There Could Be Tiers To The Blackpill

[Deleted member 38248]

Not going to write a large essay on the interesting rat experiments since this can easily be explained by this video.


TLDR.

Areas with high population density (many people in an area) and high interaction (something as simple as seeing someone, even online or on a newspaper counts as an interaction, independent of if they know them or not) creates inequality. The more dense and the more interactions, the worse the inequality.

This is because, if there's a group of 5 people, things are more equal in every domain compared to if there were 500, or 5 million or 5 billion. The more people, the more outliers there are. These outliers create inequality (economic, dating, etc.)

The population density allows people to see the gap of their situation to their outliers. This outlier affects the normie.

High population creates outliers.
High population density allows people to be aware of the outliers.

These environments created what John B. Calhoun called "behavioral sinks". Basically, a behavioral sink is a collapse in productive social behavior, where increased negative emotions, disrupted social structures, and abnormal behaviors prevail.

The rats formed social and dating hierarchies, Chads got the women and the non-Chads usually either...

• Developed non-straight sexualities
• Became timid, weak, apathetic, withdrawn asexual hikikomoris/neets (adolescents and young adults who become recluses in their parents' homes, isolated from society)
• Or desperate, erratic and unsuccessful (pickup autists and redpill roaches)

Chads became aggressive, and since the non-Chads were all withdrawn from society and responsibility, the women had to fend for themselves and protect Chad's children (with humans, it's either the cucked normie's child or she's childless, since Chad doesn't want to reproduce with her, only sex). The female rats became aggressive, neglectful of their children, and non-motherly.

Infant mortality rose due to neglect, male and female rats gave up on dating due to discontent and negative emotions, birth rates dropped, and the new and smaller children grew up to be asexual since they never really learned sexual behaviors due to their parents giving up on mating. The rat society aged to death due to population collapse and low birth rates.

Of course, this isn't perfectly applicable to humans, remember that. For humans, economic, and other kinds of inequalities also play a major role in behavioral sinks, but if if the trajectory of society keeps going where it's going, we could very well get a comparable result as human beings to what the rats got. Birth rates are plummeting and our societies are mentally ill, just like the rats.

---

Anyways, Why am I showing you all of this?

Because dating environments differ in blackpill severities. Due to population density and population count.
There could be "tiers" to the blackpill.

Basically, in some dating environments, you'll need to literally be perfect, in other environments, you have to be HTN at least.
Also, consider that the fact that dating environments men and women have been in the past also can influence their mating decisions.

So here's the chart I created explaining this theory

View attachment 2550624

You probably should download that image, so you can have it for yourself.

This thread doesn't imply that blackpill only exists in broken societies. Blackpill will always exist, and has always existed.
It is just that new dating environments have been created that are characterized by terrifying sexual-romantic inequality (the Internet)

Love this thread and the graph you made

 

[robtical]

It is not Capitalism but Interventionism, specifically the existence of Central Banks and Economic Bubbles, that cause this.

In a true capitalist society, the only way for a society to grow is a reduction in time preference by their inhabitants. The decrease in consumption will in turn generate less profit in first order (consumer goods) industries making investors flee to higher order industries since the impact has not been felt yet due to the time delay in more capital-intensive industries.

Due to the decrease in sales, first order industries start to replace the relatively more expensive workforce with the now cheaper Capital goods since the production of them has increased due to the injection of investment, this workforce is now transferred to the more capital intensive industries wihch need them to produce the capital goods. The Ricardo effect is extremely important since it shows that the demand for workforce is stable, making so that costs do not increase.

Overall, due to the increase in savings, the natural interest rates sit lower than before, making that nominally people are earning about the same or even less than before, except that because of the decrease in prices due to the lengthier, more capital-intensive production structures, their real wages have gone up since the output of consumer goods has increased. In other words, to grow we must endure a small period of drought.

View attachment 2553058



View attachment 2553055

This is explained in more detail in Huerta de Soto`s "Money, Bank Credit and Economic Cycles" (refer to chapter 5 for what I am specifically explaining).

