Why so few chads?

D

Deleted member 40471

Platinum
Joined
Aug 19, 2023
Posts
1,087
Reputation
915
The differences in the mean iPD values among age groups Q320


Mean interpupillary distance mm values in various age groups



From data we can conclude average ipd is around 63mm for man.

According to blackpill ratios assume a person has average skull width its ESR will be sub 0.45 easily.

65+mm is the consensus where IPD is the most ideal

Inter pupillary distance IPD for the sample of females pink bars and males blue


yet only 40% max has IPD up to the value or above. Just by IPD alone at least 60% of male population is outclassed.

Together with FWHR, mid face ratio, chin to philtrum ratio I estimate only 15% max of population has ratios in the acceptable range.

In this population those who have hollow cheekbones, great manidible, great ramus, great maxilla, checkbones...

After this filter only 0.5% is a chad.

Still I haven't included ethnicity into this measurement,

Whites are easier to fit in these requirements than ethics. This ideal is made based on whites.

The chance for ethics to fit in these stuff are even less.

For example chance of Indians having bug eyes is very great and East Asians mostly have low PFL and no maxilla. Dragging the average chance even lower

Thats why after the ethic filter the chance is like 0.1% or less.

What are your opinions?
 

Attachments

  • pupilary-distance-average-hero-678x446-compressor.jpg
    pupilary-distance-average-hero-678x446-compressor.jpg
    42.3 KB · Views: 0
  • JFL
Reactions: Xangsane
Fitting into ideal ratios and no deformations technically makes you weak HTN, not MTN.

But this is only on paper
 
raw measurements aren't what makes a chad.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mr. President and LooksThinker
raw measurements aren't what makes a chad.
I don't see 63mm ipd can make anyone into anything except boarderline Cyclops.

Remember this is the average and half have IPD even less than this
 
  • +1
Reactions: preux
I don't see 63mm ipd can make anyone into anything except boarderline Cyclops.

Remember this is the average and half have IPD even less than this
more bone doesn't make you more chad, if too many of your features are above average you will not look appealing.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Maalik
View attachment 2454153

View attachment 2454148


From data we can conclude average ipd is around 63mm for man.

According to blackpill ratios assume a person has average skull width its ESR will be sub 0.45 easily.

65+mm is the consensus where IPD is the most ideal

View attachment 2454176

yet only 40% max has IPD up to the value or above. Just by IPD alone at least 60% of male population is outclassed.

Together with FWHR, mid face ratio, chin to philtrum ratio I estimate only 15% max of population has ratios in the acceptable range.

In this population those who have hollow cheekbones, great manidible, great ramus, great maxilla, checkbones...

After this filter only 0.5% is a chad.

Still I haven't included ethnicity into this measurement,

Whites are easier to fit in these requirements than ethics. This ideal is made based on whites.

The chance for ethics to fit in these stuff are even less.

For example chance of Indians having bug eyes is very great and East Asians mostly have low PFL and no maxilla. Dragging the average chance even lower

Thats why after the ethic filter the chance is like 0.1% or less.

What are your opinions?
i just toke a bunch of stats from my ass, guys, whats your opinion?
 
I don't see 63mm ipd can make anyone into anything except boarderline Cyclops.

Remember this is the average and half have IPD even less than this
The absolute ipd measure isn’t that important

Pitt, Zayn, Somerhalder all have less than 63mm
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mr. President
60 mm IPD

PFL and brows are the most important
A light color makes your IPD look better
if your face is narrow (in combination with low IPD) you absolutely need lateral angles and cheekbones
 

Attachments

  • 1642134652.jpg
    1642134652.jpg
    280.6 KB · Views: 0
60 mm IPD

PFL and brows are the most important
A light color makes your IPD look better
if your face is narrow (in combination with low IPD) you absolutely need lateral angles and cheekbones
@cytoplasm forum chad in this frauded pic
 
  • JFL
Reactions: cytoplasm
@cytoplasm forum chad in this frauded pic
Change your account name into AkatlynLover1999. I'm litteraly an improved version of your idole on this picture.

But I have to say that I look a lot worse that that now
 
Change your account name into AkatlynLover1999. I'm litteraly an improved version of your idole on this picture.

But I have to say that I look a lot worse that that now
I’ve seen your “normal pics”

You’re obviously good looking but irl side by side delon would mog
 
I’ve seen your “normal pics”

You’re obviously good looking but irl side by side delon would mog
You never saw young Delon IRL and you never saw me IRL.
Don't forget that I'm taller.

The main failo with my normal face come from the lack of volume in my cheekbone/undereyes and a bad quality skin (my lower third is almost good, just need more angles), which causes me saggy looking with narrow looking face. All these problems can be resolved by adding volume in the areas I mentionned.

Obviously my natural face can't look as good as Delon but with the correction I'm just an improved Delon (that's what they told here)
 
jfl at muh harmony
Nigga tf u mean muh harmony? Take a look at chico, no striking features yet they go so well together because of harmony = psl god
 
  • JFL
Reactions: mogpending

Similar threads

BWC_virgin
Replies
14
Views
2K
rhinoplasty
rhinoplasty
D
Replies
27
Views
3K
Deleted member 57356
D
heightmaxxing
Replies
13
Views
1K
Themanletauticel123
Themanletauticel123
noodlelover
Replies
60
Views
2K
autistic_tendencies
autistic_tendencies
NT Master
Replies
3
Views
327
dehydrated
dehydrated

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top