Some of you are way too biased when it comes to judging beauty/aesthetics and suffer from a serious lack of discernment

[Gargantuan]

View attachment 1121326

 

[Deleted member 12611]

but it makes no sense to to call a girl masculine cuz she’s tall

Yes it does jfl, height is a masculine dimorphic trait.

 

[Uglybrazilian]

The root of this problem is that niggas always confuse SMV with PSL when judging both females and males

 

[Uglybrazilian]

Mothafocka, peoples preference is what determines what is attractive. JFL @ You thinking that because somebody has a modeling contract they must be more attractive than those who do tik tok. Agree with most of your actual examples except the alien looking foid, sure she's a stacy, but she gets fogged by every tik toker thirst trap. Also Eva fogs the model in the post easily.

But muh aesthetics and looks theory!!!!1

Aesthetics and looks theory is derived from mass appeal, if you take a sample size of 50 men and get them to judge which of 2 women is more attractive, the winner is the one with better aesthetics and looks. Aesthetics does not exist outside of the realm of sexual attraction.

I agree with 99% of what you said except the last sentence

Sometimes I can acknowledge that a girl is very good looking even tho she doesnt arouse me that much sexually, thats how I feel about most female models


I also know when a guy is good looking even tho Im not sexually attracted to men

 

[zeke714]

View attachment 1121326

Taylor looks like a man with wig and fakeup.

 

[Deleted member 6217]

Taylor looks like a man with wig and fakeup.

you are probably above her lookmatch right?

 

[Ritalincel]

which one would u fuck

looksmax.org

 

[Copeful]

you are probably above her lookmatch right?

Most here are gigachads looksmatched with supermodels lol

 

[Deleted member 685]

Didn't expect much else from a guy who has the testosterone levels of a castrated platypus, have you taken a pregnancy test yet?

Holy shit, a mod shouldn't be allowed to have an IQ this low. Being low testosterone as a male, which I'm not considering I could easily kill you irl has nothing to do with pregnancy

 

[Gargantuan]

Holy shit, a mod shouldn't be allowed to have an IQ this low. Being low testosterone as a male, which I'm not considering I could easily kill you irl has nothing to do with pregnancy

Do I really need to remind you of the genetic failure that you are?

My T levels result came in

350ng/dl :feelsrope::feelsrope::feelsrope: No wonder I've always been very emotional deep down, this stuff explains so many situations in my life. Afterall my index finger is half a cm longer than my ring finger, indicating I had low prenatal T

looksmax.org

350ng/dl

The try guys called, they want their long lost member back

Who are you gonna kill with those t levels? A kindergartener would probably beat you up in a fight, please kys.

 

[Adriana Lima]

damm missed this

 

[Deleted member 685]

Do I really need to remind you of the genetic failure that you are?

My T levels result came in

350ng/dl :feelsrope::feelsrope::feelsrope: No wonder I've always been very emotional deep down, this stuff explains so many situations in my life. Afterall my index finger is half a cm longer than my ring finger, indicating I had low prenatal T

looksmax.org

350ng/dl
View attachment 1129552

The try guys called, they want their long lost member back
View attachment 1129553

Who are you gonna kill with those t levels? A kindergartener would probably beat you up in a fight, please kys.

Not a single molecule, that thread was a heavy larp I've never done a T test in my life

You're a fucking conspiracy theorist mod, people as low IQ like you should be castrated. Won't reply any further to this loser whos life depends on an internet forum

 

[sorrowfulsad]

It looks like an alien, thankfully I have a fetish in Martians
View attachment 1116836

true.
My seed will spread through the universe

 

[Gargantuan]

Not a single molecule, that thread was a heavy larp I've never done a T test in my life

You're a fucking conspiracy theorist mod, people as low IQ like you should be castrated. Won't reply any further to this loser whos life depends on an internet forum

Ah, of course it becomes a larp when it doesn't suit you. And even if it is, it won't be much higher than that as it's evident you're one of the lowest T users here, as well as one of the lowest in IQ.

Muh conspiracy theorist hurr durr

Please do all of us a favour and end your miserable existence by putting a 9mm Glock through your palate.