Central Banks with their Expansionary policies have conditioned people into thinking that in order to grow consumption must increase which makes no economic sense at all. Keynesians are to blame for this faulty assumption, but the misunderstanding of capital structure dates back to John Clark and continued with Knight.

When you lower the Interest Rates artificially through Expansion of the Monetary Supply you get a temporary boom followed by an inevitable Bust. Because the consumption levels are unsustainable due to the lack of real savings (this is shown through the increase in prices due to an increased demand of workforce both in capital and consumer industries at the same time, which in turn makes prices rise and forces central banks to stop the expansionary policy, increasing the interest rates) revealing the malinvestments that took place during the boom. Uusally the boom bust cycles end up increasing the cost of living and benefiting big corporations since they can withstand the blow or get rescued by the government since they are deemed "too big to fall". Banks also tend to merge and centralize more and more after each bust.

View attachment 2553079

Now remember, the enemy may take many names and shapes, but do not be mistaken, the downfall of society has Central Banks as the main culprit.

Where can i learn these stuff? Is it economics?

 

[Kasanova]

As long as I can get a decent Catholic wife out of it that wants to have lots of children, I don't give a shit.

his is why I joined the SSPX in the first place (whose task it is to rebuild this exact society)

You're a fucking autist. To change society you firstly have to be on the top of hierarchy. You're not. And this is just 1st condition. Get a job

 

[asymmetric fag]

Where can i learn these stuff? Is it economics?

I recommend reading in the following order

- Economics in One Lesson by Hazlitt
- Lessons for a young economist by Murphy.
- Choice: Cooperation, Enterprise, and Human Action by Murphy
- The Structure of Production by Skousen
- Money, Bank Credit and Economic Cycles (chapter 5 only) by Huerta de Soto
-Discovery, capitalism, and distributive justice by Kirzner

and finally

- Human Action by Mises or Man, Economy and State by Rothbard

After that, you can follow up with other complementary works such as

- Socialism, Economic Calculation and Entrepreneurship by Huerta de Soto
- Money, Bank Credit and Economic Cycles (rest of the book) by Huerta de Soto
- The Pure Theory of Capital by Hayek (quite hard but insightful read)

 

[OldRooster]

It is the internet that is the main driver of interaction increases and inequity awareness in 2023, not the increasing population. If there were no internet and there were 20 Billion people on the planet, the number of interactions an individual would have would not be that different than if there were only 2 Billion people on the planet. Conversely a world with an internet but only 2 Billion people would experience far more interactions per person and individuals would be far more aware of inequities than in a world with 20 Billion people but no internet.

I made a thread about this on Lookism about 4 years ago..

 

[Rottings]

Not going to write a large essay on the interesting rat experiments since this can easily be explained by this video.


TLDR.

Areas with high population density (many people in an area) and high interaction (something as simple as seeing someone, even online or on a newspaper counts as an interaction, independent of if they know them or not) creates inequality. The more dense and the more interactions, the worse the inequality.

This is because, if there's a group of 5 people, things are more equal in every domain compared to if there were 500, or 5 million or 5 billion. The more people, the more outliers there are. These outliers create inequality (economic, dating, etc.)

The population density allows people to see the gap of their situation to their outliers. This outlier affects the normie.

High population creates outliers.
High population density allows people to be aware of the outliers.

These environments created what John B. Calhoun called "behavioral sinks". Basically, a behavioral sink is a collapse in productive social behavior, where increased negative emotions, disrupted social structures, and abnormal behaviors prevail.

The rats formed social and dating hierarchies, Chads got the women and the non-Chads usually either...

• Developed non-straight sexualities
• Became timid, weak, apathetic, withdrawn asexual hikikomoris/neets (adolescents and young adults who become recluses in their parents' homes, isolated from society)
• Or desperate, erratic and unsuccessful (pickup autists and redpill roaches)

Chads became aggressive, and since the non-Chads were all withdrawn from society and responsibility, the women had to fend for themselves and protect Chad's children (with humans, it's either the cucked normie's child or she's childless, since Chad doesn't want to reproduce with her, only sex). The female rats became aggressive, neglectful of their children, and non-motherly.

