Europeans are Ancient Indians

[Deleted member 13787]

fuck max mueller

i have no idea who that is
but it seems that youre fixated upon the idea that aryans were indian without any scientific evidence for it

Im gonna ask you a simple question, if not EHG, which neolithic population were steppe pastoralists most related to.
That should be easy to answer for you considering how convinced you are that indo europeans were basically proto curries

 

[Deleted member 16058]

View attachment 1734179View attachment 1734188View attachment 1734180
View attachment 1734181View attachment 1734182View attachment 1734183View attachment 1734184View attachment 1734185View attachment 1734186View attachment 1734187

damn son you have too much time for this shit

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

Facial Evidence
Reconstructions of ancient Indo-Europeans by PhilipEdwin: Yamnaya
View attachment 1732330View attachment 1732331View attachment 1732333

Looks a lot like me and other north indians...



Linguistic Evidence

Sanskrit	English
Matar	Mother
Pitar	Father
bhratar	Brother
svasar	Sister
Duhitar	Daughter
Nav (boat)	Navy
Sama	same
Siri	Cereal
Manu, Manav	Man
Nara	Nerve
Deva (daiva)	Divine
Gau	Cow
Asvah	Horse
Thri	Three
Danta	Dental
Pala, Palitha	polity
Vas	House
Rtam	Rhythm
Sant	Saint
Matar	Matter
Manah	Mind
Na	No
Sarpa	Serpent
Nava (boat)	Navy
Yoga	Yolk
Gau	Cow
Sant	Saint
Vid	Video
Atma, Adima	Adam
Vatica	Vatican
Charcha	Church
Daiva	Divine
Matar	Matter

Not only these. Theres are thousands of such that are derived from Sanskrit and instantly recognizable: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-European_vocabulary

Now you would think how a language in western europe is instantly recognizable to an Indian? well thats because Indians migrated/invaded whole of europe around 3 to 5 thousand years ago. We bought hindu vedic culture there and our languages. which got corrupted overtime and changed into different languages. lets look at

Cultural Evidence


This one is the most sick.

Now if you are a hindu who worships regularly and belong to a religious family. you might want to look at this.

Indra is god of thunder who killed serpent called vritra and saved the world because the serpent had kept the entire worlds water captive and no one could access the water.

now if u close the vedas for a moment and open greek mythology u will find same thunder god named Zeus who apparently also fought a sea monster with a hammer jfl

not only this.

Dyaus pitar (most powerful hindu god) ---> Diespiter (greek) ---> Jupiter (roman mythology)

and Jupiter is again a thunder god who kills the sea serpent.

JFL this is ridiculous! its the same thing like nigeria tries to copy a hollywood movie but making it obviously nollywood with low budget and shitty accent (corrupting the original word in this case)

Now you would say jupiter would be last corruption of the original hindu vedic god Dyauspitar but you will be wrong since theres apparently another god of thunder who apparently also killed a sea serpent and apparently also saved the world.

View attachment 1732387

yes its german god thor.

Again I'm just kidding its not really a copy since europeans are ancient indians and it was their gods. what happened is just corruption of words over thousand years and thats completely logical. thats how languages and dialects have formed over the years.


This is just a single example of 1 god. if you look into european mythology as a hindu you will find a lot of similarities like familiar stories, gods and rituals.

There's a-lot of more proofs of indian migrations and invasions towards the west (europe) 3k years ago which i will cover in another thread along with genetic proof of upper caste hindus with europeans.

Europeans get their white features from the native European hunter gatherers and Anatolian farmer ancestors. Indo-European part is cope, they were just violent ogres.

 

[.🇹🇩.]

bump

 

[Deleted member 17791]

You are here trying so hard to convince whites that there is some link between you and them. No matter how ancient. Cab't you see it.

Whites just can't appreciate anyone who they don't think are whites. That's why you see sfcels claiming how Buddha, Genghis Khan, Ancient Egyptians, Jesus, Mohammed, Ancient Sumerians, Proto Japanese, Ancient Iranians were all white even if they were the farthest thing from whites.

based, if it aint white, I don't give a shit about it.

