Left wing > right wing

[Lord-Arthur_17]

Latvia

And was it really so bad?

Latvia

And how do you wanna make people equal? Perhaps it'd be possible in a small commune of hippies but not in a country with more than a few million people

Federation of People's Communes

 

[Uglybrazilian]

Most of those famines seem to have happened in African nations, specifically ones that are corrupt and inefficient, so it is an irrelevant argument.

Not really, many famines if not most were out of Africa, not in Africa. Just take a look again.

 

[Hades]

It doesn't take a genius to figure out that we are in the midst of the biggest power grab and attack on civil liberties in human history.
And yet when you look at the media/politics etc., both the left and the right still choose to hyper-focus on trivial issues such as race, gender, religion etc. All massive and blatantly obvious distractions. Divide and rule 101, basically.
What the people should be doing, is to put all of that trivial bullshit aside, and focus on our common enemy, the deep state.

The focal point shouldn't be about left vs right politics. But instead, about the attack on our civil liberties and freedoms. At the end of the day, both sides of the spectrum will gladly stab you in the back.
I'd go as far as to suggest that left/right doesn't exist. Politics doesn't exist. It's an illusion. It's all smoke and mirrors and the people at the very top are pulling the strings and dictating how it goes.

The only correct statement in this whole thread.

 

[Lord-Arthur_17]

there arent

I invite you to Afghanistan or Somalia (anarcho-capitalist utopia)

 

[maxeverything]

True left wing ideology is definitely incel-friendly. Redistribution of resources etc. However today “left wing” just means you oppose straight white males and virtue signal about equality.

 

[Deleted member 13787]

I invite you to Afghanistan or Somalia (anarcho-capitalist utopia)

theyre not anarcho capitalist and i never said i like anarcho capitalism
utterly laughable attempt at owning me

 

[Bvnny.]

>having a fixed left-wing or right-wing political position in 2022

Pathetic schizophreniamax or nothing .

 

[Bvnny.]

It is impossible to go back to what was possible until the technology is destroyed. On the other hand, I will risk saying that women have always been the dominant sex. They are given special care. It is for them that men subordinate their actions - expectations of masculinity reflect the requirements of women. Women dictate terms to men. This is biology.

View attachment 1757442

>this flag

Edgy teen vibes coming from you

 

[Deleted member 13787]

this is from the 90s
try 2019

 

[Lord-Arthur_17]

theyre not anarcho capitalist and i never said i like anarcho capitalism
utterly laughable attempt at owning me

Women have no rights under the Taliban. This is the paradise you wrote about...

>this flag

Edgy teen vibes coming from you

Read the statements @cloUder. I'm not rocking my head in the clouds. It was @cloUder who wrote about legalizing rape and buying wives.

this is from the 90s
try 2019
View attachment 1758781View attachment 1758782

I am interested in the opinion of people who lived in the previous system, not of youth. It's obvious that a lot has improved thanks to technological development. Think how much can be achieved by achieving social goals, not by filling the pockets of banksters.

True left wing ideology is definitely incel-friendly. Redistribution of resources etc. However today “left wing” just means you oppose straight white males and virtue signal about equality.

Do not confuse the left wing with the liberals. Liberals focus on cultural conflicts rather than economics. This is not a leftist approach. If we want to change people's mentality, we have to change the conditions in which they live for the better. The right wing is always against men, especially working-class people.

Why should I like vaginocentric policies like:

• forced military conscription of young men,
• special taxation of single men,
• higher retirement age for men,
• prohibition of men from leaving the country during the war,
• punishing a man for having his wife terminated pregnancy,
• ban on porn?

 

[EverythingMattersCel]

Economic egalitarianism is the worst outcome for the ugly man.

Once you level out status and money, what is there left to select for in a mate? Looks, looks, looks.

Tbh though, there are several by-products of capitalism and free markets that have made hypergamy worse.

1) Globalisation. A woman will fly out across the globe for chad. Interconnectivity means chad is no longer constrained by geography.

2) Dating apps. Were bound to be created post-internet at some point. Obviously makes things impossible for the ugly man. Related to 1) too.