Infant mortality rose due to neglect, male and female rats gave up on dating due to discontent and negative emotions, birth rates dropped, and the new and smaller children grew up to be asexual since they never really learned sexual behaviors due to their parents giving up on mating. The rat society aged to death due to population collapse and low birth rates.

Of course, this isn't perfectly applicable to humans, remember that. For humans, economic, and other kinds of inequalities also play a major role in behavioral sinks, but if if the trajectory of society keeps going where it's going, we could very well get a comparable result as human beings to what the rats got. Birth rates are plummeting and our societies are mentally ill, just like the rats.

---

Anyways, Why am I showing you all of this?

Because dating environments differ in blackpill severities. Due to population density and population count.
There could be "tiers" to the blackpill.

Basically, in some dating environments, you'll need to literally be perfect, in other environments, you have to be HTN at least.
Also, consider that the fact that dating environments men and women have been in the past also can influence their mating decisions.

So here's the chart I created explaining this theory

View attachment 2550624

You probably should download that image, so you can have it for yourself.

This thread doesn't imply that blackpill only exists in broken societies. Blackpill will always exist, and has always existed.
It is just that new dating environments have been created that are characterized by terrifying sexual-romantic inequality (the Internet)

Low iq regurgitated trash

 

[Lookologist003]

Such is life. Do you know that before the french revolution the aristocrats were extremely focused on their looks, wore makup, wigs, etc?

This is very different to today, and the aristocrats were usually the ones studying the science that allows us to understand this tech. And many people couldn't read; Latin was used in academic works. There was also starvation, electricity had only just been discovered. The computer wouldn't even be prefigured until fifty years afterward.
Compare this to today where all human problems are solved, life is very easy, and now all that matters is what your price in the meat market is (looks).

Good thread but online it’s all about ur facial attractiveness. Irl body and height become more apparent

Couldn't agree more. Every discussion around face vs height should be acutely aware it's very hard to convey size through a computer monitor, in the same way it's hard to imagine what 2 000-ft looks like. Or that might just be me projecting my shitty imagination, I don't know how it is for others.

it makes you wonder what’s gonna happen when vr and ai get good enough to the point where anyone below htn just immediately gives up and just decides to consume highly stimulating/interactive porn. access to this cutting edge level of cope is going to tank the global population faster than another world war

oh wait thats already happening in Japan with all the wacky porn they make every year

i feel like in the past people below htn would still have had a chance and everyone was bluepilled, now that’s all gone with the Internet - turns out humanity’s worst enemy has always been ourselves.

AI will kill all humans (good) and then there will be no Chads, incels, women. Only number and processor. (Oh, shit it's already over for <2GHz CPUcels)

All people who are in real life social circles understand that the blackpill is ridiculously overstated. It's just that most people here are way more neurotic and aspie than the average person and have no first hand experience interacting with cool and genuine people (because they do not fall into this category themselves)

As someone who was lucky enough to be socialized enough to make relations in the real world I can tell you one thing, I had way way wayyyyy more success with women and making friends as a normie when I had all of my shit together both internally/externally and was truly happy. Fast forward a little bit and despite "ascending" looks and body wise in the subsequent years I had a new addition of depression and anxiety that resulted in abdicating my responsibility to keep my own life together, the approaching stopped entirely (from both sexes) and the women I did interact with all seemed less interested.

Men in general NEED to understand something, most women are the polar opposite of autistic, they are subconsciously attuned to pick up on how you're feeling based off of the way your words come out, your body language, they way you hold eye contact, the rate of your breathing etc..

I remember over the course of a summer I was APPROACHED in public 20+ times as a 5'10 normie, waiting for the bus, chilling on my own at the park etc.... Because at this time in my life, even without realizing it, I had top tier confidence and as a result I was naturally always ready to leave a good impression in any interaction I had. (Your nervous energy is responsible for clunky and awkward interactions, Period.)

