$ as the costs of food and everything are way different in US and poland. If you want and accurate measure it's 15-20 % of your salary per each child
 
Yeah 100%

The world would be such a better place if only northern Europeans descendants had children.

Africans/ Asians literally bring down the gene pool every time they have kids.
 
Yeah 100%

The world would be such a better place if only northern Europeans descendants had children.

Africans/ Asians literally bring down the gene pool every time they have kids.
There are chad and stacies in every races
 
There are chad and stacies in every races
What a load of shit lol. A white man/woman will always be superior to someone with dark skin. Why do you think every race goes after white women and not blacks?
 
The way I see it people with disabilities and such (excluding injury) should not be allowed government assistance unless they loose their ability to make babies.

It's like the government is helping people that should be incels reproduce and spread their bad genes. So much suffering exists because people with bad genes are forced to exist.

If anything the government should be giving people with high iqs money for each child they have.
William Shockley, the inventor of the transistor, proposed this policy: For every IQ point below 100 you are, you get paid $1000 to sterilize yourself.
 
The way I see it people with disabilities and such (excluding injury) should not be allowed government assistance unless they loose their ability to make babies.

It's like the government is helping people that should be incels reproduce and spread their bad genes. So much suffering exists because people with bad genes are forced to exist.

If anything the government should be giving people with high iqs money for each child they have.
morally no but it would make the amount of mental or physical disabilities shrink very low and people would be overall more attractive
 

Similar threads

97baHater
Replies
45
Views
659
lonelycurry
L
thebuffdon690
Replies
547
Views
6K
thebuffdon690
thebuffdon690
noodlelover
Replies
4
Views
350
JohnDoe
JohnDoe
MaghrebGator
Replies
98
Views
2K
thebuffdon690
thebuffdon690
heightmaxxing
Replies
17
Views
2K
Klasik01
Klasik01

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top