Should Childless People Pay More Tax ? 🤔

[Brus Wane]

Apparently both Tails & Waffles think so.

Fucking NWO shills.

 

[Brus Wane]

JFL @ zero responses

I just realised no one on this forum pays any income tax so nobody really gives a fuck

 

[aesthetic beauty]

JFL @ zero responses

I just realised no one on this forum pays any income tax so nobody really gives a fuck

The tax rate should be slashed down to 25% at most for individuals.

 

[aesthetic beauty]

Apparently both Tails & Waffles think so.

View attachment 2790174View attachment 2790175

Fucking NWO shills.

I understand why they would want this policy. How does the NWO advocate for child tax credits?

 

[radicalrationalist]

relative to those with families, yes. we need to reward and incentivize having families over being loner consoomer parasites of the system.

but overall taxes across the board should be cut down and government reduced by 60%

 

[Brus Wane]

How does the NWO advocate for child tax credits?

I used this term poorly.
I just wanted to cuss at something/someone lol.
Probably makes more sense to cuss the government and big businesses tbh.

I understand why they would want this policy.

relative to those with families, yes. we need to reward and incentivize having families over being loner consoomer parasites of the system.

but overall taxes across the board should be cut down and government reduced by 60%

They are sorely mistaken tho.

These incentives and penalties that governments put on people to have kids always fail.
It's not going to change anything.

People in first world countries aren't going to become parents, because for the most part, it is a personal decision to be childless.

Nobody is gonna suddenly squeeze out a bunch of crotch goblins in the name of "national solidarity" or "public service".
are the only exception.

The whole "cost of living" thing is cope. It rarely has anything to do with money.

Men
1) are too caught up in slaying/career
2) fear financial repercussions of divorce/child support
3) simply can't find a mate (inkwelldom)

Women
a) prefer to chase a high flying career
b) do not want to be bogged down by raising kids and "looking after" a man
c) hypergamy removes most men as a potential mate

And both genders would much rather spend that spare cash on travelling and good food

In the long run, the most sensible & feasible solution is immigration. Like it or not.
It's not even really a debate at this point.

There are just 2 questions that need to be answered for it to work out well.
How many immigrants do you want?
A couple hundred a year? Or half a million?

What kind of immigrants do you want?
Males? Or females?
Cheap labour? Or high IQ performers?
Shitskins? Or cumskins?

No sense in being overly protectionist like the 4 retards in NEA


But it's also equally stupid to import low quality races like some western states


Anyway, it's unrealistic to tax spinsters and bachelors in a democracy.
That shit won't take off.

The fact that there's a birth rate crisis means most people are childless.

And most people are going to oppose a higher tax rate on themselves.

The faster everyone accepts this the better.

 

[aesthetic beauty]

I used this term poorly.
I just wanted to cuss at something/someone lol.
Probably makes more sense to cuss the government and big businesses tbh.


They are sorely mistaken tho.

These incentives and penalties that governments put on people to have kids always fail.
It's not going to change anything.

People in first world countries aren't going to become parents, because for the most part, it is a personal decision to be childless.

Nobody is gonna suddenly squeeze out a bunch of crotch goblins in the name of "national solidarity" or "public service".
are the only exception.

The whole "cost of living" thing is cope. It rarely has anything to do with money.

Men
1) are too caught up in slaying/career
2) fear financial repercussions of divorce/child support
3) simply can't find a mate (inkwelldom)

Women
a) prefer to chase a high flying career
b) do not want to be bogged down by raising kids and "looking after" a man
c) hypergamy removes most men as a potential mate

And both genders would much rather spend that spare cash on travelling and good food

In the long run, the most sensible & feasible solution is immigration. Like it or not.
It's not even really a debate at this point.

There are just 2 questions that need to be answered for it to work out well.
How many immigrants do you want?
A couple hundred a year? Or half a million?

What kind of immigrants do you want?
Males? Or females?
Cheap labour? Or high IQ performers?
Shitskins? Or cumskins?

No sense in being overly protectionist like the 4 retards in NEA


But it's also equally stupid to import low quality races like some western states


Anyway, it's unrealistic to tax spinsters and bachelors in a democracy.
That shit won't take off.

The fact that there's a birth rate crisis means most people are childless.

And most people are going to oppose a higher tax rate on themselves.

The faster everyone accepts this the better.

I agree except for the immigration part.

 

[Brus Wane]

I agree except for the immigration part.

Fair enough, but then there would be no other solution.
You'd just have to brace for an aging population and smaller economy.

Which actually might not be a bad thing.
Housing will become cheaper and the workplace will be less competitive.