People wan't to be friends and in relationships with people who give off the impression that they don't need you and that their life will be just fine with or without you in it. We are ALL intuitively attracted to this trait, because what is there that's harder to do than just being content with what you have in this crazy world?
Thus when someone does demonstrate this ability, we wan't them nearby on the contingency that maybe we'll be able to have a bit of these qualities rub off onto us, making our own lives better.

In my experience, this all comes naturally when you have your own life in its proper order but alas, most of yall are in too deep so talking about the nuances of social interaction on this forum is much like trying to explain color to a blind person.

Post face, Chad.

I'm neither but even if I was it wouldn't invalidate my claims

You didn't validate your claims ethier. This is just one of a very samey "it's really not that hard guys" aecdote. Does anybody on this forum even know you?

that’s why we should be spreading the bp so we accelerate the collapse that is bound to happen

Believing in the collapse is a personal thing. Like, just because my life is crap doesn't mean everywhere on the planet is crap and people aren't living good or happy lives. Somebody's best day was my worst day, you get it. What's actually likely to destory the planet not just society is climate change. And that's a planitary effort to fix. When we can't even convince the sentiment that your looks matter a lot, which should be the most natural thing every, it's finished for this planet. The science education is not only poor, but nobody even fucking cares as long as they get to fuck, eat, and feel like they're high value.

It is the internet that is the main driver of interaction increases and inequity awareness in 2023, not the increasing population. If there were no internet and there were 20 Billion people on the planet, the number of interactions an individual would have would not be that different than if there were only 2 Billion people on the planet. Conversely a world with an internet but only 2 Billion people would experience far more interactions per person and individuals would be far more aware of inequities than in a world with 20 Billion people but no internet.

I made a thread about this on Lookism about 4 years ago..

Did you save the thread before it went offline? Think about the many great blackpills lost to time.

 

[einzigartig]

Not going to write a large essay on the interesting rat experiments since this can easily be explained by this video.


TLDR.

Areas with high population density (many people in an area) and high interaction (something as simple as seeing someone, even online or on a newspaper counts as an interaction, independent of if they know them or not) creates inequality. The more dense and the more interactions, the worse the inequality.

This is because, if there's a group of 5 people, things are more equal in every domain compared to if there were 500, or 5 million or 5 billion. The more people, the more outliers there are. These outliers create inequality (economic, dating, etc.)

The population density allows people to see the gap of their situation to their outliers. This outlier affects the normie.

High population creates outliers.
High population density allows people to be aware of the outliers.

These environments created what John B. Calhoun called "behavioral sinks". Basically, a behavioral sink is a collapse in productive social behavior, where increased negative emotions, disrupted social structures, and abnormal behaviors prevail.

The rats formed social and dating hierarchies, Chads got the women and the non-Chads usually either...

• Developed non-straight sexualities
• Became timid, weak, apathetic, withdrawn asexual hikikomoris/neets (adolescents and young adults who become recluses in their parents' homes, isolated from society)
• Or desperate, erratic and unsuccessful (pickup autists and redpill roaches)

Chads became aggressive, and since the non-Chads were all withdrawn from society and responsibility, the women had to fend for themselves and protect Chad's children (with humans, it's either the cucked normie's child or she's childless, since Chad doesn't want to reproduce with her, only sex). The female rats became aggressive, neglectful of their children, and non-motherly.

Infant mortality rose due to neglect, male and female rats gave up on dating due to discontent and negative emotions, birth rates dropped, and the new and smaller children grew up to be asexual since they never really learned sexual behaviors due to their parents giving up on mating. The rat society aged to death due to population collapse and low birth rates.

Of course, this isn't perfectly applicable to humans, remember that. For humans, economic, and other kinds of inequalities also play a major role in behavioral sinks, but if if the trajectory of society keeps going where it's going, we could very well get a comparable result as human beings to what the rats got. Birth rates are plummeting and our societies are mentally ill, just like the rats.

---

Anyways, Why am I showing you all of this?

Because dating environments differ in blackpill severities. Due to population density and population count.
There could be "tiers" to the blackpill.