3) Social media. Same reason as 2) and related to 1)

4) A product of 3) is exacerbating the hyper-individualistic and consumerist culture. Makes ppl treat one another like commodities, especially when it comes to dating... see 2) . If we think of specs in a person as asset classes in a portfolio, looks has by far the biggest weighting... the ugly man has the lowest value.

5) A big predictor of economic growth and development is female education + allowing workforce entry. When women enter the workplace, they become more financially independent... which means no need to rely on men. That means they can select for looks and looks only.

6) Increased security and welfare as a result of economic growth, means an increase in mate selection for looks.

So if we reach the singularity, and we live in some utopian, fully automated world where 99.99% of people are living off of UBI, you better hope gene editing and cosmetic surgery also make rapid advances. The ugly man in the current climate is doomed. He has no way to increase his SMV.

*Now if we exclude all other quality of life indicators... and we talk about the best conditions for an ugly man to get laid...

The best society for an ugly man is one that is socially conservative, inherently patriarchal but economically meritocratic for men.

 

[Deleted member 17872]

Like a forced "everyone must have a gf" thing. Meanwhile it would just be ugly straight males that would ask and benefit from this

That's not patriarchy.

Patriarchy is means the autocratic rule by the male head of the family. Nothing else

And who said Freemasonry is bad?

Unlike u i don't listen to authority i see evidence.

They are responsible for modern scientific racism, the kleptrocratic banking system, racial antisemitism, white supremacy, colonialism and communism among other things

Remember who supported the 8-hour working day, the right to join trade unions, the right to strike, the minimum wage, health and safety regulations and pensions.

idk the same people who support the ongoing uyghur and tibetan genocide in China? And many others genocide throughout the 20th century?

or the same people who supported the slavery?

When Liberalism Defended Slavery - Boston Review

The political ideology of slaveholders depended on liberal humanism.

bostonreview.net

 

[looksmaxxed]

conservative societies are the only possible way for people to become better looking. so while ugly men are meant to benefit in that type of environment, the overall trajectory is genetic advancement and improvement. leftism produces the opposite result, sexual liberation and its corollary liberal progressive cultural and social practices have introduced vast amounts of dysgenics, mental disorder, cultural chaos, and social decay. in all of the liberal west, men are becoming uglier than ever before possible. leftism is literally self sabotage. these small retarded objects want and will become smaller and more retarded. just look at their ideal diet and cultural practices, all meant to make them LESS evolutionarily competitive

 

[Lord-Arthur_17]

Economic egalitarianism is the worst outcome for the ugly man.

Once you level out status and money, what is there left to select for in a mate? Looks, looks, looks.

Tbh though, there are several by-products of capitalism and free markets that have made hypergamy worse.

1) Globalisation. A woman will fly out across the globe for chad. Interconnectivity means chad is no longer constrained by geography.

2) Dating apps. Were bound to be created post-internet at some point. Obviously makes things impossible for the ugly man. Related to 1) too.

3) Social media. Same reason as 2) and related to 1)

4) A product of 3) is exacerbating the hyper-individualistic and consumerist culture. Makes ppl treat one another like commodities, especially when it comes to dating... see 2) . If we think of specs in a person as asset classes in a portfolio, looks has by far the biggest weighting... the ugly man has the lowest value.

5) A big predictor of economic growth and development is female education + allowing workforce entry. When women enter the workplace, they become more financially independent... which means no need to rely on men. That means they can select for looks and looks only.

6) Increased security and welfare as a result of economic growth, means an increase in mate selection for looks.

So if we reach the singularity, and we live in some utopian, fully automated world where 99.99% of people are living off of UBI, you better hope gene editing and cosmetic surgery also make rapid advances. The ugly man in the current climate is doomed. He has no way to increase his SMV.

*Now if we exclude all other quality of life indicators... and we talk about the best conditions for an ugly man to get laid...

The best society for an ugly man is one that is socially conservative, inherently patriarchal but economically meritocratic for men.

WAGE-SLAVERY

​

Chad has sex, the beta male has the so-called dead bed - even if he proves that the child is not his, he has to pay alimony. When women are financially dependent on men, this is the worst possible situation for inferior men. It would be much better for them to masturbate, go to a prostitute or fuck some sex doll. There is no real feeling or desire in a relationship like this - so it's worth nothing. The man only loses on it. He keeps telling himself otherwise to protect his sense of masculinity.