 

[Deleted member 17791]

Europeans get their white features from the native European hunter gatherers and Anatolian farmer ancestors. Indo-European part is cope, they were just violent ogres.

based.

 

[Deleted member 17872]

I’m legit killing myself if this is true

@looksmaxxer234 @WontStopNorwooding @Johanjohan

do it even if it is wrong. The world would be a better place without you.

 

[.🇹🇩.]

bump

 

[Detona]

Europeans get their white features from the native European hunter gatherers and Anatolian farmer ancestors. Indo-European part is cope, they were just violent ogres.

Cope. White features come from Indo European steppe people, European hunter gatherers were dark (except Eastern Hunter Gatherers who formed the paternal ancestry of Indo Europeans).

Also anatolian farmers were darker than the steppe people.

 

[Tom Jones]

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

Cope. White features come from Indo European steppe people, European hunter gatherers were dark (except Eastern Hunter Gatherers who formed the paternal ancestry of Indo Europeans).

Also anatolian farmers were darker than the steppe people.

Light hair and eyes come from native European hunter gatherers while the Steppe people like from yamnaya all had dark hair and eyes. Steppe people were darker than modern Europeans. The native Europeans were only dark in some parts of Europe, but were very light skinned in places like Scandinavia.

 

[Detona]

Light hair and eyes come from native European hunter gatherers while the Steppe people like from yamnaya all had dark hair and eyes.

Wrong. Yamnaya were 50% Eastern Hunter Gatherer and had light hair and light eyes. Blond hair comes from Ancient North Eurasians in Siberia, not Europe. Only Eastern European Hunter Gatherers had it, because they were mostly Siberian in origin.



https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/exd.14142


Interestingly, ancient North Eurasian derived populations, such as eastern hunter-gatherers and Yamnayas, carried the blond hair allele rs12821256 of the KITLG gene to Europe.[66]


The rapid increase in population size due to the Neolithic revolution,[64, 80 such as the use of milk products as food source for adults and the rise of agriculture,[81 as well as the massive spread of Yamnaya pastoralists likely caused the rapid selective sweep in European populations towards light skin and hair.

Steppe people were darker than modern Europeans. The native Europeans were only dark in some parts of Europe, but were very light skinned in places like Scandinavia.

Cope. All European Hunter Gatherers in Scandinavia were darker than Steppe people, and all west of the Danuve were South Indian-colored.

 

[Detona]

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.05.04.490594v2.full.pdf

Taken together, these analyses help to settle the famous discussion of selection in Europe relating to
height 45,80,203. The finding that steppe individuals have consistently high genetic values for height
(Supplementary Note 4c), is mirrored by the UK Biobank results, which find that the ‘Steppe’
ancestral components (Yamnaya/EHG) contributed to increased height in present-day populations
(Supplementary Note 4h). This shows that the height differences in Europe between north and south
may not be due to selection, as claimed in many previous studies, but may be a consequence of
differential ancestry.

Likewise, European hunter gatherers are genetically predicted to have dark skin pigmentation and
dark brown hair 11,20,21,79,83,168,204,205, and indeed we see that the WHG, EHG and CHG components
contributed to these phenotypes in present-day individuals whereas the Yamnaya and Anatolian
farmer ancestry contributed to light brown/blonde hair pigmentation (Supplementary Note 4h).


Interestingly, loci associated with overdispersed mood-related polygenic phenotypes recorded
among the UK Biobank individuals (like increased anxiety, guilty feelings, and irritability) showed
an overrepresentation of the Anatolian farmer ancestry component;

 

[vaseqmoherad]

Europeans get their white features from the native European hunter gatherers and Anatolian farmer ancestors. Indo-European part is cope, they were just violent ogres.

No, but indians weren't the original indo-europeans, they got ruled by them.