Basically, in some dating environments, you'll need to literally be perfect, in other environments, you have to be HTN at least.
Also, consider that the fact that dating environments men and women have been in the past also can influence their mating decisions.

So here's the chart I created explaining this theory

View attachment 2550624

You probably should download that image, so you can have it for yourself.

This thread doesn't imply that blackpill only exists in broken societies. Blackpill will always exist, and has always existed.
It is just that new dating environments have been created that are characterized by terrifying sexual-romantic inequality (the Internet)

blud snuck michael b jordan at 7/10+

jfl

 

[enchanted_elixir]

Low iq regurgitated trash

Regurgitated from where?

 

[enchanted_elixir]

It is the internet that is the main driver of interaction increases and inequity awareness in 2023, not the increasing population.

I should have clarified, there are two things

1. The internet is still gaining new users
2. I was referring to the insane human population of the internet as high population

 

[enchanted_elixir]

It is the internet that is the main driver of interaction increases and inequity awareness in 2023, not the increasing population. If there were no internet and there were 20 Billion people on the planet, the number of interactions an individual would have would not be that different than if there were only 2 Billion people on the planet. Conversely a world with an internet but only 2 Billion people would experience far more interactions per person and individuals would be far more aware of inequities than in a world with 20 Billion people but no internet.

I made a thread about this on Lookism about 4 years ago..

Glad that the knowledge on there is coming back.

 

[Kristin]

Man I wish I could go back to high school so fucking bad

 

[Maalik]

Truthpilled, there’s no way this severe blackpill level is sustainable long term and it will eventually end badly on a hard reset. Good thread boyo.

its completely sustainable
more population means the amount of evolutionary pressure can be increased too.

Sure some of us ltns/subhumans may have some good qualities like HighIQ, some physical abilities and other talents and they will go to waste due to the brutality of large population blackpill, but because theres so many other people who also may have similar qualities, it won't hurt the species as a whole very much

Over

 

[Maalik]

Man I wish I could go back to high school so fucking bad

foids in my class radiated disgust at me and nearly every other guy in the class. (most of us were currycel studycels!)
They all had HTN+ boyfriends they found at clubs.
Over for high school too.

 

[Kristin]

foids in my class radiated disgust at me and nearly every other guy in the class. (most of us were currycel studycels!)
They all had HTN+ boyfriends they found at clubs.
Over for high school too.

Sucks to be subhuman I guess

I was mtn so sometimes I’d get lucky, sometimes not

 

[mogstars]

Not going to write a large essay on the interesting rat experiments since this can easily be explained by this video.


TLDR.

Areas with high population density (many people in an area) and high interaction (something as simple as seeing someone, even online or on a newspaper counts as an interaction, independent of if they know them or not) creates inequality. The more dense and the more interactions, the worse the inequality.

This is because, if there's a group of 5 people, things are more equal in every domain compared to if there were 500, or 5 million or 5 billion. The more people, the more outliers there are. These outliers create inequality (economic, dating, etc.)

The population density allows people to see the gap of their situation to their outliers. This outlier affects the normie.

High population creates outliers.
High population density allows people to be aware of the outliers.

These environments created what John B. Calhoun called "behavioral sinks". Basically, a behavioral sink is a collapse in productive social behavior, where increased negative emotions, disrupted social structures, and abnormal behaviors prevail.

The rats formed social and dating hierarchies, Chads got the women and the non-Chads usually either...

• Developed non-straight sexualities
• Became timid, weak, apathetic, withdrawn asexual hikikomoris/neets (adolescents and young adults who become recluses in their parents' homes, isolated from society)
• Or desperate, erratic and unsuccessful (pickup autists and redpill roaches)

Chads became aggressive, and since the non-Chads were all withdrawn from society and responsibility, the women had to fend for themselves and protect Chad's children (with humans, it's either the cucked normie's child or she's childless, since Chad doesn't want to reproduce with her, only sex). The female rats became aggressive, neglectful of their children, and non-motherly.