I used to think that it was possible to try and convince both genders to come together and get that TFR back to 2.1 with Carrot-and-Stick type policies but I think it's all for naught.

 

[aesthetic beauty]

Fair enough, but then there would be no other solution.
You'd just have to brace for an aging population and smaller economy.

Which actually might not be a bad thing.
Housing will become cheaper and the workplace will be less competitive.

The deflationary pressures on the economy and an aging population that needs expensive care would counteract this.

I used to think that it was possible to try and convince both genders to come together and get that TFR back to 2.1 with Carrot-and-Stick type policies but I think it's all for naught.

The biggest thing is the cost of living and hypergamy. Once schooling and housing become cheaper this trend will reverse marginally. Hypergamy is probably here to stay tho.

 

[ElTruecel]

Wheat waffles is a borderline redpilled retard barely blackpilled

 

[moggathon]

Apparently both Tails & Waffles think so.

View attachment 2790174View attachment 2790175

Fucking NWO shills.

They should be given tax refunds for not bringing their hellish sumhuman to life.

 

[Brus Wane]

The deflationary pressures on the economy and an aging population that needs expensive care would counteract this.

Eh? How so?

Once schooling and housing become cheaper this trend will reverse marginally.

Yeah just a little bit.
But I doubt housing is going to get any cheaper in any city.

Hypergamy is probably here to stay tho.

100%.

Wheat waffles is a borderline redpilled retard barely blackpilled

Yeah but in this case its irrelevant.
Both these clowns with their heads up their asses think taxation is going to solve the birth rate crisis.

The tax rate should be slashed down to 25% at most for individuals.

Frankly, anything above 15% is theft.

They should be given tax refunds for not bringing their hellish sumhuman to life.

I'm positive neither of those bozos pay tax.

 

[moggathon]

Eh? How so?

Yeah just a little bit.
But I doubt housing is going to get any cheaper in any city.

100%.

Yeah but in this case its irrelevant.
Both these clowns with their heads up their asses think taxation is going to solve the birth rate crisis.

Frankly, anything above 15% is theft.

I'm positive neither of those bozos pay tax.

Aside from muhh ugly people, why should people without kids have to pay more tax when they cost less overall. No school fees , health care fees etc

 

[moggathon]

But no I do not pay tax

 

[radicalrationalist]

I used this term poorly.
I just wanted to cuss at something/someone lol.
Probably makes more sense to cuss the government and big businesses tbh.


They are sorely mistaken tho.

These incentives and penalties that governments put on people to have kids always fail.
It's not going to change anything.

People in first world countries aren't going to become parents, because for the most part, it is a personal decision to be childless.

Nobody is gonna suddenly squeeze out a bunch of crotch goblins in the name of "national solidarity" or "public service".
are the only exception.

The whole "cost of living" thing is cope. It rarely has anything to do with money.

Men
1) are too caught up in slaying/career
2) fear financial repercussions of divorce/child support
3) simply can't find a mate (inkwelldom)

Women
a) prefer to chase a high flying career
b) do not want to be bogged down by raising kids and "looking after" a man
c) hypergamy removes most men as a potential mate

And both genders would much rather spend that spare cash on travelling and good food

In the long run, the most sensible & feasible solution is immigration. Like it or not.
It's not even really a debate at this point.

There are just 2 questions that need to be answered for it to work out well.
How many immigrants do you want?
A couple hundred a year? Or half a million?

What kind of immigrants do you want?
Males? Or females?
Cheap labour? Or high IQ performers?
Shitskins? Or cumskins?

No sense in being overly protectionist like the 4 retards in NEA


But it's also equally stupid to import low quality races like some western states


Anyway, it's unrealistic to tax spinsters and bachelors in a democracy.
That shit won't take off.

The fact that there's a birth rate crisis means most people are childless.

And most people are going to oppose a higher tax rate on themselves.

The faster everyone accepts this the better.

my method incentives white christian/nuclear families and disincentivizes black reproduction. small government=no welfare=black extinction. by freeing up resources and improving living condition and the economy, people will naturally want to raise families.

 

[Brus Wane]

why should people without kids have to pay more tax

Some people think that taxing them will make them have more kids

my method incentives white christian/nuclear families and disincentivizes black reproduction. small government=no welfare=black extinction. by freeing up resources and improving living condition and the economy, people will naturally want to raise families.

How exactly are you incentivizing the starting of families?

Not having kids isn't a financial issue.

First world people are simply choosing NOT to breed.
They'd rather spend their time, money & effort elsewhere.

That's what people don't seem to understand.