Original Indo europeans looked something like this:

Corded phenotype, this pheno happens among some ethnics as well who also got invaded and ruled by indo europeans:

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

Wrong. Yamnaya were 50% Eastern Hunter Gatherer and had light hair and light eyes. Blond hair comes from Ancient North Eurasians in Siberia, not Europe. Only Eastern European Hunter Gatherers had it, because they were mostly Siberian in origin.



https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/exd.14142


Interestingly, ancient North Eurasian derived populations, such as eastern hunter-gatherers and Yamnayas, carried the blond hair allele rs12821256 of the KITLG gene to Europe.[66]


The rapid increase in population size due to the Neolithic revolution,[64, 80 such as the use of milk products as food source for adults and the rise of agriculture,[81 as well as the massive spread of Yamnaya pastoralists likely caused the rapid selective sweep in European populations towards light skin and hair.




Cope. All European Hunter Gatherers in Scandinavia were darker than Steppe people, and all west of the Danuve were South Indian-colored.

The yamnaya all had dark hair and eyes, but some of their descendant populations had blonde hair. However, since no one from the yamnaya is found to have blonde hair, then it’s probably just a result of admixture with other groups. I mean, it explains why blonde hair allele is non-existent in places like northern curryland and Iran unless they are of later Scythian descent (R1A IE DNA is present everywhere in North West Curryland to Afghanistan). This comes from the Chad scandinavian original whites of Europe.

SHG = Scandinavian Hunter Gatherer
WHG = Western (European) Hunter Gatherer

Actually, even dark skin with blue eyes is chad trait. The Indo-Europeans were subhuman in comparison because there is no evidence of them having light eyes (not even speculative like blonde hair), but rather had poop eyes (death sentence).

 

[Detona]

View attachment 1770137

The yamnaya all had dark hair and eyes, but some of their descendant populations had blonde hair.

Read your own quote. It says Yamna and their antecendants had blonde hair. Now read the quotes I showed you. They too say Yamna had blonde hair, and that blonde hair cones from Siberia and Steppe people, not European hunter gathering primates.

However, since no one from the yamnaya is found to have blonde hair,

Wrong, not what your quote says.

then it’s probably just a result of admixture with other groups.

No, dark hair in Yamna is a result of mixture with other groups. Over 50% of Yamnaya DNA is from Caucasus hunter gatherers and other groups.

I mean, it explains why blonde hair allele is non-existent in places like northern curryland and Iran unless they are of later Scythian descent (R1A IE DNA is present everywhere in North West Curryland to Afghanistan). This comes from the Chad scandinavian original whites of Europe.

WIshful thinking, Indians have zero Scandinavian Hunter Gatherer ancrstry just like Scythians lacked.

The few Scandinavian Hunter Gatherers who were blonde got it from earlier steppe (Ancient North Eurasian) admixture.

View attachment 1770139

SHG = Scandinavian Hunter Gatherer
WHG = Western (European) Hunter Gatherer

And how did you miss that this says nothing different from your other quote, and nothing about hair?


Also, this is what you get for using such a shit, nameless source. Eastern Hunter Gatherers had blue eyes and they originated in the Black Sea region, not Western Europe.

Actually, even dark skin with blue eyes is chad trait. The Indo-Europeans were subhuman in comparison because there is no evidence of them having light eyes (not even speculative like blonde hair), but rather had poop eyes (death sentence).

Blue eyes are found in Indo Europeans and they originare from Black Sea region, were found in EHGs like Samara and Indo Europeans like Corded Ware.

 

[JBcollector]

Humans are ancient cousins of chimps
What about it

 

[mug]

It makes you more confident about your lineage. Most europeans here despise hindus and make fun of them - call them curries but genetically they were hindus themselves. so basically they are self hating. They shouldnt self hate. they should own it. and be proud of their genetics instead of making fun of it. owning it will give u confidence and make u a much stronger man, then you'll attract girls.

IM A PROUD INDIAN BHAI

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

Read your own quote. It says Yamna and their antecendants had blonde hair. Now read the quotes I showed you. They too say Yamna had blonde hair, and that blonde hair cones from Siberia and Steppe people, not European hunter gathering primates.






Wrong, not what your quote says.




No, dark hair in Yamna is a result of mixture with other groups. Over 50% of Yamnaya DNA is from Caucasus hunter gatherers and other groups.






