what did my friend mean by this?

[IntolerantSocialist]

he said:

you seem to reject humanist ethics wholesale, more than I do, but also share a much more essentialized view of humanity

does that even have a name?

calling philosophycels

@Insomniac @The Dude Abides @Ledgemund @DeformAspergerCel @xom

 

[Yummyinmytummy]

 

[IntolerantSocialist]

Yummyinmytummy
I WOULD KILL MYSELF BUT I AM A LOW T COWARD

 

[Insomniac]

uh...

 

[AntiSocial-Fakecel]

It's just some pseudointellectual, non-sense. Disregard what he said.

 

[Extra Chromosome]

Having little to no cognitive biases?

 

[Deleted member 283]

-Socialist

 

[xom]

repeating what he heard from a phil 101 class lol

 

[Ritalincel]

View attachment 34986

 

[IntolerantSocialist]

Having little to no cognitive biases?

I dunno it seems like Nietzsche without the existentialism

-Socialist
View attachment 34991View attachment 34993

More whites are on welfare than blacks, so ubi is necessary if only the first step.

 

[Deleted member 97]

I dunno it seems like Nietzsche without the existentialism

In a sense - sort of along the axis of the residual traces of Schopenhauer in his philosophy. The will as the bare state of existence. This is the "essentialism" half of your friend's appraisal presumably; an essential conception of the human nature, that then avoids the cloying lapses into "individual freedom" and "autonomy" that are usually tied into discussions of "humanity". Instead, from what I've seen you write, you see the fractious clash of individual wills as the basic state of existence out of which one prevails or not.

A concerted opposition against others, in line with Nietzsche, against Schopenhauer's ascetic pessimism as a response to the problem. Here is perfect occasion to laugh, with Cioran (free @nausea), at the debauched carnival of human strife as well, to take mirth in the forces of unreason that dissolve all pretensions of yuman digniteehee.

 

[NickGurr]

In a sense - sort of along the axis of the residual traces of Schopenhauer in his philosophy. The will as the bare state of existence. This is the "essentialism" half of your friend's appraisal presumably; an essential conception of the human nature, that then avoids the cloying lapses into "individual freedom" and "autonomy" that are usually tied into discussions of "humanity". Instead, from what I've seen you write, you see the fractious clash of individual wills as the basic state of existence out of which one prevails or not.

A concerted opposition against others, in line with Nietzsche, against Schopenhauer's ascetic pessimism as a response to the problem. Here is perfect occasion to laugh, with Cioran (free @nausea), at the debauched carnival of human strife as well, to take mirth in the forces of unreason that dissolve all pretensions of yuman digniteehee.

This better be some obscure copypasta or you and OP are faggots

 

[IntolerantSocialist]

This better be some obscure copypasta or you and OP are faggots

Ok nigger

In a sense - sort of along the axis of the residual traces of Schopenhauer in his philosophy. The will as the bare state of existence. This is the "essentialism" half of your friend's appraisal presumably; an essential conception of the human nature, that then avoids the cloying lapses into "individual freedom" and "autonomy" that are usually tied into discussions of "humanity". Instead, from what I've seen you write, you see the fractious clash of individual wills as the basic state of existence out of which one prevails or not.

A concerted opposition against others, in line with Nietzsche, against Schopenhauer's ascetic pessimism as a response to the problem. Here is perfect occasion to laugh, with Cioran (free @nausea), at the debauched carnival of human strife as well, to take mirth in the forces of unreason that dissolve all pretensions of yuman digniteehee.

Sounds sort of an Absurdist take on Egoism. Fucking weird. Camus meets Stirner.

 

[Deleted member 97]

P

The supreme irony of the "OP is a faggot" meem.

plus

r/iamverysmart

Normalniggers always get damned touchy about anyone who isn't visibly mediocre. As with the rest, your gay snark is meant to preempt any attention that might otherwise be paid to your own vacuity.

 

[NickGurr]

The supreme irony of the "OP is a faggot" meem.

plus





Normalniggers always get damned touchy about anyone who isn't visibly mediocre. As with the rest, your gay snark is meant to preempt any attention that might otherwise be paid to your own vacuity.

Keep saving the world bh having intellectual discussions while intentionally changing the syntax and replacing perfectly good words with lesser known synonyms to show how above normies you are after doing an online IQ test and getting over 100

 

[IntolerantSocialist]

The nigger is mad

 

[itsoverbuddyboyo]

philosophy is gay

 

[IntolerantSocialist]

philosophy is gay

so is your mother but that never stopped me from sucking her dick.

 

[Deleted member 1084]

humanist ethics = i wear a cage around my penis while tyrone fucks my wife

non-essentialized view of humanity = muh nignogs would be living in wakanda n shit if it weren't for the evils of whitey
Edit

Ok nigger



Sounds sort of an Absurdist take on Egoism. Fucking weird. Camus meets Stirner.

