Women being repulsed by short men makes evolutionary sense. Height is part of masculinity.

D

Deleted member 27674

Bronze
Joined
Mar 22, 2023
Posts
370
Reputation
1,068
Sexual dimorphism exists in many animals. Male peacocks have long colorful feathers, which they display to attract mates, and the females are drawn to the male with the biggest feathers.

Male lions are bigger the lionesses, and when they fight for mating rights, the larger male will typically emerge victorious. Being a small male lion in the wild is a death sentence. Only large males get to breed.

In humans, sexual dimorphism is mainly about the difference in size and physical strength between males and females. Male humans are supposed to the physically taller and stronger than females,

Women are biologically wired to be attracted to masculinity. This means they will be strongly attracted to tall men, and will be repulsed by short men.

At the same time, short height in females is feminine. Women are supposed to be small, that's why short women do not experience any negative consequences for their height.

Being a manlet goes against basic human evolution, and nature will weed you out of the gene pool by making women repulsed by your genes.

Being on the receiving end of natural selection is brutal.
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: AngryShortMale, Kamui, Deleted member 26410 and 1 other person
IMG_3201.jpeg
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Vermilioncore, ReadBooksEveryday and BrahminBoss
Some animals benefit from being smaller - it allows them to hide easier, sneak around unobserved, dig tunnels, search for food underground, etc., during periods of war, disasters, famine, etc. shorter humans are actually more likely to survive since they require less food.
Right now we live in an era of abundance, there's plenty of food, but this might change in the near future due to overpopulation, loss of farm land and other factors and the first who'll die of starvation will be the tall guys while the short ones will become kings again.
 
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: 3weq and mogstars
Sexual dimorphism exists in many animals. Male peacocks have long colorful feathers, which they display to attract mates, and the females are drawn to the male with the biggest feathers.

Male lions are bigger the lionesses, and when they fight for mating rights, the larger male will typically emerge victorious. Being a small male lion in the wild is a death sentence. Only large males get to breed.

In humans, sexual dimorphism is mainly about the difference in size and physical strength between males and females. Male humans are supposed to the physically taller and stronger than females,

Women are biologically wired to be attracted to masculinity. This means they will be strongly attracted to tall men, and will be repulsed by short men.

At the same time, short height in females is feminine. Women are supposed to be small, that's why short women do not experience any negative consequences for their height.

Being a manlet goes against basic human evolution, and nature will weed you out of the gene pool by making women repulsed by your genes.

Being on the receiving end of natural selection is brutal.

We have guns so it's better to be short for vigor + strength + agility, including the better immune system and longer lifespan.

What women think doesn't matter because I can just rape them.
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 51465
Some animals benefit from being smaller - it allows them to hide easier, sneak around unobserved, dig tunnels, search for food underground, etc., during periods of war, disasters, famine, etc. shorter humans are actually more likely to survive since they require less food.
Right now we live in an era of abundance, there's plenty of food, but this might change in the near future due to overpopulation, loss of farm land and other factors and the first who'll die of starvation will be the tall guys while the short ones will become kings again.
1705349426227
my honest reaction
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Gonthar and Deleted member 51465
Sexual dimorphism exists in many animals. Male peacocks have long colorful feathers, which they display to attract mates, and the females are drawn to the male with the biggest feathers.

Male lions are bigger the lionesses, and when they fight for mating rights, the larger male will typically emerge victorious. Being a small male lion in the wild is a death sentence. Only large males get to breed.

In humans, sexual dimorphism is mainly about the difference in size and physical strength between males and females. Male humans are supposed to the physically taller and stronger than females,

Women are biologically wired to be attracted to masculinity. This means they will be strongly attracted to tall men, and will be repulsed by short men.

At the same time, short height in females is feminine. Women are supposed to be small, that's why short women do not experience any negative consequences for their height.

Being a manlet goes against basic human evolution, and nature will weed you out of the gene pool by making women repulsed by your genes.

Being on the receiving end of natural selection is brutal.

e90697f43d45b5a3571ba9040ef29712.jpg
 

Similar threads

chief detectiveman
Replies
8
Views
2K
bourgeoizyzz
bourgeoizyzz
mogstars
Replies
79
Views
5K
anitalooksmax
anitalooksmax
flippasav
Replies
9
Views
828
mogstars
mogstars
D
Replies
11
Views
2K
Celery
C
D
Replies
28
Views
1K
Skywalker
Skywalker

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top