 

[Deleted member 685]

Ah, of course it becomes a larp when it doesn't suit you. And even if it is, it won't be much higher than that as it's evident you're one of the lowest T users here, as well as one of the lowest in IQ.

Muh conspiracy theorist hurr durr

Please do all of us a favour and end your miserable existence by putting a 9mm Glock through your palate.

Not a molecule

 

[Gargantuan]

Not a molecule

Won't reply any further

Walking contradiction, you're the gift that keeps on giving

Keep dancing for me you mentally stunted dog

 

[Ritalincel]

 

[Deleted member 685]

Walking contradiction, you're the gift that keeps on giving

Keep dancing for me you mentally stunted dog

Still didn't read

 

[Gargantuan]

Still didn't read

You read every single word, you giga autist.

Keep telling yourself you're gonna ignore me when in reality you can't stop barking for me

Talk about rent free

 

[Ritalincel]

View attachment 1121369

 

[court monarch777]

I can respect the fact that some people will prefer Eva over Candice, and that's probably how most people will interpret fog battles, they go for the female of their preference.
However, Candice fogs Eva quite comfortably, if you look at it objectively. They are not on the same level, this is a fact and not a preference.

That's your preference, JFL. Candice is below Eva with this hammer shark level IPD

 

[Gargantuan]

That's your preference, JFL. Candice is below Eva with this hammer shark level IPD

No, it isn't. The former is a gigastacy and the latter is a high-tier becky, not comparable whatsoever.

And why are you bringing up IPD as if it's a decisive factor?

Kaia Gerber has a low IPD, lower than Candice, I'm sure, but is still attractive

Elsa Hosk and Sasha Luss both have very wide IPD's, but are also attractive

 

[Pietrosiek]

Great thread, i read everything and i looked at every picture very closly, it was a nice sight to behold

 

[court monarch777]

No, it isn't. The former is a gigastacy and the latter is a high-tier becky

I stopped reading when you said that Eva is just a high-level becky, I can't take your opinion seriously, sorry.

you must live in heaven for this to not even be a stacy lite

 

[Deleted member 2403]

I stopped reading when you said that Eva is just a high-level becky, I can't take your opinion seriously, sorry.
View attachment 1149319you must live in heaven for this to not even be a stacy lite

She was stacylite in her prime

 

[Gargantuan]

I stopped reading when you said that Eva is just a high-level becky, I can't take your opinion seriously, sorry.
View attachment 1149319you must live in heaven for this to not even be a stacy lite

She actually mogs girls where I live but I don't think she is anything special, honestly. Above average, sure, I'll give credit where credit is due, but stacy/stacylite? Nah.

This is stacylite/stacy-tier, for me. I think Eva is a level below that, honestly.

 

[Gargantuan]

She was stacylite in her prime

View attachment 1149335View attachment 1149338View attachment 1149340

HTB

 

[Deleted member 2403]

She actually mogs girls where I live but I don't think she is anything special, honestly. Above average, sure, I'll give credit where credit is due, but stacy/stacylite? Nah.

This is stacylite/stacy-tier, for me. I think Eva is a level below that, honestly.

Blonde and blue eyes=low iq bimbo

 

[Descartes]

Damn low t subhumans everywhere son

I don't get the correlation between being low t and liking feminine women, it's usually the other way around, men that lack masculine features themselves seeking them in females for "muh slayer sons"

 

[Gargantuan]

I don't get the correlation between being low t and liking feminine women, it's usually the other way around, men that lack masculine features themselves seeking them in females for "muh slayer sons"

Pretty much all men like feminine women. The thing is, a lot of guys here (wrongly) perceive universally attractive features (aka features that look good on both genders) as masculine features, such as dense eyebrows, long ramus, decent sized-mandible+good forward growth, low gonial angle, compact orbitals etc.

 

[antiantifa]

Good thread

 

[Gazzamogga]

Very good thread bro, shame I missed it

Way too little knowledge and way too much cope wrt this topic

Tag me in the future

 

[Deleted member 9890]

It looks like an alien, thankfully I have a fetish in Martians
View attachment 1116836

It looks like an alien, thankfully I have a fetish in Martians
View attachment 1116836

This forum is infinitely amusing

 

[Deleted member 9890]

Do I really need to remind you of the genetic failure that you are?