Pseudointellectual levels over 9000

 

[itsoverbuddyboyo]

so is your mother but that never stopped me from sucking her dick.

faggit

 

[Deleted member 97]

Keep saving the world bh having intellectual discussions while intentionally changing the syntax and replacing perfectly good words with lesser known synonyms to show how above normies you are after doing an online IQ test and getting over 100

loled man thx

Pseudointellectual levels over 9

oh no no no

Normalniggers always get damned touchy about anyone who isn't visibly mediocre.

Can't even mention a philosopher by name without "cringe"-obsessed dorks trying to prune the scope of discussion (and this from someone with the appellation "Paretocel" jfl), to say nothing of mentioning even the most superficial and simple aspects of their thought. The use of the term "pseudointellectual" is especially telling here. People in a fuss about their own dullness will deploy it as though to say "lol us think ur smart but ur not" as though intellectual was a synonym of insightful, keen, whatever. "Intellectual" in its strict application refers more to defined cognitive pursuits and those who make their living from them; to that caste of people who are employed in theoretical and empirical work in institutional capacities (you should know that @IntolerantSocialist wants to KhmerRouge these people), from whjch their ideas derive their legitimacy.

This, despite his own intentions, betrays the slavishness and noxious obedience of the online anklebiter. Serious ideas are in the purview of only the qualified (and me secretly teehee - just wait until I bust something out one of these days!) and anything outside the bounds of the most boring truisms is to be met with cynical suspicion. "You are not allowed to think unless you're being paid to", at bottom "u think ur better than me?" Given the forum we're on, you'd be able to police in this manner much more effectively if you spent your time deflating people who talk about hyoid bones, spin rating scales out of thin air, and repost graphs from unread studies on Lookism without having so much as cracked an anatomy textbook.

Bro, I've seen you take the spurs to ethnicopers before. I want to be on your side, but the resentful Redditard normalnigger is the natural enemy of the autodidact, his education, and his tempering; the enforcer of consensus in the full expanse of its crippling mediocrity; it must be swiftly stamped out wherever it appears.

 

[Limerencel]

Ask him.

 

[NickGurr]

loled man thx



oh no no no



Can't even mention a philosopher by name without "cringe"-obsessed dorks trying to prune the scope of discussion (and this from someone with the appellation "Paretocel" jfl), to say nothing of mentioning even the most superficial and simple aspects of their thought. The use of the term "pseudointellectual" is especially telling here. People in a fuss about their own dullness will deploy it as though to say "lol us think ur smart but ur not" as though intellectual was a synonym of insightful, keen, whatever. "Intellectual" in its strict application refers more to defined cognitive pursuits and those who make their living from them; to that caste of people who are employed in theoretical and empirical work in institutional capacities (you should know that @IntolerantSocialist wants to KhmerRouge these people), from whjch their ideas derive their legitimacy.

This, despite his own intentions, betrays the slavishness and noxious obedience of the online anklebiter. Serious ideas are in the purview of only the qualified (and me secretly teehee - just wait until I bust something out one of these days!) and anything outside the bounds of the most boring truisms is to be met with cynical suspicion. "You are not allowed to think unless you're being paid to", at bottom "u think ur better than me?" Given the forum we're on, you'd be able to police in this manner much more effectively if you spent your time deflating people who talk about hyoid bones, spin rating scales out of thin air, and repost graphs from unread studies on Lookism without having so much as cracked an anatomy textbook.

Bro, I've seen you take the spurs to ethnicopers before. I want to be on your side, but the resentful Redditard normalnigger is the natural enemy of the autodidact, his education, and his tempering; the enforcer of consensus in the full expanse of its crippling mediocrity; it must be swiftly stamped out wherever it appears.

 

[IntolerantSocialist]

loled man thx



oh no no no



Can't even mention a philosopher by name without "cringe"-obsessed dorks trying to prune the scope of discussion (and this from someone with the appellation "Paretocel" jfl), to say nothing of mentioning even the most superficial and simple aspects of their thought. The use of the term "pseudointellectual" is especially telling here. People in a fuss about their own dullness will deploy it as though to say "lol us think ur smart but ur not" as though intellectual was a synonym of insightful, keen, whatever. "Intellectual" in its strict application refers more to defined cognitive pursuits and those who make their living from them; to that caste of people who are employed in theoretical and empirical work in institutional capacities (you should know that @IntolerantSocialist wants to KhmerRouge these people), from whjch their ideas derive their legitimacy.

This, despite his own intentions, betrays the slavishness and noxious obedience of the online anklebiter. Serious ideas are in the purview of only the qualified (and me secretly teehee - just wait until I bust something out one of these days!) and anything outside the bounds of the most boring truisms is to be met with cynical suspicion. "You are not allowed to think unless you're being paid to", at bottom "u think ur better than me?" Given the forum we're on, you'd be able to police in this manner much more effectively if you spent your time deflating people who talk about hyoid bones, spin rating scales out of thin air, and repost graphs from unread studies on Lookism without having so much as cracked an anatomy textbook.

Bro, I've seen you take the spurs to ethnicopers before. I want to be on your side, but the resentful Redditard normalnigger is the natural enemy of the autodidact, his education, and his tempering; the enforcer of consensus in the full expanse of its crippling mediocrity; it must be swiftly stamped out wherever it appears.