Unlike u i don't listen to authority i see evidence.

They are responsible for modern scientific racism, the kleptrocratic banking system, racial antisemitism, white supremacy, colonialism and communism among other things

idk the same people who support the ongoing uyghur and tibetan genocide in China? And many others genocide throughout the 20th century?

or the same people who supported the slavery?

When Liberalism Defended Slavery - Boston Review

The political ideology of slaveholders depended on liberal humanism.

bostonreview.net

Conspiracy theory

conservative societies are the only possible way for people to become better looking. so while ugly men are meant to benefit in that type of environment, the overall trajectory is genetic advancement and improvement. leftism produces the opposite result, sexual liberation and its corollary liberal progressive cultural and social practices have introduced vast amounts of dysgenics, mental disorder, cultural chaos, and social decay. in all of the liberal west, men are becoming uglier than ever before possible. leftism is literally self sabotage. these small retarded objects want and will become smaller and more retarded. just look at their ideal diet and cultural practices, all meant to make them LESS evolutionarily competitive

 

[Deleted member 17872]

​

Conspiracy theory

So u have no arguments. All i have said i pretty well known and accepted in academia.

 

[Lord-Arthur_17]

So u have no arguments. All i have said i pretty well known and accepted in academia.

At the Alex Jones Academy xD

 

[Deleted member 17872]

At the Alex Jones Academy xD

Ofcourse a retarted ideologue like u could use never argue logically

How the Enlightenment Created Modern Race Thinking and Why We Should Confront It

Ignoring the racial hierarchy that was born of the Enlightenment underestimates its influence.

slate.com

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17496977.2020.1794161

Racism from the Enlightenment to the Age of Imperialism

Whatever may be the differences of opinion as regards racism, its origin, the principal factors that led to its acceptance and even the use of the term itself, with its biological connotations, to describe an entirely sociological phenomenon, it will be generally...

link.springer.com

Enlightened racism? - ABC Religion & Ethics

Recent anti-racism protests around the drawn have drawn attention to the overtly racist attitudes of Enlightenment philosophers like David Hume. But is Hume’s attitude to race incidental to his philosophical worldview, or is it integral? What if it cannot easily be disentangled from his other...

www.abc.net.au

 

[eyebagcel]

left wing is destroying ethnic male smv. fuck that

 

[Lord-Arthur_17]

Ofcourse a retarted ideologue like u could use never argue logically

How the Enlightenment Created Modern Race Thinking and Why We Should Confront It

Ignoring the racial hierarchy that was born of the Enlightenment underestimates its influence.

slate.com

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17496977.2020.1794161

Racism from the Enlightenment to the Age of Imperialism

Whatever may be the differences of opinion as regards racism, its origin, the principal factors that led to its acceptance and even the use of the term itself, with its biological connotations, to describe an entirely sociological phenomenon, it will be generally...

link.springer.com

Enlightened racism? - ABC Religion & Ethics

Recent anti-racism protests around the drawn have drawn attention to the overtly racist attitudes of Enlightenment philosophers like David Hume. But is Hume’s attitude to race incidental to his philosophical worldview, or is it integral? What if it cannot easily be disentangled from his other...

www.abc.net.au

What do I have to do with this? Ask the conservatives why they are racist and not me.

 

[Deleted member 17872]

What do I have to do with this? Ask the conservatives why they are racist and not me.

Weren't u the one who were defending freemasons?

Conservatives are not defending freemasons

 

[Lord-Arthur_17]

left wing is destroying ethnic male smv. fuck that

We will destroy a lot more. The New World Order will not spare any of you. The World Government will rule - whether you like it or not.

 

[Lord-Arthur_17]

Weren't u the one who were defending freemasons?

Conservatives are not defending freemasons

Let's not change the topic. The theme is the left wing vs. right wing.

 

[Deleted member 17872]

Let's not change the subject. The theme is the left wing vs. right wing.

And who said Freemasonry is bad? Church? xD

Let's not shift the goal post

 

[Lord-Arthur_17]

Let's not shift the goal post

You say it doesn't matter left or right. But you are secretly right-wing. Why hide it?

 

[Deleted member 17872]

You say it doesn't matter left or right. But you are secretly right-wing. Why hide it?

Ironic coming from a racist.