 

[randomop]

No , I don’t want to bring children in this world currently

 

[Gonthar]

Lol, back in the communist era in Romania if you didn't have kids after the age of 25 they would cut 10% of your salary. It didn't matter if you were married or not, if you were impotent or any other reasons, it was one of the measures to increase population.
However, back then almost everyone, even subhumans could easily find a wife and marrying got you a better home, better career prospects, it was more easy to buy a car, a color TV, etc.
This also meant that most girls were also pretty much forced to marry and have kids, for an easier life, there were very few strong, independent single women back then.

 

[albe.ORG]

Apparently both Tails & Waffles think so.

View attachment 2790174View attachment 2790175

Fucking NWO shills.

move to saudi, leave taxes problems to west ncps

not giving my money to corruct jew politicians and single mothers

 

[Brus Wane]

move to saudi, leave taxes problems to west ncps

not giving my money to corruct jew politicians and single mothers

Why Saudi? You're not Muslim nor brown skin

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Apparently both Tails & Waffles think so.

View attachment 2790174View attachment 2790175

Fucking NWO shills.

Mr cash money is a real nigga

Gets 22k a month for having 20 kids mirin

 

[romanstock]

Lol, back in the communist era in Romania if you didn't have kids after the age of 25 they would cut 10% of your salary. It didn't matter if you were married or not, if you were impotent or any other reasons, it was one of the measures to increase population.
However, back then almost everyone, even subhumans could easily find a wife and marrying got you a better home, better career prospects, it was more easy to buy a car, a color TV, etc.
This also meant that most girls were also pretty much forced to marry and have kids, for an easier life, there were very few strong, independent single women back then.

idk about romania but weren't single mothers completely provided for in soviet russia?

 

[Aladin]

I used this term poorly.
I just wanted to cuss at something/someone lol.
Probably makes more sense to cuss the government and big businesses tbh.


They are sorely mistaken tho.

These incentives and penalties that governments put on people to have kids always fail.
It's not going to change anything.

People in first world countries aren't going to become parents, because for the most part, it is a personal decision to be childless.

Nobody is gonna suddenly squeeze out a bunch of crotch goblins in the name of "national solidarity" or "public service".
are the only exception.

The whole "cost of living" thing is cope. It rarely has anything to do with money.

Men
1) are too caught up in slaying/career
2) fear financial repercussions of divorce/child support
3) simply can't find a mate (inkwelldom)

Women
a) prefer to chase a high flying career
b) do not want to be bogged down by raising kids and "looking after" a man
c) hypergamy removes most men as a potential mate

And both genders would much rather spend that spare cash on travelling and good food

In the long run, the most sensible & feasible solution is immigration. Like it or not.
It's not even really a debate at this point.

There are just 2 questions that need to be answered for it to work out well.
How many immigrants do you want?
A couple hundred a year? Or half a million?

What kind of immigrants do you want?
Males? Or females?
Cheap labour? Or high IQ performers?
Shitskins? Or cumskins?

No sense in being overly protectionist like the 4 retards in NEA


But it's also equally stupid to import low quality races like some western states


Anyway, it's unrealistic to tax spinsters and bachelors in a democracy.
That shit won't take off.

The fact that there's a birth rate crisis means most people are childless.

And most people are going to oppose a higher tax rate on themselves.

The faster everyone accepts this the better.

They need to incentivize having girls and aborting boys in order to balance the gender ratio. @john2

 

[AlexBrown84]

it already happens in america

we get less tax cuts vs people that have children

i don’t really care personally

 

[Michael Myers]

Apparently both Tails & Waffles think so.

View attachment 2790174View attachment 2790175

Fucking NWO shills.

Retarded faggots. It should be people with children who have to pay more taxes, because they bring in more subhumans into the world which means more resources are needed. They should pay, not us childless heroes.

 

[Brus Wane]

They need to incentivize having girls and aborting boys in order to balance the gender ratio. @john2

Jfl they cant even incentivise people to squeeze anything out, youre jumping the gun

But i agree

There are way too many men around

At least 70% need to be sent to war or some shit just so the other 30% can live decent lives

 

[Gonthar]

idk about romania but weren't single mothers completely provided for in soviet russia?

There were very few single mothers back then...Also, they didn't quite provide you with stuff for free, everyone had to work, not working was illegal, however this meant that even if you were lazy and incompetent it was very difficult to get fired, they would just put you instead in a place where you didn't have to do much, half of the jobs back then were pretty much useless - all sorts of guards and supervisors, in places where there was no need for them, these people show up to work and simply sat all day.

 

[Shogun]

No, death havers should pay more taxes and truecels should pay less taxes

 

[albe.ORG]

Why Saudi? You're not Muslim nor brown skin

Just an example on a place with Low taxes