Most of the reason of my Pol Pot obsession stems from the current accepted discourse pushing out wrongthink so everyone thinks alike, whereas I am not against "intellectual pursuits" but rather the current state of "intellectual discourse" (two different things mind you) if real "freedom of discussion" was truly allowed I certainly wouldn't advocate such brash measures.

 

[Deleted member 97]

Most of the reason of my Pol Pot obsession stems from the current accepted discourse pushing out wrongthink so everyone thinks alike, whereas I am not against "intellectual pursuits" but rather the current state of "intellectual discourse" (two different things mind you) if real "freedom of discussion" was truly allowed I certainly wouldn't advocate such brash measures.

I figured, yeah. That was more or less what I was going for with my "institutional legitimacy -> production of consensus" pipeline, but I suppose it's worth stating explicitly. Of these, journalists are by far the worst lapdogs of the GloboHomo regime.

 

[IntolerantSocialist]

I figured, yeah. That was more or less what I was going for with my "institutional legitimacy -> production of consensus" pipeline, but I suppose it's worth stating explicitly. Of these, journalists are by far the worst lapdogs of the GloboHomo regime.

I saw some stupid article (by a dumb ass uk publication) on how the upcoming joker movie was an example of "white male fragility" not realizing the press is immune to understanding how they're just feeding into memes (honk honk). I don't get why they don't get why people see these articles and flood their comment section with trolling and shitposts and then they close down the comments so people just keep jumping from one platform to another and make them look even more idiotic than the lugenpresse already is (anything is truly possible). A meme is born. Is all of it just run by ignorant boomers and the more bluepilled part of early Generation X and don't get how memes work? "What's this Alt Right? Isn't it just two keys on my Windows 95 machine?"

?

 

[dontgoLAXb4UMAXx]

High IQ thread

 

[Cretinous]

sounds like your friend is trying to fuck you

 

[Ritalincel]

sounds like your friend is trying to fuck you

 

[IntolerantSocialist]

sounds like your friend is trying to fuck you

what you jealous. Want sum fuk?

faggit

that's ok I'll save some creme de la penis for you

humanist ethics = i wear a cage around my penis while tyrone fucks my wife

non-essentialized view of humanity = muh nignogs would be living in wakanda n shit if it weren't for the evils of whitey
Edit

Pseudointellectual levels over 9000

better to be a pseud than an actual one.

 

[Cretinous]

what you jealous. Want sum fuk?


that's ok I'll save some creme de la penis for you

I'm 220lbs with a gut, a big cock and a rug on my back. You'd be scarred for life my guy.

 

[IntolerantSocialist]

That's ok it's probably passed down from your female relatives. I've taken on bigger. I'm a size king.

 

[rockndogs]

It means that you seem to reject humanist ethics wholesale, more than him, but also share a much more essentialized view of humanity

 

[IntolerantSocialist]

It means that you seem to reject humanist ethics wholesale, more than him, but also share a much more essentialized view of humanity

Thank you pet rock

 

[Cali Yuga]

you seem to reject humanist ethics wholesale, more than I do, but also share a much more essentialized view of humanity

This is 'philosophy' for: "I am gay and retarded."

 

[RedPilledStemcel]

It means that you seem to reject humanist ethics wholesale, more than him, but also share a much more essentialized view of humanity

You reject what most people think is good or bad but your core views of humanity are still the same as the friend's? tbh he could have said this in a less retarded way.

This is 'philosophy' for: "I am gay and retarded."

this is the correct answer ngl

 

[IntolerantSocialist]

This is 'philosophy' for: "I am gay and retarded."

proud of it too. Homofascism. Gas the intellectuals

You reject what most people think is good or bad but your core views of humanity are still the same as the friend's? tbh he could have said this in a less retarded way.

this is the correct answer ngl

Ignorance is strength, unironically

 

[Extra Chromosome]

I'm 220lbs with a gut, a big cock and a rug on my back. You'd be scarred for life my guy.

How tall?

 

[Cretinous]

How tall?

5'11.5

 

[Lil_KINJA]

you seem to reject humanist ethics wholesale, more than I do, but also share a much more essentialized view of humanity

It' means that's he's probably a neckbeard strasserist trying to out-edge you.

 

[IntolerantSocialist]

It' means that's he's probably a neckbeard strasserist trying to out-edge you.

Neckbeard

t. soy
I'll grow the beard while you bend over and take my cock up your anus twink boy

 

[RedPilledStemcel]

proud of it too. Homofascism. Gas the intellectuals


Ignorance is strength, unironically

In my experience only ugly people care about politics/philosophy/etc

 

[GenericChad1444]

so is your mother but that never stopped me from sucking her dick.

 

[IntolerantSocialist]

In my experience only ugly people care about politics/philosophy/etc

in my experience, which is the only real experience I notice people don't actually exist and the internet is fake.

 

[AntiSocial-Fakecel]

-Socialist
View attachment 34991View attachment 34993

He has Browning headphones. That is a redneck brand. Country gamer, bro.

 

[Ritalincel]

View attachment 37577