I'm against racism and supports worker rights. So can't be right wing but nice try

 

[Lord-Arthur_17]

Ironic coming from a racist.

I'm against racism and supports worker rights. So can't be right wing but nice try

You have Marxism-Leninism-Maoism (proletarian ideology) and revisionism (bourgeois ideology) - you have to decide on one of the two

 

[Deleted member 17872]

You have Marxism-Leninism-Maoism (proletarian ideology) and revisionism (bourgeois ideology) - you have to decide on one of the two

Unlike u i'm not some retard who believs in what retarded ideology the elites forces upon me.

 

[Lord-Arthur_17]

Unlike u i'm not some retard who believs in what retarded ideology the elites forces upon me.

 

[n0rthface]

We will destroy a lot more. The New World Order will not spare any of you. The World Government will rule - whether you like it or not.

Cringe

 

[n0rthface]

View attachment 1759136

Aren’t you an atheist lmao?

 

[Deleted member 17872]

View attachment 1759136

U still have provided no arguments. I will recognize this as your defeat

 

[Lord-Arthur_17]

Cringe

I also think that's your cringe to believe in the existence of the Illuminati who supposedly control all political movements.

U still have provided no arguments. I will recognize this as your defeat

I don't see any point in discussing with you, because you won't change your mind anyway. Before that, you didn't debunk my long answer in which I criticized conservatism.

 

[n0rthface]

I also think that's your cringe to believe in the existence of the Illuminati who supposedly control all political movements.


I don't see any point in discussing with you, because you won't change your mind anyway. Before that, you didn't debunk my long answer in which I criticized conservatism.

Who believes in the illuminati?

 

[Lord-Arthur_17]

Who believes in the illuminati?

@David Rothschild

 

[Deleted member 17872]

@David Rothschild

I don't. Freemasonry and illuminati are two diffrenet things

Even the most reputed media houses know about freemasons

Why the secret handshake between police and Freemasons should worry us | Duncan Campbell

It is as clear as ever that membership of both bodies is incompatible with public service, writes the former Guardian journalist and freelance writer Duncan Campbell

www.theguardian.com

The freemasons no longer have significant influence in the British police

As the service becomes more professional and diverse, the less it can be influenced by boys’ clubs.

theconversation.com

Also jfl at calling me cringe when u urself believe in some retarted markist theory of some bourgoeis elite controlling the workers jfl

I don't see any point in discussing with you, because you won't change your mind anyway.

Ironic coming from u

Before that, you didn't debunk my long answer in which I criticized conservatism.

why would i debunk the long answer which wasn't evven directed at me. lol

 

[Lord-Arthur_17]

Also jfl at calling me cringe when u urself believe in some retarted markist theory of some bourgoeis elite controlling the workers jfl

You're so stupid. Yes, the bourgeoisie created Marxism to call for self overthrow, that makes sense xD

 

[Deleted member 17872]

You're so stupid. Yes, the bourgeoisie created Marxism to call for self overthrow, that makes sense xD

Keep strawmanning me. U still ahven't disproved anything i have said.

 

[Lord-Arthur_17]

Right wing ideologies are so cringe, they tell men to focus on themselves while encouraging violence and they don't care about you like not at all. They force morality like the cucks they actually are, only weak pussies created the right wing when you think deeply about it

On the other hand, left wing mogs hard, it's supportive unlike right, yes both parties don't give a fuck about you but left wing atleast pretends like they care about you. Atleast you can embrace your true self in the leftwing community and exploit the system as it is. While in the right wing community you get tortured if you don't act obedient

I think both parties are shit but if i was to choose, i would go with leftwing always. Right is repressing true human nature.

Absolutely, nowadays it's only the pussies who are right wing because they cannot exploit the system and fight in this cruel world methaporically speaking

Muh right wing and hitler, meanwhile high T men are not worried and fuck other women while these cucks complain.

 

[SntDomistheRealChad]

I'm so confused. Isn't the guy on the left hand side a right winger or am I mental?

 

[Joe Rogancel]

No u get this as a ugly white man
View attachment 1480981
View attachment 1480982
Oh and she is a multimillionaire so no betabuxx
She may not be as pretty as white women but come on man she ain't repulsive or anything

Ugly white men are incels. Most of this forum is white.