My T levels result came in

350ng/dl :feelsrope::feelsrope::feelsrope: No wonder I've always been very emotional deep down, this stuff explains so many situations in my life. Afterall my index finger is half a cm longer than my ring finger, indicating I had low prenatal T

looksmax.org

350ng/dl
View attachment 1129552

The try guys called, they want their long lost member back
View attachment 1129553

Who are you gonna kill with those t levels? A kindergartener would probably beat you up in a fight, please kys.

My guy is fucking brooootal.

 

[Deleted member 10987]

For as long as I've been here, I've pretty much always had the idea that looks theory was all about judging beauty from an objective point of view, whatever has happened to this concept? So why is it no longer applied here, by a lot of people?

Before I start to point out some of the misguided views some people seem to have here, I will concede that beauty isn't always 100% objective, though it usually is.
However, for a small part, and only under certain circumstances, can it be viewed as subjective and I will elaborate on those type of situations in a bit.

So where does this sudden shift come from? From what I've noticed, the problem is rooted in the fact that guys here cling to their personal preferences way too much.
The degree of attractiveness, when you see someone, is one thing, but actual beauty/aesthetics (which, as I said before, is almost always objective) is an entirely different thing.

Whenever these guys are shown a girl that isn't their 'type' or ideal woman, they will automatically assume that the girl in question is unattractive, simply because she isn't their type.
There's nothing wrong with having a type/ideal woman. In fact, it's completely normal and indeed subjective.
Beauty, on the other hand, is not subjective, in nearly all instances.

Some copes that I've encountered, along the way:
View attachment 1116618View attachment 1116619View attachment 1116621
'Muh she looks like an alien, I wouldn't fuck her even though I'm an incel'
View attachment 1116624
Sure thing, buddy. What you were really trying to say, is that she isn't your type/ideal woman and therefore, you automatically try to assume that she isn't attractive, even though she quite clearly is very good-looking and top-tier, in terms of beauty and aesthetics.

View attachment 1116625View attachment 1116626View attachment 1116630
(credit goes to @looksmaxxer234 for the last pic)

'Muh she looks like a tranny, so overrated, I know girls who fog her by 2 entire PSL points and I wouldn't fuck her, hurr durr'

Once again, she may not be your type either, and that's perfectly fine. However, lay down the copium and put your bias aside for a bit, because it's clouding your judgement.

Do you honestly think that one of the most successful runway models of all time, who has walked 18 Victoria Secret fashion shows, is not objectively attractive? Please quit this community right now if you think that's the case and sign up to Reddit instead.
Alternatively, you could also try to fix your 250ng/dL testosterone levels.

Can subjectivity be the decisive factor when determining beauty? Yes, it can, but only under certain and specific circumstances:
View attachment 1116631View attachment 1116633View attachment 1116635
Meghan Roche and Birgit Kos are both top-tier fashion/runway models, they are both 99th percentile in beauty for women, objectively speaking: Top-tier phenos, lips, ratios, eye areas, lower thirds etc. they tick all of the boxes in what constitutes an objectively beautiful/aesthetic female, one of the core principles that PSL/looks theory was founded on.

Personally, I prefer Birgit over Meghan but I have no issue with people preferring Meghan because they are both on the same level of beauty/aesthetics, it's a preference at this point.

Unironically though, I've seen people claim that both of these legit gigastacys supposedly 'look like shit'.
Maybe I'd say the same thing if my T levels were lower than that of the average woman, causing me to be shook of females who look more dimorphic than I do because only these type of 'males' can cope to this extent.

Another example:
View attachment 1116646View attachment 1116647View attachment 1116648
Taylor Hill vs Grace Elizabeth

Again, we're talking about the 99th percentile in terms of female beauty, here.
I prefer Grace over Taylor but many of you might give the edge to Taylor because of personal preferences.

If you do a fog battle between Taylor, Grace, Meghan and/or Birgit, the determining factor at play is subjectivity because all 4 of them qualify as 99th percentile beauty and aesthetics for females.

You may not find all of them to be ideal/your type of woman, but that doesn't mean they're unattractive, their level of beauty (objective) remains unchanged.


