Is Lamarckian inheritance actually the truth?

[NoReedemingFeature]

As an example. Niggers in Africa have very long legs, now this makes sense considering that long legs are advantageous for running and hunting. But what doesn't really make sense is how to adaptation got there in the first place. Would the shorter legged hunters die off and not be able to reproduce? I don't think so.

I also heard of some Indigenous group that were very good at diving, and had some adaptations for it (specifically lungs iirc). Now, would the indigenes not able to dive really well just die off and be unable to reproduce? Would there really be a Darwinistic incentive for those adaptations to occur? I don't really think so.

Also Slavs have very long torsos, which suits their role for slave work, but that doesn't mean that long legged slavs would die off. Yet Slavs still have the long torso adaptation.

 

[NoReedemingFeature]

bump

 

[NoReedemingFeature]

@Gonthar elaborate, don't just leave me hanging with a jfl react.

 

[Gonthar]

@Gonthar elaborate, don't just leave me hanging with a jfl react.

Just go and ask them: "Hey, why do you African niggas here, have deez long legz, did you inherit them from LaMarc?"

 

[longjohnmong]

yes

 

[horizontallytall]

V