WIshful thinking, Indians have zero Scandinavian Hunter Gatherer ancrstry just like Scythians lacked.

The few Scandinavian Hunter Gatherers who were blonde got it from earlier steppe (Ancient North Eurasian) admixture.





And how did you miss that this says nothing different from your other quote, and nothing about hair?


Also, this is what you get for using such a shit, nameless source. Eastern Hunter Gatherers had blue eyes and they originated in the Black Sea region, not Western Europe.






Blue eyes are found in Indo Europeans and they originare from Black Sea region, were found in EHGs like Samara and Indo Europeans like Corded Ware.

It says it’s found in descendants of the steppe people, not among the steppe people themselves. There has not been a single person from the yamnaya itself found to have light hair or eyes. Also, blonde hair didn’t originate in Siberia jfl, but the highest rates in the world today are still found in Scandinavia.

The first quote talked about how “some individuals in yamnaya are believed to have carried the blonde gene due to a few later people with steppe ancestry found with blond hair. They obviously seem like outliers, and to think that makes the original yamnaya that are all found to have dark hair originally blonde is a mega cope.

Second quote was showing how Scandinavian Hunter Gatherers were different to other ones in Europe as they were light skinned along with having light hair and eyes. They were pretty much the original whites. It literally comes from wikipedia in the section of archeogenetics of the yamnaya and Scandinavian hunter gatherers.

Give it up curry/sand nigger coper, you will never be white and were never close. You just got baited by the IE stuff.

 

[Detona]

It says it’s found in descendants of the steppe people, not among the steppe people themselves.

No, dumb cunt, your quote says very clearly:


"The Ancient North Eurasian population, who contributed significant ancestry to Western Steppe Herder populations, are believed to be the source of this mutation."


The Yamnaya got the blond hair gene from ANE, which comprises roughly 50% of their DNA. ANE are the Steppe ancestors of Yamnaya.

There has not been a single person from the yamnaya itself found to have light hair or eyes.

Wrong.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/exd.14142

^ Clearly says blonde hair originates near Kazakhstan in Siberia, and that Yamnaya had mixed eye colors and some blonde hair.

Also, blonde hair didn’t originate in Siberia jfl, but the highest rates in the world today are still found in Scandinavia

Wrong.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/exd.14142

^ Clearly says blonde hair originates near Kazakhstan, and that Yamnaya had mixed eye colors and some blonde hair.

The first quote talked about how “some individuals in yamnaya are believed to have carried the blonde gene due to a few later people with steppe ancestry found with blond hair. They obviously seem like outliers, and to think that makes the original yamnaya that are all found to have dark hair originally blonde is a mega cope.

They are not outliers and the dark ones got those features from CHG. ALSO, IT WAS THE BLONDE STEPPE ONES WHO DID ALL THE REPRODUCING IN EUROPE.


Again:



Likewise, European hunter gatherers are genetically predicted to have dark skin pigmentation and
dark brown hair 11,20,21,79,83,168,204,205, and indeed we see that the WHG, EHG and CHG components
contributed to these phenotypes in present-day individuals whereas the Yamnaya and Anatolian
farmer ancestry contributed to light brown/blonde hair pigmentation (Supplementary Note 4h).

Second quote was showing how Scandinavian Hunter Gatherers were different to other ones in Europe as they were light skinned along with having light hair and eyes.

No they weren't. Your fucking source said most of them were still dark all over, only like one of them could be characterized that way.

They were pretty much the original whites. It literally comes from wikipedia in the section of archeogenetics of the yamnaya and Scandinavian hunter gatherers.

It says none of this shit. Most of those SHGs were dark.

Give it up curry/sand nigger coper, you will never be white and were never close. You just got baited by the IE stuff.

Keep coping. Everyone knows original Europeans were dark, light features come fron Chad Easterners like Vladimir Putin, who is now repeating what the original Steppe chads did. Modern Germanic Europeans and Southerners = farmers and hunter gatherers, running around like headless chickens.

 

[.🇹🇩.]

bump

 

[.🇹🇩.]

bump