Here are some more examples of people's preferences in attractiveness clouding their judgement on overall beauty and aesthetics:
View attachment 1116713View attachment 1116714View attachment 1116716View attachment 1116717
'Tik Tok females are ideal and neotenous queens, bro!'

Okay, great. More power to you, if that's your preference/type.
However, the moment that you start to suggest that they mog actual female models, you've officially lost the plot, big time.

I would like to reiterate once again that you may PREFER them over models, which is perfectly normal, but to suggest that they FOG models, is nonsensical and ridiculous.

They simply do not compare to this level of beauty:
View attachment 1116726View attachment 1116727View attachment 1116728
To give you an analogy (people who watch soccer/football will know what I'm talking about):
Girls on TikTok, pop stars, musicians etc. are Europa-league tier, whereas female models are Champions League-tier.


This is a nonsensical comparison:

Fog Battle: Eva Cudmore vs Candice Swanepoel

Eva Cudmore Candice Swanepoel

looksmax.org

I can respect the fact that some people will prefer Eva over Candice, and that's probably how most people will interpret fog battles, they go for the female of their preference.
However, Candice fogs Eva quite comfortably, if you look at it objectively. They are not on the same level, this is a fact and not a preference.


This is a comparison that actually makes sense:

which one would u fuck

looksmax.org

I know the context is a little bit different here (as is evident in the title of the thread), but the 2 girls in question here are actually pretty much on the same level of beauty/aesthetics and therefore, make a good comparison with one another.


As does this one:

Barbara Palvin vs Taylor Hill

Barbara Palvin Taylor Hill

looksmax.org

(I know that I commented that Grace Elizabeth fogs the pair of them, in this thread, so I might come across as a hypocrite here, but I was merely pointing out that I prefer Grace over both Taylor and Palvin) > After all, preference is LEGIT, as a determining factor of beauty, when the girls in question are on the same level of beauty/aesthetics (which they all were, here)

Think about it: Every model could potentially be a star on TikTok, but no TikTok girl could ever be an actual runway model.


TLDR: The bottom line is: I'm not criticizing people for having a different taste in females, in comparison to my taste in females, that would be a silly thing to do as it's totally subjective for each and every individual.
However, I will say that there are different levels to actual beauty and aesthetics that should be recognized and cannot be transcended by preference.

So stop calling females, who are objectively good looking, ugly/trannies whatever, just because they aren't your type.

Beauty and aesthetics, observable reality = objective
Attractiveness and preference, having a type = subjective

@TRNA @SendMePicsToRate @HowAmIAlive123

Grace Elizabeth is very feminine/neotonous

 

[Deleted member 10987]

“Ewe tranny”

View attachment 1116841

“omg prime jb ”

View attachment 1116842

Digusting eyebrowlet eyes tbh
Eyes are everything on females and she has vomit inducing ones

 

[Deleted member 10987]

All models look better in motion than they do in pictures, it seems. And they probably look even more stunning in real life, I bet.
Palvin looks kinda weird in some pictures as well but she looks much better in motion.

Grace unironically comes across as a really nice person as well, but maybe that's just looks halo influencing me lol

She does seem very nice

 

[Deleted member 10987]

A very based contribution nonetheless
View attachment 1116889
Still very underrated though @Vagabond

Just need a qt body

 

[Deleted member 7580]

@looksmaxxer234 medium ugly theory apply to girls too

I feel intimidated when a real Stacy shows interest ... but wanna kill myself when I see them with ugly guys

 

[Deleted member 10987]

@looksmaxxer234 medium ugly theory apply to girls too

I feel intimidated when a real Stacy shows interest ... but wanna kill myself when I see them with ugly guys

Stfu

 

[Gargantuan]

this is called psl autism i think

Not on my behalf. I simply have a yearning to be as objective as I possibly can be, without trying to be biased.

I acknowledge the concept of preference but some people take it too far and up becoming deluded.

It also ties in with the wide-spread pathology that is present on this forum, which I explained briefly here:

Don't put all your eggs in one basket (nuance is key)

What I've noticed on these type of forums, is that a lot of people operate within the intellectual confines of dichotomous thinking (This applies to most people in society as well, where it is arguably an even bigger problem). If you criticize certain aspects of the blackpill/looks theory or...

looksmax.org