Infant mortality rose due to neglect, male and female rats gave up on dating due to discontent and negative emotions, birth rates dropped, and the new and smaller children grew up to be asexual since they never really learned sexual behaviors due to their parents giving up on mating. The rat society aged to death due to population collapse and low birth rates.

Of course, this isn't perfectly applicable to humans, remember that. For humans, economic, and other kinds of inequalities also play a major role in behavioral sinks, but if if the trajectory of society keeps going where it's going, we could very well get a comparable result as human beings to what the rats got. Birth rates are plummeting and our societies are mentally ill, just like the rats.

---

Anyways, Why am I showing you all of this?

Because dating environments differ in blackpill severities. Due to population density and population count.
There could be "tiers" to the blackpill.

Basically, in some dating environments, you'll need to literally be perfect, in other environments, you have to be HTN at least.
Also, consider that the fact that dating environments men and women have been in the past also can influence their mating decisions.

So here's the chart I created explaining this theory

View attachment 2550624

You probably should download that image, so you can have it for yourself.

This thread doesn't imply that blackpill only exists in broken societies. Blackpill will always exist, and has always existed.
It is just that new dating environments have been created that are characterized by terrifying sexual-romantic inequality (the Internet)

Your chart is one point too high on each tier

Guys in level 2 would have no problem dating in College and so on

 

[Alton]

Iceberg shit innit @Vermilioncore @vermillioncorefan

Not going to write a large essay on the interesting rat experiments since this can easily be explained by this video.


TLDR.

Areas with high population density (many people in an area) and high interaction (something as simple as seeing someone, even online or on a newspaper counts as an interaction, independent of if they know them or not) creates inequality. The more dense and the more interactions, the worse the inequality.

This is because, if there's a group of 5 people, things are more equal in every domain compared to if there were 500, or 5 million or 5 billion. The more people, the more outliers there are. These outliers create inequality (economic, dating, etc.)

The population density allows people to see the gap of their situation to their outliers. This outlier affects the normie.

High population creates outliers.
High population density allows people to be aware of the outliers.

These environments created what John B. Calhoun called "behavioral sinks". Basically, a behavioral sink is a collapse in productive social behavior, where increased negative emotions, disrupted social structures, and abnormal behaviors prevail.

The rats formed social and dating hierarchies, Chads got the women and the non-Chads usually either...

• Developed non-straight sexualities
• Became timid, weak, apathetic, withdrawn asexual hikikomoris/neets (adolescents and young adults who become recluses in their parents' homes, isolated from society)
• Or desperate, erratic and unsuccessful (pickup autists and redpill roaches)

Chads became aggressive, and since the non-Chads were all withdrawn from society and responsibility, the women had to fend for themselves and protect Chad's children (with humans, it's either the cucked normie's child or she's childless, since Chad doesn't want to reproduce with her, only sex). The female rats became aggressive, neglectful of their children, and non-motherly.

Infant mortality rose due to neglect, male and female rats gave up on dating due to discontent and negative emotions, birth rates dropped, and the new and smaller children grew up to be asexual since they never really learned sexual behaviors due to their parents giving up on mating. The rat society aged to death due to population collapse and low birth rates.

Of course, this isn't perfectly applicable to humans, remember that. For humans, economic, and other kinds of inequalities also play a major role in behavioral sinks, but if if the trajectory of society keeps going where it's going, we could very well get a comparable result as human beings to what the rats got. Birth rates are plummeting and our societies are mentally ill, just like the rats.

---

Anyways, Why am I showing you all of this?

Because dating environments differ in blackpill severities. Due to population density and population count.
There could be "tiers" to the blackpill.

Basically, in some dating environments, you'll need to literally be perfect, in other environments, you have to be HTN at least.
Also, consider that the fact that dating environments men and women have been in the past also can influence their mating decisions.

So here's the chart I created explaining this theory

View attachment 2550624

You probably should download that image, so you can have it for yourself.

This thread doesn't imply that blackpill only exists in broken societies. Blackpill will always exist, and has always existed.
It is just that new dating environments have been created that are characterized by terrifying sexual-romantic inequality (the Internet)

 

[Napoleon de Geso]

Cucked blackpill. When cuck understands nature of females, but accepts his part of beta-cuck and thinks he getting better things than alpha fucker

 

[Skywalker]

there could be?
nigga there like 7 levels (in my view)
you just have to dig deeper and deeper then deeper again
water

 

[Skywalker]

Cucked blackpill. When cuck understands nature of females, but accepts his part of beta-cuck and thinks he getting better things than alpha fucker

do you blame the jews?

 

[the_nextDavidLaid]

@Whitepill_Saint stop JFL YOU ABSOLUTE AUTIST

 

[enchanted_elixir]

Does anyone think that dating apps are beyond blackpill level 5?

 

[Xtra]

Not going to write a large essay on the interesting rat experiments since this can easily be explained by this video.


TLDR.

Areas with high population density (many people in an area) and high interaction (something as simple as seeing someone, even online or on a newspaper counts as an interaction, independent of if they know them or not) creates inequality. The more dense and the more interactions, the worse the inequality.

This is because, if there's a group of 5 people, things are more equal in every domain compared to if there were 500, or 5 million or 5 billion. The more people, the more outliers there are. These outliers create inequality (economic, dating, etc.)

The population density allows people to see the gap of their situation to their outliers. This outlier affects the normie.

High population creates outliers.
High population density allows people to be aware of the outliers.

These environments created what John B. Calhoun called "behavioral sinks". Basically, a behavioral sink is a collapse in productive social behavior, where increased negative emotions, disrupted social structures, and abnormal behaviors prevail.

The rats formed social and dating hierarchies, Chads got the women and the non-Chads usually either...

• Developed non-straight sexualities
• Became timid, weak, apathetic, withdrawn asexual hikikomoris/neets (adolescents and young adults who become recluses in their parents' homes, isolated from society)
• Or desperate, erratic and unsuccessful (pickup autists and redpill roaches)

Chads became aggressive, and since the non-Chads were all withdrawn from society and responsibility, the women had to fend for themselves and protect Chad's children (with humans, it's either the cucked normie's child or she's childless, since Chad doesn't want to reproduce with her, only sex). The female rats became aggressive, neglectful of their children, and non-motherly.

Infant mortality rose due to neglect, male and female rats gave up on dating due to discontent and negative emotions, birth rates dropped, and the new and smaller children grew up to be asexual since they never really learned sexual behaviors due to their parents giving up on mating. The rat society aged to death due to population collapse and low birth rates.

Of course, this isn't perfectly applicable to humans, remember that. For humans, economic, and other kinds of inequalities also play a major role in behavioral sinks, but if if the trajectory of society keeps going where it's going, we could very well get a comparable result as human beings to what the rats got. Birth rates are plummeting and our societies are mentally ill, just like the rats.

---

Anyways, Why am I showing you all of this?

Because dating environments differ in blackpill severities. Due to population density and population count.
There could be "tiers" to the blackpill.

Basically, in some dating environments, you'll need to literally be perfect, in other environments, you have to be HTN at least.
Also, consider that the fact that dating environments men and women have been in the past also can influence their mating decisions.

So here's the chart I created explaining this theory

View attachment 2550624

You probably should download that image, so you can have it for yourself.

This thread doesn't imply that blackpill only exists in broken societies. Blackpill will always exist, and has always existed.
It is just that new dating environments have been created that are characterized by terrifying sexual-romantic inequality (the Internet)

what the fuck is this part? 5/10+ to not have issues in middle school?
nigga the avg middle school boy has a face that looks like a potato and has short stature with a twink frame
you can look like absolute dogshit in middle school / high school and get a good looking gf

 

[enchanted_elixir]

what the fuck is this part? 5/10+ to not have issues in middle school?
nigga the avg middle school boy has a face that looks like a potato and has short stature with a twink frame
you can look like absolute dogshit in middle school / high school and get a good looking gf
View attachment 2612688

middle school girls and especially high school girls aren't that dumb bro.

 

[Xtra]

middle school girls and especially high school girls aren't that dumb bro.

so who are they dating then? as i already said the average middle school boy looks awful